StatCounter

Wednesday, September 9, 2026

”The 5 Stages of Economic Collapse”

”The 5 Stages of Economic Collapse” 
by Dmitry Orlov

“Elizabeth Kübler-Ross defined the five stages of coming to terms with grief and tragedy as denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance, and applied it quite successfully to various forms of catastrophic personal loss, such as death of a loved one, sudden end to one’s career, and so forth. Several thinkers, notably James Howard Kunstler and, more recently John Michael Greer, have pointed out that the Kübler-Ross model is also quite terrifyingly accurate in reflecting the process by which society as a whole (or at least the informed and thinking parts of it) is reconciling itself to the inevitability of a discontinuous future, with our institutions and life support systems undermined by a combination of resource depletion, catastrophic climate change, and political impotence.

But so far, little has been said specifically about the finer structure of these discontinuities. Instead, there is to be found continuum of subjective judgments, ranging from “a severe and prolonged recession” (the prediction we most often read in the financial press), to Kunstler’s evocative but unscientific-sounding “clusterf**k,” to the ever-popular “Collapse of Western Civilization,” painted with an ever-wider brush-stroke.

For those of us who have already gone through all of the emotional stages of reconciling ourselves to the prospect of social and economic upheaval, it might be helpful to have a more precise terminology that goes beyond such emotionally charged phrases. Defining a taxonomy of collapses might prove to be more than just an intellectual exercise: based on our abilities and circumstances, some of us may be able to specifically plan for a certain stage of collapse as a temporary, or even permanent, stopping point.

Even if society at the current stage of socioeconomic complexity will no longer be possible, and even if, as Tainter points in his “Collapse of Complex Societies,” there are circumstances in which collapse happens to be the correct adaptive response, it need not automatically cause a population crash, with the survivors disbanding into solitary, feral humans dispersed in the wilderness and subsisting miserably. Collapse can be conceived of as an orderly, organized retreat rather than a rout.

For instance, the collapse of the Soviet Union – our most recent and my personal favorite example of an imperial collapse – did not reach the point of political disintegration of the republics that made it up, although some of them (Georgia, Moldova) did lose some territory to separatist movements. And although most of the economy shut down for a time, many institutions, including the military, public utilities, and public transportation, continued to function throughout. And although there was much social dislocation and suffering, society as a whole did not collapse, because most of the population did not lose access to food, housing, medicine, or any of the other survival necessities. The command-and-control structure of the Soviet economy largely decoupled the necessities of daily life from any element of market psychology, associating them instead with physical flows of energy and physical access to resources. Thus situation, as I argue in my forthcoming book, Reinventing Collapse, allowed the Soviet population to inadvertently achieve a greater level of collapse-preparedness than is currently possible in the United States.

Having given a lot of thought to both the differences and the similarities between the two superpowers – the one that has collapsed already, and the one that is collapsing as I write this – I feel ready to attempt a bold conjecture, and define five stages of collapse, to serve as mental milestones as we gauge our own collapse-preparedness and see what can be done to improve it.

Rather than tying each phase to a particular emotion, as in the Kübler-Ross model, the proposed taxonomy ties each of the five collapse stages to the breaching of a specific level of trust, or faith, in the status quo. Although each stage causes physical, observable changes in the environment, these can be gradual, while the mental flip is generally quite swift. It is something of a cultural universal that nobody (but a real fool) wants to be the last fool to believe in a lie.

Stages of Collapse:

Stage 1: Financial collapse. Faith in “business as usual” is lost. The future is no longer assumed resemble the past in any way that allows risk to be assessed and financial assets to be guaranteed. Financial institutions become insolvent; savings are wiped out, and access to capital is lost.

Stage 2: Commercial collapse. Faith that “the market shall provide” is lost. Money is devalued and/or becomes scarce, commodities are hoarded, import and retail chains break down, and widespread shortages of survival necessities become the norm.

Stage 3: Political collapse. Faith that “the government will take care of you” is lost. As official attempts to mitigate widespread loss of access to commercial sources of survival necessities fail to make a difference, the political establishment loses legitimacy and relevance.

Stage 4: Social collapse. Faith that “your people will take care of you” is lost. As local social institutions, be they charities, community leaders, or other groups that rush in to fill the power vacuum, run out of resources or fail through internal conflict.

Stage 5: Cultural collapse. Faith in the goodness of humanity is lost. People lose their capacity for “kindness, generosity, consideration, affection, honesty, hospitality, compassion, charity” (Turnbull, "The Mountain People"). Families disband and compete as individuals for scarce resources. The new motto becomes “May you die today so that I die tomorrow” (Solzhenitsyn, "The Gulag Archipelago"). There may even be some cannibalism.

Although many people imagine collapse to be a sort of elevator that goes to the sub-basement (our Stage 5) no matter which button you push, no such automatic mechanism can be discerned. Rather, driving us all to Stage 5 will require that a concerted effort be made at each of the intervening stages. That all the players seem poised to make just such an effort may give this collapse the form a classical tragedy – a conscious but inexorable march to perdition – rather than a farce (“Oops! Ah, here we are, Stage 5.” – “So, whom do we eat first?” – “Me! I am delicious!”) Let us sketch out this process.

Financial collapse, as we are are currently observing it, consists of two parts. One is that a part of the general population is forced to move, no longer able to afford the house they bought based on inflated assessments, forged income numbers, and foolish expectations of endless asset inflation. Since, technically, they should never have been allowed to buy these houses, and were only able to do so because of financial and political malfeasance, this is actually a healthy development. The second part consists of men in expensive suits tossing bundles of suddenly worthless paper up in the air, ripping out their remaining hair, and (some of us might uncharitably hope) setting themselves on fire on the steps of the Federal Reserve. They, to express it in their own vernacular, “f**ked up,” and so this is also just as it should be.

The government response to this could be to offer some helpful homilies about “the wages of sin” and to open a few soup kitchens and flop houses in a variety of locations including Wall Street. The message would be: “You former debt addicts and gamblers, as you say, ‘f****d up,’ and so this will really hurt for a long time. We will never let you anywhere near big money again. Get yourselves over to the soup kitchen, and bring your own bowl, because we don’t do dishes.” This would result in a stable Stage 1 collapse – the Second Great Depression.

However, this is unlikely, because in the US the government happens to be debt addict and gambler number one. As individuals, we may have been as virtuous as we wished, but the government will have still run up exorbitant debts on our behalf. Every level of government, from local municipalities and authorities, which need the financial markets to finance their public works and public services, to the federal government, which relies on foreign investment to finance its endless wars, is addicted to public debt. They know they cannot stop borrowing, and so they will do anything they can to keep the game going for as long as possible.

About the only thing the government currently seems it fit to do is extend further credit to those in trouble, by setting interest rates at far below inflation, by accepting worthless bits of paper as collateral and by pumping money into insolvent financial institutions. This has the effect of diluting the dollar, further undermining its value, and will, in due course, lead to hyperinflation, which is bad enough in any economy, but is especially serious for one dominated by imports. As imports dry up and the associated parts of the economy shut down, we pass Stage 2: Commercial Collapse.

As businesses shut down, storefronts are boarded up and the population is left largely penniless and dependent on FEMA and charity for survival, the government may consider what to do next. It could, for example, repatriate all foreign troops and set them to work on public works projects designed to directly help the population. It could promote local economic self-sufficiency, by establishing community-supported agriculture programs, erecting renewable energy systems, and organizing and training local self-defense forces to maintain law and order. The Army Corps of Engineers could be ordered to bulldoze buildings erected on former farmland around city centers, return the land to cultivation, and to construct high-density solar-heated housing in urban centers to resettle those who are displaced. In the interim, it could reduce homelessness by imposing a steep tax on vacant residential properties and funneling the proceeds into rent subsidies for the indigent. With plenty of luck, such measures may be able to reverse the trend, eventually providing for a restoration of pre-Stage 2 conditions.

This may or may not be a good plan, but in any case it is rather unrealistic, because the United States, being so deeply in debt, will be forced to accede to the wishes of its foreign creditors, who own a lot of national assets (land, buildings, and businesses) and who would rather see a dependent American population slaving away working off their debt than a self-sufficient one, conveniently forgetting that they have mortgaged their children’s futures to pay for military fiascos, big houses, big cars, and flat-screen television sets. Thus, a much more likely scenario is that the federal government (knowing who butters their bread) will remain subservient to foreign financial interests. It will impose austerity conditions, maintain law and order through draconian means, and aid in the construction of foreign-owned factory towns and plantations. As people start to think that having a government may not be such a good idea, conditions become ripe for Stage 3.

If Stage 1 collapse can be observed by watching television, observing Stage 2 might require a hike or a bicycle ride to the nearest population center, while Stage 3 collapse is more than likely to be visible directly through one’s own living-room window, which may or may not still have glass in it. After a significant amount of bloodletting, much of the country becomes a no-go zone for the remaining authorities. Foreign creditors decide that their debts might not be repaid after all, cut their losses and depart in haste. The rest of the world decides to act as if there is no such place as The United States – because “nobody goes there any more.” So as not to lose out on the entertainment value, the foreign press still prints sporadic fables about Americans who eat their young, much as they did about Russia following the Soviet collapse. A few brave American expatriates who still come back to visit bring back amazing stories of a different kind, but everyone considers them eccentric and perhaps a little bit crazy.

Stage 3 collapse can sometimes be avoided by the timely introduction of international peacekeepers and through the efforts of international humanitarian NGOs. In the aftermath of a Stage 2 collapse, domestic authorities are highly unlikely to have either the resources or the legitimacy, or even the will, to arrest the collapse the dynamic and reconstitute themselves in a way that the population would accept.

As stage 3 collapse runs its course, the power vacuum left by the now defunct federal, state and local government is filled by a variety of new power structures. Remnants of former law enforcement and military, urban gangs, ethnic mafias, religious cults and wealthy property owners all attempt to build their little empires on the ruins of the big one, fighting each other over territory and access to resources. This is the age of Big Men: charismatic leaders, rabble-rousers, ruthless Macchiavelian princes and war lords. In the luckier places, they find it to their common advantage to pool their resources and amalgamate into some sort of legitimate local government, while in the rest their jostling for power leads to a spiral of conflict and open war.

Stage 4 collapse occurs when society becomes so disordered and impoverished that it can no longer support the Big Men, who become smaller and smaller, and eventually fade from view. Society fragments into extended families and small tribes of a dozen or so families, who find it advantageous to band together for mutual support and defense. This is the form of society that has existed over some 98.5% of humanity’s existence as a biological species, and can be said to be the bedrock of human existence. Humans can exist at this level of organization for thousands, perhaps millions of years. Most mammalian species go extinct after just a few million years, but, for all we know, Homo Sapiens still have a million or two left.

If pre-collapse society is too atomized, alienated and individualistic to form cohesive extended families and tribes, or if its physical environment becomes so disordered and impoverished that hunger and starvation become widespread, then Stage 5 collapse becomes likely. At this stage, a simpler biological imperative takes over, to preserve the life of the breeding couples. Families disband, the old are abandoned to their own devices, and children are only cared for up to age 3. All social unity is destroyed, and even the couples may disband for a time, preferring to forage on their own and refusing to share food. This is the state of society described by the anthropologist Colin Turnbull in his book “The Mountain People.” If society prior to Stage 5 collapse can be said to be the historical norm for humans, Stage 5 collapse brings humanity to the verge of physical extinction.

As we can easily imagine, the default is cascaded failure: each stage of collapse can easily lead to the next, perhaps even overlapping it. In Russia, the process was arrested just past Stage 3: there was considerable trouble with ethnic mafias and even some warlordism, but government authority won out in the end. In my other writings, I go into a lot of detail in describing the exact conditions that inadvertently made Russian society relatively collapse-proof. Here, I will simply say that these ingredients are not currently present in the United States.

While attempting to arrest collapse at Stage 1 and Stage 2 would probably be a dangerous waste of energy, it is probably worth everyone’s while to dig in their heels at Stage 3, definitely at Stage 4, and it is quite simply a matter of physical survival to avoid Stage 5. In certain localities – those with high population densities, as well as those that contain dangerous nuclear and industrial installations – avoiding Stage 3 collapse is rather important, to the point of inviting foreign troops and governments in to maintain order and avoid disasters. Other localities may be able to prosper indefinitely at Stage 3, and even the most impoverished environments may be able to support a sparse population subsisting indefinitely at Stage 4.

Although it is possible to prepare directly for surviving Stage 5, this seems like an altogether demoralizing thing to attempt. Preparing to survive Stages 3 and 4 may seem somewhat more reasonable, while explicitly aiming for Stage 3 may be reasonable if you plan to become one of the Big Men. Be that as it may, I must leave such preparations as an exercise for the reader. My hope is that these definitions of specific stages of collapse will enable a more specific and fruitful discussion than the one currently dominated by such vague and ultimately nonsensical terms as “the collapse of Western civilization.”

The Daily "Near You?"

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada. Thanks for stopping by!

"100 Laws of Life So You Don't Screw Your Life Up Like I Did"

Full screen recommended.
"100 Laws of Life So You Don't Screw Your Life Up Like I Did"
"Unearth 100 life-changing laws distilled from the mistakes of those who came before us. These are the lessons hard-earned through the school of knocks. These laws are your roadmap to avoiding missteps and leading a more meaningful life."
Comments here:
o
And a few others...
“Never hate your enemies. It clouds your judgment.”
- "Michael Corleone"

"Forgive your enemies, but never forget their names."
- John F. Kennedy

The Poet: Charles Mackay, "No Enemies"

 

"Has Our Luck Finally Run Out?"

"Has Our Luck Finally Run Out?"
by Charles Hugh-Smith

"Long-term cycles escape our notice because they play out over many years or even decades; few noticed the decreasing rainfall in the Mediterranean region in 150 A.D. but this gradual decline in rainfall slowly but surely reduced the grain harvests of the Roman Empire, which coupled with rising populations resulted in a reduced caloric intake for many people. This weakened their immune systems in subtle ways, leaving them more vulnerable to the Antonine Plague of 165 AD.

The decline of temperatures in Northern Europe in the early 1300s led to “years without summer” and failed grain harvests which reduced the caloric intake of most people, leaving them weakened and more vulnerable to the Black Plague which swept Europe in 1347.

I’ve mentioned the book "The Fate of Rome: Climate, Disease, and the End of an Empire" a number of times as a source for understanding the impact of natural cycles on human civilization. It’s important to note that the natural cycles and pandemics of 200 AD didn’t just cripple the Roman Empire; this same era saw the collapse of the mighty Parthian Empire of Persia, the kingdoms of India and the Han Dynasty in China.

In addition to natural cycles, there are human socio-economic cycles of debt and decay of civic values and the social contract: a proliferation of parasitic elites, a weakening of state finances and a decline in the purchasing power of wages/labor. The rising dependence on debt and its eventual collapse is a cycle noted by Kondratieff and others, and Peter Turchin listed these three dynamics as the key drivers of decisive discord of the kind that brings down empires and nations. All three are playing out globally in the present.

In this context, the election of Donald Trump in 2016 was a political expression of long-brewing discontent with precisely these issues: the rise of self-serving parasitic elites, the decay/corruption of the social contract and state finances and the decades-long decline in the purchasing power of wages/labor.

Which brings us to karma, a topic of some confusion in Western cultures more familiar with Divine Retribution than with actions having consequences even without Divine Intervention, which is the essence of karma. Broadly speaking, the U.S. squandered the opportunities presented by the end of the Cold War 30 years ago on hubristic Exceptionalism, wars of choice, parasitic elites and an unprecedented waste of resources on unproductive consumption.

Now the plan–for lack of any real plan–is to borrow trillions of dollars to fund an even more spectacular orgy of unproductive consumption, on the bizarre belief that “money” can be conjured out of thin air in essentially infinite quantities and squandered, and there will magically be no consequences of this trickery in the real world.

Actions have consequences, and after 30 years of waste, fraud and corruption being normalized by the parasitic elites while the purchasing power of labor decayed, the karmic consequences can no longer be delayed by doing more of what’s hollowed out the economy and society.

Which brings us to luck. As a general rule, historians seek explanations which leave luck out of the equation. This gives us a false confidence in the predictability and power of human will and action and cycles. Yes, cycles and human action influence outcomes, but we do a great disservice by shunting luck into the shadows as a non-factor.

If Emperor Pius had chosen someone other than Marcus Aurelius as his successor, someone weak, vain and self-absorbed like so many of Rome’s late-stage emperors, then Rome would have fallen by 170 AD as the Antonine Plague crippled finances and the army, and the invading hordes would have swept the empire into the dustbin of history. It can be argued that only Marcus Aurelius had the experience and character to sell off the Imperial treasure to raise the money needed to pay the soldiers and spend virtually his entire term in power in the front lines of battle, preserving Rome from complete collapse. That was good judgement by Pius but also good luck.

As we ponder luck, consider the estimate that had the meteorite that wiped out the dinosaurs 65 million years ago struck the Earth 30 minutes earlier or later, it would not have generated the Nuclear Winter that destroyed the dinosaurs. (A direct hit in deep water would have spawned a monstrous tsunami, but no dust cloud. A direct hit on land would have raised a dust cloud but without the water vapor/steam generated by the vaporization of millions of gallons of sea water, the cloud wouldn’t have risen high enough to encircle the planet.) That was bad luck for the dinosaurs, and good luck for the mammals who replaced them.

The global economy has been extraordinarily lucky for 75 years. Food and energy have been cheap and abundant. (If you think food and energy are expensive now, think about prices doubling or tripling, and then doubling again.)

In our complacency and hubris, we attribute this to our wonderful technologies, which we assume guarantee us permanent surpluses of energy and food. The idea that technology has reached hard limits or that it could fail doesn’t occur to us. We’ve taken good luck to be our birthright because it’s all we’ve known. We attribute this good fortune to things within our control–technology, wise investments and policies, etc. The possibility that all these powers that we consider so godlike are insignificant doesn’t occur to us because we’ve enjoyed the favorable winds of luck without even being aware of it.

We are woefully unprepared for a long run of bad luck. My sense is the cycles have turned and the good luck has drained from the hour-glass. Energy and food will no longer be cheap and abundant, our luck in leadership will vanish, and our vaunted technologies will fail to maintain an abundance so vast that we can squander the finite wealth of soil, water, resources and energy on mindless consumption.

I’m reminded of a line from an Albert King song, "Born Under a Bad Sign" (composed by Booker T. Jones and William Bell): “If it wasn’t for bad luck, I wouldn’t have no luck at all.” The next few years might have us singing this line with feeling."

"Snyder Reports, 9/9/26"

Full screen recommended.
Snyder Reports, 9/9/26
"The Economic Storm Is Here, Why You Need To Prepare.
"83% Are Not Ready For What's Coming, Recession, Layoffs & Food Crisis" 
"Why 83% of Americans won't survive the next recession  and the warning signs flashing right now. From gas stuck at $4.22 until after the midterms to JP Morgan's food crisis warning, here's why so many households have less than 1 month of expenses saved and what a recession actually does to jobs, credit, and housing. In this video I break down President Trump's latest comments on oil hitting $100 a barrel and gas dropping below $2 only after the midterms, why $4.22 today matters for your wallet, the fertilizer backup-plan problem no one is solving, and the real layoff spiral one business owner just showed me (cutting 80 employees to 40-50). Plus, why 3-6 months of savings isn't enough anymore - experts now say 9-12 months. Are we in a recession? Is a recession inevitable in 2026? And what's giving Americans a false sense of security right now? Let's get into it."
Comments here:
o
Full screen recommended.
Snyder Reports, 9/9/26
"3 Huge Changes Are Happening In America Right Now"
"3 massive changes are hitting America right now and millions are not prepared. From TSA ending a 25-year post-9/11 rule, to new bans and 50% tariffs on Canadian imports starting September 9th, to Brent crude topping $100 and gas averaging $4.22 - here's what's happening, how it impacts your wallet, and what to do next. In this video: ✓ TSA's new Gateside program - which 13 airports now let non-ticketed visitors past security and how to apply ✓ US bans on Canadian alcohol, dairy & motorcycles + 50% tariffs on cheese, furniture, steel & more ✓ Why oil over $100 means higher food, shipping, insurance & gas prices. Sound off: Should TSA open secure areas to non-ticketed visitors? Is banning Canadian products smart? How are $4.22 gas prices hitting you?"
Comments here:

"This Is What's Coming To Every Store In America And It's Scary"

Full screen recommended.
Epic Economist, 9/9/26
"This Is What's Coming To 
Every Store In America And It's Scary"
"Store closings are moving faster than the announcements. In this video, Americans film what is left after the doors shut - a mall down to a single open store, a GameStop chain vanishing from Long Island, a Starbucks marked permanently closed, a 70-year-old Chicago shop that did not make it to 71, a pharmacy pulling its shutters down, empty windows on Rodeo Drive, and three malls counting down their last weeks. What follows a closure is never in the press release. The anchor store goes, the center loses its traffic, the small shops that lived off that traffic go inside of two years, and the tax base goes with them. One closure in one town is a headline nobody outside it reads. This many is a structural change - and it is happening while the official numbers still say the consumer is fine. Both are true at once, because the spending is concentrating: moving online, moving to a handful of chains, and draining out of the places built for a country that shopped locally. Nobody is tracking how many corridors go dark in a single county, and nothing exists to put anything back."
Comments here:

"How It Really Is"

 

U.S. National Debt Clock, Real Time

"America After 9/11: 25 Years of Fear, War, Surveillance and Permanent Emergency"

"America After 9/11: 25 Years of Fear, War, 
Surveillance and Permanent Emergency"
By John & Nisha Whitehead

“I tell you, freedom and human rights in America are doomed. The U.S. government will lead the American people in - and the West in general - into an unbearable hell and a choking life.” - Osama bin Laden (October 2001)

“GIVE THEM NIGHTMARES.” - President Donald Trump (September 2026)

Days before the 25th anniversary of 9/11, President Trump flooded his Truth Social account with AI-generated fantasies of himself commanding armies of giant, red-eyed robots.

In one, Trump strides through a darkened Washington surrounded by robotic soldiers beneath the words, “THEY WILL NEVER SLEEP AGAIN.” Another declares, “THEY WILL DREAM OF US FOREVER.” A third depicts Trump seated on a mechanical throne, surrounded by an army of robots and the presidential seal, beneath the warning: “GIVE THEM NIGHTMARES.”

Twenty-five years after 9/11, one has to ask: has the nightmare ever really ended? For a quarter-century, Americans have been governed by fear: fear of terrorists and foreign enemies, fear of domestic extremists and political opponents, fear of the next attack, the next crisis, the next emergency. That fear has given us endless war, mass surveillance, militarized police, secret courts, indefinite detention, government watchlists, domestic military deployments and an imperial presidency armed with powers that would have been unthinkable before 9/11.

Now the man entrusted with the imperial powers of the modern-day presidency is publicly imagining himself enthroned over robotic armies, raining destruction on his enemies and promising nightmares. The imagery may be unhinged from reality, but the powers of the presidency are not. Neither are the questions raised by Trump’s increasingly unhinged public behavior about whether any president - especially one armed with the accumulated powers of the post-9/11 national-security state - is mentally and temperamentally fit to wield them. That is where America’s two great anniversaries of 2026 collide.

On July 4, America celebrated 250 years since the Declaration of Independence, born from a revolt against King George III and a system in which too much power rested in the hands of one ruler. At its heart was the radical proposition that government derives its just powers from the consent of the people. On September 11, we mark 25 years since the terrorist attacks that killed nearly 3,000 people, shattered the nation’s sense of security, and set in motion a massive expansion of presidential, military and national-security power.

America began by rebelling against a king. Two hundred and fifty years later, we have created a presidency with increasingly king-like powers. And now we must confront an uncomfortable question the Founders understood all too well: what happens when immense power is placed in the hands of someone whose fitness to wield it is itself in question?

To understand how we arrived at this dangerous moment, we have to go back to the moment when fear gave the government permission to begin dismantling the restraints on its power. That trail leads inevitably back to 9/11. A quarter-century later, serious questions and suspicions persist about what government officials knew before the attacks, what warnings were ignored, whether more could have been done to prevent them, and whether the American people have ever been given the full story of 9/11. Those questions deserve scrutiny, but they should not obscure what we know happened next.

Whatever the truth about what the government knew before 9/11, there can be little dispute about what the government did afterward. It used the attacks and the fear they generated to radically expand its powers over the American people.

Twenty-five years after 9/11, the “war on terror” has become a war without end, the emergency has become permanent, the surveillance state has become omnipresent, the police have become militarized, and the presidency has accumulated powers that would have horrified the revolutionaries of 1776. This is the bitter irony of America at 250.

We declared our independence from a government that subjected its people to standing armies, arbitrary searches, taxation without meaningful representation and the dictates of a ruler who considered himself above the law. Yet over the course of the past 25 years, in the name of national security, we have resurrected many of those same evils and wrapped them in the American flag.

What did 25 years of surrendering liberty in exchange for security actually buy us? Not peace. Not security. Not fiscal stability. Not a less intrusive government. Instead, we got the Patriot Act and mass surveillance; secret courts and government watchlists; indefinite detention and torture; militarized police; endless wars and trillions in debt; and a presidency increasingly untethered from Congress, the courts and constitutional restraint. And still the government insists it needs more power to keep us safe. That is the trap.

Twenty-five years later, the emergency never ended - it became the government. The USA Patriot Act, rushed through Congress just 45 days after the 9/11 attacks, drove a stake through the heart of the Bill of Rights. It dramatically expanded the government’s powers, weakened safeguards against government overreach, and opened the door to far-reaching surveillance of the American people. What was sold to us as a temporary response to terrorism became the foundation for something much larger.

The lesson we still haven’t learned: mammoth legislation that expands the government’s powers at the citizenry’s expense will not make anyone safer. Every president since has inherited the machinery of the post-9/11 national-security state. Every president has found new ways to use it. And almost none of the powers claimed in the name of emergency have ever been willingly surrendered.

George W. Bush gave us the Patriot Act, warrantless surveillance, torture, indefinite detention and preemptive war. Barack Obama expanded the drone wars, normalized targeted killings and presided over an increasingly sophisticated surveillance apparatus. Successive administrations embraced secret watchlists, warrantless data collection and sweeping executive authority.

Donald Trump did not create this machinery. He inherited it. What makes this moment so dangerous is his willingness to use that machinery aggressively, openly and with little patience for the constitutional restraints that are supposed to prevent presidents from becoming kings. Nowhere is that more apparent than in the return to preemptive war.

Not content to wage war against Afghanistan after 9/11, the United States invaded Iraq under a preemptive war doctrine that embraced striking threats before they were fully formed. The consequences were catastrophic: lives lost, trillions squandered, regions destabilized, terrorist movements radicalized, and the constitutional power to decide when the nation goes to war steadily transferred from Congress to the president.

Twenty-five years after 9/11 plunged the United States into a cycle of preemptive war, blowback and permanent emergency, President Trump has launched another preemptive war against Iran without a declaration of war by Congress. The circle is complete.

9/11 gave us the War on Terror. The War on Terror gave us permanent emergency. Permanent emergency gave us the imperial presidency. And the imperial presidency has given us another war. The lesson we still haven’t learned: preemptive strikes do not make us safer. They create more enemies, more instability and more blowback. War has become the permanent business of the American empire. The military-industrial complex profits. Defense contractors prosper. Politicians posture. Presidents accumulate power. The American people get the bill.

The post-9/11 wars have cost trillions, killed or displaced millions, and scarred generations of servicemen and women. Every new conflict creates the justification for still more military spending, secrecy, emergency powers and government control. War abroad has a way of coming home.

After 9/11, the government embraced torture in the name of national security. Abu Ghraib demonstrated what happens when human beings are reduced to enemy combatants and government agents are told the normal rules no longer apply. That battlefield mindset did not remain overseas. Local police departments acquired armored vehicles, military weapons, tactical gear and battlefield training. SWAT teams became routine instruments of law enforcement. Military surveillance tools became tools for monitoring ordinary Americans.

Today, ICE increasingly operates like a domestic paramilitary force, carrying out raids, detentions and enforcement operations under a cloak of secrecy and impunity while being equipped with ever more aggressive technologies, from robot dogs to electric shock weapons. National Guard troops are being normalized as a domestic law-enforcement presence, further eroding the barrier between military and civilian government that laws such as the Posse Comitatus Act were intended to preserve.

The language changed, too. Citizens became “suspects.” Communities became “threat environments.” Protesters became potential extremists. The homeland became a battlefield. The lesson we still haven’t learned: the tactics and weapons of war, once deployed abroad, will eventually be used against the citizenry at home. This is precisely what the Founders feared. James Madison warned that “the means of defence against foreign danger have been always the instruments of tyranny at home.”

We ignored him. The result is a country in which the dividing line between soldier and police officer, battlefield and neighborhood, foreign enemy and domestic suspect has become dangerously blurred. The same vicious cycle has played out with surveillance.

The Patriot Act normalized mass surveillance. Technology has since made the machinery exponentially more powerful. Today, government agencies no longer need someone following you in an unmarked car to create detailed records of where Americans travel, whom they visit and how they live. Your phone tells them. Your car tells them. FLOCK license plate readers tell them. Facial recognition cameras tell them. Your purchases, internet searches, social-media activity, location history and digital communications fill in the rest.

Allowing the government to spy on the citizenry will not eliminate terrorism. It will create a watched, tracked and increasingly submissive society. Yet the deeper problem is that we stopped insisting that government obey the same laws it imposes on us. Once “national security” became an acceptable excuse for warrantless surveillance, torture, indefinite detention, secret courts and undeclared wars, the exception began swallowing the rule.

Congress surrendered authority. Presidents seized it. Courts deferred. The public became accustomed to government officials acting first and answering questions later. Now we see the consequences everywhere.

The Supreme Court increasingly arrives too late to stop executive abuses before the damage is done, if it intervenes at all. The president bulldozes through legal and constitutional restraints, creates a crisis or a spectacle, and leaves Congress, the courts and the American people to deal with the wreckage.

The lesson we still haven’t learned: if we stop holding the government accountable to the rule of law, the only laws it will respect will be the ones it can use against us. This failure transcends political parties. Republicans cheered executive power under Republican presidents. Democrats cheered it under Democratic presidents. Then both sides expressed shock when those powers were turned against them.

Powers do not remain partisan. Surveillance powers created to catch terrorists are used against Americans. Emergency powers become tools of ordinary government. Military powers migrate into domestic policing. Executive powers tolerated under one president become precedents for the next. And once government acquires a weapon, it rarely gives it back.

Trump is merely the latest president to demonstrate the danger of giving any one person such enormous power. He has inherited the machinery of the post-9/11 state and shown how readily it can be turned to the purposes of an increasingly imperial presidency. We are not merely repeating the mistakes of the past 25 years. We have institutionalized them.

A national-security apparatus powerful enough to track a terrorist can track a political opponent. A president empowered to wage war without Congress can invoke “national security” to bypass constitutional limits at home. A military normalized on American streets can be turned against Americans. The police state does not care which party controls it. And therein lies the madness of giving any president such enormous power.

The Founders did not assume that every president would be wise, rational, restrained or benevolent. They divided power precisely because human beings cannot be trusted with too much of it. A free people cannot make their liberties dependent upon the judgment, temperament or sanity of a single ruler. Yet for 25 years, under presidents of both parties, we have systematically weakened those restraints while strengthening the presidency. Now the reckoning has arrived.

Trump’s fitness to exercise the immense powers of his office cannot be separated from the larger question of why any president should possess so much unilateral power in the first place. The lesson we still haven’t learned: the more power we give the presidency, the more dangerous the presidency becomes when the person occupying it proves unwilling - or unable - to exercise that power with restraint.

That brings us back to the nightmare. Fear has always been the fuel of the police state. Keep people frightened enough, divided enough and distrustful enough of one another, and they will beg the government to protect them - even when the price of that protection is their freedom. That bargain has defined post-9/11 America.

Benjamin Franklin famously warned against trading essential liberty for temporary safety. We made the trade anyway. The government seized our freedoms, but the assurance of safety never materialized. Instead, the emergencies multiplied: Terrorism. War. Pandemic. Immigration. Crime. Civil unrest. Political extremism. Each crisis becomes another justification for government power. Each new power establishes another precedent. Each precedent becomes another weapon waiting for the next president to wield it. That is what makes the convergence of these two anniversaries so important.

The Declaration of Independence was an indictment of a despot who obstructed the laws, manipulated institutions, maintained standing armies among the people, placed military power above civilian authority and repeatedly violated the rights of those he governed.

Two hundred and fifty years later, those grievances sound uncomfortably familiar. The uniforms have changed. The technology has changed. The vocabulary has changed. The greed for money and power have not. Nor have the duties of the citizenry to oppose such tyranny.

If constitutional government is to survive, Congress must reclaim the powers it has surrendered. The courts must stop treating “national security” as a magic phrase capable of making constitutional violations disappear. The machinery of mass surveillance must be dismantled. Domestic militarization must be rolled back. Emergency powers must be temporary, narrow and subject to meaningful oversight. And the American people must stop allowing fear to dictate the boundaries of their freedom.

Twenty-five years ago, Osama bin Laden predicted that the American government would lead its own people into “an unbearable hell and a choking life.” Bin Laden did not defeat America. He did not destroy the Constitution. We are doing that ourselves. Every time we accept another surveillance program because we’re afraid, the Fourth Amendment dies a little more. Every time we tolerate another war because we’re told it will make us safe, constitutional restraints on war-making die a little more. Every time Congress surrenders power and the courts defer to “national security,” the rule of law dies a little more. Every time we allow the government to turn another American community into a battlefield, the barrier between military force and civilian government dies a little more.

Every time we shrug and tell ourselves that the latest encroachment on liberty is temporary, necessary or would only be used against someone else, the Constitution dies a little more. As we make clear in "Battlefield America: The War on the American People" and its fictional counterpart "The Erik Blair Diaries," this is how freedom dies in a country that still calls itself free.

Twenty-five years after 9/11, the question is no longer whether terrorism poses the greatest threat to our freedoms. The question is whether the American Police State itself has become the greater threat. America has spent 250 years proclaiming its freedom and the past 25 years building the machinery with which to extinguish it. Two anniversaries. One reckoning.

America must decide what it intends to be: a republic governed by the rule of law or an empire governed by permanent war, permanent surveillance and permanent emergency. We cannot be both. The choice we make will determine nothing less than the survival of the American experiment in freedom."

"Spy TVs: 200 Million Smart TVs Serve As Eavesdropping And Listening Devices - Even When Switched Off"

"Spy TVs: 200 Million Smart TVs Serve As Eavesdropping 
And Listening Devices - Even When Switched Off"
by Leo Hohmann

"Remember when the government used to have to plant an electronic bug inside the home or office of a suspected criminal, and they needed to get a search warrant providing solid evidence of criminal wrongdoing before they could plant such a device? Those days are long over, as most of us purchase the bug ourselves and set it up in our living rooms. Most, if not all, smart TVs, along with smartphones, smart appliances, etc., are daily collecting loads of data on every individual and family in America.

Cybernews reports in a September 8, 2026 article that LG Corp.’s smart TVs can listen in on voice commands, gather data that reveals your location, and scan your home for other connected devices, according to a major new investigation into the company’s webOS platform. LG Electronics, maker of the smart TVs, is owned by the South Korean conglomerate LG Corp., which after Samsung is the world’s second-largest maker of internet-connected smart televisions.

Researchers working with independent technology outlet Gamers Nexus captured LG televisions scanning local networks and identifying phones, smartwatches, printers, air-conditioning units, and many other everyday consumer devices and appliances that had never been connected to the TV. These devices all have one thing in common, however. They are all connected to the internet and are part of the “internet of things.”

I’m pretty sure that if a similar test was run on other brands of smart TVs, the results would be similar, but this article focuses exclusively on LG as that was the company that was placed under a microscope by the independent researchers in their recent study.

Their investigation found that LG’s televisions use an advertising technology called Automatic Content Recognition, or ACR, to identify what was being watched across different inputs, while voice interactions could be converted into plain text and stored in logs on the television. In other words, the TV’s speakers hear what you’re saying and the software is trained, probably using AI, to make a note of it and feed this information into algorithms. In one test, researchers said voice data continued to be stored even after the TV was disconnected from the internet.

Smart TVs are not only ubiquitous in homes, but in hotel rooms, hospitals and corporate offices, “potentially placing them alongside sensitive conversations and devices,” Cybernews reports. Gamers Nexus worked with cybersecurity researchers MrBruh and unturn, alongside Wendell Wilson of Level1Techs, to investigate LG TVs and the company’s webOS software. The results are presented in a video (below) posted to YouTube:
Full screen recommended.
Below is an excerpt from the Cybernews recap of the test run on LG smart TVs: In one test, an LG TV identified 38 other devices, including smartphones belonging to staff who were unaware of the investigation, smartwatches, a 3D printer, an air purifier, thermostats, and a dev board. According to Gamers Nexus, testing showed LG TVs were capable of collecting and identifying:

ͦ  IP addresses and geolocation data.
ͦ  Internal IP addresses belong to other devices on the network.
ͦ  Names, signal strengths, and channels of neighboring WiFi networks.
ͦ  Phones, smartwatches, and other connected hardware.
ͦ  Content displayed on the TV using ACR.
ͦ  Audio fingerprints of content played through the television.
ͦ Voice commands converted into plain text and stored in on-device logs.
ͦ Privacy and consent settings stored by the TV (and whether users had opted in or out).

Information about surrounding WiFi networks can potentially be used to help determine a device’s physical location, Wilson noted. Gamers Nexus said much of the network discovery and data collection it observed was built into LG’s TVs rather than the result of a security vulnerability. The investigation also reported that its test television was sending around 4GB of ACR-related data back to LG each month. I wonder how much of that data is sold to the govenment, or just handed over upon request? George Orwell’s "1984" is no longer a fictional account of a dystopian future. It’s here, and has been for quite a few years, but with AI we are rapidly moving beyond Orwell’s vision."

Bill Bonner, "Battleships and Camshafts"

US Commodore Matthew Perry is greeted by Japanese officials in Yokohama.
"Battleships and Camshafts"
by Bill Bonner

‘I believed Free Trade would have the tendency to unite mankind in the bonds of peace, and it was that, more than any pecuniary consideration, which sustained and actuated me, as my friends know, in that struggle.’ - Richard Cobden

Poitou, France - "Yesterday, we reported on the move to remake the map of the world. The UN approved a more ‘realistic’ map...in which the large countries of the northern hemisphere were no longer made to appear larger than they actually were. The US voted against it. And then, POTUS, roused to cartographic fever, awakened his inner Mercator...or perhaps his inner Teddy Roosevelt. He draped the US flag over all of North America...including Caribbean islands.

Which is it? Is the US empire swelling, as Trump suggests? Or, is it being downsized and deflated? All we know is that bubbles always deflate; Bubble Empires, like a bloated steer, deflate in a particularly noisy and disagreeable way. We also mentioned yesterday that the US had lost the top credit rating, which it has had since 1919.

Here are couple more news ‘dots’ that need to be connected. Modern Diplomacy: "Norway’s $2.3 Trillion Fund Is Cutting Treasuries. Here’s Who’s Left Holding Washington’s Debt." The $2.3 trillion Government Pension Fund Global - the largest single pool of investment capital on Earth - asked its own finance ministry for permission to do something it has never done at this scale: shrink its government-bond weighting. The September 1 letter proposes cutting government bonds from 70% to 50% of the fund’s fixed-income benchmark, trimming roughly $80 billion from US Treasuries alone. It landed the same week fresh jobs data pushed the 10-year Treasury yield toward 4.8%, and as Beijing’s and Tokyo’s own Treasury stacks sit near multi-year lows.

The Financial Times: "Dutch Central bank moves gold bars out of New York over “geopolitical unrest.” DNB prefers London over the American city. The Dutch are not given to hysteria. When they take their gold out of your vaults you might want to consider moving your own money, too.

But money - and the goods and services it buys - are on the move all the time. Cutting yourself off from the world is cutting yourself off from money...and progress. Then, the people who did not cut themselves off kick your butt. Cobden was wrong. Trade is not necessarily the way to peace; but it is the only way to protect yourself from war.

But POTUS seems to have come to a different conclusion: "We could do tremendous good for ourselves by just not trading with countries." If that were so, there is no evidence for it in the historical record. Countries that cut themselves off fall behind. Eventually, they are pried open by someone with better artillery.

That is what happened to Japan. The country had been isolated - by choice - for 220 years. Then, in 1853, Commodore Perry landed a group of just 250 marines, backed by the latest ship-borne artillery. The local authorities realized it was impossible to resist. They came to an important insight: close your doors and you will fall behind.

Commodore Perry’s diplomatic gifts included a model train and the latest rifles and handguns. In a few years, there were railways all over Japan. And then, Japan was soon on the map...and growing larger - economically and militarily. A few decades later, Japan had the most lethal armies in Asia.

By the 1930s, it had captured much of the Chinese mainland. In 1940, it attacked French Indo-China. Then, in 1941, Japan bombed Pearl Harbor...followed in 1945 by America’s devastating firebombing of Tokyo...and the first and, so far, only use of atomic weapons on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. And by 1989, the Honda Accord was the best-selling car in America.

It is only by trade, interaction, and competition that a nation is able to keep up with its rivals...and improve its own citizens’ standards of living. Richard Cobden’s free-trading Great Britain proved it. Japan proved it twice, once with battleships...and later with camshafts. More to come..."

Dan, I Allegedly, "Your Bank Account Just Went To Zero"

Full screen recommended.
Dan, I Allegedly, 9/9/26
"Your Bank Account Just Went To Zero"
"Thousands of bank customers woke up over Labor Day weekend to discover something terrifying: their bank accounts appeared to have a zero balance. BMO completed the sale of 138 branches to First Citizens, and customers in multiple states reported problems accessing their money, debit cards, online banking and everyday transactions during the transition. This happened at the beginning of the month, when rent, bills, automatic payments and other financial obligations were coming due. This is not a bank failure, but it raises serious questions about banking, branch sales, mergers, digital banking and what happens when control of your account suddenly changes. We look at BMO, First Citizens, the 138-branch transaction, customer access problems, bank runs, financial instability, business news and why having multiple financial institutions and a backup plan may be more important than ever. This is a warning about how quickly access to your money can change when banking becomes entirely digital."
Comments here:

"The First 50 Foods You Should Stockpile For Disaster - Before the 2027–2028 Food Crisis Begins, When the Shelves Go Empty and It’s Already Too Late"

"The First 50 Foods You Should Stockpile For Disaster -
 Before the 2027–2028 Food Crisis Begins, 
When the Shelves Go Empty and It’s Already Too Late"
by John Walter

Excerpt: "Editor’s Note: "I have spent years listening to people who know things the general population prefers not to hear. I have sat in rooms with agricultural economists who whisper about phosphorus depletion curves, spoken with truck drivers who describe the increasing difficulty of sourcing diesel parts, with warehouse managers who watch real-time inventory dashboards flicker from green to red. The panic is there, beneath the surface, in the questions people ask when they think no one is listening.

This manuscript is not the product of professional expertise in nutrition or logistics. It is the synthesis of countless conversations with the worried, the observant, the quietly preparing. I have no credentials to wave, no institutional authority to invoke. I have only the accumulated testimony of those who have watched the machinery falter and who understand that the abundance we assume permanent is, in fact, conditional.

What follows is a catalog of resistance. Not political resistance, but biological resistance - the refusal to let one’s family become malnourished because systems failed to deliver. The fifty items listed here are not theoretical recommendations. They are the specific foods that keep reappearing in the calculations of those who have done the mathematics of scarcity. Acquire them, store them, learn to use them now, while the window remains open.

The Winter That Does Not End: By the winter of 2027-2028, the convergence of pressures we have collectively ignored will reach a threshold that cannot be smoothed away by press releases or temporary adjustments. I do not speak in metaphors of apocalypse. I speak of diesel shortages already constraining agricultural machinery across the grain belts, of phosphate reserves depleting to the point where fertilizer production must ration, of aquifers that have sustained American agriculture for generations finally reaching extraction limits that physics will not forgive. These are not distant problems. They are present realities that have not yet translated into empty shelves at your local market.

The prediction I offer is specific and grounded. Within thirty months, the just-in-time inventory system that places food on shelves approximately twelve hours before you purchase it will experience cascading failures that last not days but weeks. You will not receive clear warning. Official channels will speak of “temporary supply adjustments” and “regional distribution challenges” even as the scope widens and the duration extends. By the time the general population recognizes that this is not a temporary disruption but a structural transition, the opportunity to prepare will have closed.

Consider what it means to live in a society where the average family maintains less than three days of food in their home. Consider that this is not historical necessity but recent aberration - a condition that has existed for only fifty years of human history, enabled entirely by cheap petroleum and functional electrical grids. Consider that both of these conditions are now subject to increasing volatility. The shelves you see stocked today represent not abundance but velocity, the rapid movement of goods through a system with no margin for error. When that velocity slows, the shelves empty. When the shelves empty in a culture that has forgotten how to store, the result is not inconvenience but crisis.

You feel it already, perhaps without naming it. The way prices climb while quality degrades. The increasing frequency of “out of stock” notices for items you once assumed permanent. The subtle wrongness in the air that your grandparents would have recognized immediately but which you have been trained to dismiss as temporary glitch. That feeling is your inheritance speaking - the survival instincts of ten thousand generations who knew that winter always came, that harvests failed, that preparation separated the living from the dead.

The question before you is not whether you will face hardship, but whether you will face it with resources or with empty hands. The fifty items that follow are your margin. They are the difference between anxiety and capability, between dependence and autonomy, between watching your children hungry and feeding them from stores you laid down in foresight. They are not excessive. They are not paranoid. They are the minimum prudence that every generation before ours would have considered obvious." "The Fifty: What You Must Store Before the Darkness Falls."
Full, most highly recommended article is here:

"Goldman Sachs Warns Oil Could Soon Rise Above $120 A Barrel And The Price Of Diesel Just Set Another Record As World War 3 Continues To Escalate"

by Michael Snyder

"The global energy supply crunch is only going to get worse as long as the conflicts in the Middle East and Eastern Europe are raging. A lot less oil is getting through the Strait of Hormuz than normal, and diesel production in Russia has been significantly diminished by relentless Ukrainian drone strikes. As a result, we have a facing an unprecedented energy squeeze. The average price of a gallon of gasoline in the United States has never been this high so late in the calendar year, and the average price of a gallon of diesel in the United States just set yet another all-time record.

At this stage, nobody can deny that a global energy crisis is here. In fact, Goldman Sachs just warned that the price of oil could soon jump above $120 a barrel… Goldman Sachs is warning that heightened attacks in the Persian Gulf and Red Sea could push global oil prices above $120 a barrel, which would add to the surging fuel costs Americans have faced during the Iran war. The investment bank’s forecast implies a roughly 20% increase in the cost of Brent crude, the international benchmark, which is trading at nearly $100 a barrel.

For months, there have been extraordinary efforts to keep the price of oil below the psychologically important $100 a barrel mark. But authorities will not be able to hold that line for much longer. Already, U.S. consumers have spent an extra $100 billion on fuel since fighting with Iran erupted in February…American consumers spent an additional $100 billion on fuel between the start of the Iran war on Feb. 28 and Sept. 8, according to a tracker from Brown University. Higher gasoline prices accounted for about $55 billion of that amount, while diesel accounted for the remaining $45 billion.

Unfortunately, fuel prices just continue to rise. On Labor Day, the average price of a gallon of diesel in the United States reached another brand new record high…Diesel, which is widely used in the trucking, construction, agriculture and rail sectors, reached a record $5.90 a gallon on Labor Day, AAA data shows. It is over six dollars a gallon where I live. In some parts of California, it is now over eight dollars a gallon. And industry executives are telling us that global supplies of diesel will continue to be very tight for the foreseeable future…

Global diesel supply will remain tight due to a lack of spare refining capacity, Russia’s ban ​on exports and the approach of peak winter demand, senior industry ‌executives said on Tuesday. The wars in Ukraine and Iran have impacted refineries in Russia and the Middle East, pushing diesel margins to record levels in Europe and the U.S., while reducing crude ​supplies to Asia. “There’s really a shortage of products because we’re missing 2 ​million barrels a day from Russia, and we’re missing nearly 2 million ⁠barrels a day from the Middle East,” Vitol CEO Russell Hardy told the ​APPEC conference on Tuesday.

If things are this bad now, what will they look like a few months from now if World War 3 continues to intensify? On Tuesday, oil spiked after the Houthis launched a barrage of missiles and drones at Saudi Arabia…Oil prices rose Tuesday after Iran-allied militants in Yemen attacked several energy facilities in Saudi Arabia, forcing a temporary halt to some operations. Brent crude futures rose 1% to $97.99 a barrel by 11:28 a.m. E.T. The international benchmark hit a session high of $99.46 earlier. U.S. West Texas Intermediate futures advanced 1.55% to $92.90 per barrel. Oil prices are up more than 8% in September as the U.S. and Iran have traded military strikes for the first time since July.

We are only a little over a week into this month, and the price of oil is already up about 8 percent. That is not a good sign at all. The Houthis know how to hit Saudi Arabia where it hurts. Multiple Aramco facilities were targeted, and it is being reported that fires caused “temporary shutdowns” at several of them…Houthi militants targeted civilian and economic assets in the cities of Abha, Khamis Mushait, Jazan and Najran, the Saudi Foreign Ministry said. More than 70 civilians were injured in the attacks, it said.

The attacks caused fires at several energy facilities resulting in temporary shutdowns, the kingdom’s Energy Ministry said in a statement. Emergency services are working to contain fires at the sites and assess the extent of damage, the world’s largest oil exporter added. Riyadh did not disclose what type of energy facilities were struck. Houthi state media said the group attacked Saudi Aramco facilities in southern areas with drones and ballistic missiles.

In addition to launching missiles and drones at the Saudis, the Houthis have also begun a major ground offensive in the direction of the Bab al-Mandab Strait… The Houthis launched a broad offensive along frontlines on the western Red Sea coast in a bid to advance towards the Bab al-Mandab Strait, experts say. The waterway forms the southern entrance to the Red Sea, a shipping artery that has become vital for Saudi oil exports during Tehran’s blockade of the Strait of Hormuz since the start of the U.S.-Iran war.

Meanwhile, the recent fighting between the U.S. and Iran threatens to greatly escalate. Over the weekend, the U.S. severely damaged three Iranian oil tankers…The United States struck three Iranian oil tankers on Saturday, U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) has confirmed, which it said were involved in covert oil shipment near the critical Kharg Island terminal.

Only one of the vessels was near Kharg Island. In addition to one vessel “permanently disabled” off the coast of Kharg, Centcom said it had “completely destroyed” another oil carrier near the port city of Jask, while rendering another “inoperable” in the Gulf of Oman “after the crew was directed to abandon ship.”

Exports of Iranian oil have essentially dropped to zero, and the Iranian economy is being strangled by the U.S. naval blockade. Authorities in Iran are deeply frustrated, and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian is pledging that the U.S. will soon be “brought to complete regret”…Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian vowed continued resistance against the U.S. on Tuesday, writing on X that the U.S. will “regret” the war.

“The Islamic Republic of Iran has always opposed war and has considered the preservation of the people’s interests and regional security to lie in refraining from igniting conflict,” Pezeshkian wrote. However, just as it has boldly risen to defend against aggression up to this day, it will continue this resistance with full strength until the aggressors are brought to complete regret and will remain the guardian of the rights of the great Iranian nation,” he added.

Many wrongly consider such threats to be quite empty. But the Iranians do appear to have freshly upgraded ballistic missiles, and they are threatening to use them to conduct preemptive strikes…Iran has issued a fresh threat to the US over its newly upgraded ballistic missile, with officials warning that the nation “will take action against any threat, even before it is carried out.” The report by Iran’s state news agency on Monday highlighted comments broadcast on state television the previous day by the head of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, Mohsen Rezaei.

He praised the country’s expanded arsenal and claimed a new missile had been “tested” against a US warship. However, it was unconfirmed whether the test involved the solid-fueled Qassem Basir featured in the new report. There is speculation that Iran’s freshly upgraded ballistic missiles could potentially be a serious threat to our warships. Needless to say, the sinking of even a single U.S. warship would change everything.

But President Trump continues to be optimistic. On Monday, he assured us that the price of oil will quickly fall below two dollars a gallon “when we WIN the war with Iran”…President Trump on Monday said oil prices “will drop precipitously” after the Iran war is won, as Iran seeks to maintain its control of the Strait of Hormuz with a “restricted zone.” “Oil prices will drop precipitously, like everything else is dropping (but more!), when we WIN the war with Iran,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. “Three Dollars a gallon, but ultimately, below Two Dollars a gallon. It will all happen quickly, and Iran will never have a Nuclear Weapon.”

In Ukraine, the Russians have resumed hitting Ukrainian cities with a vengeance…At least five people were killed in Kyiv after Russia launched what Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy called a “complex” attack on the city, with Moscow resuming long-range strikes on the Ukrainian capital following a three-day pause to allow the visit of a U.S. peace talks delegation. Ukraine’s air force said Russia launched 166 drones, 32 cruise missiles and an unspecified number of anti-ship and ballistic missiles into the country overnight. The air force said its forces downed 142 drones, 31 cruise missiles and two ballistic missiles.

The Russians are hoping that greatly escalating the intensity of strikes will convince the Ukrainians to stop hitting their refineries. It isn’t going to work. Both sides are just going to continue to pummel one another, and that isn’t going to be good news for any of us.

In addition to repeatedly targeting Kyiv, the Russians also hit the city of Odessa really hard…Kyiv and the southern port city of Odessa were the main targets, the air force reported. Missiles and drones impacted across 29 locations, it added in a post to Telegram. Russia’s Defense Ministry said in a post to Telegram that the “massive strike” targeted defense industrial facilities and military transport and logistical hubs, plus port facilities in Odesa. The ministry also posted a graphic showing what appeared to be cruise missiles, with the caption, “Targeting day and night.”

Unless the war between Russia and Ukraine ends, the diesel supply crunch will continue to escalate. And as long as traffic through the Strait of Hormuz is only a fraction of what it was before the war with Iran, there will be upward pressure on the price of oil. The higher energy prices go, the worse things will get for the entire global economy. The clouds on the horizon are getting really dark, and at this point everyone can see that a major storm is rapidly approaching."