StatCounter

Thursday, July 16, 2026

Dan, I Allegedly, "This Is Making America Even More Expensive"

Full screen recommended.
Dan, I Allegedly, 7/16/26
"This Is Making America Even More Expensive"
"Today's economy is filled with policies and financial decisions that sound great on paper but often make life even more expensive. In this video I break down Alameda County's proposal for a $30 per hour minimum wage, why restaurants and businesses are warning about higher prices, and how longer 96-month auto loans could leave millions of Americans trapped in debt. We also discuss soaring vehicle prices, Ford recalls, Lucid's financial struggles, and why buying beyond your means has never been more dangerous. I also cover the latest business news including Costco's massive new gas station, 7-Eleven's store remodels and closures, Nike's unusual lawsuit, weakness in major technology stocks, and why protecting your finances has become more important than ever. If you're interested in business news, the economy, inflation, personal finance, banking, real estate, and what these changes mean for everyday Americans, this is a video you won't want to miss."
Comments here:

"Most Americans Are Running Out of Money Right Now"

Full screen recommended.
"Most Americans Are Running Out of Money Right Now"
"Most Americans Are Running Out of Money Right Now, but the real problem goes far beyond inflation. Why are millions of working Americans struggling to stay afloat even as wages continue to rise? This documentary uncovers the hidden forces behind America's growing financial pressure. Millions of households are discovering that earning more does not necessarily mean living better. This video explores how real wage growth has barely kept pace with inflation, while the cost of living continues to rise through higher housing, groceries, insurance, healthcare, and transportation expenses. It explains why slowing inflation does not bring prices back down, leaving many families with little financial margin to absorb unexpected costs. As everyday bills consume a larger share of income, saving for the future becomes increasingly difficult. The documentary also examines the housing affordability crisis, rising mortgage rates, growing credit card debt, and the increasing reliance on second jobs to cover basic living expenses. Through evidence based analysis and real life examples, it reveals why many middle class Americans feel financially trapped despite a stable economy. This is a closer look at the economic realities reshaping everyday life across the United States.'
Comments here:

"Thought..."

"Men fear thought as they fear nothing else on earth, more than ruin, more even than death. Thought is subversive and revolutionary, destructive and terrible, thought is merciless to privilege, established institutions, and comfortable habit. Thought looks into the pit of hell and is not afraid. Thought is great and swift and free, the light of the world, and the chief glory of man."
- Bertrand Russell

"Five percent of the people think; 
ten percent of the people think they think; 
and the other eighty-five percent would rather die than think."
 - Thomas A. Edison.

"Huxley vs. Orwell"

"Huxley vs. Orwell"
by Neil Postman

“What Orwell feared were those who would ban books.
 What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to
 ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one...
Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information. Huxley feared those 
who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egoism...
Orwell feared that the truth would be concealed from us.
Huxley feared the truth would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance...
Orwell feared we would become a captive culture. Huxley feared we 
would become a trivial culture, preoccupied with some equivalent
 of the feelies, the orgy porgy, and the centrifugal bumblepuppy...
As Huxley remarked in 'Brave New World Revisited', the civil libertarians and the rationalists who are ever on the alert to oppose tyranny “failed to take into account man’s almost infinite appetite for distractions.” In '1984,' Huxley added, people are controlled by inflicting pain. In 'Brave New World,' they are controlled by inflicting pleasure...In short, Orwell feared that what we hate will ruin us. Huxley feared that what we love will ruin us."
Huxley was very obviously correct..
o
Freely download “Amusing Ourselves to Death:
Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business”, by Neil Postman, here:

"This Species is Amusing Itself to Death. The Addictive Contaminated Media Reality"

"This Species is Amusing Itself to Death.
The Addictive Contaminated Media Reality"
By Dr. Gary G. Kohls

“And when they found our shadows (grouped ‘round the TV sets), they ran down every lead; they repeated every test; they checked out all the data in their lists. And then the alien anthropologists admitted they were still perplexed, but on eliminating every other reason for our sad demise they logged the only explanation left: This species has amused itself to death.”  - Roger Waters

“Apathy and indifference are nurtured in the modern age as most peoples’ free time is frittered away with worthless trivia like ball games, computer games, movies and soaps, and fiddling with their mobile phones. These distractions might be fun, but after most of them you’ve learnt nothing of any value, and remain ignorant, malleable and suggestible, which is just how the elites want you.” – Clive Maund

“A truth’s initial commotion is directly proportional to how deeply the lie was believed… When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker, a raving lunatic.” – Dresden James

“A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on.”
– Winston Churchill

"30 years ago (1985) Neil Postman (a professor of communications arts and sciences at New York University – until his death in 2003) wrote the best-selling book “Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business”. (Free download below.) The book exposed, among other things, the subtle but profound dangers to the developing mind from the mesmerizing (and addictive) commercial television industry.

The lessons from that book have essentially been ignored by the amoral and corrupted sociopathic capitalist system that says “damn the torpedoes/full steam ahead” and blindly and greedily promotes unlimited growth no matter what the costs and who or what gets hurt long–term in the resource-extractive, exploitive and permanently polluting processes.

But Postman’s thesis applies even more strongly today to the current internet/computer/ age-inappropriate, pornographic sex and pornographic violence-saturated televangelist/political-contaminated media reality with which the prophetic Postman was properly alarmed.

SOMA, the Drug That Predicted Prozac by 50 Years: In the classic “Brave New World” (1932) Aldous Huxley wrote about the new form of totalitarianism that has now come to pass in the developed world, thanks to the privatized profit-driven, drug, medical and psychiatric corporations whose practitioners were once (naively or altruistically?) mainly concerned with relieving human suffering and trying to holistically and permanently cure their distressed patients’ ailments (rather than lucratively “managing” said “clients” as permanently paying consumers of unaffordable prescription drugs). Nearly 30 years after he wrote the book, Huxley said,

“And it seems to me perfectly in the cards that there will be within the next generation or so a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude, and producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda, brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods.” Neil Postman’s very last sentence of his book concerned the prescription drug-infested victims of the new form of totalitarianism that Huxley had described in “Brave New World”.

Of course, Huxley’s book was all about his imaginary psychotropic drug SOMA that Prozac’s makers and promoters in the late 1980s to falsely claim to make its swallowers “feel better than well”. One of the characters in Brave New World said: “And if ever, by some unlucky chance, anything unpleasant should somehow happen, why, there’s always Soma to give you a holiday from the facts. And there’s always Soma to calm your anger, to reconcile you to your enemies, to make you patient and long-suffering. In the past you could only accomplish these things by making a great effort and after years of hard moral training. Now, you swallow two or three half-gramme tablets, and there you are. Anybody can be virtuous now. You can carry at least half your morality about in a bottle. Christianity without tears; that’s what Soma is.”

Postman ended his book by writing: “What afflicted the people in Brave New World was not that they were laughing instead of thinking, but that they did not know what they were laughing about and why they had stopped thinking.” A couple of years after the publication of Postman’s book, Roger Waters (of “Pink Floyd’s The Wall” fame) released a “concept” album that was inspired by the book. He titled the album “Amused to Death”. The lyrics of the title track are as follows:
“Amused To Death”
by Roger Waters

"Doctor, Doctor what’s wrong with me?
This supermarket life is getting long.
What is the heart life of a color TV?
What is the shelf life of a teenage
queen?
Ooh western woman,
Ooh western girl,
News hound sniffs the air
When Jessica Hahn goes down
He latches on to that symbol of
detachment
Attracted by the peeling away of
feeling
The celebrity of the abused shell
of the belle
Ooh western woman
Ooh western girl
And the children of Melrose strut
their stuff
Is absolute zero cold enough?
And out in the valley warm and clean
The little ones sit by their TV screens
No thoughts to think
No tears to cry
All sucked dry down to the very
last breath.

Bartender what is wrong with me,
Why I am so out of breath?
The captain said excuse me ma’am,
This species has amused itself to death
We watched the tragedy unfold,
We did as we were told.
We bought and sold,
It was the greatest show on earth.
But then it was over,
We oohed and aahed,
We drove our racing cars,
We ate our last few jars of caviar,
And somewhere out there in the stars
A keen-eyed look-out
Spied a flickering light
Our last hurrah.

And when they found our shadows,
Grouped ‘round the TV sets,
They ran down every lead
They repeated every test,
They checked out all the data in
their lists.
And then the alien anthropologists
Admitted they were still perplexed.
But on eliminating every other reason
For our sad demise,
They logged the only explanation left.
This species has amused itself to death.
No tears to cry,
No feelings left,
This species has amused itself to
death…"
Freely download “Amusing Ourselves to Death:
Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business”, by Neil Postman, here:

Wednesday, July 15, 2026

Canadian Prepper, "Matthew Hoh: Trump: 6 Days Until Blackout"

Canadian Prepper, 7/15/26
"Matthew Hoh: Trump: 6 Days Until Blackout"
Comments here:

"Warning! Brutal Market Crash Is Coming, The First Domino To Fall Could Be Oracle"

Jeremiah Babe, 7/15/26
"Warning! Brutal Market Crash Is Coming,
 The First Domino To Fall Could Be Oracle"
Comments here:

Musical Interlude: 2002, "Breathing Light"

Full screen recommended.
2002, "Breathing Light"

"A Look to the Heavens"

“These three bright nebulae are often featured in telescopic tours of the constellation Sagittarius and the crowded starfields of the central Milky Way. In fact, 18th century cosmic tourist Charles Messier cataloged two of them; M8, the large nebula left of center, and colorful M20 on the right. The third, NGC 6559, is above M8, separated from the larger nebula by a dark dust lane. All three are stellar nurseries about five thousand light-years or so distant.
The expansive M8, over a hundred light-years across, is also known as the Lagoon Nebula. M20's popular moniker is the Trifid. Glowing hydrogen gas creates the dominant red color of the emission nebulae, with contrasting blue hues, most striking in the Trifid, due to dust reflected starlight. The colorful skyscape recorded with telescope and digital camera also includes one of Messier's open star clusters, M21, just above the Trifid.”

"A Midnight Journey Through Fading Shadows"

Full screen recommended.
Golden Quiet Things,
"A Midnight Journey Through Fading Shadows"
"Welcome to a dark, whimsical musical journey. "Shadows on the Faded Glass" is a mystery-folk cinematic ballad that captures the bittersweet isolation of a midnight journey. Tailored with a distinctive "stop-motion puppet texture," the track features an intimate, close-mic older male baritone lead. The song moves at a steady walking pace driven by a fingerpicked acoustic guitar, deep upright bass, low viola pads, and delicate pizzicato strings. Wrapped entirely in a warm, dusty analog tape hiss with absolutely no EDM elements, it evokes the feeling of an old film reel coming to life. If you love atmospheric acoustic music, dark storytelling, and melancholic indie folk, this track is for you."

"I Am 78, and There Are Still 9 Things About Growing Old That Make No Sense to Me"

Full screen recommmended.
Native Elder,
"I Am 78, and There Are Still 9 Things 
About Growing Old That Make No Sense to Me"

"Life Beat the Pretty Outta Me"

Full screen recommended.
Delta King's Blues,
"Life Beat the Pretty Outta Me"
"Life didn’t leave me flawless… it left me real. “Life Beat the Pretty Outta Me” is a gritty, soul-stirring Delta King’s Blues tune about hard roads, broken dreams, and the quiet strength that comes from surviving what should’ve broken you. A weathered, slow-burning acoustic guitar carries the melody like worn boots walking through another long sunset. The harmonica cries deep and weary, echoing every scar, every heartbreak, and every lesson earned the hard way. The groove stays slow and heavy, built for folks whose faces tell stories that words never could. This is blues for the beautifully worn. For those who traded youthful shine for wisdom, resilience, and a soul that can’t be bought. Life may have taken the pretty… but it left me with character, grit, and a story worth telling."

The Daily "Near You?"

Huntington, Vermont, USA. Thanks for stopping by!

"The Long Dark"

"The Long Dark"
by Chris Floyd

"We are in the Long Dark now. Both hope and despair are the enemies of our survival. We must live in the awareness that we might not see the light come back, without ceasing to work - with empathy, anger and knowledge - for its return.

We must be here, in the moment, experiencing its fullness (whatever its horrors or joys), yet be elsewhere, removed from the madness pouring in from every side, the avalanche of degradation. We must be here, now, but also in a future we can’t see or even imagine.

We must see that we are lost, with no clear way forward, no sureties or verities to cling to, no roots to anchor us, no structures within or without that will always keep their coalescence in the chaotic, surging flow.

We must live in discrete moments of illumination and connection, pearls hung on an almost invisible string winding through the darkness. Striving, always striving, but not expecting; striving without hope, without despair, without any certainty at all as to the outcome, good or bad.

These are the conditions of the Long Dark, this is what we have to work with, this is where we find ourselves in the brief time we have in this vast, indifferent, astounding universe. As I once wrote long ago, quoting the old hymn: “Work, for the night is coming.”

So do we counsel fatalism, a dark, defeated surrender, a retreat into bitter, curdled quietude? Not a whit. We advocate action, positive action, unstinting action, doing the only thing that human beings can do, ever: Try this, try that, try something else again; discard those approaches that don't work, that wreak havoc, that breed death and cruelty; fight against everything that would draw us down again into our own mud; expect no quarter, no lasting comfort, no true security; offer no last word, no eternal truth, but just keep stumbling, falling, careening, backsliding, crawling toward the broken light.

And what is this "broken light"? Nothing more than a metaphor for the patches of understanding – awareness, attention, knowledge, connection – that break through our darkness and stupidity for a moment now and then. A light always fractured, under threat, shifting, found then lost again, always lost. For we are creatures steeped in imperfection, in breakage and mutation, tossed up – very briefly – from the boiling, chaotic crucible of Being, itself a ragged work in progress toward unknown ends, or rather, toward no particular end at all. Why should there be an "answer" in such a reality?

What matters is what works – what pulls us from our own darkness as far as possible, for as long as possible. Yet the truth remains that "what works" is always and forever only provisional – what works now, here, might not work there, then. What saves our soul today might make us sick tomorrow.

Thus all we can do is to keep looking, working, trying to clear a little more space for the light, to let it shine on our passions and our confusions, our anger and our hopes, informing and refining them, so that we can see each other better, for a moment – until death shutters all seeing forever."

The Poet: Charles Mackay, "No Enemies"

 

"Two Kinds Of People..."

 

"The Great Enemy"

"The Great Enemy" 
by Wendell Berry

"In a society in which nearly everybody is dominated by somebody else's mind or by a disembodied mind, it becomes increasingly difficult to learn the truth about the activities of governments and corporations, about the quality or value of products, or about the health of one's own place and economy.

In such a society, also, our private economies will depend less and less upon the private ownership of real, usable property, and more and more upon property that is institutional and abstract, beyond individual control, such as money, insurance policies, certificates of deposit, stocks, and shares. And as our private economies become more abstract, the mutual, free helps and pleasures of family and community life will be supplanted by a kind of displaced or placeless citizenship and by commerce with impersonal and self-interested suppliers...

Thus, although we are not slaves in name, and cannot be carried to market and sold as somebody else's legal chattels, we are free only within narrow limits. For all our talk about liberation and personal autonomy, there are few choices that we are free to make. What would be the point, for example, if a majority of our people decided to be self-employed?

The great enemy of freedom is the alignment of political power with wealth. This alignment destroys the commonwealth - that is, the natural wealth of localities and the local economies of household, neighborhood, and community - and so destroys democracy, of which the commonwealth is the foundation and practical means."
 - Wendell Berry 
Freely download
"The Art of the Commonplace: The Agrarian Essays"
o
o
"In a closed society where everybody’s guilty, the only crime is 
getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity."
- Hunter S. Thompson

"How It Really Is"

 

"Has Automation Stolen What It Means to Be Human?"

"Has Automation Stolen 
What It Means to Be Human?"
By Jessica Rose

"I want to begin this article by reminding everyone reading it of the old parable of the man fishing alone on a beach. It goes something like this, more or less.

There’s a man fishing alone on a beach with a single, simple fishing pole. Another man walks up to him and asks him why he doesn’t buy a boat to fish because then, he could catch more fish. The fisherman responds by saying: “Then what?” The passer-by then says in a matter-of-fact way: “Well then, you could buy an even bigger boat and catch even more fish with the money from selling all of that fish!”. The fisherman responds by saying: “Then what?” The passer-by confounded that the fisherman does not seem to understand what he is telling him balks: “Then you could retire and hire others to do the fishing for you!” The fisherman responds by saying: “Then what?” Even more confounded, the passer-by says: “Then you could have more time to spend doing what you love!”

The fisherman looks at him. And waits. For understanding. The passer-by then comprehends perhaps for the first time in his life that the long and often exploitative path to simplicity is pointless. The fisherman, even with all of the money in the world would be doing precisely what he already was doing.

Here’s a more “well-known” version if you like.

One day, a wealthy businessman (or investment banker, in some tellings) was vacationing in a small coastal village in Mexico. He watched as a lone fisherman rowed his little boat back to shore with just a few large fish. The businessman complimented the fisherman on the quality of the catch and asked, “How long did it take you to catch those?” “Only a little while,” the fisherman replied. “Why didn’t you stay out longer and catch more?” the businessman asked. “I caught enough for my family’s needs today,” the fisherman said.

The businessman pressed on: “But what do you do with the rest of your time?” The fisherman smiled and answered, “I sleep late, fish a little, play with my children, take siestas with my wife, stroll into the village each evening where I sip wine and play guitar with my amigos. I have a full and busy life."

”The businessman scoffed. “I’m a Harvard MBA – I can help you. You should spend more time fishing. With the extra money, buy a bigger boat. With the bigger boat, catch even more fish, then buy several boats and build a fleet. Cut out the middleman, sell directly to processors, open your own cannery. Control production, processing, and distribution. You’d eventually move to the city, expand to other locations, run a growing enterprise.”

The fisherman listened patiently, then asked, “And how long would all that take?” “Fifteen, maybe twenty years,” the businessman replied. “And then what?” the fisherman asked. The businessman laughed. “That’s the best part! When the time is right, you announce an IPO, sell your company stock to the public, make millions – become very rich!” “Millions… and then what?” the fisherman repeated.

“Then,” the businessman said triumphantly, “you could retire! Move to a small coastal village where you could sleep late, fish a little, play with your kids, take siestas with your wife, stroll to the village in the evenings to sip wine and play guitar with your friends.” The fisherman looked at him quietly for a moment, then smiled and said, “But that’s exactly what I’m already doing.” The businessman stood there, speechless, as the simple truth sank in: the fisherman was already living the very life the ambitious man dreamed of achieving – after decades of grinding pursuit…

I was walking today and knew that I had to write up some of the thoughts I had about automation being the key to the demise of what it means to be human. To be connected. To work hard. To truly earn. To truly learn.

It got me thinking about one of the first examples of automation that was actually a really neat idea: the water wheel. Water wheels and similar devices appeared as early as the 1st century BC (or possibly earlier in rudimentary forms) among the Greeks and Romans, used for grinding grain. These harnessed flowing water to drive machinery continuously without constant human input, representing early power automation in industry. Similar water-powered trip-hammers existed in ancient China over 2,000 years ago.

The most commonly cited earliest true example of automated control – a self-regulating feedback mechanism – is the improved water clock (clepsydra – comes from Ancient Greek meaning to pipette…) invented by the Greek engineer Ctesibius around 270–250 BC in Ptolemaic Egypt (Alexandria)…

Automatic devices can be divided into subdivisions based on function. Some devices help and are “non-invasive” in terms of imposing on the human part of humanity. Some devices are quite “invasive” in this same way.

Many – if not all – devices made in the last century fall into the latter subdivision. I think of these as inflictions upon humanity masquerading as “convenience”, as opposed to devices that make our human lives better. Many examples exist and play a daily role in our human lives today. Some examples:

Single-serve pod coffee makers: Ah yes! The promise of instant coffee without that brewing hassle! Only problem is what you actually get is mediocre taste, generation massive plastic waste, ingestion of microplastics and likely forever chemicals, high cost per cup relative to traditional methods, and most importantly, the removal of the simple ritual of making coffee that many find relaxing or social.

Smartphones: How many times a day does someone on one of these dumb devices almost bump into you? How many people do you see on a daily basis who are literally in phone-land – more akin to zombies – than engaged with nature or others? With constant notifications and app ecosystems, they automate communication, information access, navigation, and entertainment into one device for seamless convenience! The only catch is that they contribute to addiction, reduced attention spans, social isolation, anxiety, poorer sleep, and less presence in real-life and social interactions.

Robotic vacuum cleaners: Why vacuum or sweep when you can off-shore that duty to a robot! They handle floor cleaning autonomously so you “don’t have to”. But guess what? They require more setup/maintenance than promised, miss spots, create noise/annoyance, and don’t replace the satisfaction or light exercise of manual vacuuming, perhaps even as a family activity, eliminating yet another social interaction. But hey, you get yet another gadget to charge and repair.

Microwave ovens: Ah yes. Where would we all be without being able to speed up heating of forever plastic/endocrine disrupting nightmares that are TV dinners? But hey, isn’t that the ultimate convenience? Guess again! This encouragement of ingesting ultra-processed ready meals to save you time also reduces home cooking skills/pleasure, alter social family meal rituals, and shift food prep away from shared or mindful preparation toward solitary, rushed eating. Not very social or human-like behavior.

And now we get to the real winners in our list:

Smart home devices and always-on assistants: Oh man, where do I start with these? Automation of climate control, lighting, music, shopping lists, etc., for effortless living! Why wouldn’t you want to not take the time to get up off your ass and turn the thermostat yourself when a computer can do it for you! I am being sarcastic, of course, because all of these so-called smart devices foster dependency, privacy erosion (constant listening), increased screen time fragmentation, and a subtle loss of basic self-reliance or analog comforts. Loss of self-reliance. Isolation. Loss of social structure.

Automatic/self-checkout kiosks and app-based ordering: Welcome to the new world where all you have to be able to do is use your index finger to have all of your shopping needs fulfilled! No more actually having to walk to the grocery store or market! No more talking to other people at the market! No need to go slow! Ingest! Ingest! Ingest! Consume! Consume! Consume! They’re so awesome, aren’t they? Speeding up transactions by removing cashiers and human interaction. Stupid humans: so error-prone and slow! But hey, guess what? These apps and self-checkouts also increase frustration (computers never make mistakes – wait, is the printer not printing again?), reduce jobs/social contact, and turn routine errands into impersonal, glitch-prone experiences that feel more alienating, than efficient.

I could go on… but these examples are sufficient for now. Notice how in every single example, there is an inherent de-socialization component baked in. Hmm. Is this to ensure that our lives are made more convenient, or is this something more insidious? Having said that, I want to stress how deeply disturbed I am every single day that these things are being demanded by humans.

No demand; no supply. Why are we demanding these things? Do people really and truly believe that these idiotic things make their lives easier/better? Where does the line get drawn between convenience and relinquishing self-sovereignty? Does this line get drawn? Have we not opted into slavery? Why are supply chains even a thing? The only supply chain that any human used to need is the line from their own goat to fresh cheese.

This automation of human work, to me, poses a real existential crisis that is the root reason why we are “where we are” today as a society. Giving up these wonderful ritualistic habits that translate to being able to eat that day, or being with our loved ones, or sleeping well after a day of hard work, has led us nowhere but isolated and dependent. 

I simply hope that this article is shared profusely and that perhaps, even one person will wake up from their digital slumber as a result of reading it. Notice that I didn’t even touch on AI or human-replacing robots: the ultimate automation enforcing a permanent vacation from human-ation. Be like the man alone fishing on the shore and never succumb to the lie that the act of DOING is something that needs to be sped up or removed from the human equation. DOING is not far from BEING. Love and light."

Joel Bowman, "Misogynist Monsoons"

"Misogynist Monsoons"
by Joel Bowman

“The Prophet married her when she was six years old and he 
consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, 
and then she remained with him for nine years.”
~ Sahih al-Bukhari, Book 63, Hadith 122

Buenos Aires, Argentina - "We were going to write to you about the engines of history today, dear reader, continuing on from last week’s Notes. But the past will have to wait. Today, it is the lunacy of the present that presses upon us...

Every now and then, in moments of apparent weakness, when your correspondent’s well-honed cynicism is found wanting, we discover, in our quietude, a sympathetic fiber inclined toward the chattering class of the unpopular press. They can’t all be that fatuous, that doltish, that cruel and stupid, we reckon on behalf of our colleagues in the mainstream news, forgetting for a moment the gushing Niagara of evidence to the contrary.

Surely, we reason, there exists some redeeming artifact aboard the sinking legacy-media vessel, some part worth rescuing from the barbed wire canoe as it slips beneath the waves, a single salvageable utensil ensnarled in the mangled, rusted heap?

Misogynist Monsoons: Then a headline catches our eye, like the one below, and our basic sanity awakens as though from deep, restorative slumber. From Australia’s ABC:
According to the article: The growing intensity of natural disasters across Asia is leading to increasing numbers of child marriages of girls, according to aid organizations... Climate change is now believed to be a leading contributor to more frequent and younger nuptials. Yes, gentle reader, you read that correctly: climate change... “leading contributor”... younger nuptials. That is to say, the region that suffers the highest incidence of child bride-making in the world, a practice it has committed for millennia on end, is suddenly the passive victim of the most utterly precedented phenomenon of all: the weather.

And just when you thought it was safe to turn on the air conditioning again! One can only imagine the imminent surge of misogynist monsoons, white supremacist squalls, transphobic tsunamis and cisgender cyclones boiling on the horizon of the author’s short-circuiting imagination.

The Other Untouchables: And there’s a bonus aspect for the managerial class, too. Since global warming climate change comes directly from your indulgent, first world lifestyle (per Paris’s deputy mayor and petit fonctionnaire du jour), the child bride travesty is, naturally, your fault. (And really, whose else could it be?)

Continues the article: "After a natural disaster in Bangladesh, child marriages can surge by up to 39 per cent, according to the International Rescue Committee. South Asia, one of the most vulnerable regions to the impacts of climate change, accounts for most of the world’s child marriages. Bangladesh has the highest rate in Asia according to Plan International, with more than 50 per cent of girls married before they turn 18."

Nevermind that taking child brides is a canonical tenet of Islamic (and Hindu) texts, and that it has been a stain on that part of the world since Mo played striker for the Mecca Minors. Noticing that Bangladesh is a 91% Muslim country (plus 8% Hindu)... and that Muslims (and Hindus) are by far and away the largest perpetrators of this practice... the reader will nonetheless search the article in vain for any keywords associated with those, shall we say, “untouchable” faiths. Nothing to see there, the author assures us, for although... “Twelve million girls are tipped to become child brides this year, according to Plan International. Child marriage is a global problem across cultures and religions.”

Sure it is. Suuure it is. Such hard-hitting journalism, by the bye, comes courtesy of the gutless sham that is the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC), which owes its regrettable existence to A$1.2 billion in annual government subsidies, the vast majority of which is funded directly by Australian taxpayers via federal allocations.

This is the same vestigial organ of the fourth estate that served up such editorial enviro-gruel as, “How Trump inspired this queer-centered, climate change religion” (April, 2025), “Fears climate change is contributing to gender-based violence” (June, 2025), and “Climate Crisis Threatening Disabled Australians’ Access to Nature” (December, 2025).

The Prejudice of Diminished Standards: Still, calling the individual author of this article silly names would be easy. So here goes... You, unlettered scribe at the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, are a saddle-goose. A fopdoodle. A wantwit. You are thirty seconds in an hourglass. A two-slice loaf. A dolthead. A mooncalf. A bipedal ass. Moreover, you are a traitor to your sisters, whom you twice scorn... first for running cover for actual child rapists, and second for accepting a taxpayer-funded salary to gaslight your readers into thinking it is they who are to blame!

What next, Minneapolis air conditioning addicts at fault for a seasonal surge in Somali FMG? Gas stove usage in East Birmingham responsible for an uptick in transgender bridal miscarriages in Pakistan? And what about bride burnings, a regional practice among both Hindus and Muslims in which women are brutally murdered by the groom’s family for not carrying sufficient dowry into the marriage.

At about ten so-called “dowry deaths” per hundred thousand women in the north Indian state of Uttarakhand alone, the beastly perpetrators of these crimes claim victims at roughly the rate of gun-related homicides in Houston, Texas. (Though with about five times the population, the absolute numbers are commensurately higher.) Naturally, we hear a lot about the latter from the gun-shy ABC... not so much about the former.

Hmm... Does the ABC consider climate change a “major driver” of systematic femicide in Uttarakhand, too? Or perhaps there’s a cowboy in a pick-up truck somewhere in Texas who needs castigating for the direct actions of heinous individuals he’s never met on the other side of the planet?

Because as we all know, nothing bad can ever happen in the world without it first and foremost being the exclusive fault of civilized people in developed, western societies politely going about their business. And therein lies the stealthy prejudice of diminished standards, as mindlessly practiced by ABC authors and their irksome ilk across mainstream media; the relentless, solipsistic drive to center themselves in the universe as the cause and cure of all life’s ills.

Meanwhile, according to their own website, 2026-27 funding for the ABC was recently boosted by a cool A$87 million, in large part due to new allocations for its Indo-Pacific Broadcasting Strategy. Which is to say, expect more bile from the Corpse’s talentless pool of global hall monitors and do-gooders. That ahead of us, we’ll gladly return to our musings on the past, next time. As always, stay tuned for more Notes From the End of the World."

John Wilder, "Sam Colt Made Men Equal. A.I. Won’t Even Try"

"Sam Colt Made Men Equal. A.I. Won’t Even Try"
by John Wilder

“Where’d you get the pistol?” 
– "No Country for Old Men"

"Birthdays are healthy. Studies show that people who have more of them live longer. If you have the tallest man on Earth and add him to a group of 99 random people, the average height might move upwards a quarter of an inch, at most. But if you have the richest man in the world and add him to a group of 99 random people, on average, everyone has about 80 billion dollars depending on the day and the price of SpaceX®.

Elon Musk is roughly 14,000,000 times richer than the average person on Earth. Height follows a normal distribution, what we would call a classic bell curve. The tallest man might tower over the rest, but he’s not 2,651.5 miles tall. Hmm, I should stop now before I give Elon ideas.

Wealth does not follow a normal distribution. At the extremes it follows a Pareto distribution. A very small slice of people command the overwhelming share of resources, and there’s no natural ceiling. Wealth concentrates, it does not equalize.

Back when armor was the ultimate status symbol and battlefield insurance, only the wealthy could afford a full suit of plate. A knight on horseback was a walking fortress. Then came the longbow at places like Agincourt. English yeomen, common men with years of training, unleashed volleys that turned French heavy cavalry into pin cushions. Arrows punched through armor and the French knights dropped their baguettes and cigarettes.

The expensive advantage of the mounted noble evaporated in the mud and guns finished the job. A peasant with a musket could drop a lord in plate armor from a hundred yards with a few weeks of training. Rifles and pistols made personal defense cheap and portable. The playing field for violence flattened dramatically.

God made men. Sam Colt made them equal. And that equality made governments think twice before pushing too hard. Warfare tells the same story on a larger scale. World War II was industrial attrition on an insane level. The Soviets threw bodies at the problem to sponge up German bullets. The Americans threw factories, ships, tanks, and aircraft at it until the Axis ran out of everything else.

The U.S. and Soviets spent the Cold War trying to outproduce each other in the old game. America won that contest so thoroughly that the rules changed. Ukraine, and then Iran’s proxies, show how much the game had shifted. Precision munitions, satellite targeting, real-time communications, and swarms of cheap drones turned expensive armor and aircraft into expensive liabilities rather than decisive weapons.

A few thousand dollars in drone parts plus some clever targeting can take out a multi-million-dollar tank or ship. The battlefield is being equalized again by access to information and cheap, smart munitions. Technology handed smaller players and irregular forces new leverage. The pattern repeats across history and across domains. Some tools compress advantages. Others stretch them.

I saw a newsletter yesterday where the author declared war on the very idea of merit. His working definition of merit is talent plus effort. He hates it. Talent, in his view, is unearned, an accident of birth or genes. He was honest enough to admit talent isn’t evenly distributed. Talent follows the same normal curve as height or I.Q. No one walks around with a 14-million I.Q.

Luck plays a role too. To reach the absolute pinnacle usually requires talent, effort, and luck. For most people with average talent and average luck. Effort is the variable that actually moves the needle.

The writer seemed personally offended that some people could be smarter or more disciplined and therefore succeed more. He celebrated A.I. because it might let anyone churn out a business plan that once required years of education and experience. That will knock the smart kids down a peg!

He’s half right about A.I.’s impact. It is already replacing or augmenting large chunks of cognitive work. Roughly 21% of American adults are functionally illiterate, and 54% read below a sixth-grade level. Hand those folks a powerful AI and they can produce a decent business plan. Whether they can understand or execute on it is another question entirely since it’s like giving an orangutan the equations for orbital mechanics.

For someone with a 100+ I.Q., A.I. is different. It removes drudgery and raises the floor on what one person can accomplish. It lets a competent individual punch above his weight. A.I. will not be distributed evenly, however. The versions available to the wealthy won’t look at all like what will be available to the masses. They’ll use it to design new products, optimize supply chains, and compound advantages. Teens will use a simpler version to make cat pictures.

This is the recurring story of transformative technology. The printing press took knowledge out of the hands of a tiny literate elite and scattered it across Europe. Ideas that once required a monastery or a university could spread in weeks. Books got cheap. Literacy rose. The printing press was an enormous equalizer. Yet the biggest winners built printing empires, publishing houses, and networks of distribution and could control mass media. The tool rewarded those who could organize capital and talent around it.

The same pattern appeared with electricity. It lit homes, powered factories, and created entirely new industries. Living standards rose across the board. But the big utilities and manufacturers built vast fortunes and influence. The automobile obliterated distance in a way no king could have done. It reshaped cities, commerce, and daily life. Henry Ford’s moving assembly line made cars affordable.

Equalizer, but the companies and supply chains that scaled the technology created concentrated wealth and power that still echoes today. Personal computers and the early internet followed suit. A motivated individual could reach a global audience or start a business with almost nothing but time and ingenuity. Barriers collapsed. Then the platforms that captured attention and data became trillion-dollar businesses that could control commerce and shut off channels to those with controversial opinions.

Technology does not care about fairness. It amplifies existing differences in talent, effort, discipline, and capital allocation. It lowers some barriers and erects new ones built around mastery of the new tools themselves. The commie newsletter writer wanted the talented and hardworking punished for their advantages. He wanted A.I. to act as a great leveler downward. But effort still compounds and preparation still matters. The distribution of outcomes stays wide. The bell curve isn’t going anywhere.

Is A.I. an equalizer, then? No. It will act like wealth. It won’t be equally distributed. Carlos from the Jiffy-Lube® will only have the free tier of ChatGPT©. Elon will have versions of weapons-grade A.I. available to him. Probably figuring out how to make himself 2,651.5 miles tall."

"The Battle For The Strait Of Hormuz Will Show Whether The World Can Survive Without Oil From The Persian Gulf Or Not"

by Michael Snyder

"Now we are going to get to see what really happens to the global economy when the Strait of Hormuz is completely closed for an extended period of time. Before the war, approximately 45 percent of all Asian oil imports traveled through the Strait of Hormuz. The Chinese normally get more oil from the Middle East than anyone else, and the amount of crude oil that they have been importing has collapsed. That is not sustainable for the Chinese, and they are getting very angry. At the same time, relentless drone attacks on Russia’s energy infrastructure have forced the Russians to buy gasoline from India. If the Strait of Hormuz remains completely closed for months, global energy supplies will get extremely tight and the price of oil will go into unprecedented territory.

On Monday, the world was shocked when two oil tankers from the United Arab Emirates were struck by Iranian cruise missiles…"Iranian cruise missiles hit two oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz, killing one crew member and injuring eight, the United Arab Emirates’ Ministry of Defense said Monday.

The attacks took place when the tankers - Mombasa and Al Bahiyah - were sailing through the strait’s southern shipping lane, which hugs the coast of Oman, the defense ministry said. Iran has insisted that commercial ships use a separate lane near the Iranian coastline and seek permission from Iranian authorities. Iran has not publicly commented on the apparent attacks. The deceased crew member and six injured crew members were Indian nationals, and two of those injured were from Ukraine, according to the United Arab Emirates."

The Iranians have warned that any commercial vessels that attempt to travel through the Strait of Hormuz without their permission are subject to attack, and they were not bluffing. On Tuesday, three Liberian-flagged oil tankers were also attacked by the Iranians…"Oman’s Maritime Security Center said Tuesday that three Liberian-flagged oil tankers were targeted in separate incidents off the Omani coast. The center said the Al Bahyah, owned by Al Bahyah Inc. and based in the United Arab Emirates, was targeted about 9.6 nautical miles off the coast of Musandam Governorate. A Royal Navy of Oman vessel is monitoring the situation, and 18 crew members were evacuated by nearby maritime vessels, while three crew members remain missing, officials said."

These attacks have brought traffic through the Strait of Hormuz to a standstill. And that isn’t going to change any time soon, because the IRGC just announced that “as long as the US evil stays in the region, not a drop of oil and gas will be exported from the region”…"Amid ongoing cross-Gulf attacks today between Iranian and US forces, the IRGC says they targeted enemy weapons and parts storages in Bahrain and Kuwait. This after the US appeared to attack some critical Iranian infrastructure on coastal islands. The IRGC has issued a fresh statement via state media on Tuesday, saying that “as long as the US evil stays in the region, not a drop of oil and gas will be exported from the region.”

Wow. That is quite a strong statement. Meanwhile, President Trump has decided to impose a “full blockade” on all ship traffic coming to and from Iran…
This is really happening. Even before these latest moves, traffic through the Strait of Hormuz had fallen to the lowest level in five weeks…Tanker traffic through the Strait of Hormuz dipped on Sunday to the lowest number in five weeks as the latest U.S.-Iran escalation reignited concerns among ship operators about safety at the key oil and LNG chokepoint.

Now that the Iranians have shown that they are quite serious about enforcing the closure of the Strait, it is highly unlikely that shipping companies will dare to test them. Even the smallest oil tankers cost millions of dollars, and so if you own one you don’t want it getting sent to the bottom of the ocean by a cruise missile.

And the U.S. Navy is going to make sure that no Iranian oil gets shipped out of the region. The U.S. blockade of Iran is really going to upset the Chinese, because they depend on that oil. On Tuesday, they demanded the resumption of “normal and safe passage” through the Strait…"A Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson demanded “normal and safe passage” be restored in the Strait of Hormuz Tuesday before the United States reinstated a naval blockade targeting Iranian ports.

Lin Jian made the remark when asked by Iranian state media about the renewed U.S. military blockade and if Beijing is “prepared to take any concrete steps to mitigate the impact of these measures against Iran and deepen its economic and military cooperation with Iran.” President Donald Trump said Monday he was reinstating the blockade because Iran broke the recent ceasefire deal by launching missile attacks on commercial tankers and by trying to shut down the Strait of Hormuz.

“China is deeply concerned over resumed military conflict in the Gulf region. China calls on relevant parties to heed the strong call for peace and stability from the region and beyond, remain calm and exercise restraint, safeguard the hard-won ceasefire, avoid the return of war and more importantly, prevent the fighting from spreading and hurting more innocent people,” Lin Jian said Tuesday."

The good news for the Chinese is that they have larger oil reserves than anyone else. But the bad news is that China’s crude oil imports have fallen to exceedingly low levels…"China’s crude oil imports crashed to a decade-low in June as the reduced flows through the Strait of Hormuz hiked oil prices and reduced refiners’ appetite for costly crude. Overall Chinese imports of crude oil plunged by 41.3% in June from a year earlier, to just 29.27 million tons, or 7.12 million barrels per day (bpd), according to official Chinese customs data released on Tuesday."

If this crisis goes on for long enough, China will be forced to do something to restore the flow of oil. But unless one side chooses to back down, there is no chance that this crisis will end any time soon.

As a former Pentagon official named Jason H. Campbell has pointed out, bombing Iran from the air will not be enough to win the battle for the Strait of Hormuz… “It’s very difficult to envision any scenario where you could satisfactorily secure the Strait of Hormuz absent ground forces,” Campbell said. Doing so would require tens of thousand of troops, Campbell said, not only to take out Iran’s hidden munitions but to secure hundreds of miles of coastline and large swaths of inland territory. The U.S. troops would likely face insurgent attacks. Standing up that kind of force would take a few months and include “very high costs,” Campbell said."

This is what I have been saying all along. Hitting Iran from the air is not going to get the job done, but sending ground forces in is unthinkable. So where do we go from here? For now, the bombing of Iran continues. On Tuesday the Iranians hit Bahrain with cluster munitions, and the U.S. response has already begun
We are also being told that the U.S. is attacking Qeshm Island once again… Projectiles hit Iran’s Gulf island of Qeshm near the Strait of Hormuz on Tuesday, Iran’s state broadcaster reported, citing local officials who blamed the U.S. “At 19:00, a location on Qeshm Island was struck by projectiles from the American enemy,” Hormozgan governor’s office said, according to IRIB.

This is it. Iran War 3 is here. The IDF is not an active participant yet, but Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is telling the Iranians that they will get hit really hard if Israel is attacked… Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned Iran Tuesday that Israel would hit back if attacked. “Do not count on things remaining quiet if you attack us,” Netanyahu said at a conference in Dimona, in Israel’s southeast, in a video released by his office. “The days are over when someone strikes us and we don’t hit back with a decisive blow.”

I think that it is just a matter of time before Iranian missiles are flying toward Israel once again. And then things will get really crazy. Speaking of crazy, the Houthis just bombarded an airport in Saudi Arabia after one of their own airports got bombed by the Saudis…Meanwhile, the threat of Iranian-backed Houthis being dragged into the war was raised when Saudi Arabia said the militant group fired ballistic missiles and drones at a civilian airport in the kingdom’s southwestern city of Abha.

The attacks were the first major fighting since a 2022 truce that ended a seven-year conflict between northern Yemen’s Tehran-aligned rulers and several Arab countries. The militant group had accused the Saudis of bombing its airport in the capital Sanaa to prevent the landing of a plane returning the Houthi delegation from the funeral of Iran’s slain leader, Ali Khamenei.

A full-blown war between the Houthis and the Saudis could erupt at any time. And that could drag in Pakistan, because the Pakistanis recently signed a mutual defense pact with the Saudis… Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif said Tuesday in a post on X that Pakistan “strongly condemns” the Houthi ballistic missile attacks targeting southern Saudi Arabia, calling them a violation of the kingdom’s sovereignty and reaffirming Islamabad’s “unwavering support” for its security.

The time for talk is over. I am convinced that we will soon witness some absolutely shocking escalations, and the Strait of Hormuz will be closed for an extended period of time. This will be a real test of the resilience of the global economy. Oil stockpiles are being steadily depleted, and once they get low enough there will be a tremendous amount of panic."
o