StatCounter

Tuesday, October 7, 2025

The Myth of Human Progress”

Full screen recommended.
“The Myth of Human Progress”
By Chris Hedges

“Clive Hamilton in his “Requiem for a Species: Why We Resist the Truth About Climate Change” describes a dark relief that comes from accepting that “catastrophic climate change is virtually certain.” This obliteration of “false hopes,” he says, requires an intellectual knowledge and an emotional knowledge. The first is attainable. The second, because it means that those we love, including our children, are almost certainly doomed to insecurity, misery and suffering within a few decades, if not a few years, is much harder to acquire. To emotionally accept impending disaster, to attain the gut-level understanding that the power elite will not respond rationally to the devastation of the ecosystem, is as difficult to accept as our own mortality. The most daunting existential struggle of our time is to ingest this awful truth – intellectually and emotionally – and continue to resist the forces that are destroying us.

The human species, led by white Europeans and Euro-Americans, has been on a 500-year-long planetwide rampage of conquering, plundering, looting, exploiting and polluting the Earth – as well as killing the indigenous communities that stood in the way. But the game is up. The technical and scientific forces that created a life of unparalleled luxury – as well as unrivaled military and economic power – for the industrial elites are the forces that now doom us. The mania for ceaseless economic expansion and exploitation has become a curse, a death sentence. But even as our economic and environmental systems unravel, we lack the emotional and intellectual creativity to shut down the engine of global capitalism. We have bound ourselves to a doomsday machine that grinds forward, as the draft report of the National Climate Assessment and Development Advisory Committee illustrates.

Complex civilizations have a bad habit of destroying themselves. Anthropologists including Joseph Tainter in “The Collapse of Complex Societies,” Charles L. Redman in “Human Impact on Ancient Environments” and Ronald Wright in “A Short History of Progress” have laid out the familiar patterns that lead to systems breakdown. The difference this time is that when we go down the whole planet will go with us. There will, with this final collapse, be no new lands left to exploit, no new civilizations to conquer, no new peoples to subjugate. The long struggle between the human species and the Earth will conclude with the remnants of the human species learning a painful lesson about unrestrained greed and self-worship.

“There is a pattern in the past of civilization after civilization wearing out its welcome from nature, overexploiting its environment, overexpanding, overpopulating,” Wright said when I reached him by phone at his home in British Columbia, Canada.

“They tend to collapse quite soon after they reach their period of greatest magnificence and prosperity. That pattern holds good for a lot of societies, among them the Romans, the ancient Maya and the Sumerians of what is now southern Iraq. There are many other examples, including smaller-scale societies such as Easter Island. The very things that cause societies to prosper in the short run, especially new ways to exploit the environment such as the invention of irrigation, lead to disaster in the long run because of unforeseen complications. This is what I called in ‘A Short History of Progress’ the ‘progress trap.’ We have set in motion an industrial machine of such complexity and such dependence on expansion that we do not know how to make do with less or move to a steady state in terms of our demands on nature. We have failed to control human numbers. They have tripled in my lifetime. And the problem is made much worse by the widening gap between rich and poor, the upward concentration of wealth, which ensures there can never be enough to go around. The number of people in dire poverty today – about 2 billion – is greater than the world’s entire population in the early 1900s. That’s not progress.

If we continue to refuse to deal with things in an orderly and rational way, we will head into some sort of major catastrophe, sooner or later. If we are lucky it will be big enough to wake us up worldwide but not big enough to wipe us out. That is the best we can hope for. We must transcend our evolutionary history. We’re Ice Age hunters with a shave and a suit. We are not good long-term thinkers. We would much rather gorge ourselves on dead mammoths by driving a herd over a cliff than figure out how to conserve the herd so it can feed us and our children forever. That is the transition our civilization has to make. And we’re not doing that.”

Wright, who in his dystopian novel “A Scientific Romance” paints a picture of a future world devastated by human stupidity, cites “entrenched political and economic interests” and a failure of the human imagination as the two biggest impediments to radical change. And all of us who use fossil fuels, who sustain ourselves through the formal economy, he says, are at fault.

Modern capitalist societies, Wright argues in his book “What Is America?: A Short History of the New World Order,” derive from European invaders’ plundering of the indigenous cultures in the Americas from the 16th to the 19th centuries, coupled with the use of African slaves as a workforce to replace the natives. The numbers of those natives fell by more than 90 percent because of smallpox and other plagues they hadn’t had before. The Spaniards did not conquer any of the major societies until smallpox had crippled them; in fact the Aztecs beat them the first time around. If Europe had not been able to seize the gold of the Aztec and Inca civilizations, if it had not been able to occupy the land and adopt highly productive New World crops for use on European farms, the growth of industrial society in Europe would have been much slower. Karl Marx and Adam Smith both pointed to the influx of wealth from the Americas as having made possible the Industrial Revolution and the start of modern capitalism. It was the rape of the Americas, Wright points out, that triggered the orgy of European expansion. The Industrial Revolution also equipped the Europeans with technologically advanced weapons systems, making further subjugation, plundering and expansion possible.

Wright explained this further on our call. “The experience of a relatively easy 500 years of expansion and colonization, the constant taking over of new lands, led to the modern capitalist myth that you can expand forever. It is an absurd myth. We live on this planet. We can’t leave it and go somewhere else. We have to bring our economies and demands on nature within natural limits, but we have had a 500-year run where Europeans, Euro-Americans and other colonists have overrun the world and taken it over. This 500-year run made it not only seem easy but normal. We believe things will always get bigger and better. We have to understand that this long period of expansion and prosperity was an anomaly. It has rarely happened in history and will never happen again. 

We have to readjust our entire civilization to live in a finite world. But we are not doing it, because we are carrying far too much baggage, too many mythical versions of deliberately distorted history and a deeply ingrained feeling that what being modern is all about is having more. This is what anthropologists call an ideological pathology, a self-destructive belief that causes societies to crash and burn. These societies go on doing things that are really stupid because they can’t change their way of thinking. And that is where we are.

And as the collapse becomes palpable, if human history is any guide, we like past societies in distress will retreat into what anthropologists call “crisis cults.” The powerlessness we will feel in the face of ecological and economic chaos will unleash further collective delusions, such as fundamentalist belief in a god or gods who will come back to earth and save us.”

As Wright told me: “Societies in collapse often fall prey to the belief that if certain rituals are performed all the bad stuff will go away. There are many examples of that throughout history. In the past these crisis cults took hold among people who had been colonized, attacked and slaughtered by outsiders, who had lost control of their lives. They see in these rituals the ability to bring back the past world, which they look at as a kind of paradise. They seek to return to the way things were. Crisis cults spread rapidly among Native American societies in the 19th century, when the buffalo and the Indians were being slaughtered by repeating rifles and finally machine guns. People came to believe, as happened in the Ghost Dance, that if they did the right things the modern world that was intolerable – the barbed wire, the railways, the white man, the machine gun – would disappear.

We all have the same, basic psychological hard wiring. It makes us quite bad at long-range planning and leads us to cling to irrational delusions when faced with a serious threat. Look at the extreme right’s belief that if government got out of the way, the lost paradise of the 1950s would return. Look at the way we let oil and gas exploration rip when we knew that expanding the carbon economy was suicidal for our children and grandchildren. The results can already be felt. When it gets to the point where large parts of the Earth experience crop failure at the same time then we will have mass starvation and a breakdown in order. That is what lies ahead if we do not deal with climate change.

If we fail in this great experiment, this experiment of apes becoming intelligent enough to take charge of their own destiny, nature will shrug and say it was fun for a while to let the apes run the laboratory, but in the end it was a bad idea.”

"A Dangerous Place..."

"If I were to remain silent, I'd be guilty of complicity."
- Albert Einstein

"Wrong is wrong, even if everyone is doing it.
Right is right even if only you are doing it."
- Author Unknown

"How It Really Is, And Always Will Be..."

Hey, they have something big for you too, Good Citizen...
Same as it ever was, same as it ever will be...

Dan, I Allegedly, "Proof Business is Struggling - Pop Ups and Mergers"

Full screen recommended.
Dan, I Allegedly, 10/7/25
"Proof Business is Struggling - 
Pop Ups and Mergers"
"Amazon is stepping up its grocery game! In today’s video, I break down Amazon's bold move to take on Walmart and Target in the grocery business with their new Amazon Grocery stores. Using a UK-inspired model, Amazon aims to become the top discount grocery store—can they pull it off? I also dive into the return of Toys R Us with pop-up stores, the latest bank mergers like Fifth Third and Comica, and what it all means for the economy. Plus, a few bonus stories about ultra-wealthy trends, retirement savings, and why some discount programs just don’t work anymore."
Comments here:

Bill Bonner, "Are We There Yet?"

"Are We There Yet?"
by Bill Bonner

"That which does not kill you makes you stronger."
- Friedrich Nietzsche

Youghal, Ireland - "The Financial Times reports: "UK start-up seeks to reverse aging with drug aimed at blocking cell death. LinkGevity plans global trial targeting kidney damage in first step to reversing necrosis."

Now, there’s a cause we can get behind! Not since Jesus Christ has there been the promise of everlasting life. And LinkGevity is promising not just to slowthe ageing process...but to reverse it. Where do we sign up? And please stop the reversal when we get back to age 18 or so...no need to go through pimples and puberty once again. But what would it mean? If we could stop death...what couldn’t we stop?

The geniuses who run public policies have been trying to stop bear markets, crashes, unemployment and recessions for many years. Not much success so far. Like Smokey the Bear, who snuffs out forest fires, they can delay corrections by easing credit. But people use the low rates to go deeper into debt...the dry tinder piles up on the forest floor and makes the inevitable conflagrations even worse.

And today, the things the feds are trying to stop grow closer. Fortune: "America saw ‘essentially no job growth’ last month, warns Moody’s, and any roles added were in three wealthy states. And if you live in Wyoming, Montana, Minnesota, Mississippi, Kansas, Massachusetts, Washington, Georgia, New Hampshire, Maryland, Rhode Island, Illinois, Delaware, Virginia, Oregon, Connecticut, South Dakota, New Jersey, Maine, lowa, West Virginia, District of Columbia...you’re probably already in a recession."

Here’s Newsweek: "According to (Mark) Zandi’s analysis, 21 states and the District of Columbia are currently either in a recession or at high risk of entering one. Zandi categorizes 13 state economies as “treading water,” and 16 as growing.

Unnatural things, such as internal combustion engines, get no benefit from setbacks. A motor is intended to function in a certain way under certain conditions. Drain away the oil...cut the ignition cables...twist the tie rods - almost anything that is out of line with the user’s manual will cause dysfunction.

But natural things - living things - are different. They need curve balls, challenges, and corrections to grow...to learn...to triumph. Businesses learn from their Edsels and Cybertrucks. An investor who has lost money on Pets.com may be reluctant to buy Palantir. And interest rates - which the feds try to keep as low as possible - need to rise to flush out bad bets.

Even death has its purpose. How else to get rid of geezers and make room for the next generation?

Patterns. Patterns. Patterns. Patterns within patterns. Patterns coinciding with other patterns. Patterns that seem to off-set each other. Life...death. Boom...bust. Success...failure. We are all part of these patterns, not the architects or controllers of them. When a child is born, you might as well alert the funeral parlor. There is no doubt where this will lead - to lilies and the grave. It doesn’t matter what we think or what we want. We get what the pattern gives us, not what we want.

Few investors want to see their favorite bubble stocks collapse. But that is what they do. In a well-documented pattern, bubbles always deflate. Yes, of course there are always good ‘reasons’ why the bubble will not deflate. ‘AI will bring unparalleled progress.’ ‘Tariffs will pay off the national debt.’ ‘All that money on the sidelines will soon go into the stock market.’ Even bad news can give us reasons for believing in greater stock market glory. ‘Investors are going to buy stocks to protect themselves from inflation!’

All of these things are part of the pattern. A bubble draws in investors...hoping to get rich. More and more ‘reasons’ are found to believe in it. Prices go higher; Palantir sells, not just for one-times sales...but 110 times. And then...the bubble pops. Where are we now? Our guess: very near the top. We’ll see."

Adventures With Danno, "Unbelievable Prices at Walmart"

Full screen recommended.
Adventures With Danno, 10/7/25
"Unbelievable Prices at Walmart"
Comments here:

"3I/ATLAS Just Fired an Intense Beam of Light Towards Earth"

Full screen recommended.
Hidden Headlines, 10/7/25
"3I/ATLAS Just Fired an Intense 
Beam of Light Towards Earth"
Comments here:
o
Full screen recommended.
Infinity Loop, 10/7/25
"Oumuamua Back in Contact - 
What NASA Just Detected Will Shock You!"
Comments here:

"A Reasonable End"

"A Reasonable End"
by The ZMan

Did cavemen feel guilt? Shame? It may sound like a stupid and pointless question, but it is a place to start when trying to understand the current crisis. While we cannot know if primitive man felt things like shame, we can guess. In fact, that is the point of the Genesis story of Adam and Eve. Shame and guilt were not natural to men until introduced by devilish forces. At least that is what the authors of the Adam and Eve story surmised when trying to answer those questions.

To feel guilt one must have a guilty mind when committing some act, which means you knew the act was wrong when you did it. You can also feel guilt for having unknowingly broken a rule but learning after the fact that you broke the rule and should have known you were breaking the rule. Shame works the same way. It is impossible to feel guilt for having broken a rule if you never know about the rule or you reject the legitimacy of the rule or the authority that made the rule.

Our cavemen therefore could only feel guilt or shame if in their group there existed a set of normative rules from a recognized authority. Given the simplicity of their life and the demands of it, they probably had few rules on individual conduct. Those that did exist were most likely related to the preservation of the group. Males had to be good hunters and not avoid pulling their weight in the hunt. Members had to sacrifice themselves for the good of the group. That was about it for their morality.

To answer the question at the start, the sense of guilt and shame was probably as primitive as the moral code that existed within the group. Given that early bands of humans were surely based on blood, as in they were extended families, not propositional collections of strangers, things like guilt and shame arose from the biological loyal that lies at the heart of man. We abide by the rules of our kind because they are our family, and we have a natural loyalty to them.

This works fine in small groups, but once small groups started to band together to defend hunting grounds and defensible shelters, something more was needed to extend that natural sense of loyalty to the whole group. The trading of women, which we know was a part of early man’s existence, was one solution. This binds the groups by blood and therefore tapped into biological loyalty. The human sciences tell us that the formation of larger human groups was biological.

This works with a federation of kin groups, but once human settlements reached a large enough size, this was no longer practical, so something else arrived. The solution to the limits of blood was religion, specifically gods. Distantly related people may not feel a great loyalty to one another, but those protected by the same god can feel loyalty to one another in service to that god. Guilt and shame over breaking god’s rules works just as well as guilt and shame over harming the family.

A crude way of summarizing this is we went from, “We are the sons of Grog and this is how the sons of Grog live” to “We are the people who live by this portion of the river, and this is how we live.” The next logical step was, “We are the followers of sky god, and this is how we live.” This allows for the group to expand, as new members merely must accept sky god and be accepted by sky god. It harnesses guilt and shame in the service of a group whose size extends beyond blood.

While the mental state of early man is a bit of a guess for us, we do know that humans organized around their gods. This was the state of the ancient world, about which we know a great deal. While what led to this stage of human development is a bit of guesswork, we know that mankind arrived at this point. By the time there are fully formed gods, there are fully formed moral codes attached to them that define large groups of people with a sense of identity.

That does not solve the puzzle of this age. We know that folk religions eventually gave way to universal religions. About ninety percent of humans belong to a universal religion, which means their religion is open to everyone. You do not have to be born into Hinduism to be a Hindu. Only a tiny portion of humanity sticks with folk religions like Judaism which have a biological component. Everyone else is open to people outside the blood, as long as they accept the moral claims of the faith.

Of course, universalist religion did not end human conflict. In fact, they probably made it worse as the base assumption of universalist religion is that there is only one way to live because there is only one moral authority. Once you accept that your god is the only god, it means the other gods are false. Worse yet, those gods are an afront to your god and they must be eliminated. The way to do that is to conquer the people who are offering up the false god as a challenge to the true god.

The modern West has complicated this further by removing God entirely from the Christian moral framework and replacing him with a mirror called reason. It is reason that tells us that there must be one way of organizing society. It is reason that tells us there must be one moral code. Therefore, it is reason that tells us that alternative ways of organizing society must be false. The same is true for alternative morality, which like a false god, is an afront to reason.

If you think about it, this iteration of the Great Awakening has been little more than the believers of one god attacking those who either reject their god or worship another God, like the God of the Bible. Not only do they hate your lack of guilt over violating their codes, but they also feel guilty for not imposing those codes on you. The followers of the god of reason ended up at witch burning as the solution to heresy. They seek salvation through the spilling of blood.

The crisis in the West is a crisis of reason. We have reasoned ourselves to a dead end where shame and guilt are tied to the assertion that there must be only one moral authority, and it emits only one moral code. Those who must have the warm embrace of faith now target their sense of guilt and shame toward their own kind, for the sin of not embracing what they believe is the only moral code. The rest are left to defend themselves and civilization from the true believers.

The question at the heart of the crisis is can the fury of these zealots be reoriented toward a folk religion or even a passive universalism? If the answer is no, then how can society defend against them? Another way of stating it is, can the cancer be put into remission or must it be removed? It is a terrible question that no one wants to face, but the West must face it. The god of reason is either reformed or removed along with her followers as that is the only reasonable thing to do."

"Mapping Extreme Poverty Across All American States"

"Mapping Extreme Poverty Across All American States"
by Tyler Durden

"In 2024, 6% of the U.S. population lived in extreme poverty, equal to 20.4 million people. While there are different definitions of extreme poverty, this is represented as those earning less than $8,160 in annual income, or half of the poverty line. As the federal budget makes cuts to food assistance and healthcare, levels of extreme poverty run the risk of worsening even further. The above graphic, via Visual Capitalist's Dorothy Neufeld, shows the share of each state living in extreme poverty in 2024, based on data from the U.S. Census Bureau.

Washington D.C. has the highest level of extreme poverty. Last year, more than one in 10 residents of the nation’s capital lived in extreme poverty. Going further, economic hardship disproportionately impacts people of color in Washington D.C., with one in three black children living in poverty between 2019 and 2023, on average.

As we can see, Southern states also rank among the most impoverished. In Louisiana, 9% of residents live in extreme poverty, and on average, 18.9% lived below the poverty line between 2021 and 2023. Meanwhile, 7% of New York’s population are extremely impoverished, equal to an estimated 1.4 million people.

On the other end of the spectrum is New Hampshire with the lowest rate nationally, at 3.9%. The Granite State benefits from a stable job market, low unemployment, and a strong education system. Paired with relatively affordable healthcare, these factors contribute to higher living standards for its residents, reducing the risk of poverty."

But send $359 BILLION to Ukraine, and spend $1 TRILLION on "Defense"...700,000 homeless Americans, including 60,000 veterans, 22 of whom commit suicide every single day, while children go hungry. There are no words for the absolutely total disgrace this country has become... - CP

"The Coup, the Calamity, and the Conspiracy"

"The Coup, the Calamity, and the Conspiracy"
by Jeffrey A. Tucker

"A website specializing in data visuals offered a helpful graphic on global inflation, 2020-2025, with no other comment about how or why this happened. The results are eye-popping and amazing, and a reminder that hardly anyone has fully come to terms with what transpired over five years. Most currencies in the world took a 25-35 percent haircut, Far East excepted.
That’s a technical description that obscures what actually happened. The measures by which most people in the world hold the liquid part of their worldly possessions – the money they earned through hard work and saving – was robbed by a quarter and more.

Where did it go? After all, the wealth didn’t sink in the ocean. It was transferred from one group to another. It went from the poor and middle class to the elites in well-connected industries and government. It was simply sucked away from one sector to another, achieving in a matter of a few years what would have been impossible in normal times.

The forced transfer of wealth went from small business to large, from physical enterprise to digital, from store fronts to online, from citizens to government-connected contractors, from workers to leveraged capital, from families to corporations, from savers to a deeply indebted government, and so on.

You are perfectly free to believe that this was all a mistake. Just bad policy. The world panicked because of a pathogen, and central banks ran the printing presses. Out of compassion for our suffering, legislators rained fresh paper on the population which we used to buy hardware and digital gadgetry, while fostering addiction to online entertainment.

Regrettably and mistakenly, governments criminalized small businesses and subsidized large ones. Inadvertently our communities and extended families were divided and then shattered and replaced with the only technology around, Zooming and TikToking while awaiting artificial intelligence to replace the intelligence lost during school and college closures.

Sadly, the shots that everyone thought would save us made us sicker than ever – surely an earnest attempt gone wrong – while a depressed population got hooked on weed and liquor from shops that remained open, and availed themselves to psych drugs newly available through liberalized access via telehealth. The population in the developed world lost three years of lifespan expectation.

You can believe all of this befell people all over the world at the same time via a series of pathetic misjudgments. Or you could be more realistic and see that this was not a mistake at all. It was entirely intentional, the unfolding of a dark scheme hatched by an indescribably sadistic ruling class. Indeed, if this had all been an accident, we surely would have heard someone apologize by now.

There is also the planning involved. There was Event 201, the lesser-known Crimson Contagion, and many others. They are usually described in the mainstream press as rehearsals for unplanned contingencies, like resiliency training. Absurd. This was plotted far in advance. We have all the receipts. To realize this and connect the dots does not make you a conspiracy theorist. It makes you a person with the capacity to think. To deny nefarious motives and schemes makes you impossibly naive to the point of sedation. At best, it makes you ill-read in history.

After five years, what can we say was the plan and purpose of this calamity? We all have our views. Certainly within Brownstone ranks, there are many opinions. We argue among ourselves all the time. Coming up with a clean and clear explanation is not easy because there are so many moving parts and so many industrial opportunists who took advantage of the crisis to cash out.

So we all have our own judgments. Mine is as follows. There were three primary motivations and purposes for destroying the world as we knew it: Political, Industrial, and Pharmaceutical.

Political: In the years before the Covid response, the deep state in all nations was being put through a wrenching crisis of public plebiscites that were not going their way. This movement was dubbed and denounced as populist, meaning that actual people were using democratic means to voice their opinions. All this happened between 2010 and 2020 – you can date it decades earlier too – culminating in the lockdowns of 195 countries, which was the turning point as a hammer blow against all these populist movements.

In the UK, the voters had approved Brexit, which was a deep wound on the European Union scheme that dates back decades. The chosen leader in the UK was of course Boris Johnson who later found himself humiliated to have to lead the Covid lockdown campaign. The same was happening in Brazil with the rise and challenge to the establishment by Jair Bolsonaro.

In Italy, there was Matteo Salvini as Deputy Prime Minister and Interior Minister who led an Italy First movement, Marine Le Pen as leader of the National Rally in French politics, Viktor Orbán of Hungary who broke with euro-centralism, Geert Wilders of The Netherlands who headed the Party for Freedom, Rodrigo Duterte of the Philippines with populist appeal, Andrzej Duda of Poland who promoted nationalist policies, and Recep Tayyip Erdoğan of Turkey who was aligned with anti-globalist trends.

You don’t have to regard all these people as “good guys” to recognize how terrifying they are to the neo-liberal consensus, the phrase we use to mean permanent government by the administrative state backed by an entrenched industrial elite in finance, pharma, and elsewhere.

Above all else, there was Donald Trump in the US, who won in 2016 despite every conceivable effort and expectation that he would lose. This was the shock of a century of US history, a sure signal that the system set up since before the Great War to rig American electoral outcomes had broken. What was the fear? It was that he was an outsider who might respond to voter wishes and common sense. That much the establishment could not bear.

So the plot was on. It was the media, the financial establishment, the administrative state, all hands on deck. The election was declared invalid because of Russian interference and years of reporting and investigation commenced, which in the end produced absolutely nothing. It just so happened that the American people elected the man to disrupt a system that had been gamed for the better part of their lives.

With all other options failing, they finally played the pandemic card. The action unfolded from the fall of 2019 (the lab leak) through the spring of 2020, when Trump, surrounded on all sides, and after much resistance, finally greenlighted the lockdowns that wrecked the growing economy he had tried to foster.

The promise was that a shot would arrive in time for the election but the release kept being delayed through the summer and fall during which time he only inhibited the office of presidency, but was otherwise ignored and finally deleted from all social media. Nothing could stop the disaster they tried to prevent: he was reelected.

The rest of the history you know: the Russia scam, the impeachments, the wild media attacks, and the later assassination attempts.

Two fascinating unknowns. First, recall that Trump fired James Comey, head of the FBI, throwing all of Washington into a panic. The man at the Department of Justice tasked with the job was Rod Rosenstein. He has a sister, Dr. Nancy Messonnier, who worked at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. It was Nancy who first briefed the US press (February 25, 2020) about the coming lockdowns, without ever having checked with the White House.

Second, the plan was to replace Trump as president with a new head of state, General Terrence John O’Shaughnessy. A 2020 story in Newsweek, taken down after the second Trump inauguration, explains: “According to new documents and interviews with military experts, the various plans – codenamed Octagon, Freejack and Zodiac – are the underground laws to ensure government continuity. They are so secret that under these extraordinary plans, ‘devolution’ could circumvent the normal Constitutional provisions for government succession, and military commanders could be placed in control around America….The officer jokes, in the kind of morbid humor characteristic of this slow-moving disaster, that America had better learn who Gen. Terrence J. O’Shaughnessy is. He is the ‘combatant commander’ for the United States and would in theory be in charge if Washington were eviscerated. That is, until a new civilian leader could be installed.”

This is right out of Hollywood: "Seven Days in May," the 1964 movie starring Burt Lancaster, Kirk Douglas, Fredric March, and Ava Gardner that detailed an attempted military coup against the president.

Technological: The digital revolution dates from the invention of the web browser in 1995 but didn’t have far-reaching industrial implications for another 10 years, at which point online businesses were competing directly with physical ones. The shift was called the third Industrial Revolution – the second being electricity, internal combustion, and the commercialization of steel from 1870 to 1890 – but it was too slow in coming due to legacy habits and slow adoption.

By legend, every great technological shift in history was accompanied by some measure of violence and perhaps this one would be no different. So mused the gurus in the higher ranks of the techno-utopians.

Meanwhile, the power of the new players in town kept growing: Microsoft, Google, Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Twitter, Tesla, Oracle, Palantir, eventually Nvidia, and so many others, the entire suite of what became the stock market’s highest performers. Their presence in Washington grew too, along with the government contracts, rise of Big Data, global economic dependency, and a new professional class convinced that a leisure life of tapping and remote work was their birthright.

This remarkable shift affected every industry, but dreamers in the space believed that a dramatic upheaval was necessary to convince the world of the need for dramatic shift. The “creative” of Joseph Schumpeter’s story – he was a great scholar who is wrongly interpreted and mischaracterized – was done but the “destruction” part was taking too long.

When the lockdowns came to the US in March 2020, the viral article that first explained the thinking and rationale behind “Fourteen Days to Flatten the Curve” was by Tomás Pueyo, the owner of an online learning platform who otherwise had never written about anything epidemiological. He was clearly tasked with the job and his article had been clearly workshopped, and then amplified by every social media platform.

Now in control of public information flows, the Big Tech platforms, which had grown in influence thanks in part to government contracts, got immediately into the business of piecemeal censorship which only intensified month by month. Amazon was deprecating and taking down books on vaccines and pharmaceuticals while all social media took down accounts, Google gamed search, Facebook smashed dissident accounts and groups, and YouTube deleted millions of videos over time.

Communities shattered, families wrecked, friend networks in upheaval, churches disrupted, the population in large parts of the world in 2024 was barely functioning at a level it had five years earlier. Ill-health, substance abuse, and old-fashioned depression set in against the backdrop of learning loss of two years of closures, masks, and shot mandates in all schools. Trillions were dumped on the population to allow them cash to snap up all the latest digital tools and enjoy the benefits of Zoom weddings, funerals, and church services.

Out of nowhere came the magic cure: the artificial intelligence of large-language models. It was there to upgrade search, make reading essentially unnecessary, replace careful thought, and displace all ways of knowing that humanity had previously. It’s even replacing the confessional and counseling session. Do you really believe all this was a coincidence? It looks for all the world to be the most far-reaching industrial reset in world history. It worked.

Pharmaceutical: The world’s most powerful industry – history’s richest and most insidiously influential industry – is pharmaceuticals. There are no close competitors, not even the storied munitions manufacturers, shippers, and slave traders of the past. They seem to have everyone on the hook: media, academia, medicine, professional associations, and the population generally. Before Covid, this was not obvious. Today it should be to anyone paying attention.

Theorists can tell a compelling story about this, how when the search for resources and profits via pillaging was exhausted, the parasites among the state-backed industrial forces turned their attention to the ultimate colonization target: the human body itself.

That might be the big story but the smaller version turns on a technology that showed promise decades ago but never gained approval in normal times: mRNA therapeutics that allow fast potion printing as inoculation of any conceivable pathogen, distributed on a subscription model with digital documentation.

Lacking any means for official approval, the deep embeds in public health turned to emergency use authorization, with the hope of gaining liability protection grandfathered in from the childhood vaccination schedule. The problem of course was that Covid was never a threat to children, but the plotters saw every empirical fact as an obstacle to overcome.

Between whipping up public frenzy about mere exposure, PCR tests with 90 percent false positives, and subsidized sickness and death misclassification, the appearance of a population-wide deadly pandemic was merely a matter of public relations. It also became necessary to pull alternative therapeutics from the shelf, if only to preserve an immunologically naive population for the great inoculation to follow. Audacious doesn’t quite describe the scheme.

It seems incredible for me in particular to type those words. Five years ago, as the organizer of the Great Barrington Declaration, I had no idea of the ferocity of the industry against which we were standing. The lockdowns, the distancing, the masks, the closures, five years ago this week, all to be a giant public-health error, an unscientific lurch into destructive absurdity.

Speaking for myself, it took two years for me fully to realize the role that pharma and modified mRNA played here. The first clue should have been the deprecation of natural immunity, a subject about which humanity has known since the Peloponnesian War. The next clue should have been removal of the shots from J&J and AstraZeneca that used adenovirus-based vector tech, if only to cobble together an mRNA monopoly.

Indeed, there were many clues along the way. I personally received a call from a major player in pandemic planning early on who explained the game plan. It was so absurd that I didn’t believe him and hung up. I should have taken him seriously: after all, he ran pandemic planning under George W. Bush and headed vaccine research for the Gates Foundation.

In the meantime, the evidence of the harm has mounted by the day but so has evidence of the raw power of the mRNA platform. They truly imagine a transhumanist future in which every illness requires a fix that can be monitored using digital technology, a future that guts not only natural biology and free will but also privacy and genuine health. It’s not implausible at all to view this technology as an extension of the eugenics ambition of a century ago.
The Ongoing Crisis

Anyone who imagined that getting one good leader in one country would be the solution to this crisis without precedent is overlooking 1) the Covid response was global not national, and 2) the industries that were driving the agenda are more powerful than any government in the world; indeed all governments in the world.

The recent press conference in which the otherwise resilient and strong Donald Trump was deferring to Pfizer as if it were his boss should have revealed all. RFK, Jr. could only look upon the scene with disdain.

Meanwhile, people in the UK today are being jailed for wrongspeak on Facebook, a new digital ID is coming, and London itself is becoming a carbon-zero 15-minute city. In Brazil, Bolsonaro languishes in prison. The plots and schemes in Europe to keep the populists at bay continue apace. Democracy is still alive in the US; witness the return of Trump. But tech companies are building their technocracy (see the role of Palantir and Starshield) and pharma has survived to experience another chapter of its parasitical profitability.

The battle we kicked off with the Great Barrington Declaration is hardly over. Indeed, it has barely begun. Its conclusion is unknown. But make no mistake: it’s the ideas held in the public mind that drives this narrative of history, not ultimately industrial profits and not government power. This is the source of our optimism. This can be won but the solution is not as effortless as electing a white knight in one country."

Monday, October 6, 2025

"Alert! They Did It! USA Went Nuclear On Russia! Tomahawks Sent! NATO Planes Go Dark!"

A terrifying must-view!
Strong language alert!
Prepper News, 10/6/25
"Alert! They Did It! USA Went Nuclear On Russia! 
Tomahawks Sent! NATO Planes Go Dark!"
Comments here:

Musical Interlude: 2002,"When I See You Again"

Full screen recommended.
2002,"When I See You Again"

"A Look to the Heavens"

"Galaxies don't normally look like this. NGC 6745 actually shows the results of two galaxies that have been colliding for only hundreds of millions of years. Just off the above digitally sharpened photograph to the lower right is the smaller galaxy, moving away. The larger galaxy, pictured above, used to be a spiral galaxy but now is damaged and appears peculiar. Gravity has distorted the shapes of the galaxies.
Although it is likely that no stars in the two galaxies directly collided, the gas, dust, and ambient magnetic fields do interact directly. In fact, a knot of gas pulled off the larger galaxy on the lower right has now begun to form stars. NGC 6745 spans about 80 thousand light-years across and is located about 200 million light-years away."

Chet Raymo, “The Journey”

“The Journey”
by Chet Raymo

"Here's a deep-deep sky map of the universe from the March 9, 2006 issue of Nature. The horizontal scale is a 360 view right around the sky; the vertical gaps at 6 hours and 24 hours are the parts of the universe that are blocked to our view by the disk of our own Milky Way Galaxy. The vertical scale - distance from Earth - is logarithmic (10, 100, 1000, etc.) measured in megaparsecs (a parsec equals 3.26 light-years). Across the top is the Big Bang, and the oldest and most distant thing we can see, the cosmic microwave background, the radiation of the Big Bang itself. A few relatively nearby galaxies are designated at the bottom. All that stuff in the middle that looks like smoke or dusty cobwebs are quasars and galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey.

A smoke of galaxies! (2 trillion galaxies according to latest estimates.- CP) A universe cobwebbed with Milky Ways! Each galaxy itself a smoke of stars, hundreds of billions of stars, many or all of them with planets. My book, "Walking Zero," is about the human journey from the omphalos of our birth into the world of the galaxies, a journey many of us are disinclined to make. Here is how the Prologue to the book begins:

"Each of us is born at the center of the world. For nine months our physical selves are assembled molecule by molecule, cell by cell, in the dark covert of our mother's womb. A single fertilized egg cell splits into two. Then four. Eight. Sixteen. Thirty-two. Ultimately, 50 trillion cells or so. At first, our future self is a mere blob of protoplasm. But slowly, ever so slowly, the blob begins to differentiate under the direction of genes. A symmetry axis develops. A head, a tail, a spine. At this point, the embryo might be that of a human, or a chicken, or a marmoset. Limbs form. Digits, with tiny translucent nails. Eyes, with papery lids. Ears pressed like flowers against the head. Clearly now a human. A nose, nostrils. Downy hair. Genitals.
 
As the physical self develops, so too a mental self takes shape, not yet conscious, not yet self-aware, knitted together as webs of neurons in the brain, encapsulating in some respects the evolutionary experience of our species. Instincts impressed by the genes. The instinct to suck, for example. Already, in the womb, the fetus presses its tiny fist against its mouth in anticipation of the moment when the mouth will be offered the mother's breast. The child will not have to be taught to suck. Other inborn behaviors will express themselves later. Laughing. Crying. Striking out in anger. Loving.
 
What, if anything, goes on in the mind of the developing fetus we may never know. But this much seems certain: To the extent that the emerging self has any awareness of its surroundings, its world is coterminous with itself. We are not born with knowledge of the antipodes, the plains of Mars, or the far-flung realm of the galaxies. We are not born with knowledge of Precambrian seas, the supercontinent of Pangea, or the Age of Dinosaurs. We are born into a world scarcely older than ourselves and scarcely larger than ourselves. And we are at its center.
 
A human life is a journey into the grandeur of a universe that may contain more galaxies than there are cells in the human body, a universe in which the whole of a human lifetime is but a single tick of the cosmic clock. The journey can be disorienting; our first instincts are towards coziness, comfort, our mother's enclosing arms, her breast. The journey, therefore, requires courage - for each individual, and for our species.
 
Uniquely of all animals, humans have the capacity to let our minds expand into the space and time of the galaxies. No other creatures can number the cells in their bodies, as we can, or count the stars. No other creatures can imagine the explosive birth of the observable universe 14 billion years ago from an infinitely hot, infinitely small seed of energy. That we choose to make this journey - from the all-sustaining womb into the vertiginous spaces and abyss of time - is the glory of our species, and perhaps our most frightening challenge.”

"The World..."

“The world is not respectable; it is mortal, tormented, confused, deluded forever;
but it is shot through with beauty, with love, with glints of courage and laughter;
and in these, the spirit blooms timidly, and struggles to the light amid the thorns.”
- George Santayana

"Why Does the Law Not Warn?"

"Why Does the Law Not Warn?"
by Paul Rosenberg

"Everyone who has children, or even nieces and nephews, understands that you have to warn a child before punishing them. If not, you teach the child a rash of bad lessons, like these:

• Punishment can rain down upon you at any time, with no warning.
• The world can’t be predicted.
• There are two kinds of people: those who order and punish and those who obey or suffer.
• The line between what is punished and what is not is unknown.
• Trying new things brings you shame and pain.

I doubt that any of my readers would consider these as healthy attitudes for a child to assume. And that’s why we warn before we punish. We want them to understand that there are rational reasons for punishment, and we don’t want them cowering in perpetual fear. Warning, then, is an essential tool, and yet it plays almost no role in modern law. And this begs the question: Why not?

What Is the Purpose of Law? The purpose of law is to facilitate beneficial interaction and to minimize conflict. This concept, however worded, is what the founders of civilizations nearly always come back to. So, if warnings help beneficial interaction, why should they be pushed out of law? Consider:Is it more beneficial to warn the truck driver that he’s violating some regulation or to enforce the law, impounding his truck for a week in the process? What are the economies of these two scenarios? Which facilitates benefit?

Is it better to warn the kid with five vape kits and a small bag of hashish (or whatever forbidden substance), or is it better to send him to jail and perhaps condemn him to a decade in prison? Is derailing his promising life a factor to be considered? Or must we shut down our minds in the face of “it’s the law”? Would it be better to warn a small business that they’re late on a tax deposit, or should they be ruined instead? Which makes life better for more people?

It’s obvious in all of these cases – and we could add many more – that warning is far better at accomplishing what law is supposed to accomplish than slamming people with automated punishments. Why, then, does the law not warn?

What Has Happened: The use of warnings has historically been common and often mandatory. Even the Romans (no bleeding hearts, they) nearly always warned before they struck. As historian Paul Johnson wrote, "Roman law tended to sleep unless infractions were brought to its attention by the external signs of disorder… Then it warned, and if its warnings were unheeded, acted with ferocity…"

Even into my lifetime, beat cops used to warn people who were passing into criminality. (Hopefully there are a few who still do.) What has happened is that law has been subverted through a long, slow process. Any given part of the process could be viewed as fixing a problem; the net result, however, has been the degrading of law.

Justice, over more or less the whole of the Western tradition, was held above the ruler. But once rulers could create endless streams of new laws and impose outcomes upon judges and juries, law was submerged beneath rulership. Previously (as under the common law), judges sought justice, and the legislated edicts of politicians were all but absent.

As this process continued, politics overtook society, a far more dangerous thing than is usually understood. Power seeks nothing so much as more power. Under that mindset, whatever limits or insults power is an enemy… it becomes the crime of lèse-majesté, of injuring the honor of the ruler.

It’s important to understand that lèse-majesté is not a physical thing like damaging persons or property. It is, rather, an emotional thing. With rulership unrestrained, lèse-majesté becomes anything that portrays power as something to be limited.

Warnings, of course, do not feed power. Rather, they starve it, and that, to the powerful is the same as lèse-majesté: an insult to their position. What’s good for power are fear and blind obedience, and warnings minimize both. If the law warned rather than striking first, there would be far less fear among the ruled, and power would have to justify itself rationally.

In the End…In the end, the situation boils down to this: Warnings clearly help accomplish the proper goal of law: beneficial interaction. But they oppose the demands of power to be blindly obeyed. Therefore warnings have been pushed out of the practice of law. Further, we can expect this situation to remain as long as politics reigns as sovereign over law and as a jealous lord over society."

"Trump Is Threatening To Bomb Iran Again, But Israel May Beat Him To It"

"Trump Is Threatening To Bomb Iran Again,
 But Israel May Beat Him To It"
by Michael Snyder

"During the weeks ahead, I will be watching Israel and Iran like a hawk. Prior to the 12 day war between Israel and Iran earlier this year, it was clear that something was up. Now we are witnessing similar signs, and many experts are concerned that the very fragile ceasefire that was agreed to at the end of the 12 day war could soon collapse. Iran is rebuilding their nuclear sites and is telling western countries that there will be no more negotiations. On the other side, the U.S. and Israel have both pledged that Iran will not be allowed to rebuild their nuclear program. In fact, on Sunday President Trump publicly threatened to bomb Iran again

“They were going to have a nuclear weapon within a month,” Trump said. “And now they can start the operation all over again, but I hope they don’t because we’ll have to take care of that too if they do, I let them know that. You want to do that, it’s fine, but we’re going to take care of that and we’re not going to wait so long.”

Of course President Trump knows very well that Iranian officials have repeatedly stated that they will never give up their nuclear program, and satellite images prove that Iran has been conducting construction work at two very important enrichment facilities…"Three months after US and Israeli strikes on Iran’s nuclear sites, new satellite images show signs of construction work at two of its key enrichment facilities. An analysis of high-resolution satellite imagery captured by Maxar Technologies on 18 September reveals work on a new perimeter and tunnel south of the Natanz enrichment complex. Multiple construction vehicles are visible in an area south of the complex while digging work appears to be underway. Images also show work to extend a perimeter around that same area."

The Iranians responded to Trump’s threat of more bombing on Monday. They called the U.S. “a law-breaking country”, and they made it clear that there will be no negotiations… "Iran’s foreign ministry on Monday branded the United States a “law-breaking” country, rejecting any prospect of talks with Washington after US President Donald Trump warned he would again bomb Iran if it resumes nuclear activities.

Trump’s public remarks amounted to an admission of “a criminal and illegal act” that only reinforced America’s image as a violator of international law, Foreign Ministry Spokesman Esmail Baghaei said during his weekly briefing. “It will be clear to the international community and to the Iranian nation that the United States is a law-breaking country,” Baghaei added. “We have no plan for negotiations.”

The Iranians have clearly made their choice. So how long will Trump wait before he pulls the trigger again? We were surprised by Trump’s timing during the 12 day war, and we may be surprised the next time it happens too. If we bomb Iran, one of the first places that Iran will hit will be our base in Qatar.

Interestingly, President Trump recently signed an order that makes any attack on Qatar a “threat to the peace and security of the United States”…"President Donald Trump signed an order Monday offering a U.S. guarantee for Qatar’s security - a significant commitment for the rising non-NATO Arab ally. “The United States shall regard any armed attack on the territory, sovereignty, or critical infrastructure of the State of Qatar as a threat to the peace and security of the United States,” the order, made public Wednesday, read in no uncertain terms. In the event of such an attack, the United States shall take all lawful and appropriate measures - including diplomatic, economic, and, if necessary, military - to defend the interests of the United States and of the State of Qatar and to restore peace and stability.”

Recently, the U.S. military sent a whole bunch of air tankers to our base in Qatar, and that created quite a stir. Because the last time we witnessed a deployment of air tankers of this magnitude, Iran got bombed… "Behnam Taleblu, senior director of the Iran program at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, tells the Daily Mail, while ‘correlation is not causation’, he can’t help but think of the last time there was a mass tanker deployment by the United States.

‘Soon after that something went boom in the Middle East. Critically, in Operation Midnight Hammer, the Trump administration executed a decoy or deception effort to mask the flight of the B-2 bombers to Iran,’ Taleblu said, emphasizing that he is the only US president in two decades to deploy over military force against Iranian nuclear facilities. ‘Big military movements on his watch are something to keep an eye on,’ Taleblu added. Of course it is also possible that those tankers may have been deployed to assist Israel in new strikes against Iran.

As I discussed in a previous article, Iranian forces have already been put on high alert because Iranian leaders are extremely concerned that new attacks could happen at any moment. And the Institute for the Study of War has come to the conclusion that those running Iran “believe that the ceasefire with Israel will collapse”…"Officials in Iran believe that the ceasefire with Israel will collapse and that conflict will resume in the future, according to the Institute for the Study of War (ISW). The assessment by the Washington, DC think tank outlined how Iran’s Supreme National Security Council (SCNC) had directed military and civilian officials to designate successors in the event of leadership disruption to ensure continuation in the event of war."

If at some point the Iranians are convinced that an Israeli strike is imminent, could they actually choose to strike first in order to get the upper hand? Israeli politician Avigdor Liberman is convinced that this is the case, and he is urging Israeli citizens to “be careful and close to protected spaces” during Sukkot…"He urged Israelis to celebrate cautiously on the coming Sukkot, which starts Monday night and lasts for seven days: “Spend time with family and friends, but be careful and close to protected spaces.”

This year, the first day of Sukkot runs from the evening of October 6th to the evening of October 7th. Needless to say, October 7th is a very significant date for Israel. Two years ago, the war in the Middle East started when Hamas terrorists came pouring across the border. It looks like the conflict in Gaza may be wrapping up, but things with Iran are a long way from being resolved.

Before Israeli leaders sign a comprehensive Middle East peace agreement, they want the threat that Iran poses to be completely neutralized. So I think that we will soon see major events occur in the Middle East, and when that happens the entire globe will be shocked."

A Comment: And I don't give a goddamn who doesn't like it: You know, Michael, I highly respect your analytical and writing skills and agree with most of your opinions, but I do NOT agree with the way you characterize Hamas as "terrorists"- have you not read the true history and not know of the horrible slaughters the psychopathic, inbred degenerate Zionist genocidal monsters have done? And now before the whole world have slaughtered at least 80,000 innocent civilian Palestinians, including 20,000 CHILDREN! And let's not forget these bloodthirsty lunatics have an estimated 300 nuclear bombs, why are you not protesting that? Do you agree with the psychotic mass-delusional "Chosen People" horseshit? They really believe that only they are real humans, while the rest of Mankind is "human animals", as they're so fond of saying publicly. Ever read the Talmud, Michael? You should to learn what they really believe. Sad, Michael, very sad... -CP

The Daily "Near You?"

Greenville, South Carolina, USA. Thanks for stopping by!

don Miguel Ruiz, “The Power of Doubt”

“The Power of Doubt”
by don Miguel Ruiz

“Have you ever asked yourself if something you heard was actually true? Have you ever wondered if someone was lying to you, or worse yet, have you ever wondered, “Am I lying to myself?” Do you believe those voices in your head that are giving you opinions? Do you tend to believe other people’s opinions? If you answered yes to any of these questions, you will understand when being skeptical is a good thing.

Right now, you’re delivering a message to yourself and to everyone around you. You’re always delivering messages, and you’re always receiving messages from one mind to another mind. But the most important messages are the ones you deliver to yourself. What are those messages? The word is a force you cannot see, but you can see the manifestation of that force, the expression of the word, which is your own life. The way to measure the impeccability of your word is to ask yourself: Am I happy or am I suffering? If you’re suffering, it’s because you’re telling yourself a story that isn’t true, but you believe it.

When you look at yourself in a mirror, do you like what you see, or do you judge your body and use the word to tell yourself lies? If you believe that you are not attractive enough, then you believe a lie, and you are using the word against yourself, against the truth.

Is it really true that you are too heavy or too thin? Is it really true that you are not beautiful? If you’re telling yourself: “I’m fat. I’m ugly. I’m old. I’m not good enough. I’ll never make it,” then be skeptical. Don’t believe yourself, because none of these messages come from truth, from life. These messages are distorted; they’re nothing but lies. The truth is, there are no ugly people. There’s no universal book of law where any of these judgments are true. Every judgment is just an opinion - it’s just a point of view - and that point of view wasn’t there when you were born.

Everything you think about yourself, everything you believe about yourself, is because you learned it. You learned the opinions from Mom, Dad, siblings and society. They sent all those images of how a body should look; they expressed all those opinions about the way you are, the way you are not, the way you should be. They delivered a message, and you agreed with that message. And now you think so many things about what you are, but are they the truth?

What is the truth and what is the lie? Humans believe so many lies because we aren’t aware. We ignore the truth or we just don’t see the truth. When we are educated, we accumulate a lot of knowledge, and all that knowledge is just like a wall of fog that doesn’t allow us to perceive the truth, what really is. We only see what we want to see; we only hear what we want to hear. Our belief system is just like a mirror that only shows us what we believe.

In our development, as we grow throughout our lives, the structure of our beliefs becomes very complicated, and we make it even more complicated because we make the assumption that what we believe is the absolute truth. We never stop to consider that our beliefs are only a relative truth that’s always going to be distorted by all the knowledge we have stored in our memory. As children, we are innocent; we believe almost everything that we learn, but everything that we learn isn’t true. We put our faith in lies, we give them power, and soon those lies are ruling our lives.

Just imagine becoming the way you used to be as a very young child, before you understood the meaning of any word, before opinions took over your mind. The real you is loving, joyful and free. The real you is just like a flower, just like the wind, just like the ocean, just like the sun. There is nothing to justify, nothing to believe. You have no mission except to enjoy life. You are here just to be, for no reason. Then the only thing you need to be is the real you. Be happiness. Be love. Be yourself. That’s wisdom. It’s the complete acceptance of yourself just the way you are, and the complete acceptance of everybody else just the way they are. The reward is your eternal happiness.

But first you have to unlearn a lot, and you only have one tool to do this. That tool is doubt. Being skeptical is an important part of recovering what you really are because it uses the power of doubt to break all those spells you’ve been under. Whenever you hear a message from yourself, or from someone else, simply ask: Is it really true? With the power of doubt, you challenge every message you deliver and receive. You challenge every belief that rules your life. Then you challenge all the beliefs that rule society, until you break the spell of all the lies and superstitions that control your world.

Once you recover all the power you invested in lies, you can see what is real; you can feel what is real. Even though lies still exist, you no longer believe them. You don’t believe everything anymore, but you can see, and what you can see is the truth. The truth doesn’t need you to believe it. The truth simply is, and it survives – believe it or not. Lies need you to believe them. If you don’t believe lies, they don’t survive your skepticism, and they simply disappear.

Centuries ago, people believed that the earth was flat. Some said that elephants were supporting the earth, and that made them feel safe. The belief that the earth was flat was considered the truth, and almost everybody agreed, but did that make it true? It was nothing but a superstition, and I can assure you that we still live in a world of superstition. The question is: Are we aware of it?

Wherever you go, you will hear all kinds of opinions and stories from other people. You will find great storytellers wanting to tell you what you should do with your life: “You should do this, you should do that, you should do whatever.” Don’t believe them. Be skeptical, but learn to listen and then make your choices. Be responsible for every choice you make in your life. This is your life; it’s nobody else’s life, and you will find that it’s nobody else’s business what you do with your life.

For centuries, there have been prophets who predicted big catastrophes in the world. Not that long ago, there were people who predicted that in the year 2000 all the computers would fail and society as we know it would disappear. The day arrived, and what happened? Nothing happened. Thousands of years ago, just like today, there were prophets who were waiting for the end of the world. At that time, a great master said: “There will be many false prophets who claim to be speaking the word of God. Don’t believe.” You see, being skeptical is nothing new. Doubt takes you behind the words and helps you to discern the truth from lies. And this is a good thing.”