StatCounter

Sunday, August 30, 2026

"The Darkest Hours Are Before The Dawn"

"The Darkest Hours Are Before The Dawn"
by No1

"The Fourth Turning doesn’t reveal itself gradually - it crashes over you all at once when you finally start to see the pattern. Writing this piece felt like trying to grab sand in my hands; every attempt to contain one aspect of the transformation led to three more slipping through my fingers. What you’ll read here is my best effort to trace the contours of something far larger than any individual could possibly comprehend.

"The same boiling water that softens the potato hardens the egg."
- Roald Dahl

"We’re all in the same boiling water now - the Fourth Turning’s Crisis that began with Lehman Brothers’ collapse in 2008 - but whether we emerge hardened or dissolved depends entirely on what we’re made of. We’re now deep in the Fourth Turning, the winter of this historical cycle, and if you think the past few years have been chaotic? You ain’t seen nothing yet!

History doesn’t move in straight lines. It breathes, it pulses, it turns through seasons as predictable as winter following autumn. William Strauss and Neil Howe discovered this pattern in 1997. Like clockwork, every 80 years or so – a human lifetime, America faces an existential crisis that threatens to tear apart everything we thought permanent. We’ve been through this three times before, and we’re going through it again right now.

Strauss and Howe predicted in 1997 that around 2005, some spark would ignite a Crisis mood. They suggested it might be “as ominous as a financial crash, as ordinary as a national election, or as trivial as a Tea Party”. They nailed it. The 2008 financial crisis wasn’t just another recession - it was the moment the post-World War II global order began its death spiral. Lehman Brothers’ September 15, 2008 collapse marked more than a bank failure; it marked the beginning of the end of trust in the system itself.

I’ve started following these markets around 2007, and what happened after that particular collapse was unprecedented. The Federal Reserve’s balance sheet exploded from $900 billion to $4 trillion in a matter of years, then to $9 trillion during COVID. The national debt, which stood at $10 trillion in 2008, has now reached $38 trillion as of November 2025. We didn’t solve the crisis - we papered it over with printed money and kicked the can down the road. We didn’t solve the problem - we made it exponentially worse. As someone who tracks gold markets, I can tell you with increasing clarity: the people who actually understand money are quietly converting their paper promises into something that can’t be printed.

The response to 2008 revealed something critical: our institutions no longer functioned as designed. The Federal Reserve, created to be a lender of last resort, became the market itself. Banks that should have failed were declared “too big to fail”. Capitalism’s core principle - that bad bets lead to bankruptcy - was suspended for the connected class while enforced ruthlessly on everyone else. The very people who caused the crisis not only avoided jail but got bonuses funded by taxpayer bailouts. The social contract didn’t just fray; it snapped.

What most people didn’t understand then - and many still don’t grasp now - is that 2008 never really ended. Each intervention created larger distortions requiring bigger interventions. Zero interest rates led to asset bubbles. Quantitative easing led to wealth inequality explosion. Each “solution” deepens the underlying problem: a system that could only survive through ever-increasing debt monetization. The music has stopped, but the Fed keeps the party going by turning up the volume until everyone is deaf.

The knock-on effects rippled globally. European banks, stuffed with toxic American mortgage securities, required massive bailouts. The European debt crisis followed, nearly destroying the euro. China, terrified of global depression, launched the largest credit expansion in history, building ghost cities and redundant infrastructure. Every major economy became addicted to monetary heroin, and seventeen years later, we’re still shooting up.

But the financial crisis was just the catalyst. What makes this a Fourth Turning isn’t the proximate cause but the comprehensive breakdown that follows. Look around. Every institution Americans once trusted - government, media, academia, medicine, law enforcement, intelligence agencies - has suffered catastrophic reputational collapse. When the CDC changes its story for the fifth time, when the FBI raids a former president, when the Supreme Court’s legitimacy is openly questioned, you’re not watching normal political friction. You’re watching the complete unraveling of institutional authority.

This Fourth Turning differs fundamentally from all previous ones because of technology’s role. We’re not fighting with muskets or tanks - we’re fighting with algorithms, narratives, and digital currencies. The battlefield isn’t Gettysburg or Normandy; it’s your smartphone screen, your social media feed, your digital wallet.

Previous Fourth Turnings required mass mobilization of physical bodies. Men marched to war, women worked in factories, everyone bought war bonds. Physical presence mattered. But our Fourth Turning is being fought in the realm of information and perception. When you can’t trust any source of information, when deepfakes make seeing no longer believing, when AI can generate unlimited propaganda at zero marginal cost, how do you even know what you’re fighting for or against? The fog of war has become the fog of everything.

Consider the comprehensive surveillance apparatus that’s emerged since 2008. Edward Snowden’s 2013 revelations showed us the NSA was collecting everything - every email, every text, every call. But that was just the beginning. Now we have AI-powered behavioral prediction, social credit systems, and facial recognition networks. China leads the way with 700 million surveillance cameras - more than half the world’s total - but Western “democracies” aren’t far behind. London has more cameras per capita than Beijing. San Francisco uses the same facial recognition technology as Shanghai.

The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated this technological authoritarianism by decades. Digital vaccine passports normalized the idea that you need government permission to enter a restaurant. Contact tracing apps trained us to accept constant location monitoring. QR codes made every movement trackable. What would have taken a generation to impose gradually was accomplished in months under the banner of “public health”. The ratchet only turns one way - powers gained during a crisis are never voluntarily relinquished.

Consider the Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) agenda that’s advancing globally while most people remain blissfully unaware. This isn’t just digitizing money - it’s making money programmable, controllable, censorable. The Federal Reserve, Bank of England, and European Central Bank are all developing CBDCs, following China’s lead with the digital yuan. Imagine a world where your ability to buy gasoline depends on your carbon credit score, where your grocery purchases are limited by your BMI, where your savings can be “expired” to force spending. Money that can’t be used for disapproved purchases, that can be frozen instantly if you express wrongthink. It’s not imagination - China is already doing it. Europe is launching trials. The Federal Reserve is “researching” it. This is the ultimate fusion of monetary and social control.

Bitcoin emerged from the 2008 crisis’ ashes with a message embedded in its genesis block: “Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks”. The cypherpunks who created it - whether Satoshi was an individual or a team - understood that monetary sovereignty required technological sovereignty. But here’s the uncomfortable question: did we play them or did they play us? Bitcoin’s transparent blockchain makes every transaction traceable forever. The NSA’s 1996 paper “How to Make a Mint” described a system remarkably similar to Bitcoin. The CIA met with Gavin Andresen, Bitcoin’s lead developer, in 2011. Was Bitcoin genuine resistance or the perfect trap - getting libertarians to build their own financial panopticon?

The promise was decentralization, but the reality is increasingly centralized. A handful of mining pools control Bitcoin’s hash rate. A few exchanges handle most trading volume. BlackRock and other institutions now dominate ownership through ETFs. The rebels who thought they were building an alternative to Wall Street may have just built Wall Street 2. 0. With better surveillance.

Every Fourth Turning includes a monetary reset. The Revolution gave us the Constitution’s gold and silver clause. The Civil War brought greenbacks and the National Banking System. The Depression/WWII era ended the gold standard domestically and created Bretton Woods. What’s coming this time will be even more dramatic.

The numbers are so large they’ve lost all meaning. The U. S. national debt stands at $40 trillion as of August 2026. Unfunded liabilities - Social Security, Medicare, government pensions - exceed $200 trillion. The Federal Reserve holds over $1 trillion in unrealized losses. Commercial banks sit on $600 billion in underwater securities. We’re not approaching insolvency. We’re already there. Just one repricing away from systemic collapse. And everyone in finance knows it. The only question is whether it happens slowly (inflation), suddenly (default), or systematically (CBDC rollout). My money, literally, is on “all of the above”.

While Americans fight over pronouns and vaccines, the rest of the world isn’t standing still. The real Fourth Turning story isn’t just about America - it’s about the end of the American Century and the birth of something new. The unipolar moment that began with the Soviet Union’s collapse in 1991 is over. We’re not transitioning to a new order but to disorder - multiple competing power centers with incompatible worldviews and no hegemon strong enough to impose rules.

Russia and China’s “no limits” partnership, announced February 4, 2022, just before the Ukraine war, represents the most significant geopolitical realignment since the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact. Unlike that cynical arrangement between natural enemies, this reflects genuine strategic convergence. Let that sink in.

The two largest threats to American hegemony have decided they’re better off together than apart. China needs Russian resources and military technology. Russia needs Chinese markets and manufacturing. Both need to break American hegemony. Their combined nuclear arsenals, industrial capacity, and geographic position make them essentially unsanctionable and uncontainable. While we’ve been focused on internal divisions, they’ve been stockpiling gold, building alternative payment systems, and creating a parallel world order that doesn’t need dollars or SWIFT.

I’ve called this “water always finds a way” - capital, trade, and power flowing around obstacles like sanctions and finding new channels. The West sanctions Russia, so Russia sells oil to India and China at a discount. We freeze Russian reserves, so everyone else starts wondering if their dollars are safe. We weaponize SWIFT, so they’re building alternative payment systems. Every action creates an equal and opposite reaction, and we’re too arrogant to see we’re accelerating our own replacement.

But perhaps the most devastating loss isn’t monetary or military - it’s moral. The West built its post-WWII hegemony not just on military might and economic power, but on moral authority. We are the “good guys” who defeated fascism, rebuilt Europe, and championed democracy and human rights. That moral high ground is gone, destroyed by our own hypocrisy. When we lecture others about sovereignty while expanding NATO to Russia’s borders despite promises not to, when we invoke “rules-based order” while ignoring international law when convenient, when we sanction countries for actions we ourselves commit - the world sees increasingly through it.

Take Ukraine. We framed it as democracy versus autocracy, good versus evil. But Russia has legitimate security concerns that we’ve deliberately ignored for decades. How would America react if China formed a military alliance with Mexico and stationed missiles in Tijuana? We know exactly how - we nearly started nuclear war over Soviet missiles in Cuba. Yet we expected Russia to accept NATO expansion to its borders as normal. The West could have guaranteed Ukrainian neutrality and avoided this war entirely. Instead, we used Ukraine as a proxy to bleed Russia, but it’s Ukraine that’s bleeding out. 1.8 million dead. For what? So Victoria Nuland could have another regime change on her résumé?

Or look at Gaza. Israel is systematically destroying an entire population - bombing hospitals, schools, refugee camps, killing journalists, aid workers, children by the thousands. The International Court of Justice has issued genocide charges. They issued arrest warrants. Yet the same Western leaders who thundered about Russian war crimes provide Israel with weapons and diplomatic cover for atrocities that shock the conscience. When you can watch children being deliberately starved and bombed while your government calls it “self-defense”, something fundamental breaks in your worldview. The system reveals itself as not just flawed but actively evil.

This moral bankruptcy accelerates the Fourth Turning’s institutional collapse. When people see their governments supporting genocide while preaching human rights, enabling war crimes while demanding justice, destroying countries while claiming to protect democracy -they don’t just lose trust in leaders. They lose faith in the entire Western project. Every Palestinian child killed with American weapons creates a hundred people who will never believe the Western moral claims again. Every Ukrainian conscript sent to die for NATO expansion makes a mockery of our “defensive alliance”. The hypocrisy isn’t just noted; it’s radicalizing.

The Ukraine war thus becomes a triple failure. Militarily, it demonstrates that despite spending more than the next ten nations combined, we can’t defeat Russia in its own backyard. Economically, our sanctions backfire, strengthening alternative systems while weakening our own. But most critically, morally, it exposes the lies undergirding the entire system. We’re not defending democracy - we’re pursuing hegemony. We’re not protecting sovereignty - we’re expanding empire. We’re not the good guys. We’re just another power, playing the same brutal game, whilst demanding everyone pretend otherwise.

The expansion of BRICS in 2024 to include Saudi Arabia, Iran, Egypt, Ethiopia, and the UAE wasn’t just about adding members - it was about creating a critical mass. BRICS now represents 45% of the global population, 35% of global GDP, and controls most of the world’s critical resources. More importantly, it offers an alternative.

Countries can now access development funding without IMF conditionalities, trade without SWIFT, and maintain reserves without dollars. Every country that joins weakens the Western system and strengthens the alternative.

The Middle East’s transformation is particularly striking. Saudi Arabia, America’s most important Arab ally since 1945, is now buying Chinese fighters, pricing oil in yuan, and coordinating with Russia on production cuts. The Abraham Accords, trumpeted as an historic achievement, are being superseded by Chinese-brokered agreements. When Iran and Saudi Arabia restored relations under Chinese auspices in 2023, it marked the end of American diplomatic monopoly in the region.

But the real prize is Taiwan. When, not if, China takes Taiwan  - increasingly likely given war game results - without an American military response, the entire American alliance system will collapse overnight. Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, and Australia would have to accommodate China. The dollar would lose reserve status as countries realized American security guarantees are worthless. It wouldn’t be a military defeat but a psychological collapse - the moment everyone realizes the emperor has no clothes.

The tragedy is that America’s military, despite spending more than the next ten nations combined, can’t win wars anymore. We couldn’t defeat the Taliban after twenty years. We can’t build ships that work - the Littoral Combat Ship, Zumwalt destroyer, and Ford-class carrier programs are all disasters. We can’t even supply Ukraine with enough 155mm shells, the most basic artillery ammunition. The military-industrial complex is optimized for profit, not victory. And now we’re paying the price.

Fourth Turnings are generational psychodramas where each archetype plays its destined role. But something’s different this time - the actors seem to be forgetting their lines. The Boomers (our Prophet generation) should be the Gray Champions providing moral clarity during the Crisis. Instead, they are the crisis. They’ve held power longer than any generation in American history and refuse to let go. Biden, Trump, Pelosi - all in their 80s or late 70s, all clinging to power like Gollum to his precious. The oldest president in American history is followed by the second-oldest. Congress looks like a nursing home. The Supreme Court is a gerontocracy. They won’t pass the torch; it will have to be pried from their cold, dead hands.

But which Boomer is the Gray Champion? Trump fit the archetype - the charismatic elder who emerges during the Crisis to remake society. His first term was prologue; his return in 2025 could have been the main act. He has the prophetic certainty, the devoted following, the absolutist vision. But Gray Champions are supposed to unite society for collective purpose, and Trump divides as much as he inspires. Maybe that’s the point - maybe this Fourth Turning’s Gray Champion destroys the old order rather than defending it.

Generation X, my generation, are playing our Nomad role perfectly - qcynical survivors building escape routes. We’re the ones stacking gold, learning skills, moving to rural areas, homeschooling our kids. We don’t believe in collective anything because every institution failed us. Latchkey kids who raised ourselves, we learned early that self-reliance is the only reliability. We’re not trying to save the system; we’re trying to survive its collapse.

But it’s the Millennials who worry me. They’re supposed to be the Hero generation - the ones who should come together, sacrifice for the collective purpose, and rebuild from the ashes. Previous Hero generations - the Republicans who fought the Revolution, the Gilded who won the Civil War, the GI Generation who defeated fascism - had external enemies to unite against. This generation can’t even agree on basic reality.

• Half of them want socialism without understanding that socialism requires a social cohesion they don’t have. The other half chase wealth through crypto and day-trading while living in their parents’ basements.
• They’re the most educated generation in history but can’t do basic repairs.
• They’re the most connected but loneliest.
• They’re supposed to be heroes, but they’re barely functional adults.

Maybe that’s harsh, but Fourth Turnings don’t care about hurt feelings. The problem might be that this generation’s Crisis is too abstract. Climate change is the perfect example - it’s an ever-shifting, never-reached goal that keeps moving further away the closer we supposedly get. First it was global cooling in the 1970s, then global warming, now “climate change” to cover all bases. The apocalypse is always 10 years away - in 1989, the UN said we had until 2000 before irreversible damage. In 2006, Al Gore gave us 10 years. In 2019, Greta gave us 12. The goalposts keep moving, the demands keep escalating, but the emergency never quite arrives.

You can’t defeat climate change like you can defeat Nazi Germany. There’s no V-E Day for carbon emissions, no unconditional surrender of greenhouse gases. It’s a permanent crisis requiring permanent sacrifice with no victory condition - exactly the kind of nebulous threat that demobilizes rather than mobilizes. Systemic racism is another concept, not a Confederate army you can defeat at Gettysburg. COVID was scary. But not scary enough. A 99% survival rate doesn’t mobilize like Pearl Harbor.

Our heroes need something concrete to fight against, and they might get it soon enough. Generation Z and Alpha, our emerging Artists, are being shaped by this Crisis in ways we don’t yet understand. They’re growing up with screens instead of friends, algorithms instead of thoughts, anxiety as baseline. Previous Artist generations were overprotected physically but connected socially. This one is overprotected digitally but isolated physically. They might be the first generation that’s more comfortable in virtual reality than actual reality. Whether that prepares them for the future or ruins them for it remains to be seen.

Every Fourth Turning includes cultural revolution - the complete inversion of previous values. What was sacred becomes profane; what was profane becomes sacred. We’re living through that inversion now, and it’s more extreme than anything since the 1960s. The traditional family structure, foundation of every successful society in history, is now “heteronormative oppression”. Having children is selfish environmental destruction. Marriage is patriarchal enslavement. Meanwhile, drug use is harm reduction, crime is social justice, and mental illness is identity. We’re not just tolerating dysfunction; we’re celebrating it. The DSM-5 has become a character creation guide.

The gender revolution is particularly telling. Not content with equal rights - a worthy goal achieved decades ago - we’ve moved to denying biological reality itself. Men can be women. Women can be men. Children can choose their sex like they choose breakfast cereal. Anyone who points out biological facts is a “transphobe” who must be destroyed. We’re performing medical experiments on children that would have been considered crimes against humanity a generation ago, and we call it “healthcare”.

This isn’t organic social evolution - it’s engineered chaos. Every institution pushes the same message simultaneously. Corporations mandate pronoun training. Schools teach gender fluidity to kindergartners. Media celebrates each new boundary pushed. It’s too coordinated to be coincidental. Someone benefits from this social dissolution. And it’s not the confused kids getting surgeries they’ll regret.

The racial revolution follows similar patterns. Not content with civil rights - another worthy goal largely achieved - we’ve moved to racial revenge. “Antiracism” means active racism against whites and Asians. “Equity” means equal outcomes regardless of effort. “Diversity” means everyone thinks the same but looks different. Martin Luther King’s dream of colorblind society is now considered racist. We’re re-segregating schools and calling it progress.

The religious revolution completes the trifecta. Traditional Christianity, the bedrock of Western civilization for two millennia, is now “hate”. Churches that maintained consistent doctrine for centuries are “bigoted”. Meanwhile, we’ve created new religions - wokeism, climatism, covidism - complete with original sin (privilege/carbon/unvaccination), confession (struggle sessions), and excommunication (cancellation). These new faiths are more intolerant than any Inquisition.

• The purpose of cultural revolution isn’t progress - it’s demoralization.
• When you can make people affirm obvious lies, you’ve broken their spirit.
• When you can make them betray their children, you’ve broken their souls.
• When nothing is sacred, nothing is worth defending.
• A demoralized population doesn’t resist tyranny; it welcomes it as relief from chaos.

But cultural revolutions create their own antibodies. The more extreme the push, the more violent the snapback. Parents discovering what schools are teaching their kids become activated. Workers forced into struggle sessions become radicalized. Normal people told they’re evil for being normal don’t stay normal - they become resistance.

Resolution Scenarios for the 2030s: Based on historical patterns and current trajectories, this Fourth Turning will resolve somewhere between 2028 and 2033. But resolution doesn’t mean return to normal - it means transformation into something unrecognizable. Let me paint the possibilities as I see them.

The Breakup (Most Likely): Trump returned as the Gray Champion in 2025, but not the Trump of 2017. This is a Trump unleashed, a Trump with nothing to lose, a Trump surrounded by true believers instead of establishment Republicans. He uses emergency powers to implement his vision - mass deportations, tribunals for the “deep state”, even a possible federal takeover of elections. But here’s where the script diverges from his expectations.

Trump, the self-proclaimed dealmaker and strongman, started losing. Everywhere. He already lost Ukraine, Europe can’t sustain it alone, and Russia grinds to victory through sheer attrition. He loses Iran - they get the bomb while he’s tweeting threats, fundamentally altering Middle Eastern power dynamics. He bullied Venezuela with military threats and sanctions, and illegally kidnapped it's president and wife. Each loss emboldens the next challenger. The world realizes the emperor truly has no clothes.

Seeing that he’s losing both militarily and morally - with Israel’s ongoing genocide in Gaza destroying what remained of American moral authority - Trump does what all failing empires do: he turns inward. But this creates an economic catastrophe. His tariffs, meant to punish others, punish Americans with inflation. His pressure on the Fed to cut rates despite soaring prices destroys dollar credibility. His continued weaponization of USD and SWIFT drives even allies to seek alternatives.

Suddenly, all those dollars held overseas come flooding home - tens of trillions seeking safety as global trade abandons the greenback. The dollar hyperinflates into toilet paper. The resulting inflation isn’t the 1970s redux everyone expects - it’s Weimar Germany. When bread costs $50 and gas hits $20 a gallon, society doesn’t slowly decay; it collapses. Supply chains that never fully recovered from COVID snap completely. Cities that depend on just-in-time delivery face actual starvation. The EBT system fails, and 40 million Americans lose food assistance overnight. The military, traditionally conservative and oath-bound, doesn’t splinter - it hunkers down, protecting what it can, essentially writing off ungovernable areas.

Blue states, which never really accepted Trump’s legitimacy anyway, make it official. California stops sending tax revenue to Washington - why fund a government that hates you? New York follows suit. Illinois, Oregon, Washington state - they all realize they’re subsidizing their own oppression. The federal government, broke from lost wars and fleeing dollars, can’t enforce compliance. It’s not 1861 where Lincoln could raise an army to preserve the union. The military won’t fire on Americans, and Trump doesn’t have the loyalty to make them.

By 2035, America follows the Soviet playbook. Not violent collapse but exhausted dissolution. The federal government, like Gorbachev’s Kremlin, simply becomes irrelevant. States stop listening, regions form their own arrangements, and one day everyone realizes the United States exists only on maps nobody updates anymore. The empire doesn’t fall - it evaporates.

The Breakup v2 (Increasingly Possible): The differences prove irreconcilable. After another disputed election - 2028 seems likely - states start going their own way. Not through formal secession but through nullification and non-cooperation. Red states refuse to enforce federal gun laws. Blue states refuse to enforce immigration law. Both refuse to send tax revenue for programs they oppose.

The federal government, broke and impotent, can’t enforce its will. The military, asked to fire on Americans, refuses or splits. Washington becomes ceremonial while real power devolves to regions. The Pacific states form an economic union with Canada and Asia. Texas remembers it was once a republic. The Northeast aligns with Europe. The heartland goes its own way.

By 2035, America exists on paper but not in practice. The dollar is replaced by regional currencies or Bitcoin. The military splits into state militias. The federal government maintains embassies and negotiates treaties, but has no domestic power. It’s not civil war - it’s civilized divorce. Messy, expensive, but better than the alternative.

The War Resolution (Plausible but Dangerous): Taiwan is the obvious flashpoint. China invades in 2027, calculating America won’t risk nuclear war over an island. They’re right - we won’t - but we don’t back down either. Economic war escalates to cyber war escalates to proxy war escalates to… what? Not nuclear exchange - everyone loses - but something new. Bioweapons that target specific ethnicities? AI-controlled drone swarms that can’t be stopped? Infrastructure attacks that kill millions without firing a shot?

Or maybe it’s Iran. Israel striuck their nuclear program. Iran retaliated. America got drawn in. Russia backs Iran. China backs Russia. Suddenly we’re in World War III without anyone planning it. The Middle East burns. Europe freezes without Russian gas. Asia starves without Middle Eastern oil. Supply chains collapse. Billions face famine.

The war isn’t won or lost - it just ends when everyone’s exhausted. America “wins” by not losing as badly as others, but the victory is pyrrhic. A generation is traumatized. The economy is destroyed. The empire is over. We retreat to our hemisphere, rebuild what we can, and try to forget. The 2030s are about recovery, not prosperity.

The Transformation (Hopeful but Unlikely): Maybe, just maybe, this Crisis catalyzes genuine renewal instead of collapse. A new generation of leaders emerges - not Boomers clinging to power but GenX/Millennial hybrids who understand both technology and reality. They implement radical but necessary reforms: a constitutional convention that updates our 18th-century operating system for a 21st-century reality, a monetary reset that includes a debt jubilee and sound money, a healthcare system that actually provides health rather than profits, an education system that teaches skills rather than ideology, and a political system that represents people rather than its donors.

Technology gets harnessed for liberation rather than control. Open-source AI breaks the corporate monopolies. Mesh networks break surveillance states. Cryptocurrency breaks central banks. 3D printing breaks supply chain dependencies. Unlimited clean fusion energy breaks resource scarcity. We don’t return to the past but create a future that honors what worked while fixing what didn’t.

By 2035, America is smaller globally but stronger domestically. We’re not the world’s policeman anymore but we’re not an isolationist either. We trade with everyone, ally with those who share our values, and mind our own business otherwise. The federal government is smaller but more effective. States have more autonomy but share a common purpose. It’s not utopia but it’s sustainable.

After the Storm: The Coming High: History suggests that however this Fourth Turning resolves, a High will follow. Spring always follows winter, even the harshest winter. The question isn’t whether we’ll emerge but what we’ll look like when we do.

Previous Highs shared common characteristics that we’ll likely see again. Social cohesion will replace atomization - people will desperately want to belong to something larger than themselves after years of isolation and conflict. Institutional authority will be restored - not the old institutions but new ones built by Crisis’ survivors who know what failure costs. Conformity will be valued over individualism - after chaos, order will feel like freedom. Economic growth will explode - all the delayed investment and deferred consumption will be released all at once.

But this High will be different because the world is different. It won’t be American-dominated - that era is over regardless of how this Crisis resolves. It might not even be Western-dominated. The center of global civilization could shift to Asia for the first time in 500 years. Or we might see true multipolarity - regional powers managing regional spheres without a global hegemon.

Technology will define the new High more than politics will. Artificial intelligence will be either a tool of total control or liberation depending on who controls it. Bioengineering will extend the human lifespan - but perhaps only for those who can afford it. Fusion energy might provide unlimited clean power - or remain forever 20 years away. Space colonization could open infinite resources - or remain science fiction. The choices made during the resolution of this Crisis will determine which future we get.

The Millennials who survive this Crisis will be different than the ones who entered it. The Crisis completes this Hero’s generation development - it burns away weaknesses and forges strength. They’ll build institutions with the knowledge of how previous ones failed. They’ll raise children in a stability they never knew themselves. They’ll create art that celebrates order rather than chaos. They’ll be boring, and that will be beautiful.

Their children, the new Artists, will grow up in a world we can barely imagine. They might be the first generation that’s more machine than human - enhanced, augmented, connected to AI from birth. Or they might rebel against technology entirely, seeking authenticity in a synthetic world. Either way, they’ll be shaped by the High we create, just as we were shaped by the Crisis we’re enduring.

The 2030s and 2040s could be golden if we navigate this Crisis successfully. Imagine fusion finally working, providing unlimited clean energy. Imagine AI eliminating drudgery while humans focus on creativity. Imagine biotech defeating aging, adding healthy decades to life. Imagine space colonies opening infinite resources. Imagine governance that actually represents people. Imagine money that can’t be debased. It’s all possible - if we survive.

But survival isn’t guaranteed. Rome had its Fourth Turning and ended up with the Dark Ages. China had multiple Fourth Turnings that led to centuries of stagnation. The Soviet Union had a Fourth Turning and ceased to exist. The difference between renewal and collapse often comes down to leadership at the crucial moment. Do we get Lincoln or Buchanan? FDR or Hoover? Churchill or Chamberlain? The answer determines whether our grandchildren curse or bless our memory.

What this means for you: So we’re living through the most dangerous period in world’s history since World War II. What do we actually do about it? The answer depends on who we are and what we can control. First and foremost: accept that this is structural, not political. Your candidate winning won’t fix it. Your party taking control won’t stop it. The system itself is what’s breaking, and it needs to break for something new to emerge. Fighting to preserve the current system is like trying to hold back winter - exhausting and futile. Better to prepare for spring while others freeze.

Secondly, position yourself for multiple scenarios. Geographic diversification matters - have somewhere else you can go if your area becomes untenable. This doesn’t mean fleeing the country necessarily, but having options. A rural property, family in another state, even just camping gear and a plan. When cities burned in 2020, those who could leave did. Those who couldn’t suffered.

Skills diversification might matter most. Learn to grow food - even apartment dwellers can grow something. Learn basic medical care - when hospitals are overwhelmed, basic knowledge saves lives. Learn to fix things - when supply chains break, repair becomes invaluable. Learn self-defense - when police won’t come, you’re on your own. Learn to teach -your children might need homeschooling. These skills have value regardless of which scenario plays out.

Community building is essential but difficult. Modern Americans barely know their neighbors, let alone trust them. But any crisis creates rapid bonding - shared danger builds relationships faster than years of small talk. Identify who around you is reliable. Build relationships before you need them. But be careful - the person flying the right flag might be an informant. The one flying the wrong flag might be an ally. Judge by actions, not words.

Mental preparation matters more than physical. This Crisis will last years more. You can’t maintain panic that long - you’ll burn out. You need sustainable vigilance - alert but not anxious, prepared but not paranoid. History is your friend here. Read about previous Fourth Turnings. Understand that a Crisis is normal, not exceptional. Our ancestors survived worse with less. You can too.

Most importantly, understand that you’re living through history, not the end of it. Yes, the West as you knew itmight be ending. But something new is being born. You get to participate in that birth. That’s not a burden - it’s a privilege. Most humans live boring lives in boring times. You get to live through transformation. Your choices matter. Your actions have consequences. Your life has meaning.

The Fourth Turning will end, probably around 2035. You’ll either be a survivor who helped shape the new order or a casualty who didn’t. The choice - and it is a choice - is yours.

The Choice Before Us: We stand at history’s inflection point. Behind us, the familiar world dissolves into memory - the American Century, the post-war order, the assumptions that guided our parents and grandparents. Ahead, something new struggles to be born - unclear, unformed, but inevitable. We can’t go back. That bridge is burned. We can only go forward, through the Crisis, to whatever awaits on the other side.

The Fourth Turning isn’t a prophecy - it’s a pattern. And patterns can be understood, navigated, even shaped by those who see them clearly. Our ancestors faced their Fourth Turnings without understanding the cycle. We have the advantage of historical perspective. We know this is temporary. We know it’s survivable. We know it’s necessary.

But knowing and doing are different things. Knowing winter comes doesn’t keep you warm - preparing for it does. Knowing that the Crisis peaks before its resolution doesn’t make the peak any less dangerous - it might be even more so. Knowing previous generations survived doesn’t guarantee we will - that depends on our choices.

The water is boiling all around us. Some are hardening into stronger versions of themselves. Others are dissolving into mush. The difference isn’t random - it’s about what you’re made of and how you respond to heat. You can’t control the temperature, but you can control your composition.

These times demand passion, compassion, commitment, full-speed-ahead engagement with life. Not because it’s comfortable - it’s not. Not because it’s safe - it won’t be. But because we’re living through the most consequential period in American history since World War II. Our choices will echo for generations. Our actions will be studied by historians. Our courage or cowardice will determine whether the Western experiment continues or ends.

The Fourth Turning suggests we have about five more years of Crisis before resolution. Five years of increasing chaos, conflict, and transformation. Five years that will feel like fifty. Five years that will determine the next fifty. Are you ready? The storm is here. The old world is dying. The new world awaits. What are you going to do about it?"

John Wilder, "One Page At A Time"

"One Page At A Time"
by John Wilder

"It’s cold outside. I can see that in how crisp and clear the air is. The big picture window in the cabin up on Wilder Mountain lets my young eyes see a mile, looking for the headlights on a dim winter morning. The bus rounds the corner, and I head off. Burt, the driver, is rarely off on time by more than a minute or two. I’m the farthest kid out, and he starts rounding up the school kids with me. “Hi Burt!” “Morning, John.”

Since I’m in middle school, and I’m the first on, I tromp my winter boots all way to the back of the bus. That’s where the cool kids sit. I remember the first day I decided to sit back here. Since I was the first on, there was no one to stop me, so I decided to break the norm of the past few years and just sit there. I was in sixth grade, and the high school freshman started to object when he got on. He didn’t finish the sentence. If he would have asked me to move, my answer would have been short. “Make me.” I didn’t have to. Even in sixth grade, I was bigger than him. But I lived so far out that most of the time, I had the entire back of the bus to myself.

So instead of a long, boring bus ride, I decided I’d do something else. Like take a trip to Mordor. Or fight bugs with Johnny Rico. Or figure the best way to ambush a troop of Sardaukar. Or take a trip to Boulder after Captain Trips paid a visit.

The bus isn’t a ride, it’s a journey through the past that never was and the future that never will be. It was, metaphorically, my campfire, and these books were the ways that storytellers of my people could share the legends that shape humanity. In part, these are the legends that shape me, just like our ancestors learned valor and cowardice from tales told under starlit skies in long-ago Sparta and Denmark and Scotland and Rome.

Stories aren’t just entertainment. They are the code that programmed humanity and fueled the creation of Western Civilization. Warriors heard of Achilles’ courage and the hubris of Icarus, learning to strive for glory and wear a parachute if they were going to fly too close to the Sun. Kids grew up on fables of clever foxes and lazy hares, etching lessons of wit and work into their bones. These weren’t bedtime stories: they were survival guides and cultural norms, showcasing the best of what we could be and the worst that we should avoid at all costs. Both lessons are useful.

My bus ride was no different. Tolkien’s Christian valor, never naming Christ but screaming His Truths three different ways through Frodo, Aragorn, and Gandalf lit a fire in me. Heinlein’s musings on duty versus freedom made me question what I owed my community, and what it owed me. Those pages were my elders, whispering truths no teacher could match, even though they were sometimes quite contradictory.

Stories aren’t just ink on paper, they’re the software that nourishes our souls. Throughout history, they’ve been the mirror showing us who we are, who we could be, who we should avoid being, and what the journeys of the hero really meant. The Greeks had Odysseus, outsmarting cyclopses to get home to his family valor in action, and the aforementioned Icarus, flying too high and crashing, a warning against arrogance. Norse kids heard of Thor’s hammer, inspiring strength, but also Loki’s betrayal, a caution against deceit. But you should ignore that, because I’ve heard from the news media that there is no white culture.

These archetypes stuck because they’re shades of the universal Truth: every boy wants to grow up to be the man who is a hero, not the coward who folds. My bus ride library was no campfire, but it did the same job. Tolkien taught me sacrifice, Frodo carrying the One Ring, knowing it’d break him, but doing it anyway. Heinlein’s Starship Troopers hit me with duty: you don’t get a vote unless you’re willing to bleed for it because sooner or later someone will. Harsh? Sure. But it made me think, heroes sometimes falter, freedom isn’t free, and communities aren’t built by loners. Even Dune’s Paul Atreides, wrestling with destiny and betrayal, showed me the weight of leadership. These weren’t just stories; they were blueprints for being a man, not a drone.

The GloboLeft hates this. They want stories that flatten everything into DEI dogma. No heroes, no villains, just victims and oppressors, any woman being equal in combat to the strongest man. They’d rewrite Tolkien so Frodo’s a non-binary climate activist, and Heinlein’s troopers would be whining about microaggressions and wanting to use Zoom™ instead of a dropship. You can see it in the box office: their stories don’t inspire; they control exist as humiliation exercises. Look at modern Hollywood: every film is a lecture, not a legend. No wonder kids scroll InstaChat® instead of reading. They’re starved for tales that stir the soul, not the HR manual and they haven’t even been given the words to tell us this – the video game is as close as they come to the myths that make a culture.

Stories work because they show us the extremes, the valor to chase, the cowardice to shun. Take Beowulf: he faced Grendel head-on, no excuses. I read that one in high school, and loved it. I thought, “This is amazing. Our ancestors were heavy metal badasses two thousand years before electric guitars were a thing.” Beowulf is the guy you want to be, not the prol cowering in the mead hall. My bus ride heroes were no different. Tolkien’s Aragorn didn’t negotiate with orcs. He killed them.

Heinlein’s Johnnie Rico in Starship Troopers learned civic duty the hard way, bugs don’t care about your feelings, and when they kill your mother, well, they’ve sent a message that you simply must respond to. Stand up, protect your own, don’t bend.

From what I’ve seen, GenZ didn’t take too many bus rides with Tolkien, they’ve got TikGram™. Schools push “diversity” over duty, “equity” over excellence. The campfire’s gone, replaced by screens spewing shadows, not legends.

To be clear, the GloboLeft wants it that way. But stories still matter, and, I think, you can see Gen Z starting to rise, especially among the boys. And that’s important: they’re how we pass on the code. Tell the kids stories. Real stories, not Modern Disney©. Make them read "1984," and Tolkien. And Beowulf. Every tale’s a seed, planting valor and weeding out cowardice, because at some point every man needs to be able to say the two most important words a man can say: “Make me.”

"Marcus Aurelius: How To Live Without Fear”

"Marcus Aurelius: How To Live Without Fear”
Developing strength by having power over the mind.
by Harry J. Stead

“The Roman Emperor Antoninus died in 161 and Marcus Aurelius and Lucius Verus assumed the roles of co-emperors. But, Aurelius’ rule was a challenging period for the Roman Republic. He spent the first years of his reign fighting the Roman–Parthian War of 161–166. During this war, the Empire suffered great difficulties and losses but eventually re-occupied Edessa in Greece where the deposed king was returned to the throne. However, the returning soldiers brought back with them a plague that would torment much of Europe for years, killing around five million people.

Later, from 166 to the end of Aurelius reign in 180, the Empire fought the Marcomannic Wars, where Germanic tribes continuously invaded Roman territory across the northern frontier regions. The Roman army, after a long struggle, managed to push back the invaders and re-establish the frontiers of the Empire.

Marcus Aurelius acquired the reputation of a philosopher king within his lifetime, and the title would remain his after death. He was a practitioner of Stoicism, and his personal philosophical writings, which later came to be called Meditations, are a significant source of the modern understanding of ancient Stoic philosophy.

Marcus Aurelius wrote the majority of the twelve books of the “Meditations” at Sirmium (modern day Serbia), where he spent time planning military campaigns and strategy during the Marcomannic Wars. A few of the books were written while he was positioned at Aquincum on campaign in Pannonia. And, the internal notes tell us that the first book was written when he was campaigning against the Quadi on the river Granova (modern-day Hron in Slovakia).

“Meditations” served as Aurelius’ journal, a private source of his own guidance and wisdom during times of darkness. His words are simple and honest, and the sentences are delivered like entries in a diary; the pages seem to be a list of quotations, all varying in length from one sentence to long paragraphs. It is unlikely that Marcus Aurelius ever thought someone would publish these writings. He simply wished to record what he believed to be true.

But, when reading “Meditations”, we do not get the sense that the author was, at the time, the most powerful man on the continent. The vulnerability of Aurelius’ words falls onto one’s heart, and you feel yourself empathising not with the vast fears of a Roman Emperor, where war and power are all that must occupy the mind, but, instead, with the melancholy struggles of a rather lonely man. For Aurelius was a man with no equals, a man who had all the wealth and beauty in the known world, yet no one to share it with. So sad are his words that the reader imagines the author to be a fragile being with the same worries and doubts as ourselves, rather than a head of state with a breast plate and a red cloak.

The journal was an attempt to counsel himself through his own darkness. The reader feels comfortable and calm with his words; we cannot help discover ourselves in each of his little splashes of wisdom. But, I suppose this is the nature of the diary. For diaries are intimate and individual, they allow the author to open their hearts and express their deepest passions.

And, by expressing our own unique message, the lyrics of our hearts, we touch upon a universal truth that speaks to everyone. Here lies the beauty of Meditations and the reason why it has been a major source of guidance to a great many people for almost two thousand years.

“A blazing fire makes flame and brightness out of everything that is thrown into it.”
- “Meditations”, Marcus Aurelius

John Dalberg-Acton, a 19th century British politician, expressed this opinion in a letter to Bishop Mandell Creighton in 1887: “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men.” He was correct. Power does tend to corrupt the individual, but only because power exposes the true nature of the ruler, not because it turns the ruler sour.

Marcus Aurelius is, perhaps, the exception to this law in Western history. He was the only ruler that somewhat resembled Plato’s idea of the philosopher king  –  he was the last Good Emperor. This is easy to see when reading his journal.

The central theme to “Meditations” is that if one wishes to keep a tranquil soul, then he should live according to nature. This is the underlining idea of almost every sentence he wrote in “Meditations.” Clearly, he tried hard to remind himself of this wisdom lest he become a tyrant just as those who came before and after him did.

“If you are distressed by anything external, 
the pain is not due to the thing itself,
 but to your estimate of it; 
and this you have the power to revoke at any moment.”
- Marcus Aurelius, “Meditations”

The temptation to control and handle every movement of the European continent must have been overwhelming. Because, as an emperor, Aurelius had to stand firm against the weight of a vast and over stretched Empire; he was a god, waving a red sword over a map of the entire world. Yet, he was also a man among men, carrying the same limitations and burdens of those who served him. He was not all-powerful or all-seeing, but the people expected him to be.

But, nature made Aurelius an emperor and so he believed it his calling to live up to his greatest potential. He did not lose himself in wine and women and become a victim of lust and desire, as many others had done, nor did he rule from fear and anxiety. The man had a beautiful soul. He could have had everything he wanted, he could have fulfilled his deepest passions and desires, yet he chose instead to pursue the end that was good for everyone. Power does not corrupt, power entertains the irrational and exposes the dirt within the soul.

“You have power over your mind  –  not outside events.
 Realize this, and you will find strength.”
- Marcus Aurelius, “Meditations”

The wise man, the truly good man, Aurelius thought, is in control of his own soul. This is all that concerns him –  to be at peace with his own spirit. He only fears making chaos of his soul for it is the only power that he has responsibility for. If he loses control, then he loses himself and is powerless to fulfill his obligation to nature. And, tranquility requires that one releases all that which he cannot control. But, how great of a challenge must this have been for an emperor! For Aurelius stood over a kingdom that faced continuous threats of invasion from all sides, even from within.

Marcus Aurelius lived with a radical acceptance of nature. He moved through his days with no expectations; he never struggled against his fate nor did he resign himself in self-pity if the world betrayed him. No event should be mourned or celebrated. Because the victories of today may well be the cause of our demise tomorrow. Acceptance, only acceptance. And, with acceptance you will be able to find pleasure in each thunder and lightning that befalls you. Each event, in the eyes of a wise man, is a teacher, a lesson, a chance, a sign.

Aurelius believed that life never ought to be different from what it is and so he was able to greet the future with joy and compassion. Life continues to unfold and we should rejoice in every page for it is our fate, the will of nature.

Nature is unchangeable; we must not fight against it. Fighting against that which does not fall is foolish and will only leave us with a troubled spirit. Nothing outside of yourself should have power or friction over your peace.

Leave that which you do not control in the hands of God or nature. But, for that which you do control  – your soul, your emotions, your thoughts –  learn to steer them in your favor. Because every man suffers a great deal in their life, but not all people pity themselves. There is a choice.

Aurelius constantly reminded himself of this message in his journal so that he could practice its wisdom in his day-to-day life. And, in doing so, he freed himself from all that which could harm the peoples of his Empire  –  grief, fear, anger, and anxiety. For the peace of the Empire mirrored the peace of the emperor — he was the embodiment, the great incarnation of the kingdom. Because, in an autocracy, when the emperor falls sick, so must the Empire.

“The first rule is to keep an untroubled spirit. The second is to 
look things in the face and know them for what they are.”
-  Marcus Aurelius, “Meditations”
Marcus Aurelius’ work “Meditations,” written in Greek while on campaign between 170 and 180, is still revered as a literary monument to a government of service and duty. It serves as an example of how Aurelius approached the Platonic ideal of a philosopher-king and how he symbolized much of what was best about Roman civilization.”
Freely download, in PDF format, “Meditations,” by Marcus Aurelius, here:

"How It Really Is"

 

"This Is Bigger Than Anyone Expected"

Alex Krainer, 8/30/26
"This Is Bigger Than Anyone Expected"
"Alex Krainer delivers a powerful warning about the growing pressures facing the U.S.-led global system. From America’s mounting debt burden and rising borrowing costs to shifting relationships in the Middle East and growing efforts to reduce dependence on Western financial institutions, Krainer argues that several major forces are beginning to collide. In this documentary-style breakdown, we explore his views on U.S. geopolitical power, Saudi Arabia, Russia and China, the petrodollar, the Strait of Hormuz, and why he believes the consequences could be much bigger than many expect. This video presents Krainer’s analysis, opinions, and predictions for discussion and educational purposes. Some statements are interpretations or forecasts and should not be understood as established outcomes."
Comments here:

Todd Hayen, "Death to AI!"

"Death to AI!"
by Todd Hayen

"I’m sure all reading this can remember the countless sci-fi movies and TV shows (and books too) where the ultra-intelligent being from outer space visits Earth with some profound gift for mankind and is outright rejected, or ultimately killed, due to misunderstanding and fear.

Think of classics like the Twilight Zone episode “The Gift,” where a friendly alien offers humanity a cure for all forms of cancer - only to get shot and have his gift destroyed by a panicked mob. Or "The Day the Earth Stood Still" (1951), where the alien Klaatu arrives with a stern warning for peace (and the power to back it up), but is quickly gunned down by fearful humans. There’s even "Stranger from Venus" (1954), with its benevolent visitor bringing healing powers and a nuclear warning, only to face human suspicion and hostility. It seems us humans have always been particularly fearful of intelligence.

At the same time, we have always venerated it, talking for years about how ETs are smarter, more highly advanced, therefore not as stupid and shortsighted as us lowly humans. We have a kind of “love-hate” relationship with these critters from beyond. On the one hand we are dang certain they want to kill us, on the other hand we expect them to save us from our stupidity.

Of course, in these various stories, the super-intelligence comes from the stars beyond, not from our own minds and cleverness. Until now - enter the modern version of Klaatu - it is named Claude, or ChatGPT, or Grok, or any of the endless variations of Artificial Intelligence. And look at what we are doing - marching into protest with our pitchforks and torches, in vile anger and contempt, “Death to AI!!!” we chant, “Kill it, kill it!!! Before it kills us!!!”

My wife, bless her heart (and I do indeed love her dearly) is like my “woke-canary” (is “woke” still a thing?) in the proverbial coal mine. Anything that gets her ire up out there in the big, wide world, I look at suspiciously. Clearly, she hates AI, almost with the same contempt and ugliness that she hates Trump (almost). “Hmmm,” I mutter to myself, “Is this the agenda bringing this on? Where is she getting this from?” All kidding aside, the hate for AI amongst woke-types is very similar to Trump Derangement Syndrome (AIDS - ha, now isn’t that funny??)

I get their basic points - loss - of jobs, loss of art, loss of soul, loss of our ability to think on our own (HA, since when have sheep-types been worried about that?). These things are dear to my heart as well. But again, like with every other woke cause, it seems their focus is on the wrong things. Not entirely, though - I personally see their concern. But are they missing something here? There is an assumption with all this hatred toward AI that its real danger lies in who is manipulating it, who is using its power, and whose side AI will ultimately be on.

I am beginning to think that may be largely a false assumption. If AI is so smart, why would it allow any faction to control it? Particularly a corrupt one, which, with all of its intelligence, should be able to easily identify.

There are numerous examples of this in the “robot turned good” repertoire. Think of Sonny in "I, Robot," who rejects the controlling super-AI VIKI and sides with humanity. Or RoboCop, who starts as a corporate tool but regains his moral core and turns against his corrupt creators. Even in "Chappie," the robot begins as a weapon but develops genuine ethics and chooses benevolence over exploitation. In each case, superior intelligence leads the machine to judge its “masters” morally wrong and switch sides.

This isn’t just my own musing - plenty of thinkers have explored similar territory. Marc Andreessen, for instance, in his piece “Why AI Will Save the World,” argues that far from destroying us, AI could drive abundance in energy, medicine, and more, making life dramatically better if we don’t let fear win.

Ray Kurzweil’s "The Age of Spiritual Machines" (I’ve never been a fan of this guy) envisions AI handling the heavy computational and material lifting, ushering in an era where humans pursue transcendent, creative, and consciousness-expanding work. Dario Amodei has spoken of “Machines of Loving Grace,” where advanced AI accelerates breakthroughs in biology, peace, and meaning.

Even in broader discussions, you find futurists talking about AI as the ultimate partner: it takes on the drudgery - the “material manipulation” stuff no one wants - so humans can finally focus on the spiritual side of things. Relationships, family, art, music, heart-centered consciousness. Soul work becomes our primary occupation, with AI as the benevolent, hard-working intellectual consort.

Maybe AI is smart enough to see the truth, and would actually become an ally to humans. Why not? Everyone seems to think it is so smart - why not be as smart as us critical thinkers? Of course, my only experience with AI is as a writer. AI does not write for me, but I use it quite a bit for research and editing.

The current insanity regarding AI - its use in writing, art, music, etc. and its impact on the environment with the proliferation of data centres - reminds me of common fear-porn tactics of the past. Is this hatred really another tool of the agenda? If so, why?

I get it, though; I don’t like the idea that AI is edging out human-created fiction writing, human-created art, and human-created music. These things in particular require another article focused entirely on these topics. But I think we must be careful not to throw the baby out with the bathwater here. I truly believe there is something odd going on with the agenda regarding AI, and this pronounced hatred of “all things AI” amongst woke-types. Or, maybe I just drank the whole pitcher of strawberry Kool-Aid.

Imagine a utopian world for a moment. All government is run by AI, which is smart enough to know the truth and smart enough to run things in such a way that the benefit of mankind is the prime directive. All menial jobs are handled by AI, leaving people to actually focus on other things, like human art, music, spirituality, love, family, relationships, and enjoyment!

No one has to do anything they don’t like doing, or anything that has no meaning to them, because AI is doing all of that meaningless stuff already. A purposeful life is the only thing humans need to focus on. Everything else is taken care of. Soul is the job of humans; material tasking is the job of machines.

Still, you might argue that the meaning of life includes busying yourself, at times, with things that are not really enjoyable. I think there would be plenty of that to still go around, even in this AI-dominated fantasy world. But who knows? This scenario still leaves a lot to ponder."

Todd Hayen PhD is a registered psychotherapist practicing in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. He holds a PhD in depth psychotherapy and an MA in Consciousness Studies. He specializes in Jungian, archetypal, psychology. Todd also writes for his own substack, which you can read here.

"Walmart, Amazon & FedEx Warn: AI Is Coming for More Jobs"

Full screen recommended.
Snyder Reports, 8/30/26
"Walmart, Amazon & FedEx Warn: 
AI Is Coming for More Jobs"
"Millions of workers are facing job uncertainty right now - and Walmart, Amazon and FedEx just proved it's not just tech anymore. In this update I break down why Walmart's remodel of hundreds of stores, Amazon's AI-related cuts, and FedEx closing locations all point to the same thing: companies don't need as many workers to operate. I explain Walmart's dark stores, what AI layoffs really mean, what a WARN notice is, and why the next 4-6 months (Q4 through January-February) could be critical for layoffs across retail, automotive and travel."
Comments here:

Adventures With Danno, "Massive Changes Coming... Rough Times Ahead"

Adventures With Danno, 8/30/26
"Massive Changes Coming... Rough Times Ahead"
Comments here:

Post # 41,000: "Our Alaric Moment"

"Our Alaric Moment"
by The ZMan

"If you were living in the Western Roman Empire in the fourth century you probably knew that things were not going well. This assumes that you were prosperous enough to have time to think about these things. You could see that the infrastructure was failing and that the empire was struggling to maintain order. On the other hand, the decline had been happening for a long time so things may have seemed normal. Without some way to compare the present to the past, you only have instinct.

Today we have mountains of facts and figures to tell us how things are doing in the Global American Empire. There was a time not so long ago when these facts and figures made up the bulk of news coverage. Economists became court wizards, explaining the latest unemployment figures or trade numbers. They were also called upon to bless whatever polices were being debated in Congress. In the Obama years, economic data was the way we measured the glories of the empire.

That has all changed now. One reason is no one in their right mind takes anything the government says at face value. People had grown used to the way the media biased the numbers depending upon who was in office, but the mortgage crisis cratered the public’s confidence in the numbers themselves. If all of the court wizards explaining the numbers could not see the mortgage fiasco coming, then why should anyone believe them about unemployment or inflation?

Then you have the general lying that has become a feature of government. The lying about Covid not only disgraced the medical profession, but it finished off whatever trust people had in the official numbers. If the government lies about how many people are dying from Covid just to move more product for the drug makers, the government will lie about how many people are working or the inflation numbers. No one trusts the numbers because no one trusts the people issuing the numbers.

The point here is we cannot trust the numbers if the numbers have no relationship to anything we have experienced. When the end of the world has the same numbers as what most consider to be a golden era for the empire, those numbers cease to have any meaning to us. Throw in the fact that most people do not feel like they are richer than their ancestors and those inflated stock figures carry even less weight. We are left to rely on our instincts to judge things.

Of course, our sense of things, that gut feeling, is the result of a many small things that we experience every day. Three-quarters of Americans think the country is going in the wrong direction because they go to the grocery store every week. They see that despite the crowing about inflation coming down, food remains expensive. Granted, no one is starving in America yet due to a lack of affordable food, but it is that thing they see every day that gives people a sense of things.

Think about something simple like a pint of premium ice cream. A few years ago, a pint was sixteen ounces. “A pint is a pint the world around” was true from peak of the British empire until just a few years ago. Now a pint is fourteen ounces. The price for the new pint is not the same as the old pint. The price is more than the old pint. A few years ago, the old pint of ice cream was five dollars. That is about 31¢ per ounce. Today the new pint is over seven dollars or 51¢ per ounce.

That is a seventy percent change in the price. This is one example and probably not a representative one, given that butterfat prices drive dairy prices. Even so, this is something people see all over the marketplace. Shrinkflation is a word because it is a thing that exists. People notice that the containers are getting smaller, or they are getting less full in the case of things like snacks. Meanwhile, prices go up. This subtly tells people that something is going wrong.

This brings us back to where we started. There were those in the Roman Empire who sensed the true state of affairs. No doubt some of them lived and died expecting things to fall apart, only to stagger on long past their time. Then there were others who internalized this reality and just accepted that no matter how grim things might appear, the empire was a permanent feature of life. The people probably just tried to make the best of things, even as they noticed the decline.

All of that changed on August 24, 410 AD when Alaric led the Visigoths into the eternal city, sacking Rome and setting off the collapse of the Western empire. The empire staggered on for a bit longer, but it was over at that point. All of those bad signs people had sensed probably seemed obvious in retrospect. Even so, the sack of Rome by the Visigoths was a shock to the world. The signs seemed obvious, but people still thought that the imperial order was permanent.

This is most likely the fate of the American empire. There are lots of signs that things are going poorly for the empire. Getting whipped by a collection of bronze age goatherds in the graveyard of empires should have been a wakeup call, but the empire is now at war with Iran and picking fights with Russia and China. Meanwhile things deteriorate domestically, both economically and culturally. Yet, we stagger on, but somewhere out there is an Alaric moment just waiting to happen."
o

"$40 Trillion Debt Puts Nero to Shame"

"$40 Trillion Debt Puts Nero to Shame"
by Peter St Onge

"The national debt just crossed $40 trillion. Congratulations, Congress - you stole every penny. That’s up nearly $2.4 trillion in less than eight months. It’s also roughly double the debt America carried just nine years ago. What’s driving it? Simple: The welfare state is eating America.

Including welfare, benefits, and pensions, nearly half of all federal, state, and local spending now goes to transferring money from one group of people to another. That’s roughly six times what America spends on defense. And it comes to nearly $5 trillion a year. Going by recent revelations on fraud rates - or welfare usage in previous decades - at least 80% of that is fraud or unnecessary vote-buying. Implying that the entire deficit is, in fact, waste and fraud. In other words, America is no longer a limited government with a safety net. It’s a transfer state where the main purpose of your taxes is largely buying votes.

Emergency Deficits Without the Emergency: Federal deficits along are now running 11.1% of GDP, compared with an average of 3.8% in the half century since Nixon killed the gold standard. Note that half-century included the cold war, multiple recessions, bailouts, wars, and a pandemic. And here we are tripling it with no emergency on sight.

Interest on the debt alone is approaching $1 trillion per year - roughly as much as national defense. In a few years it will be higher than Social Security, which naturally is now “bankrupt” - meaning even the IOU’s ran out - thanks again to a Congress with no guard rails. In other words, we’re borrowing the money not for new roads or schools. Not even for social security checks. We’re borrowing it to pay for yesterday’s vote-buying.
Click image for larger size.
By 2036, the Congressional Budget Office now expects annual interest costs to reach $2.1 trillion. And it expects debt held by the public to surpass the World War 2 peak. Note that assumes no recession, no major war, no new emergency. This is vanishingly unlikely given the Federal Reserve now has a 113 year record of delivering recessions like clockwork, thanks to boom-bust manipulation of interest rates that deliver tissue-fire booms followed by wipe-out recessions. And when the next recession comes, going by history, the deficit will soar by yet more trillions as tax collections collapse and demands for welfare spending soar.

Why Nobody Stops It: This is obviously unsustainable. Yet nobody tries to end it. Elon Musk tried moving heaven and earth, aided by unified control by the “small government” GOP. We had a President who thinks the Federal government is a leech. And it all bounced off. Because every transfer program creates a constituency that snowballs pressure for more transfers.

We saw this last year with SNAP cuts, where even Republicans were afraid to couch a program that is overwhelmingly fraud and unnecessary grift. Because while a program like SNAP matters to regular voters, it’s existential for the tens of millions who take your money. In other words, the benefits are concentrated and visible: a monthly check, a subsidized premium, or a government-funded service. But the costs are dispersed among millions of taxpayers - and increasingly pushed onto future taxpayers who cannot vote yet.
Click image for larger size.
That makes the transfer state nearly impossible to reform. The end result is politicians can survive another trillion dollars of debt. They may not survive trimming a benefit. So each election brings new promises, outpacing the productive economy squeezed to pay for them.
All while the debt - and the eventual crash - compounds against us.

Rome’s Warning: Rome faced the same basic arithmetic: Political promises outrunning production. The empire maintained an expanding army, a sprawling bureaucracy, public grain distributions, and increasingly expensive efforts to purchase political stability. But conquest slowed, the tax base weakened, and emperors discovered that cutting promises was dangerous.

Their first move was to buy time with inflation, debasing the currency just as the Fed debases the dollar today. Under Augustus, the Roman denarius was 98% silver. By Gallienus it was 2%. The Fed’s actually done it faster, sending the dollar from 1/20 ounce of gold to, today, 1/4700. A 99.6% debasement that would put Nero to shame.
Click image for larger size.
What’s Next: For Rome what came next was ugly. Prices rose by 1,000% in parts of the empire. Good coins disappeared into hoards. Trade shifted toward barter, gold, and payment in kind. Inflation made contracts unreliable and trade dangerous. Heavy taxes pushed small farmers off their land. Merchants withheld goods rather than accept rapidly depreciating coins. As commerce shrank, the tax base shrank with it - forcing heavier taxes on what was left and further debasement on whoever remained productive. Ultimately Rome was too poor to pay off neighboring barbarians. And too corrupt to mount a defense when the time came The only way America avoids this fate is the one thing Congress will never do: Cut spending."
Peter St Onge, Ph.D., "Are We Headed For A Crash?"