by Dr. Robert W. Malone
"One unconfirmed plague death in Russia. No outbreak. No spread. But the fear merchants in the United States and elsewhere are already selling antibiotics. A young laboratory worker died in Siberia following a reported laboratory accident. Russian authorities have refused to identify the organism responsible. There has been no confirmed plague diagnosis, no confirmed secondary case, and no evidence of an outbreak spreading beyond the laboratory incident. That is what we know.
What we have instead is a growing national and international panic about engineered plague, biological weapons, and the next pandemic. And wherever there is fear, there are people ready to make money from it. In fact, that panic is even being fueled by some in the conservative media for financial gain.
The death of Darya Shipilova at the Irkutsk Anti-Plague Institute deserves a serious investigation. Reports describe a broken laboratory tube, a delayed diagnosis, and a twenty-eight-year-old woman who died after developing severe pneumonia. Nearly two hundred people were reportedly isolated or monitored. Russian authorities insist the situation is under control but have not disclosed what killed her. That secrecy has consequences. Inside Russia, people are buying antibiotics. Outside Russia, commentators and companies are turning one unexplained death into a marketing campaign. The pathogen has not been identified. The sales pitch has.
First, the panic: On October 1, Yandex recorded roughly 14,500 searches for чума, the Russian word for plague. By October 3, that number had reached nearly 685,000, a forty-seven-fold increase in two days. Google Trends showed searches for plague rising approximately 3,200 percent over the previous week. Residents of the Irkutsk region were among the most concerned.
The fear quickly translated into purchases. On October 3, journalists surveyed pharmacies in Irkutsk and nearby Shelekhov and found residents buying antibiotics used to treat plague. Some pharmacies had exhausted their supplies. Others could not obtain replacements. In Shelekhov, pharmacies reported selling out, with no resupply expected before October 5.
There was, and still is, no confirmed outbreak. People were buying antibiotics because they were frightened, and they were frightened because their government would not tell them what happened. Moscow’s silence had created the very public anxiety its reassurances were supposed to prevent. But the Russian government is not the only institution taking advantage of uncertainty.
Then came the American salesmen: On October 7, Dr. Peter McCullough posted a video stating that “Bioweapons-grade Yersinia pestis is likely to be more pathogenic than the plague organism of decades ago.” His accompanying Substack commentary carried the headline "Bioweapons-Grade Pneumonic Plague."
The historical existence of biological weapons research involving plague is not in dispute. What is missing is evidence that the organism involved in Shipilova’s death was engineered, unusually virulent, antibiotic-resistant, or even confirmed to be Yersinia pestis. No isolate has been publicly identified. No genomic sequence has been released. No evidence of genetic manipulation has been presented. Yet the words bioweapons-grade pneumonic plague were already in the headline.
There is a commercial connection worth examining. The video appeared on Just the News and Real America’s Voice with a sponsorship banner for The Wellness Company, including a promotional discount. McCullough serves as the company’s chief scientific officer. The Wellness Company sells emergency medication kits containing prescription antibiotics, including doxycycline. This creates an obvious financial conflict that audiences deserve to understand.
On October 6, CDM Press published an article titled "The Plague? A Reminder The Next Pandemic Is Just One Accident Away." The article used the Russian incident to introduce the supposed need to stockpile antibiotics, then directed readers to The Wellness Company’s Medical Emergency Kit.
Two days later, on October 8, Breitbart published an explicitly sponsored article titled "The Plague? One Accident Could Spark the Next Pandemic." It promoted the same company’s emergency medication kit, offering readers a $30 discount with a promotional code. Conservative commentator Grant Stinchfield also released an episode titled "Plague Before the Polls?", accompanied by promotion for The Wellness Company’s emergency kit and a personalized discount code.
The company’s kit has been advertised at approximately $300. Its marketing identifies doxycycline as useful for plague exposure, among other conditions. So, hypothetically, what would one expect to pay for a prescription of doxycycline at a pharmacy?:
Click image for larger size.
CHAT-GPT analysis of cash price for Doxy in the USA - although note that prices can vary widely.There is nothing inherently improper about selling legitimate emergency medical supplies. Antibiotics can save lives when appropriately prescribed, and preparedness is a reasonable subject for public discussion. But consider the sequence. One death in a Russian laboratory. No confirmed plague diagnosis. No confirmed spread. No demonstrated threat to Americans. Within days, American media personalities and commercial outlets were using that incident to promote prescription antibiotic kits. A woman died in Siberia. Americans are being offered discount codes.
The science doesn’t support the scare: The suggestion that respiratory transmission or antibiotic resistance establishes the biological weapons engineering occurred is scientifically unsound. In 2013, a naturally occurring pneumonic plague outbreak in Madagascar infected twenty-two people. The responsible strain was resistant to streptomycin through a spontaneous chromosomal mutation. Researchers documented similar mutations arising independently in other natural plague strains. All nineteen patients who received antibiotic treatment recovered; the three who died had not been treated.
Multidrug-resistant Yersinia pestis has also been documented in naturally occurring Madagascar isolates, including strains carrying transferable resistance plasmids. Antibiotic resistance is not proof of engineering. Neither is pneumonic transmission. And neither characteristic has been established in the Irkutsk incident.
There is a legitimate scientific investigation to conduct. Whole-genome sequencing, examination of resistance determinants, plasmid characterization, and comparison with known natural lineages could help establish what organism was involved and whether anything unusual had occurred. Russia has not released the information necessary to perform that assessment. That should be the story. Instead, speculation about weaponized plague is being packaged for an audience already conditioned to expect the next pandemic. Unfortunately, this is coming from conservative media.
The technique is familiar. The headline makes an alarming assertion. The article retreats into possible, consistent with, and cannot be ruled out. The qualifications provide protection when challenged, while the frightening headline does the work of attracting attention and garnering fear. And sometimes, conveniently, there is a product to buy.
Fear is the product. Antibiotics are the upsell. There is a difference between warning the public about a demonstrated threat and manufacturing certainty where the evidence supports none. There is also a difference between selling preparedness supplies and using an unexplained death in a foreign country to frighten consumers into purchasing them.
The Irkutsk incident may ultimately prove to be an accidental exposure to a naturally occurring plague organism. It may involve another dangerous pathogen entirely. The Russian government has not provided sufficient evidence to settle the question. But the uncertainty itself has become commercially useful.
The Wellness Company’s appearance across multiple plague-themed promotions, including explicitly sponsored advertising and personalized discount codes, is not an imaginary connection. It is visible marketing of fear. Whether individual commentators were paid, received affiliate commissions, or simply promoted a company with which they were affiliated is a separate question that deserves disclosure.
The broader pattern is unmistakable. A frightening headline creates urgency. The urgency creates demand. The advertisement offers a solution. This is not a new business model. Fear has always been profitable. What has changed is the speed with which an isolated incident halfway around the world can be converted into an American sales campaign. There is one dead laboratory worker in Siberia, no confirmed plague outbreak, and no evidence of an engineered biological weapon. Yet the antibiotic kits are already being advertised with discount codes.
Russia owes the public an explanation of what killed Darya Shipilova. Those alleging biological weapons owe the public evidence. And those exploiting her death to frighten Americans into buying prescription medications need to stop. Disclosure does not excuse the practice. Turning an unconfirmed outbreak into a sales campaign is not public health, not medical preparedness, and certainly not science. It is fear-based marketing, and it is grifting. So, let’s call it what it is. Grifting."
o
"Grifting is the practice of obtaining money, property, or favors through deception, fraud, or a confidence game rather than by using physical force or violence.
Key Characteristics of Grifting:
ͦ Deception over Force: A grifter relies on charm, cleverness, lies, and psychological manipulation instead of robbery or physical coercion.
ͦ Building Trust: Grifters often establish a sense of connection, authority, or shared belief before exploiting their target.
ͦ Personal or Financial Gain: The scheme is designed to extract resources - whether cash, investments, or political support - from victims who willingly hand them over."
o
