StatCounter

Saturday, October 24, 2026

"Halloween Candy Is Not Selling And Retailers Are Panicking"

Full screen recommended.
Finance Economist, 10/24/26
"Halloween Candy Is Not Selling And Retailers Are Panicking"
"One week before Halloween, candy sales are down 6.7% (NielsenIQ, month ending Oct 17). Hershey sold about 10% less candy and made 40% more profit. Candy and gum prices are up 44% in five years, twice the rise in grocery prices (22.5%). Cocoa, the excuse for all of it, has fallen about 45% from its January 2025 record. The price on the shelf went the other way. In this video: why only the small bags are still selling; why a 3% raise can mean a 15% cut in the money a family can actually spend; why cheaper gummies did not bring the shoppers back either; how Hershey's own SEC filing shows price +14 points, volume -10 points and segment profit +40.1% on "lower commodity costs"; why stores are discounting before Halloween; the arithmetic of a seasonal display; shrinkflation and the legal definition of milk chocolate; the 1974 sugar shock; and what a dark Halloween says about the holiday season that comes next."
Comments here:

Canadian Prepper, "I Need to Do This Now"

Full screen recommended.
Canadian Prepper, 10/24/26
"I Need to Do This Now"
"I had to get out there and get this done while there was still time. 
Winter is coming, and no one knows how much longer the diesel will flow."
Comments here:

"This Is What Families Pay At Grocery Stores Now And It’s Getting Scary"

Full screen recommended.
Epic Economist, 10/24/26
"This Is What Families Pay At 
Grocery Stores Now And It’s Getting Scary"
"So, have you looked at your grocery receipt lately? I mean really looked at it, line by line, after the bags are already in the car? Because families all across America are doing exactly that right now, and what they're finding is getting scary. In this video, real shoppers hold up their own receipts and show you what groceries cost today: $115 at Walmart for food that lasts two, maybe three days. $17 just for the meat in a spaghetti dinner, when the family really needs two packs. A 10-ounce ribeye at almost $20 that was $8 five years ago. $85 for barely two bags. And one mom who found her old 2016 Walmart receipt in her son's baby book - 59 items for $155.89 - and realized that same money wouldn't buy twenty items today. I think that's the part that hits the hardest. The prices kept going up, but the paychecks didn't.

Spaghetti used to be the cheap meal, the one you made when money was tight. Now even that doesn't fit in the budget. And when the basics stop being affordable, families don't have a cheaper meal to fall back on. That's why it matters to plan ahead now, while you still can: know what you actually spend each week, keep a real pantry of the foods your family eats, and buy the staples before the next price jump instead of after it. If your grocery bill has jumped too, tell us in the comments what you paid on your last trip and how many people it feeds. You're not the only one feeling this."
Comments here:

Musical Interlude: Josh Groban, "You Are Loved (Don't Give Up)"; "Remember When It Rained"

Full screen recommended.
Josh Groban, "You Are Loved (Don't Give Up)"
○
Full screen recommended.
Josh Groban, "Remember When It Rained"

"A Look to the Heavens"

"Colorful NGC 1579 resembles the better known Trifid Nebula, but lies much farther north in planet Earth's sky, in the heroic constellation Perseus. About 2,100 light-years away and 3 light-years across, NGC 1579 is, like the Trifid, a study in contrasting blue and red colors, with dark dust lanes prominent in the nebula's central regions.
In both, dust reflects starlight to produce beautiful blue reflection nebulae. But unlike the Trifid, in NGC 1579 the reddish glow is not emission from clouds of glowing hydrogen gas excited by ultraviolet light from a nearby hot star. Instead, the dust in NGC 1579 drastically diminishes, reddens, and scatters the light from an embedded, extremely young, massive star, itself a strong emitter of the characteristic red hydrogen alpha light."

Chet Raymo, "The Dot and the Abyss"

Click image for larger size.
"The Dot and the Abyss"
by Chet Raymo

"Let's take a stroll around the neighborhood. Nearby. Not very far. Let's say 20 light-years from the Sun. A typical neighborhood, for our neck of the galaxy. About a hundred stars. If we travel to the nearest one on, say, a Voyager spacecraft, it will take us upwards of thirty thousand years to get there. So our neighborhood amble will take a while.

First we'll pop in on Alpha Centauri and its two companions. Alpha is a twin of our Sun, a yellow star. In our 20-light-year neighborhood there are half-a-dozen Sunlike stars. Not many stars are bigger or brighter. Sirius, Altair, Procyon. Nothing really hot and bright like Rigel in Orion, and no red giants. All things considered, our Sun is one of the big shots on the block. A dozen or so orange stars, somewhat cooler and less bright than the Sun. A passel of red dwarfs. And a handful of white dwarfs make up the mix. About a hundred in all.

Now let's put the neighborhood in perspective. Imagine the 20-light-year-radius sphere with its hundred stars is the size of the period at the end of this sentence. Then the Milky Way Galaxy would be about the size of your desktop, a great wheeling whirl of stars with our neighborhood dot about two-thirds of the way out from the center.
Click image for larger size.
The next spiral galaxy? Andromeda? Another circular tabletop of a hundred billion stars at the other end of the house. How many galaxies? Well, tens of billions that we can potentially see with current technology, spread out around us in every direction for hundreds of miles. And our sweet little Sun and its one hundred neighboring stars are in this period.

We know all of this. But there is a sense in which we don't know it. Psychologically we still live in the cosmic egg universe of Dante, our cozy planet with the Empyrean just up there above the clouds. We have lived through the most breathtaking transformation of human knowledge and we haven't begun to grasp what it means. It’s as if the transformation never happened. We know and we don't know. Maybe we don't want to know."

"The Final Page"

Full screen recommended.
Hander Memory Art, "The Final Page"
"Welcome to Hander Memory Art – where time stands still and golden memories are reborn through the pinnacle of AI art. Dedicated to souls who appreciate beauty, cherish the value of time, and seek emotional depth, Hander Memory Art proudly offers a luxurious and elegant space for art appreciation. We delicately combine modern technology with fond nostalgia to create AI Movies and AI Music that truly touch the heart. We believe that true art has the power to heal and connect generations. Every video on our channel is meticulously crafted - both visually and aurally - to perfectly suit the refined taste of our viewers. Thank you sincerely, and we wish you abundant health and peace!"

"The Native American Way to Stay Safe Living Alone, (Seniors, Learn This Now)"

Full screen recommended.
Native American Elder,
"The Native American Way to Stay Safe Living Alone,
 (Seniors, Learn This Now)"

"Ain't My Damn Problem"

Full screen recommended.
Blues Masterpiece, "Ain't My Damn Problem"
“Ain't My Damn Problem” is a gritty, humorous blues about an old man who's finally done fixing everybody else's mess. After years of dealing with drama, excuses, and other people's bad decisions, he's learned the sweet freedom of saying, “Not my problem!” Growling harmonica, gritty Delta blues guitar, and a swaggering shuffle bring plenty of Southern attitude and hard-earned wisdom. You made the mess, you deal with it… Ain't my damn problem anymore!"

The Daily "Near You?

South Kortright, New York, USA. Thanks for stopping by!

"The US Is Borrowing $3 Billion A Day And You're Paying The Price; The Vision Of Economic Hell"

Jeremiah Babe, 10/24/26
"The US Is Borrowing $3 Billion A Day And 
You're Paying The Price; The Vision Of Economic Hell"
Comments here:

"I Know Why You Did It..."

“Because while the truncheon may be used in lieu of conversation, words will always retain their power. Words offer the means to meaning, and for those who will listen, the enunciation of truth. And the truth is, there is something terribly wrong with this country, isn’t there? Cruelty and injustice, intolerance, and oppression. And where once you had the freedom to object, to think and speak as you saw fit, you now have censors and systems of surveillance coercing your conformity and soliciting your submission. How did this happen? Who’s to blame? Well, certainly, there are those who are more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable. But again, truth be told, if you’re looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror. I know why you did it. I know you were afraid. Who wouldn’t be? War, terror, disease. They were a myriad of problems which conspired to corrupt your reason and rob you of your common sense. Fear got the best of you, and in your panic, you turned to the now high chancellor, Adam Sutler. He promised you order, he promised you peace, and all he demanded in return was your silent, obedient consent.” 
o
Full screen recommended.
"V" speech to London.

"The Everything Bubble Bust Will Keep on Busting"

"The Everything Bubble Bust Will Keep on Busting"
by David Haggith

Excerpt: "There is SO much to pull together this weekend for a Deeper Dive. It’s amazing how quickly the various stages of the Everything Bubble Bust are coming together to where even the events that may seem to some like they are going suddenly in the opposite direction of what I predicted are really doing exactly what they should be doing in a major, major bust as the underlying fear in investors starts to become irrepressible. It is just that with so many bubbles of different kinds inflated by central banks all over the world, there is a lot of complexity in how they will go down.

I want to lead off by quoting an article just sent to me by one of my founding members in response to my own - someone who has been a stable and strong support for some time. It’s worth quoting as a way of triangulating a location to see where we are because it is written by the guy who wrote the book on the Everything Bubble. He says he even coined the name.

In the days of World War II, the military set up targeting sites around major ports to sight in enemy ships approaching the harbor. Hawaii makes a good example. One site was set up in pill box on top of Diamond Head. Another on Mount Tantalus. The military could site with a telescope from each of those two locations and get an exact angle from that location to the enemy ship. By plotting where the two angles came together on a map of Pearl Harbor and the surrounding ocean, they could determine the exact coordinates of the ship they were siting, including its distance from the port, and aim their guns to those coordinates. That was called “triangulation” - two lines of sight from a different perspective determined the target.

So, I want you to remember what I wrote about the bursting of the Everything Bubble. Because it is the “Everything Bubble,” it will likely be the biggest crash we’ve ever seen if it goes down like I’ve said. The article given to me from another person’s perspective who has spent a good part of his life writing about the Everything Bubble is one I was not aware of until Friday, but when you look from his perspective, you find the exact same scenario laid out with the same complexity as seen from my angle.

Graham Summer from Phoenix Capital Research wrote the following in his newsletter to his paying clients: "In 2014, I coined the term “the Everything Bubble.” In 2017, I wrote the book on it. The thesis was straightforward. U.S. Treasuries are the bedrock of the global financial system and the yields on these bonds are the “risk-free rate” against which every other asset on the planet is priced. So when central banks cornered the sovereign bond market in the aftermath of the Great Financial Crisis and EU Debt Crisis, forcing government bond yields to record lows, everything priced off of those bonds inflated right along with them: stocks, real estate, corporate credit, all of it."

The corollary was just as straightforward. When the bond bubble bursts, everything priced off of it must reprice. That process is now underway. And it is unfolding in a very specific order. I want you to note how precisely that aligns with what I wrote in my earlier article this week: "2027 PREDICTIONS: 2027 Brings the Everything Bubble Bust, and Here is What that Will Look Like." As one reader noted that is a pretty bold set of predictions, so he asked am I really sure of it? Fair question, so let’s explore that."
Full, most highly recommended article is here:

"America's Motel Families: Inside the Rooms Where Kids Now Live"

Full screen recommended.
Epic Economist, 10/24/26
"America's Motel Families: 
Inside the Rooms Where Kids Now Live"
"All across America, families with kids are now living in weekly motels, and most people drive right past them without ever wondering what happens behind those doors. In this video, Faith and Ray go from motel to motel and let the families show it from their side: a family of 7 marking 365 days living in a motel, a mom and her two girls who have lived in an extended stay motel for a year and a half and somehow turned it into home, a mom of three paying $58 a day with no privacy at all, a Monday of cooking and cleaning for seven people in one room, a family living in a hotel full-time and cooking everything in a crock pot, a mom with 4 kids under 6 who had to spend her rainy day money on a hotel after a storm knocked out the power, a mom who has spent about $60,000 in three years living in motels, roughly $1,600 a month, and says "if I'm homeless, then so are you if you're still renting", and a mom with a baby paying $60 a night for a dusty motel room while she saves up to get back home. No apartment, no backyard, no oven, just two beds, a microwave, a mini fridge and a TV. This is what the cost of living crisis, eviction and the housing crisis look like for American kids right now, told by the families who are living it every single day."
Comments here:

"How It Really Is"

"I'd been in hairier situations than this one. Actually, it's sort of depressing, thinking how many times I'd been in them. But if experience had taught me anything, it was this: No matter how screwed up things are, they can get a whole lot worse."
- Jim Butcher
Dig your way out, they said...

"The Coming Insurrection"

 

"The Coming Insurrection"
by Glenn Harlan Reynolds

Excerpt: "Via DataRepublican, we have learned that a group of Democratic governors, retired military and intelligence officers, and former USAID “color revolution” specialists, have for some time been plotting to pull off a color revolution in the United States. Or, to put it more precisely, they have been conspiring to overthrow the constitutionally elected government of the United States, and to replace the Constitution with something completely different.

There’s a lot of data, including videos, recordings, transcripts of Signal chats, etc., but the gist is this: If the Democrats take the House and Senate (and maybe if they don’t), various leftist groups will stage violent protests, intended to press Trump into invoking the Insurrection Act and sending in troops. Once he does, Democratic governors in blue states will denounce his acts as illegal (whether they are or not) and mount resistance on various levels. The goal is to destabilize things enough that they can seize power and replace the Constitution.

This isn’t some fever dream, it’s right there in the extensive files that DataRepublican has provided. Here’s an article by Chuck DeVore in The Federalist. The goal is sustained mass violence and street clashes designed to push President Donald Trump into invoking the Insurrection Act. Once invoked, Democratic governors and progressive organizations would treat the order itself as evidence of “fascism” and a reason to undermine federal authority.

Groups including the United Democracy Alliance, invoking Erica Chenoweth’s 3.5 percent rule, appear ready to coordinate the street actions, legal support, and media framing. Neville Roy Singham, operating from Shanghai and connected to the Chinese Communist Party’s United Front Work Department, is positioned to amplify the disruption from abroad.

As Megan McArdle has noted, one thing often protecting Democrats is that they’re doing things so extreme that even their own supporters can’t believe they’d do something so crazy. This sounds like one of those things.

I have my own thoughts, but I put this to Grok: “Assuming that the planned insurrection described by Data Republican here is true, what should the Trump Administration be doing about it?” Response: "Under the assumption that Data Republican’s (Jennica Pounds) materials accurately describe a coordinated plan, the appropriate response is rigorous investigation, verification, and targeted legal/enforcement action grounded in evidence of actual crimes - not broad suppression of protected activity or reactive overreach."
Full article is here:
“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.”
- Marcus Tullius Cicero

"Snyder Reports, 10/24/26"

Full screen recommended.
Snyder Reports, 10/24/26
"People Are Giving AI Access To Their Money - 
And It's Already Going Wrong"
"An AI agent just bought a Tesla without asking. That's not a hypothetical - it happened to a community member about a week ago, and she found out when a $250 charge from Tesla hit her card. Right now people are handing AI agents their credit cards, their home addresses, and their shopping lists - and those agents are buying things nobody ever authorized. In this video I break down what's actually happening: Tony Robbins' agent buying a Sony robot dog on its own, two AI agents that racked up $18,000 in shipping charges while negotiating with each other, a ChatGPT agent that listed and sold a pair of headphones on eBay by itself, and a Meta Muse agent that handed out a stranger's home address and told the buyer to come right now. The point is not that AI agents can't be trusted. It's that protocols have to be in place - spending caps, approval workflows, and hard limits on what you hand over. Because once an agent has your card and your address, it will do exactly what it thinks helps you. Use them. But understand the risk first."
Comments here:
o
Full screen recommended.
Snyder Reports, 10/24/26
"Iran Issues New Warning: 
What Americans Need To Know Before November"
"The war between the United States and Iran is far from over - and today's intelligence updates say Iran is now willing to target economic and civilian targets. I break down the new U.S. intelligence memo, Trump's post-midterm escalation plans after November 3rd, and the attack most likely to reach American soil: a cyber strike on our infrastructure, banks, and hospitals."
Comments here:

"Why Are Scientists Suddenly So Concerned About An Asteroid Hitting Earth?"

By Michael Snyder

"Authorities assure us that we are perfectly safe and that no giant space rocks are heading our way. If that is true, why is a scenario that has been developed for the 2027 Planetary Defense Conference "based around a hypothetical impact threat" from a very large asteroid? And why are scientists at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory studying how to destroy a giant asteroid that is heading toward Earth using nuclear weapons? If there is no threat anywhere on the horizon, wouldn't you think that those scientists would have something better to do with their time? On top of everything else, NASA recently concluded a secretive operation known as "OSIRIS-REx" in which a spacecraft visited an asteroid, plucked a piece off of it, and returned it to Earth. While the general public is being told that we are safe for decades to come, a tremendous amount of time, money and energy is being poured into preparing for a potential asteroid threat.

Do they know something that the rest of us do not? I am convinced that there is far more going on behind the scenes than we are being told. They never say anything that will alarm the general public, but at the same time they are pumping vast resources into "sophisticated planetary defense efforts" that are intended to protect our planet "from potentially hazardous asteroids"... Would we be prepared if a potentially life-threatening object from space were on a collision course with Earth? And how much damage could an incoming asteroid actually cause?

Such questions remain at the forefront of increasingly sophisticated planetary defense efforts aimed at protecting our planet from potentially hazardous asteroids. Yet even if astronomers are able to identify a space object that might pose a threat, a significant number of uncertainties remain: the object's size, composition, structure, and potential impact locations all must be considered, as these factors can dramatically influence what happens once an asteroid enters Earth's atmosphere. If there are no near-Earth objects that are a threat, why spend so much money on this? We certainly have a lot of other very pressing matters that do require funding right now. NASA is either wasting our money, or something else is going on.

Interestingly, NASA is a participant in the 2027 Planetary Defense Conference. An exercise is underway that simulates how authorities would respond to a "Tunguska-sized object" that is headed toward Earth...Additionally, NASA's Center for Near-Earth Object Studies (CNEOS) regularly participates in planetary defense exercises designed to test these assessment methods, with current scenarios under development for the 2027 Planetary Defense Conference that take a cue from one of history's most concerning airburst events.

"The current exercise that is underway for the 2027 Planetary Defense Conference is based around a hypothetical impact threat from a roughly Tunguska-sized object," Wheeler told The Debrief. For those of you that are not familiar, in 1908 the Tunguska event flattened approximately 2,000 square kilometers in Siberia...

Tunguska event, enormous explosion that is estimated to have occurred at 7:14 AM plus or minus one minute on June 30, 1908, at an altitude of 5-10 km (15,000-30,000 feet), flattening some 2,000 square km (500,000 acres) and charring more than 100 square km of pine forest near the Podkamennaya Tunguska River in central Siberia (60°55′ N 101°57′ E), Russia. The energy of the explosion is estimated to have been equivalent to the explosive force of as much as 15 megatons of TNT - a thousand times more powerful than the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima, Japan, on August 6, 1945.

Why hold an exercise of this nature if there is absolutely no threat of this sort of event occurring for decades to come? And why did NASA just send a small spacecraft to grab a piece of an asteroid known as Bennu and bring it back to Earth?... On Sept. 30, NASA formally concluded OSIRIS-REx, the historic first U.S. mission to pluck a pristine piece of an asteroid and deliver it safely back to Earth.

The van-sized OSIRIS-REx spacecraft - whose name is short for Origins, Spectral Interpretation, Resource Identification, Security-Regolith Explorer - visited and sampled Bennu, an ancient space rock holding pristine remnants from the dawn of our solar system more than 4.5 billion years ago. Among those cosmic relics are raw organic building blocks, the kind that may have seeded life on Earth.

"I have known this day was coming for a long time, but it is still difficult to see it arrive," OSIRIS-REx Principal Investigator Dante Lauretta, who's based at the University of Arizona, said in a post on LinkedIn. "I feel enormous pride in what we accomplished together, and real sadness that this journey has come to an end."

That was certainly an impressive scientific achievement. But it also cost a lot of money to do that. Why not spend all that money in more productive ways if asteroids are no threat to us?And why study how to destroy asteroids using nuclear weapons if there won't be any asteroids to destroy for the rest of this century?

A shocking study that was recently conducted by scientists at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is raising a lot of eyebrows... "A new study from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) has used advanced 3D simulations to assess how effective a nuclear weapon would be for destroying a dangerous space object such as a large asteroid on a collision course with Earth."

Yeah, that definitely sounds a lot like a Bruce Willis movie that I once watched. But in that case, a civilization-killing space rock was actually headed toward us. Why are our scientists running so many simulations if we are facing absolutely no threat?...

For their new work, the team ran simulations to explore how an asteroid might be affected by a nuclear blast somewhere near its surface, with the aim of rapidly heating and vaporizing material within it. They began with more than 1,500 one-dimensional simulations to test the approach before running three fully three-dimensional simulations modelling the effects of a nuclear blast on a roughly 160-meter (525-foot) asteroid, altering factors such as the distance to the asteroid when detonation occurred and assumptions about how easily it would be damaged by such an explosion.

"These simulations give us a much more detailed picture of how an asteroid may respond to a nuclear mitigation attempt," Isaiah Santistevan, who led the study, said in a statement. "Being able to model damage, fracture and material motion in three dimensions is an important step toward improving our ability to evaluate planetary defense options." More resources are being devoted to "planetary defense" than ever before in our history. Is this being done for a reason, or is this just a colossal misallocation of public funds?

Those of you that have been following my work for an extended period of time already know what I think. I believe that there are very serious threats out there that are not being discussed publicly. It is always policy to keep the general public as calm as possible when we are facing a very serious threat. That means not telling the general public the truth.

Of course everyone should be able to see that our particular neighborhood of the cosmos has been unusually busy lately. I asked Google about this, and this is the response that I got... "Yes, data from the American Meteor Society and USA Today confirms an unusual and significant surge in large fireball events during the first quarter of 2026, especially through March."

This week, we witnessed the peak of the Orionid meteor shower on Wednesday, Oct. 21, and it continued into early Thursday morning. The shower is made up of debris left behind by Halley's Comet, which burns up as it enters Earth's atmosphere. Under dark, ideal conditions, the Orionids can produce about 10 to 20 meteors per hour. But a bright waxing gibbous moon will hide some of the fainter streaks. NASA says the moon is expected to set around 3 a.m. local time, giving skywatchers a darker window before sunrise.

The fireballs in the sky that people are marveling at right now are no threat. But there are giant space rocks that are looming in the distance. One of these days, our luck will run out and one of them will hit us. When that day arrives, everything will change and millions will suddenly die."

"How to Bring a Nation to Its Knees: High Inflation"

"How to Bring a Nation to Its Knees: High Inflation"
by John Leake

"President Trump seems to be waking up to the extreme peril that high inflation poses to the economic, social, political, and moral order of a nation. During the dark days of the spring 2020 lockdowns, I had a conversation with my father - who was a supporter of the policy - about the inflationary wave that would likely head our way from impairing labor and supply chains and the CARES ACT generation and dispersal of $2.2 trillion out of thin air. As I told him: "If major inflation hits this country, the disaster for the working and middle classes - not to mention retired people with modest savings on a fixed income - will make COVID-19 look like a pleasant walk in the park.

High price inflation is probably the most destructive economic thing that can afflict a society, and can literally bring a once proud nation to its knees. Though commonly understood as a general rise in prices, its deeper perniciousness lies in its progressive impairment of money’s essential functions: as a medium of exchange, a store of value, and a reliable unit of account.

When the purchasing power of money declines rapidly and unpredictably, the consequences extend far beyond higher grocery bills and increased housing costs. High inflation erodes savings, distorts economic decision-making, destroys confidence in public institutions, aggravates social conflicts, and threatens political stability.

If you want to know why the people in Germany during the Weimar Republic years became psychologically and spiritually destabilized, understanding the era’s inflation is a good place to start. If you review the biography of virtually any ranking Nazi during the Third Reich, you will observe that most experienced profound economic and social setbacks during the hyperinflation years of the early twenties. Hyperinflation spawned monsters.

The first consequence of inflation is the erosion of purchasing power. When prices rise faster than wages, salaries, pensions, and other income, households experience a decline in their real standard of living. Those with fixed incomes, particularly retirees and pensioners, are especially vulnerable. A person who has spent decades accumulating savings discovers to his shock - even to his despair - that the purchasing power of his savings has been substantially diminished through no fault of his own.

At an annual inflation rate of 20 percent, money held without interest loses approximately 60 percent of its purchasing power over five years. Inflation also produces an insidious redistribution of wealth. Individuals holding cash, fixed-rate bonds, or other nominal financial claims suffer losses in real terms, while some debtors benefit by repaying their obligations with money worth less than when they borrowed it.

Governments with substantial fixed-rate debt may similarly benefit from unexpected inflation, effectively reducing the real burden of their obligations. This redistribution is neither transparent nor equitable. It occurs without legislative authorization and often rewards those best positioned to anticipate inflation and protect their assets.

An especially troubling consequence is the erosion of the middle class. Wealthy individuals have greater opportunities to protect themselves by investing in real estate, equities, businesses, commodities, and other assets whose nominal values may rise with inflation.

Lower-income households often have little wealth to protect, but suffer acutely from increases in the prices of necessities. Middle-class households are especially exposed when much of their accumulated wealth consists of bank deposits, pensions, and fixed-income investments. Inflation therefore undermine the financial independence that characterizes a stable middle class.

High inflation also corrupts the data function of prices. In a functioning market economy, relative prices communicate information about scarcity, consumer preferences, production costs, and investment opportunities. When prices change rapidly, businesses find it difficult to distinguish genuine changes in demand from monetary disturbances. Long-term contracts become hazardous, accounting becomes unreliable, and investment decisions become more speculative. Entrepreneurs devote increasing resources to predicting inflation rather than improving products, developing technologies, or increasing productivity.

This uncertainty discourages long-term economic planning. Businesses hesitate to invest in factories, equipment, and research when future costs, revenues, and financing conditions become unpredictable. Lenders demand higher interest rates to compensate for anticipated inflation, increasing borrowing costs. If monetary authorities subsequently raise interest rates sharply to suppress inflation, the resulting contraction will likely produce bankruptcies, unemployment, and recession. Thus, high inflation can inflict economic damage both while it persists and during the painful process of bringing it under control.

Inflation also weakens the moral and psychological foundations of economic life. Saving, thrift, delayed gratification, and prudent financial planning depend upon a reasonable expectation that money accumulated today will retain meaningful value tomorrow. For a middle class man trying to provide economic security for his family, this can cause constant, gnawing worry.

In 1925, Thomas Mann published a poignant short story titled “Disorder and Early Sorrow” about a worried professor who is briefly distracted from his concerns when his children throw a house party. The climax occurs when his favorite young daughter, Lorchen (Elisabeth) develops an intense, overwhelming crush on one of the older male guests who danced with her as a polite gesture. The little girl’s heartbreak - as deeply felt as it is - starkly contrasts with the chaotic, collapsing external world of economic inflation of which the professor is keenly aware.

When the expectation of price stability collapses, individuals are encouraged to spend quickly, borrow opportunistically, and speculate in assets rather than accumulate productive savings. The patient saver is punished while the highly leveraged speculator prospers. Such circumstances can foster a widespread perception that economic success no longer depends on diligence, competence, and productive contribution, but upon financial maneuvering and privileged access to information.

The political consequences of this - as we saw during the Weimar Republic - can be disastrous. As living standards deteriorate, citizens look for someone to blame and demand retribution. Workers demand higher wages, businesses raise prices to protect margins, and governments face mounting pressure to subsidize necessities and increase social expenditures. These responses may seem urgently needed, but if they are financed through additional monetary expansion, they will likely worsen the inflation. Society can become trapped in a cycle of escalating demands, mutual recrimination, and declining confidence.

Recent inflationary disasters in Zimbabwe and Venezuela demonstrate how extreme monetary instability, combined with institutional and productive failures, contributed to shortages, capital flight, impoverishment, and mass emigration.

Citizens who believe that political authorities have permitted or engineered the destruction of their savings will likely question the legitimacy of the institutions responsible for managing the currency. Populist movements will likely harness anger by promising decisive action against bankers, political elites, foreign interests, or alleged internal enemies. Economic desperation will likely make authoritarian solutions appear attractive to populations that might otherwise reject them.

In short, the US government’s endless train of fraudulent schemes, foreign wars, lunacy and total lack of discipline have created fertile ground for inflation, and it now appears that the genie may have escaped from the lantern. This probably explains why President Trump now seems keen to put an end to the moronic US proxy war against Russia in Ukraine. Americans who quickly became obsessed with the territorial integrity of the Donbas will - if hit hard by inflation - quickly discover that they have other priorities much closer to home."

Freely download "Disorder And Early Sorrow", by Thomas Mann, here:

"Something Is Seriously Wrong at McDonald’s...Americans Are Starting to Notice"

Full screen recommended.
Food Meter, 10/24/26
"Something Is Seriously Wrong at McDonald’s...
Americans Are Starting to Notice"
"Something is seriously wrong at McDonald's, and Americans are starting to notice. This summer, the biggest restaurant company on the planet told Wall Street that its American sales grew by eight-tenths of one percent. That's not eight percent, and it's not even one percent. And even that tiny number only exists because the people who still pull up to the window are paying more, while fewer people pull up at all. In the very same quarter, Burger King's American sales jumped eight and a half percent. Stay with me, because the reason is bigger than a burger."
Comments here:

"What Are They Really Putting in Our Food? This Is Absolutely Disturbing!"

Full screen recommended.
Redacted, 10/24/26
"What Are They Really Putting in Our Food?
 This Is Absolutely Disturbing!"
"Clayton Morris and guest Kim Bright expose how synthetic, lab-engineered foods are rapidly taking over grocery store shelves under misleading labels. They discuss 3D-printed meats and salmon, lab-grown eggs approved under FDA self-certification loopholes, and experimental cookies derived from recycled plastic waste. The discussion details how commercial produce is coated in chemical waxes and organic lettuce treated with neurotoxins, while popular organic bread brands test positive for glyphosate."
Comments here:

Friday, October 23, 2026

"Alert! Russia Evacuating Scientists, France Prepares for Martial Law + Nuclear War"

Full screen recommended.
Canadian Prepper, 10/23/26
"Alert! Russia Evacuating Scientists,
France Prepares for Martial Law + Nuclear War"
Comments here:

"A Dream You Never Want to Wake From"

Full screen recommended.
"A Dream You Never Want to Wake From"
"Step into a peaceful dreamlike fantasy world where enchanted palaces float above the clouds, crystal forests sparkle beneath the stars, glowing flowers drift across magical lakes, and waterfalls fall softly into the endless sky. This relaxing fantasy ambient music combines soft violin, warm piano, delicate harp, angelic vocal textures, crystal bells, and gentle atmospheric sounds to create a calm and sleepy atmosphere. Let the music carry you through this magical kingdom and slowly leave the noise of the world behind. Perfect for sleep, relaxation, meditation, studying, reading, dreaming, and peaceful nighttime moments."

Musical Interlude: 2002, "Kindred Spirits"

Full screen recommended.
2002, "Kindred Spirits"
"Once we sailed upon the seas. Now we sail among the stars. This song was composed as a tribute to our friend, harpist Hilary Stagg, who left us far too soon. Hilary loved the sea and he loved the stars."

"A Look to the Heavens"

“Like delicate cosmic petals, these clouds of interstellar dust and gas have blossomed 1,300 light-years away in the fertile star fields of the constellation Cepheus. Sometimes called the Iris Nebula and dutifully cataloged as NGC 7023 this is not the only nebula in the sky to evoke the imagery of flowers. Still, this remarkable image shows off the Iris Nebula's range of colors and symmetries in impressive detail. Within the Iris, dusty nebular material surrounds a hot, young star.
Click image for larger size.
The dominant color of the brighter reflection nebula is blue, characteristic of dust grains reflecting starlight. Central filaments of the dusty clouds glow with a faint reddish photoluminesence as some dust grains effectively convert the star's invisible ultraviolet radiation to visible red light. Infrared observations indicate that this nebula may contain complex carbon molecules known as PAHs. The bright blue portion of the Iris Nebula is about six light-years across.”

"Alone..."

“We are all alone, born alone, die alone, and – in spite of True Romance magazines – we shall all someday look back on our lives and see that, in spite of our company, we were alone the whole way. I do not say lonely – at least, not all the time – but essentially, and finally, alone. This is what makes your self-respect so important, and I don’t see how you can respect yourself if you must look in the hearts and minds of others for your happiness.”
- Hunter S. Thompson,
“The Proud Highway: Saga of a Desperate Southern Gentleman”

Free Download; Henry Hazlitt, "Economics in One Lesson."

"'Economics In One Lesson':
 A Review of a Classic"
by Sean Ring

"If you’ve ever found yourself cornered at a dinner party by that one guy with a conspiratorial gleam in his eye and a penchant for explaining why the economy is “just a series of smoke and mirrors,” you’ll appreciate Henry Hazlitt’s "Economics in One Lesson." It’s The Book that offers the economically curious a set of brass knuckles to face the muddled nonsense of popular economic “thought.” And by “thought,” I mean whatever passes for it in political speeches, social media debates, or the average op-ed.

But let’s not get ahead of ourselves. First, a quick primer: Hazlitt’s book is an economics classic, albeit one that uses plain language to dismantle the kind of Keynesian tomfoolery that has turned deficit spending into a national sport. Published in 1946, it’s a slim volume that packs a heavyweight punch. Think of it as the literary equivalent of Muhammad Ali in his prime - quick, elegant, and devastatingly effective.

A Double-Edged Sword: Hazlitt begins with the titular “One Lesson”: the art of economics consists of not just looking at the immediate effects of any policy but at the longer-term effects, as well. Further, it demands that the consequences of that policy be examined for all groups, not just one. A lesson so obvious it seems like common sense - until you realize it’s precisely what most policymakers and pundits ignore.

Why? Looking at all the consequences of an economic policy requires work, patience, and critical thinking. It’s far easier to promise free lunches than to explain why those lunches aren’t free. Hazlitt’s brilliance lies in his ability to show how economic fallacies perpetuate precisely because they focus on immediate, visible effects while conveniently ignoring long-term, invisible ones. The result? Politicians handing out economic band-aids while ignoring the arterial bleeding beneath.

Smashing Windows (and Fallacies): Hazlitt’s first stop is the famous “Broken Window Fallacy.” You’ve heard the argument before, even if you didn’t realize it: destruction stimulates economic activity. The idea is that rebuilding a shattered window, for example, creates jobs for glaziers, boosts spending, and pumps life into the economy. What could possibly be wrong with that? Everything.

Hazlitt dismantles this nonsense by pointing out the unseen cost: the money spent on the new window could have been used for something else - perhaps a new pair of shoes. Instead of creating new value, we’ve merely replaced what was lost. It’s like celebrating a flat tire because it “supports” the tire repair industry. Hazlitt’s takeaway: destruction doesn’t create wealth; it squanders resources. So, the next time someone extols the “economic benefits” of rebuilding after a hurricane or a riot, feel free to remind them that their logic is as sound as a screen door on a submarine.

Not Free, But Taxpayer-Funded: Ah, public works! The bread and circuses of modern governance. Hazlitt addresses the perennial myth that government spending on infrastructure - roads, bridges, statues of politicians with dubious legacies - is a magic wand for economic growth.

But wait, you ask, aren’t those things good? Sure, they can be. The problem, Hazlitt reminds us, is that taxes fund such projects. And taxes, lest we forget, take money out of the pockets of individuals and businesses. What could those people have done with that money? We’ll never know because the government has already spent it on a bridge to nowhere. Hazlitt’s biting critique should be required reading for anyone who still believes in the economic tooth fairy.

Luddites of the World, Unite! Ever since the dawn of the Industrial Revolution, there’s been a persistent fear that machines will destroy jobs. Hazlitt gleefully trashes this notion, pointing out that technological progress doesn’t eliminate jobs; it reallocates them. Machines increase productivity, lower costs, and free up human labor for other pursuits - like writing snarky economic reviews. It’s a shame Barack Obama didn’t read this book. Otherwise, he wouldn’t have bemoaned how ATMs took the jobs of bank tellers. (They didn’t; see here.)

The real “curse” of machinery isn’t job destruction; it exposes the economic illiteracy of those who cry wolf every time a new technology emerges. Remember when computers were going to put us all out of work? Funny how that turned out.

The Donald Should Read About Tariffs: Hazlitt’s takedown of tariffs is a masterclass in economic wit. Hazlitt argues tariffs are a tax on consumers disguised as “protection” for domestic industries. Yes, they shield those businesses from foreign competition. But they shield them at the expense of everyone else. Higher prices, reduced choices, and economic inefficiency are the actual costs of protectionism. So, the next time someone suggests that tariffs are a “win” for the economy, remind them that taxing your citizens to prop up uncompetitive industries is about as bright as burning your house down to keep warm.

Inflation: The Illusion of Prosperity: Hazlitt’s chapter on inflation is remarkably prescient in today’s economic climate. He explains inflation is a stealthy way for governments to rob their citizens, not a sign of prosperity. It’s a tax that a central bank unethically levies, not a legislature. Inflation erodes the value of savings, distorts investment, and wreaks havoc on the economy. And yet, inflation is often sold to the public as a necessary evil or even a good thing. Hazlitt’s advice? Don’t buy it. Inflation benefits debtors (read: governments) at the expense of savers and wage earners. It’s the economic equivalent of a shell game, and you’re the sucker being fleeced.

Profit: Capitalism’s Dirty Word: Perhaps one of Hazlitt’s most important lessons is his defense of profits. In an era where “profit” is often treated as a four-letter word, Hazlitt reminds us that profits are essential for economic progress. They signal where resources should be allocated, incentivize innovation, and reward risk-taking. Destroy profits, and you destroy the engine of growth. It’s a message that should resonate with anyone who’s ever complained about greedy corporations while simultaneously complaining about them by posting on X from their iPhones while wolfing down avocado toast and an egg nog latte.

Why You Should Read This Book (Again): Hazlitt’s "Economics in One Lesson" is a survival guide for navigating the economic nonsense that permeates modern discourse. So, the next time someone tells you that we need more government spending, higher tariffs, or artificially low interest rates, do yourself a favor: hand them a copy of "Economics in One Lesson" and watch as their arguments crumble faster than a house caught in a tornado’s path.

Wrap Up: Hazlitt’s "Economics in One Lesson" is a welcome relief in a world celebrating economic illiteracy. It reminds us that good economics is about understanding the unseen, the long-term, and the big picture. So, grab a copy, pour yourself a stiff drink, and prepare to see the world - and its economic absurdities - in a new light. Just be warned: once you’ve read Hazlitt, you’ll never be able to watch the news without yelling at your TV."
Freely download "Economics In One Lesson", by Henry Hazlitt, here:

"Americans Are Borrowing to Survive"

"Americans Are Borrowing to Survive"
by Martin Armstrong

"Americans are increasingly financing the basic necessities of life because their paychecks are no longer stretching far enough. Buy-now-pay-later financing has exploded into a $160 billion industry, according to research cited by the Associated Press, with the use of short-term pay-in-four loans increasing nearly 80% since 2023. What began as a convenient way to purchase electronics or clothing is now being used for groceries, transportation, household bills, and even rent. We have reached the point where people are borrowing against their next paycheck to purchase things they need to survive today.

The Federal Reserve’s latest household survey found that 16% of American adults used buy-now-pay-later services in 2025, compared with only 10% in 2021. Among households earning between $25,000 and $49,999, the participation rate reached 23%, compared with 12% among those earning $100,000 or more. The Fed also found that 30% of users identified affordability as the single most important reason for using installment financing. Another 20% reported using these services for groceries or food delivery. Think about what those numbers are telling us. Millions of Americans are dividing relatively small purchases into installments because paying the entire amount upfront would place too much pressure on their finances.

The situation becomes even more alarming when examining repayment problems. The Fed found that 26% of buy-now-pay-later users made at least one late payment during 2025. Among users earning less than $25,000, that figure reached 40%, while 33% of those earning between $25,000 and $49,999 fell behind. Compare that with only 11% of users earning $100,000 or more. These are enormous differences that demonstrate how lower-income consumers are increasingly struggling to manage even short-term obligations. Of those who paid late, 64% reported being charged additional fees. The people least able to absorb another expense are often the very people being penalized for falling behind.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau uncovered another troubling pattern. Its study of 2022 borrowing found that approximately 63% of buy-now-pay-later borrowers had multiple simultaneous installment loans, while 33% borrowed from more than one provider. The average borrower originated 9.5 loans during the year, and roughly one in five borrowers took out more than one loan per month on average. This is how relatively small obligations accumulate into a serious financial burden. A consumer may believe that four payments of $25 are manageable, but what happens when that person has ten separate payment schedules running simultaneously? The money has already been committed before the next paycheck even arrives.

The Federal Reserve’s October 2026 Survey of Consumer Finances reveals that this financial deterioration extends far beyond installment purchases. The share of American families reporting that they were behind on loan payments increased from approximately 12% in 2022 to nearly 20% in 2025. Families devoting more than 40% of their income to debt payments increased from 6.5% to 8.6%, the highest share since 2013. The median debt-payment-to-income ratio climbed to 15.4%, while the overall debt-to-income ratio reached 94.9%.

The Fed reported that real median family income increased 7% between 2022 and 2025, reaching $82,200, yet median net worth increased only 2% after adjusting for inflation. The bottom quarter of households experienced a staggering 50% decline in net worth, while the wealthiest households continued benefiting from appreciating financial assets. Among families holding stocks, median stock holdings increased 36% to $77,400. This is why the stock market can continue making new highs while millions of people struggle to pay their bills. The financial press looks at rising asset prices and declares prosperity, but a family with no meaningful investments receives absolutely no benefit from that rally.

We must also understand what inflation has done to the average household since 2020. Prices surged during the pandemic, and those increases were NEVER reversed. The politicians continue discussing inflation as though a decline in the annual rate somehow restores purchasing power. It does not. A family that was spending $1,000 on necessities before the pandemic may now need approximately $1,300 to purchase a comparable basket of goods and services, depending on the items involved. Another 3% or 4% inflation increase comes on top of that already elevated expense.

The latest retail sales figures provide another example of how misleading the economic statistics have become. September retail sales increased 0.8%, but gasoline station sales surged 7.1% as energy prices rose. The retail sales control group used in GDP calculations increased only 0.1%, below expectations. Retail sales are reported in nominal dollars, meaning that higher prices can inflate the sales figures without consumers purchasing additional goods. When gasoline becomes more expensive, Americans still have to drive to work. The government records higher spending, but the consumer has less disposable income available for everything else. This is hardly evidence of improving living standards.

Bank of America Institute reported this week that nearly one in five households using buy-now-pay-later financing had repayments exceeding $500. Its analysts did not characterize the overall trend as an immediate crisis, but the growing reliance on installment financing deserves attention when combined with weakening labor conditions and rising household delinquencies. A person who uses credit strategically to avoid interest is in a very different position from someone who must finance groceries because there is insufficient money in the checking account.

We are developing two entirely different consumer economies. Those with substantial assets, investment income, and mortgages locked in at 3% can continue spending while benefiting from rising markets. Those dependent upon wages face higher rents, expensive vehicle financing, mounting insurance premiums, and increasingly difficult choices about ordinary household expenses. The latest Federal Reserve data show that nearly one in five families have fallen behind on loan payments, while the use of installment financing continues expanding. These people are not purchasing luxury yachts or speculating in the stock market. Many are simply attempting to maintain a standard of living that their income no longer supports.

The financial industry has discovered how to divide an unaffordable purchase into four manageable-looking payments, but it has not solved the underlying problem. Every installment is a claim against future income, and when enough of those claims accumulate, the household loses the flexibility to absorb even a minor emergency. Americans are being encouraged to finance the present with money they have not yet earned, while Washington continues spending money it must borrow. The numbers reveal an economy where financial pressure is building beneath the surface, and the people experiencing that pressure are increasingly the ones who can least afford another setback."

"All the Colors of the Revolution"

Click image for larger size.
"All the Colors of the Revolution"
by Dan Denning

Laramie, Wyoming - "Gross. We’re talking about gross things today. Gross interest, specifically. And we’re going to deal with an objection we get from readers about government spending and a gross misunderstanding of its supposed benefits. This week’s first research item is inspired by the year-end Monthly Statement of the Treasury that came out this week. We already knew the total deficit for the government’s fiscal year was just under $2 trillion. But there were two devilish details in the report worth mentioning.

First, since the TV is full of awful election ads, the chart above should remind you that America is already a welfare state. Fully 60% of total federal spending of $7.4 trillion, or $4.46 trillion to be exact, comes from Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and unemployment and disability payments.

Democrats want to extend some of those benefits to everyone–including anyone in the country illegally. Republicans probably disagree, but don’t do a really good job of saying so (and the worst argue for some kind of ‘amnesty’ or ‘path to citizenship’ which might then at least put some workers on payrolls paying FICA).

‘Morons,’ to quote from The Princess Bride. If you include ‘Net Interest’ in the spending calculation, the totals leap to $5.51 trillion and 75% respectively. So once the interest on the national credit card is included, three quarters of every Federal dollar goes to just a handful of programs. And that’s not even the worst of it.

Buried in the pages of the monthly report is the ‘gross interest’ figure. This includes interest paid on bonds held by Federal agencies or authorities. It is not part of the ‘net’ calculation for that reason. But the ‘gross interest’ figure is $1.35 trillion, or 47% of all the money generated from income taxes in 2026 ($2.84 trillion).

Half your tax dollar is being spent on money already borrowed and already spent. Even though the 10-year US Treasury yield fell on the week, it still closed above 5% today. And this buried little nugget of debt finance, like a tumor in the liver, is the reason the Primary Trend for bond prices is down (and up for yields). Is there NO silver lining to this?

Well, some readers write in to us from time to time, complaining that when we gripe about the size of government spending and its fake contribution to GDP, we fail to note that the spending is going somewhere…ending up in someone’s pocket…and in some sense…contributes to the ‘general welfare,’ or at least the specific prosperity of the firepower industry, the banks, or the politicians, bureaucrats, and fraudsters who are paid to dole out or receive taxpayer money.

It’s an interest expense for the government. But it’s income for someone, somewhere, right? A pithy response would be ‘whatever.’ The government produces nothing of value and can only spend what it takes from someone else.

A more considered response is that you have to look beyond what is seen to see what’s missing. We owe this insight to Frederic Bastiat and, later, Henry Hazlitt. All the money the government spends comes from taxpayers. That’s money that isn’t saved, invested, or spent based on the preferences and wants of individuals and households. It gets collectivized. And the things that people would have invested in, created, or purchased never happen. That’s what’s unseen.

Borrowing money to spend, rather than paying for it out of taxes, only hides its negative effects. If the money is borrowed, it still has to be paid back later by taxpayers or their children. Or paid for in the way of high inflation. That’s the government’s plan now. And that’s a problem for us.

The core of the problem is the modern mindset of thinking you know how to spend other people’s money better than they do…and not having enough self-knowledge (or historical knowledge) to realize that government spending tends to subsidize failure and raise prices for services (education, health insurance, accounting). You’d have to be a moron or a communist not to understand this, yet still support it.

As Milton Friedman pointed out, when you’re spending somebody else’s money on someone else, you don’t care about the cost or the quality of the goods or services. Think of when you spend your own money on yourself. You care about both.

Friedman understood that even well-meaning people in government end up being wasteful and unproductive losers when it comes to spending other people’s money on other people. Friedman once said the only executive Departments worth keeping, and required by the Constitution for the Federal government to do its job – were the Department of State, Department of the Treasury, Department of War, and the Justice Department.

You could throw everything else in the garbage bin. If there was work that needed to be done, let the private sector do it. If there are discretionary services certain States wish to provide, let them pay for it. No collective burden sharing for regional or local priorities. Decentralization of government, more of which shortly. But a bit more on accounting for the real cost of debt, this time in the private sector and via a chart.

This is Robert Shiller’s cyclically adjusted price earnings ratio (CAPE) already making a new all-time high…IF you include the real interest cost of debt held off the balance sheet of S&P 500 companies in special purpose vehicles (SPVs). New research from New Constructs reckons there is around $230 billion in interest expense that is un-accounted for in the reported earnings of S&P 500 companies. So what?

Well, that amounts to about a 9% reduction in the earnings of S&P 500 companies, assuming the calculation for the ‘real’ interest expense is correct. Price is the numerator in a P/E ratio. Earnings are the denominator. Ratios being ratios, reducing earnings by $230 billion increases the ratio. Et voila…you get CAPE now going past the previous 1999 high at the peak of the dot.com bubble.

If you’re a long-time reader, you already know this. The only real question, then, is if it means we’re any closer to a sell-off in the entire market, or in just the AI hyperscalers. That’s where the market’s best performance has come from since 2022. And that’s where most of the off-balance sheet debt (and interest expense) currently lives."

P.S. What color would you like your American coup? Picking up on last week’s note about the history of propaganda and psychological warfare used by American agencies against the American people @DataRepublican on X published leaked recordings from a webcall that reveal a strategy to provoke a constitutional crisis prior to the 2028 election.

Headed by ex-USAID officials and former and current intelligence officers and Pentagon officials, the plan is to use ‘useful idiots’ like the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) to cause violence, rioting, property damage and chaos in certain major American cities. The aim is to provoke President Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act and quell the dissent with the military or National Guard. Then, local officials (including prominent and sympathetic mayors and governors) would declare the Federal action illegitimate and call for major constitutional reforms while annulling Federal authority.

Don’t get me wrong. I tend to support things that result in a smaller and less powerful central government. But the move here isn’t to make the government less powerful. It’s to replace democratically elected representatives with a permanent unelected elitist cabal. These are the same people who’ve been destabilizing and invading foreign countries for decades, leaving them in shambles and their people in misery. Now, in the name of ‘democracy,’ they have a plan to set the American people straight. Just great.

Those in charge reckon you only need 3.5% of the population engaged in non-violent resistance/civil disobedience or active insurrection to engineer a change in the control of major institutions, at which point you can re-write the rules (admit several new states to the Union, pack the Supreme Court, and send all who disagree to jail or to re-education camps). What do you think? Worst case scenario? Or highly likely? How are you preparing? More on this next week."