StatCounter

Tuesday, April 21, 2026

"The Darkest Hours Are Before The Dawn"

"The Darkest Hours Are Before The Dawn"
by No1

"The Fourth Turning doesn’t reveal itself gradually - it crashes over you all at once when you finally start to see the pattern. Writing this piece felt like trying to grab sand in my hands; every attempt to contain one aspect of the transformation led to three more slipping through my fingers. What you’ll read here is my best effort to trace the contours of something far larger than any individual could possibly comprehend."

"The same boiling water that softens the potato hardens the egg."
- Roald Dahl

"We’re all in the same boiling water now - the Fourth Turning’s Crisis that began with Lehman Brothers’ collapse in 2008 - but whether we emerge hardened or dissolved depends entirely on what we’re made of. We’re now deep in the Fourth Turning, the winter of this historical cycle, and if you think the past few years have been chaotic? You ain’t seen nothing yet!

History doesn’t move in straight lines. It breathes, it pulses, it turns through seasons as predictable as winter following autumn. William Strauss and Neil Howe discovered this pattern in 1997. Like clockwork, every 80 years or so – a human lifetime, America faces an existential crisis that threatens to tear apart everything we thought permanent. We’ve been through this three times before, and we’re going through it again right now.

Strauss and Howe predicted in 1997 that around 2005, some spark would ignite a Crisis mood. They suggested it might be “as ominous as a financial crash, as ordinary as a national election, or as trivial as a Tea Party”. They nailed it. The 2008 financial crisis wasn’t just another recession - it was the moment the post-World War II global order began its death spiral. Lehman Brothers’ September 15, 2008 collapse marked more than a bank failure; it marked the beginning of the end of trust in the system itself.

I’ve started following these markets around 2007, and what happened after that particular collapse was unprecedented. The Federal Reserve’s balance sheet exploded from $900 billion to $4 trillion in a matter of years, then to $9 trillion during COVID. The national debt, which stood at $10 trillion in 2008, has now reached $39 trillion as of April 2026. We didn’t solve the crisis - we papered it over with printed money and kicked the can down the road. We didn’t solve the problem - we made it exponentially worse. As someone who tracks gold markets, I can tell you with increasing clarity: the people who actually understand money are quietly converting their paper promises into something that can’t be printed.

The response to 2008 revealed something critical: our institutions no longer functioned as designed. The Federal Reserve, created to be a lender of last resort, became the market itself. Banks that should have failed were declared “too big to fail”. Capitalism’s core principle - that bad bets lead to bankruptcy - was suspended for the connected class while enforced ruthlessly on everyone else. The very people who caused the crisis not only avoided jail but got bonuses funded by taxpayer bailouts. The social contract didn’t just fray; it snapped.

What most people didn’t understand then - and many still don’t grasp now - is that 2008 never really ended. Each intervention created larger distortions requiring bigger interventions. Zero interest rates led to asset bubbles. Quantitative easing led to wealth inequality explosion. Each “solution” deepens the underlying problem: a system that could only survive through ever-increasing debt monetization. The music has stopped, but the Fed keeps the party going by turning up the volume until everyone is deaf.

The knock-on effects rippled globally. European banks, stuffed with toxic American mortgage securities, required massive bailouts. The European debt crisis followed, nearly destroying the euro. China, terrified of global depression, launched the largest credit expansion in history, building ghost cities and redundant infrastructure. Every major economy became addicted to monetary heroin, and 18 years later, we’re still shooting up.

But the financial crisis was just the catalyst. What makes this a Fourth Turning isn’t the proximate cause but the comprehensive breakdown that follows. Look around. Every institution Americans once trusted - government, media, academia, medicine, law enforcement, intelligence agencies - has suffered catastrophic reputational collapse. When the CDC changes its story for the fifth time, when the FBI raids a former president, when the Supreme Court’s legitimacy is openly questioned, you’re not watching normal political friction. You’re watching the complete unraveling of institutional authority.

This Fourth Turning differs fundamentally from all previous ones because of technology’s role. We’re not fighting with muskets or tanks - we’re fighting with algorithms, narratives, and digital currencies. The battlefield isn’t Gettysburg or Normandy; it’s your smartphone screen, your social media feed, your digital wallet.

Previous Fourth Turnings required mass mobilization of physical bodies. Men marched to war, women worked in factories, everyone bought war bonds. Physical presence mattered. But our Fourth Turning is being fought in the realm of information and perception. When you can’t trust any source of information, when deepfakes make seeing no longer believing, when AI can generate unlimited propaganda at zero marginal cost, how do you even know what you’re fighting for or against? The fog of war has become the fog of everything.

Consider the comprehensive surveillance apparatus that’s emerged since 2008. Edward Snowden’s 2013 revelations showed us the NSA was collecting everything - every email, every text, every call. But that was just the beginning. Now we have AI-powered behavioral prediction, social credit systems, and facial recognition networks. China leads the way with 700 million surveillance cameras - more than half the world’s total - but Western “democracies” aren’t far behind. London has more cameras per capita than Beijing. San Francisco uses the same facial recognition technology as Shanghai.

The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated this technological authoritarianism by decades. Digital vaccine passports normalized the idea that you need government permission to enter a restaurant. Contact tracing apps trained us to accept constant location monitoring. QR codes made every movement trackable. What would have taken a generation to impose gradually was accomplished in months under the banner of “public health”. The ratchet only turns one way - powers gained during a crisis are never voluntarily relinquished.

Consider the Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) agenda that’s advancing globally while most people remain blissfully unaware. This isn’t just digitizing money - it’s making money programmable, controllable, censorable. The Federal Reserve, Bank of England, and European Central Bank are all developing CBDCs, following China’s lead with the digital yuan. Imagine a world where your ability to buy gasoline depends on your carbon credit score, where your grocery purchases are limited by your BMI, where your savings can be “expired” to force spending. Money that can’t be used for disapproved purchases, that can be frozen instantly if you express wrongthink. It’s not imagination - China is already doing it. Europe is launching trials. The Federal Reserve is “researching” it. This is the ultimate fusion of monetary and social control.

Bitcoin emerged from the 2008 crisis’ ashes with a message embedded in its genesis block: “Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks”. The cypherpunks who created it - whether Satoshi was an individual or a team - understood that monetary sovereignty required technological sovereignty. But here’s the uncomfortable question: did we play them or did they play us? Bitcoin’s transparent blockchain makes every transaction traceable forever. The NSA’s 1996 paper “How to Make a Mint” described a system remarkably similar to Bitcoin. The CIA met with Gavin Andresen, Bitcoin’s lead developer, in 2011. Was Bitcoin genuine resistance or the perfect trap - getting libertarians to build their own financial panopticon?

The promise was decentralization, but the reality is increasingly centralized. A handful of mining pools control Bitcoin’s hash rate. A few exchanges handle most trading volume. BlackRock and other institutions now dominate ownership through ETFs. The rebels who thought they were building an alternative to Wall Street may have just built Wall Street 2. 0. With better surveillance.

Every Fourth Turning includes a monetary reset. The Revolution gave us the Constitution’s gold and silver clause. The Civil War brought greenbacks and the National Banking System. The Depression/WWII era ended the gold standard domestically and created Bretton Woods. What’s coming this time will be even more dramatic.

The numbers are so large they’ve lost all meaning. The U. S. national debt stands at $39 trillion as of April 2026. Unfunded liabilities - Social Security, Medicare, government pensions - exceed $200 trillion. The Federal Reserve holds over $1 trillion in unrealized losses. Commercial banks sit on $600 billion in underwater securities. We’re not approaching insolvency. We’re already there. Just one repricing away from systemic collapse. And everyone in finance knows it. The only question is whether it happens slowly (inflation), suddenly (default), or systematically (CBDC rollout). My money, literally, is on “all of the above”.

While Americans fight over pronouns and vaccines, the rest of the world isn’t standing still. The real Fourth Turning story isn’t just about America - it’s about the end of the American Century and the birth of something new. The unipolar moment that began with the Soviet Union’s collapse in 1991 is over. We’re not transitioning to a new order but to disorder - multiple competing power centers with incompatible worldviews and no hegemon strong enough to impose rules.

Russia and China’s “no limits” partnership, announced February 4, 2022, just before the Ukraine war, represents the most significant geopolitical realignment since the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact. Unlike that cynical arrangement between natural enemies, this reflects genuine strategic convergence. Let that sink in.

The two largest threats to American hegemony have decided they’re better off together than apart. China needs Russian resources and military technology. Russia needs Chinese markets and manufacturing. Both need to break American hegemony. Their combined nuclear arsenals, industrial capacity, and geographic position make them essentially unsanctionable and uncontainable. While we’ve been focused on internal divisions, they’ve been stockpiling gold, building alternative payment systems, and creating a parallel world order that doesn’t need dollars or SWIFT.

I’ve called this “water always finds a way” - capital, trade, and power flowing around obstacles like sanctions and finding new channels. The West sanctions Russia, so Russia sells oil to India and China at a discount. We freeze Russian reserves, so everyone else starts wondering if their dollars are safe. We weaponize SWIFT, so they’re building alternative payment systems. Every action creates an equal and opposite reaction, and we’re too arrogant to see we’re accelerating our own replacement.

But perhaps the most devastating loss isn’t monetary or military - it’s moral. The West built its post-WWII hegemony not just on military might and economic power, but on moral authority. We are the “good guys” who defeated fascism, rebuilt Europe, and championed democracy and human rights. That moral high ground is gone, destroyed by our own hypocrisy. When we lecture others about sovereignty while expanding NATO to Russia’s borders despite promises not to, when we invoke “rules-based order” while ignoring international law when convenient, when we sanction countries for actions we ourselves commit - the world sees increasingly through it.

Take Ukraine. We framed it as democracy versus autocracy, good versus evil. But Russia has legitimate security concerns that we’ve deliberately ignored for decades. How would America react if China formed a military alliance with Mexico and stationed missiles in Tijuana? We know exactly how - we nearly started nuclear war over Soviet missiles in Cuba. Yet we expect Russia to accept NATO expansion to its borders as normal. The West could have guaranteed Ukrainian neutrality and avoided this war entirely. Instead, we used Ukraine as a proxy to bleed Russia, but it’s Ukraine that’s bleeding out. 1.5 million dead. For what? So Victoria Nuland could have another regime change on her résumé?

Or look at Gaza. Israel is systematically destroying an entire population - bombing hospitals, schools, refugee camps, killing journalists, aid workers, children by the thousands. The International Court of Justice is investigated genocide charges. They issued arrest warrants. Yet the same Western leaders who thundered about Russian war crimes provide Israel with weapons and diplomatic cover for atrocities that shock the conscience. When you can watch children being deliberately starved and bombed while your government calls it “self-defense”, something fundamental breaks in your worldview. The system reveals itself as not just flawed but actively evil.

This moral bankruptcy accelerates the Fourth Turning’s institutional collapse. When people see their governments supporting genocide while preaching human rights, enabling war crimes while demanding justice, destroying countries while claiming to protect democracy -they don’t just lose trust in leaders. They lose faith in the entire Western project. Every Palestinian child killed with American weapons creates a hundred people who will never believe the Western moral claims again. Every Ukrainian conscript sent to die for NATO expansion makes a mockery of our “defensive alliance”. The hypocrisy isn’t just noted; it’s radicalizing.

The Ukraine war thus becomes a triple failure. Militarily, it demonstrates that despite spending more than the next ten nations combined, we can’t defeat Russia in its own backyard. Economically, our sanctions backfire, strengthening alternative systems while weakening our own. But most critically, morally, it exposes the lies undergirding the entire system. We’re not defending democracy - we’re pursuing hegemony. We’re not protecting sovereignty - we’re expanding empire. We’re not the good guys. We’re just another power, playing the same brutal game, whilst demanding everyone pretend otherwise.

The expansion of BRICS in 2024 to include Saudi Arabia, Iran, Egypt, Ethiopia, and the UAE wasn’t just about adding members - it was about creating a critical mass. BRICS now represents 45% of the global population, 35% of global GDP, and controls most of the world’s critical resources. More importantly, it offers an alternative.

Countries can now access development funding without IMF conditionalities, trade without SWIFT, and maintain reserves without dollars. Every country that joins weakens the Western system and strengthens the alternative.

The Middle East’s transformation is particularly striking. Saudi Arabia, America’s most important Arab ally since 1945, is now buying Chinese fighters, pricing oil in yuan, and coordinating with Russia on production cuts. The Abraham Accords, trumpeted as an historic achievement, are being superseded by Chinese-brokered agreements. When Iran and Saudi Arabia restored relations under Chinese auspices in 2023, it marked the end of American diplomatic monopoly in the region.

But the real prize is Taiwan. If China takes Taiwan - increasingly likely given war game results - without an American military response, the entire American alliance system will collapse overnight. Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, and Australia would have to accommodate China. The dollar would lose reserve status as countries realized American security guarantees are worthless. It wouldn’t be a military defeat but a psychological collapse - the moment everyone realizes the emperor has no clothes.

The tragedy is that America’s military, despite spending more than the next ten nations combined, can’t win wars anymore. We couldn’t defeat the Taliban after twenty years. We can’t build ships that work - the Littoral Combat Ship, Zumwalt destroyer, and Ford-class carrier programs are all disasters. We can’t even supply Ukraine with enough 155mm shells, the most basic artillery ammunition. The military-industrial complex is optimized for profit, not victory. And now we’re paying the price.

Fourth Turnings are generational psychodramas where each archetype plays its destined role. But something’s different this time - the actors seem to be forgetting their lines. The Boomers (our Prophet generation) should be the Gray Champions providing moral clarity during the Crisis. Instead, they are the crisis. They’ve held power longer than any generation in American history and refuse to let go. Trump, Pelosi, McConnell - all in their 80s or late 70s, all clinging to power like Gollum to his precious. The oldest president in American history is followed by the second-oldest. Congress looks like a nursing home. The Supreme Court is a gerontocracy. They won’t pass the torch; it will have to be pried from their cold, dead hands.

But which Boomer is the Gray Champion? Trump fit the archetype - the charismatic elder who emerges during the Crisis to remake society. His first term was prologue; his return in 2025 could be the main act. He had the prophetic certainty, the devoted following, the absolutist vision. But Gray Champions are supposed to unite society for collective purpose, and Trump divided as much as he inspired, and his promises have all been lies. Maybe that’s the point - maybe this Fourth Turning’s Gray Champion destroys the old order rather than defending it.

Generation X, my generation, are playing our Nomad role perfectly - cynical survivors building escape routes. We’re the ones stacking gold, learning skills, moving to rural areas, homeschooling our kids. We don’t believe in collective anything because every institution failed us. Latchkey kids who raised ourselves, we learned early that self-reliance is the only reliability. We’re not trying to save the system; we’re trying to survive its collapse.

But it’s the Millennials who worry me. They’re supposed to be the Hero generation—the ones who should come together, sacrifice for the collective purpose, and rebuild from the ashes. Previous Hero generations - the Republicans who fought the Revolution, the Gilded who won the Civil War, the GI Generation who defeated fascism - had external enemies to unite against. This generation can’t even agree on basic reality.

• Half of them want socialism without understanding that socialism requires a social cohesion they don’t have. The other half chase wealth through crypto and day-trading while living in their parents’ basements.
• They’re the most educated generation in history but can’t do basic repairs.
• They’re the most connected but loneliest.
• They’re supposed to be heroes, but they’re barely functional adults.

Maybe that’s harsh, but Fourth Turnings don’t care about hurt feelings. The problem might be that this generation’s Crisis is too abstract. Climate change is the perfect example - it’s an ever-shifting, never-reached goal that keeps moving further away the closer we supposedly get. First it was global cooling in the 1970s, then global warming, now “climate change” to cover all bases. The apocalypse is always 10 years away - in 1989, the UN said we had until 2000 before irreversible damage. In 2006, Al Gore gave us 10 years. In 2019, Greta gave us 12. The goalposts keep moving, the demands keep escalating, but the emergency never quite arrives.

You can’t defeat climate change like you can defeat Nazi Germany. There’s no V-E Day for carbon emissions, no unconditional surrender of greenhouse gases. It’s a permanent crisis requiring permanent sacrifice with no victory condition - exactly the kind of nebulous threat that demobilizes rather than mobilizes. Systemic racism is another concept, not a Confederate army you can defeat at Gettysburg. COVID was scary. But not scary enough. A 99% survival rate doesn’t mobilize like Pearl Harbor.

Our heroes need something concrete to fight against, and they might get it soon enough. Generation Z and Alpha, our emerging Artists, are being shaped by this Crisis in ways we don’t yet understand. They’re growing up with screens instead of friends, algorithms instead of thoughts, anxiety as baseline. Previous Artist generations were overprotected physically but connected socially. This one is overprotected digitally but isolated physically. They might be the first generation that’s more comfortable in virtual reality than actual reality. Whether that prepares them for the future or ruins them for it remains to be seen.

Every Fourth Turning includes cultural revolution - the complete inversion of previous values. What was sacred becomes profane; what was profane becomes sacred. We’re living through that inversion now, and it’s more extreme than anything since the 1960s. The traditional family structure, foundation of every successful society in history, is now “heteronormative oppression”. Having children is selfish environmental destruction. Marriage is patriarchal enslavement. Meanwhile, drug use is harm reduction, crime is social justice, and mental illness is identity. We’re not just tolerating dysfunction; we’re celebrating it. The DSM-5 has become a character creation guide.

The gender revolution is particularly telling. Not content with equal rights - a worthy goal achieved decades ago - we’ve moved to denying biological reality itself. Men can be women. Women can be men. Children can choose their sex like they choose breakfast cereal. Anyone who points out biological facts is a “transphobe” who must be destroyed. We’re performing medical experiments on children that would have been considered crimes against humanity a generation ago, and we call it “healthcare”.

This isn’t organic social evolution - it’s engineered chaos. Every institution pushes the same message simultaneously. Corporations mandate pronoun training. Schools teach gender fluidity to kindergartners. Media celebrates each new boundary pushed. It’s too coordinated to be coincidental. Someone benefits from this social dissolution. And it’s not the confused kids getting surgeries they’ll regret.

The racial revolution follows similar patterns. Not content with civil rights - another worthy goal largely achieved - we’ve moved to racial revenge. “Antiracism” means active racism against whites and Asians. “Equity” means equal outcomes regardless of effort. “Diversity” means everyone thinks the same but looks different. Martin Luther King’s dream of colorblind society is now considered racist. We’re re-segregating schools and calling it progress.

The religious revolution completes the trifecta. Traditional Christianity, the bedrock of Western civilization for two millennia, is now “hate”. Churches that maintained consistent doctrine for centuries are “bigoted”. Meanwhile, we’ve created new religions - wokeism, climatism, covidism - complete with original sin (privilege/carbon/unvaccination), confession (struggle sessions), and excommunication (cancellation). These new faiths are more intolerant than any Inquisition.

• The purpose of cultural revolution isn’t progress - it’s demoralization.
• When you can make people affirm obvious lies, you’ve broken their spirit.
• When you can make them betray their children, you’ve broken their souls.
• When nothing is sacred, nothing is worth defending.
• A demoralized population doesn’t resist tyranny; it welcomes it as relief from chaos.

But cultural revolutions create their own antibodies. The more extreme the push, the more violent the snapback. Parents discovering what schools are teaching their kids become activated. Workers forced into struggle sessions become radicalized. Normal people told they’re evil for being normal don’t stay normal - they become resistance.

Resolution Scenarios for the 2030s: Based on historical patterns and current trajectories, this Fourth Turning will resolve somewhere between 2028 and 2033. But resolution doesn’t mean return to normal - it means transformation into something unrecognizable. Let me paint the possibilities as I see them.

The Breakup (Most Likely): Trump returned as the Gray Champion in 2025, but not the Trump of 2017. This was a Trump unleashed, a Trump with nothing to lose, a Trump surrounded by true believers instead of establishment Republicans. He used emergency powers to implement his vision - mass deportations, tribunals for the “deep state”, even a possible federal takeover of elections. But here’s where the script diverges from his expectations.

Trump, the self-proclaimed dealmaker and strongman, started losing. Everywhere. He already lost Ukraine - Congress wouldn't fund it anymore, Europe can’t sustain it alone, and Russia grinds to victory through sheer attrition. He loses Iran - they get the bomb while he’s tweeting threats, fundamentally altering Middle Eastern power dynamics. He bullied Venezuela with military threats and sanctions. Each loss emboldens the next challenger. The world realizes the emperor truly has no clothes.

Seeing that he’s lost both militarily and morally - with Israel’s ongoing genocide in Gaza, Syria and Lebanon destroying what remained of American moral authority - Trump did what all failing empires do: he turned inward. But this created an economic catastrophe. His tariffs, meant to punish others, punished Americans with inflation. His pressure on the Fed to cut rates despite soaring prices destroyed dollar credibility. His continued weaponization of USD and SWIFT drove even allies to seek alternatives.

Suddenly, all those dollars held overseas come flooding home - tens of trillions seeking safety as global trade abandons the greenback. The dollar hyperinflates into toilet paper. The resulting inflation isn’t the 1970s redux everyone expects - it’s Weimar Germany. When bread costs $50 and gas hits $20 a gallon, society doesn’t slowly decay; it collapses. Supply chains that never fully recovered from COVID snap completely. Cities that depend on just-in-time delivery face actual starvation. The EBT system fails, and 40 million Americans lose food assistance overnight. The military, traditionally conservative and oath-bound, doesn’t splinter - it hunkers down, protecting what it can, essentially writing off ungovernable areas.

Blue states, which never really accepted Trump’s legitimacy anyway, made it official. California stopped sending tax revenue to Washington - why fund a government that hates you? New York followed suit. Illinois, Oregon, Washington state - they all realize they’re subsidizing their own oppression. The federal government, broke from lost wars and fleeing dollars, can’t enforce compliance. It’s not 1861 where Lincoln could raise an army to preserve the union. The military won’t fire on Americans, and Trump doesn’t have the loyalty to make them.

By 2035, America follows the Soviet playbook. Not violent collapse but exhausted dissolution. The federal government, like Gorbachev’s Kremlin, simply becomes irrelevant. States stop listening, regions form their own arrangements, and one day everyone realizes the United States exists only on maps nobody updates anymore. The empire doesn’t fall - it evaporates.

The Breakup v2 (Increasingly Possible): The differences prove irreconcilable. After another disputed election - 2028 seems likely - states start going their own way. Not through formal secession but through nullification and non-cooperation. Red states refuse to enforce federal gun laws. Blue states refuse to enforce immigration law. Both refuse to send tax revenue for programs they oppose.

The federal government, broke and impotent, can’t enforce its will. The military, asked to fire on Americans, refuses or splits. Washington becomes ceremonial while real power devolves to regions. The Pacific states form an economic union with Canada and Asia. Texas remembers it was once a republic. The Northeast aligns with Europe. The heartland goes its own way.

By 2035, America exists on paper but not in practice. The dollar is replaced by regional currencies or Bitcoin. The military splits into state militias. The federal government maintains embassies and negotiates treaties, but has no domestic power. It’s not civil war - it’s civilized divorce. Messy, expensive, but better than the alternative.

The War Resolution (Plausible but Dangerous): Taiwan is the obvious flashpoint. China invades in 2027, calculating America won’t risk nuclear war over an island. They’re right - we won’t - but we don’t back down either. Economic war escalates to cyber war escalates to proxy war escalates to… what? Not nuclear exchange - everyone loses - but something new. Bioweapons that target specific ethnicities? AI-controlled drone swarms that can’t be stopped? Infrastructure attacks that kill millions without firing a shot?

Or maybe it’s Iran. Israel attempted to strike their nuclear program. Iran retaliated. America gets drawn in. Russia backs Iran. China backs Russia. Suddenly we’re in World War III without anyone planning it. The Middle East burns. Europe freezes without Russian gas. Asia starves without Middle Eastern oil. Supply chains collapse. Billions face famine.

The war isn’t won or lost - it just ends when everyone’s exhausted. Each side “wins” by not losing as badly as others, but the victory is pyrrhic. A generation is traumatized. The economy is destroyed. The empire is over. We retreat to our hemisphere, rebuild what we can, and try to forget. The 2030s are about recovery, not prosperity.

The Transformation (Hopeful but Unlikely): Maybe, just maybe, this Crisis catalyzes genuine renewal instead of collapse. A new generation of leaders emerges - not Boomers clinging to power but GenX/Millennial hybrids who understand both technology and reality. They implement radical but necessary reforms: a constitutional convention that updates our 18th-century operating system for a 21st-century reality, a monetary reset that includes a debt jubilee and sound money, a healthcare system that actually provides health rather than profits, an education system that teaches skills rather than ideology, and a political system that represents people rather than its donors.

Technology gets harnessed for liberation rather than control. Open-source AI breaks the corporate monopolies. Mesh networks break surveillance states. Cryptocurrency breaks central banks. 3D printing breaks supply chain dependencies. Unlimited clean fusion energy breaks resource scarcity. We don’t return to the past but create a future that honors what worked while fixing what didn’t.

By 2035, America is smaller globally but stronger domestically. We’re not the world’s policeman anymore but we’re not an isolationist either. We trade with everyone, ally with those who share our values, and mind our own business otherwise. The federal government is smaller but more effective. States have more autonomy but share a common purpose. It’s not utopia but it’s sustainable.

After the Storm: The Coming High: History suggests that however this Fourth Turning resolves, a High will follow. Spring always follows winter, even the harshest winter. The question isn’t whether we’ll emerge but what we’ll look like when we do.

Previous Highs shared common characteristics that we’ll likely see again. Social cohesion will replace atomization - people will desperately want to belong to something larger than themselves after years of isolation and conflict. Institutional authority will be restored - not the old institutions but new ones built by Crisis’ survivors who know what failure costs. Conformity will be valued over individualism - after chaos, order will feel like freedom. Economic growth will explode - all the delayed investment and deferred consumption will be released all at once.

But this High will be different because the world is different. It won’t be American-dominated - that era is over regardless of how this Crisis resolves. It might not even be Western-dominated. The center of global civilization could shift to Asia for the first time in 500 years. Or we might see true multipolarity - regional powers managing regional spheres without a global hegemon.

Technology will define the new High more than politics will. Artificial intelligence will be either a tool of total control or liberation depending on who controls it. Bioengineering will extend the human lifespan - but perhaps only for those who can afford it. Fusion energy might provide unlimited clean power - or remain forever 20 years away. Space colonization could open infinite resources - or remain science fiction. The choices made during the resolution of this Crisis will determine which future we get.

The Millennials who survive this Crisis will be different than the ones who entered it. The Crisis completes this Hero’s generation development - it burns away weaknesses and forges strength. They’ll build institutions with the knowledge of how previous ones failed. They’ll raise children in a stability they never knew themselves. They’ll create art that celebrates order rather than chaos. They’ll be boring, and that will be beautiful.

Their children, the new Artists, will grow up in a world we can barely imagine. They might be the first generation that’s more machine than human - enhanced, augmented, connected to AI from birth. Or they might rebel against technology entirely, seeking authenticity in a synthetic world. Either way, they’ll be shaped by the High we create, just as we were shaped by the Crisis we’re enduring.

The 2030s and 2040s could be golden if we navigate this Crisis successfully. Imagine fusion finally working, providing unlimited clean energy. Imagine AI eliminating drudgery while humans focus on creativity. Imagine biotech defeating aging, adding healthy decades to life. Imagine space colonies opening infinite resources. Imagine governance that actually represents people. Imagine money that can’t be debased. It’s all possible - if we survive.

But survival isn’t guaranteed. Rome had its Fourth Turning and ended up with the Dark Ages. China had multiple Fourth Turnings that led to centuries of stagnation. The Soviet Union had a Fourth Turning and ceased to exist. The difference between renewal and collapse often comes down to leadership at the crucial moment. Do we get Lincoln or Buchanan? FDR or Hoover? Churchill or Chamberlain? The answer determines whether our grandchildren curse or bless our memory.

What this means for you: So we’re living through the most dangerous period in world’s history since World War II. What do we actually do about it? The answer depends on who we are and what we can control. First and foremost: accept that this is structural, not political. Your candidate winning won’t fix it. Your party taking control won’t stop it. The system itself is what’s breaking, and it needs to break for something new to emerge. Fighting to preserve the current system is like trying to hold back winter - exhausting and futile. Better to prepare for spring while others freeze.

Secondly, position yourself for multiple scenarios. Geographic diversification matters - have somewhere else you can go if your area becomes untenable. This doesn’t mean fleeing the country necessarily, but having options. A rural property, family in another state, even just camping gear and a plan. When cities burned in 2020, those who could leave did. Those who couldn’t suffered.

Financial diversification is crucial but complicated. Yes, own gold and silver - physical metal you can hold, not ETF promises. But also understand their limitations. Gold doesn’t earn yield. Silver is bulky. Both can be confiscated or taxed into uselessness. Diversify across jurisdictions, asset classes, and storage methods. Some gold in a safe. Some silver buried. Some Bitcoin in cold storage. Some cash in small bills. Some barterable goods - ammunition, alcohol, antibiotics. Don’t put all your eggs in any basket because all baskets have holes.

Skills diversification might matter most. Learn to grow food - even apartment dwellers can grow something. Learn basic medical care - when hospitals are overwhelmed, basic knowledge saves lives. Learn to fix things - when supply chains break, repair becomes invaluable. Learn self-defense - when police won’t come, you’re on your own. Learn to teach -your children might need homeschooling. These skills have value regardless of which scenario plays out.

Community building is essential but difficult. Modern Americans barely know their neighbors, let alone trust them. But any crisis creates rapid bonding - shared danger builds relationships faster than years of small talk. Identify who around you is reliable. Build relationships before you need them. But be careful - the person flying the right flag might be an informant. The one flying the wrong flag might be an ally. Judge by actions, not words.

Mental preparation matters more than physical. This Crisis will last years more. You can’t maintain panic that long - you’ll burn out. You need sustainable vigilance - alert but not anxious, prepared but not paranoid. History is your friend here. Read about previous Fourth Turnings. Understand that a Crisis is normal, not exceptional. Our ancestors survived worse with less. You can too.

Most importantly, understand that you’re living through history, not the end of it. Yes, the West as you knew it might be ending. But something new is being born. You get to participate in that birth. That’s not a burden - it’s a privilege. Most humans live boring lives in boring times. You get to live through transformation. Your choices matter. Your actions have consequences. Your life has meaning.

The Fourth Turning will end, probably around 2035. You’ll either be a survivor who helped shape the new order or a casualty who didn’t. The choice - and it is a choice - is yours.

The Choice Before Us: We stand at history’s inflection point. Behind us, the familiar world dissolves into memory - the American Century, the post-war order, the assumptions that guided our parents and grandparents. Ahead, something new struggles to be born - unclear, unformed, but inevitable. We can’t go back. That bridge is burned. We can only go forward, through the Crisis, to whatever awaits on the other side.

The Fourth Turning isn’t a prophecy - it’s a pattern. And patterns can be understood, navigated, even shaped by those who see them clearly. Our ancestors faced their Fourth Turnings without understanding the cycle. We have the advantage of historical perspective. We know this is temporary. We know it’s survivable. We know it’s necessary.

But knowing and doing are different things. Knowing winter comes doesn’t keep you warm - preparing for it does. Knowing that the Crisis peaks before its resolution doesn’t make the peak any less dangerous - it might be even more so. Knowing previous generations survived doesn’t guarantee we will - that depends on our choices.

The water is boiling all around us. Some are hardening into stronger versions of themselves. Others are dissolving into mush. The difference isn’t random - it’s about what you’re made of and how you respond to heat. You can’t control the temperature, but you can control your composition.

These times demand passion, compassion, commitment, full-speed-ahead engagement with life. Not because it’s comfortable - it’s not. Not because it’s safe - it won’t be. But because we’re living through the most consequential period in American history since World War II. Our choices will echo for generations. Our actions will be studied by historians. Our courage or cowardice will determine whether the Western experiment continues or ends.

The Fourth Turning suggests we have about five more years of Crisis before resolution. Five years of increasing chaos, conflict, and transformation. Five years that will feel like fifty. Five years that will determine the next fifty. Are you ready? The storm is here. The old world is dying. The new world awaits. What are you going to do about it?"

The Daily "Near You?"

Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa. Thanks for stopping by!

"Lockdowns" Are Already Happening, Americans Are Stuck"

Full screen recommended.
Snyder Reports, 4/21/26
"Lockdowns" Are Already Happening, 
Americans Are Stuck"
Comments here:

Dan, I Allegedly, "Tariff Refunds are Here! But Not to You!"

Full screen recommended.
Dan, I Allegedly, 4/21/26
"Tariff Refunds are Here! But Not to You!"
"A new website was set up to give people a tariff refund, but not for you. The U.S. government is now being forced to return $166 billion in tariff revenue after a major Supreme Court ruling - and the money is already being claimed. Over $133 billion has been accounted for, with tens of thousands of companies filing for refunds tied to import overcharges. While many believed tariff payments would lead to stimulus-style checks, the reality is far different. Businesses that directly paid tariffs are first in line, and individuals may see little to nothing.

In this video, Dan breaks down who qualifies for tariff refunds, how the claims process works, and why prices remain high despite tariffs being removed. Miguel Galindo joins us to explain how tariffs affected his company Datavideo Featuring real-world insight from industry professionals at the National Association of Broadcasters convention, this episode exposes the gap between policy promises and economic reality. If you think you’re owed money - or want to understand where this $166B is really going - watch this before you miss your chance."
Comments here:

"How It Really Is"

“I am frequently asked if I have visited Israel, whereas yet, it is simply assumed that I have. Well, I don’t travel. I really don’t, and if I did, I probably wouldn’t visit Israel. I remember how it was in 1948 when Israel was being established and all my Jewish friends were ecstatic, I was not. I said: what are we doing? We are establishing ourselves in a ghetto, in a small corner of a vast Muslim sea. The Muslims will never forget nor forgive, and Israel, as long as it exists, will be embattled. I was laughed at, but I was right. I can’t help but feel that the Jews didn’t really have the right to appropriate a territory only because 2000 years ago, people they consider their ancestors, were living there. History moves on and you can’t really turn it back.” 
-  Isaac Asimov
What do you do with an uncontrollable, rabidly vicious mad dog?
You know very well... so be it!

"The Consequences of Incompetence"

"The Consequences of Incompetence"
by Scott Ritter

"The US lost the first round of the war with Iran decisively. If Trump decides to go a second round, the results will be disastrous for American and its allies. For nearly 40 days, Israel and the United States carried out an extensive aerial campaign against Iran designed to topple the government and suppress Iran’s ability to defend itself. This campaign failed to achieve any of its stated objectives. Instead, it devolved into a numbers game where inflated outcomes were sold to an unquestioning public by military professionals and politicians alike. The Iranian government not only withstood the efforts at decapitation-induced regime change, but actually strengthened its hold on power when the people of Iran, instead of turning on the Islamic Republic, rallied to its cause.

Moreover, rather than suppressing Iran’s ability to launch ballistic missiles and drones against US military bases, critical infrastructure in the Gulf Arab States, and Israel, Iran not only sustained its ability to strike, but deployed new generations of weapons that readily defeated all missile defense systems while, using intelligence information that permitted accurate targeting, destroyed critical military infrastructure worth tens of billions of dollars.

Regional experts had long warned about the consequences of entering an existential conflict with Iran, noting that Iran would not simply allow itself to be erased as a viable nation state without ensuring that the other nations of the region were subjected to similar existential threats to their survival, and that global energy security would be disrupted in such a manner as to trigger a world economic crisis. These assessments were backed up by a belied that Iran would not only be able to shut down shipping transiting the Strait of Hormuz, but also effectively target and destroy the major energy production potential of the Gulf Arab States.

It wasn’t that the politicians and military planners in the US and Israel doubted Iran’s ability to impact global energy markets or strike targets in Israel and the Gulf region. They knew Iran had the potential. They just believed that they would be able to achieve regime change in Tehran in relatively short order, thereby mooting any threat Iran might pose to energy supplies and infrastructure. They were wrong, which is why the US was looking for an offramp from the war soon after it started. The end result was this current ceasefire, which was ostensibly entered into to buy time for US and Iranian negotiators to hammer out a lasting peace plan.

There is a fundamental problem, however. While Iran has approached the current negotiations from a practical, reality-based posture predicated on resolving the actual major points of difference between the US and Iran, the US is being held hostage by the politicized whim of an American President who needs to shape domestic public opinion in a way which transforms the reality of a humiliating defeat into the perception of a bold victory.

President Trump ran for office on a platform premised on the notion that he would keep America out of the kind of costly, open-ended military misadventures that had defined the US since the start of the 21st Century. The war with Iran proved this promise to be a lie.

This lie, combined with numerous other political missteps that have transpired during the first year and a half of his second term in office, have put President Trump and his political legacy at risk, with critical midterm elections looming on the horizon that threaten to shift the balance of power in the US Congress away from the Republican Party, and to the Democratic Party. If the Republicans lose the House of Representatives, the impeachment of Donald Trump is all but a certainty. This alone would spell the end of Trump’s legislative agenda. But if the Democrats take the Senate as well, and with a wide enough margin, the Trump will not only find himself impeached, but possibly convicted. And this would not only mean the end of the Trump Presidency, but also the end of the Trump brand, something Trump has been burnishing his entire adult life and which he has transformed into a political cult of personality that has redefined American politics.

Iran has entered the current round of negotiations focused on the practicalities and realities of geopolitics and national security. Trump is about shaping perceptions to his political benefit. These are not compatible goals and objectives, especially when Iran has emerged victorious from a war it did not want, and Trump is trying to invent a narrative that has him prevailing in a conflict his team not only should never have engaged in, but which they lost, and now Trump has to spin this dismal reality in a manner which benefits him politically.

Take the current impasse over the Strait of Hormuz. Iran has asserted control over all shipping transiting this strategic waterway, and by being selective about which ships can transit, has created a global energy crisis which has detrimentally impacted US allies in Europe and Asia. It was the reality that the US had no military solution to the problem of Iran’s compelled closure of the Strait that led the US to seek a diplomatic solution to the problems it alone had created.

There are other outstanding issues as well, such as Iran’s stockpile of 60% enriched uranium (which the US apparently tried to seize in a failed special operations raid), as well as the issue of Iran’s nuclear program in general, which the US insists can continue only if Iran forgoes enrichment altogether, something Iran has said it will never do.

The US also wishes to curtail Iran’s ballistic missile programs, despite the fact it is these very missiles which provided Iran with the ability to prevail militarily over the US, Israel and the Gulf Arab States. The US also insists that Iran cease its relationship with regional allies such as Hezbollah in Lebanon (which is engaged in an open-ended conflict with Israel due to Israel’s ongoing occupation of southern Lebanon) and the Ansarullah movement in Yemen, which has been opposing a Saudi-led aggression since 2014.

There’s literally a snowball’s chance in hell Iran would concede any of these issues, especially after winning a war where all of the non-nuclear matters helped contribute to the Iranian victory. And therein lies the rub.

Trump has largely bought into an Israeli-influenced narrative which defines victory as being predicated on Iran yielding on all of the issues listed above. Something Iran will never do. Trump has shown zero political acumen when it comes to trying to shape US public opinion in his favor. Instead of taking credit for getting Iran to agree to open the Strait of Hormuz, Trump insists on posturing as a tough guy by insisting on continuing a naval blockade which exists in name only, prompting Iran to reverse course and close down the Strait. And close down negotiations. Leaving Trump further boxed into a corner of his own making.

With the only option available being the resumption of the very military operations that had proven unable to defeat Iran and, if initiated, will trigger consequences which will have a devastating impact on global energy markets - the very thing Trump was trying to avoid when seeking out the ceasefire to begin with. But there may very well be other consequences.

Iran is at the point in this conflict where trying to play a game of escalation management is counterproductive. If the US opts to resume its attacks on Iran, with or without Israel, Iran will have no choice but to go for the jugular from the start. To strike not only the energy production capabilities of the regional actors, like the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and Bahrain, that continue to provide assistance to the US when it comes to the conflict with Iran, but also their water desalinization plants and power production plants.

Denying these nations access to the very water they need to survive. And power they need to provide air conditioning to the skyscrapers that have defined their status as modern oasis’ of civilization. The hot summer months approach. And if Iran eliminates water and air conditioning, then these modern Gulf Arab States become uninhabitable. Cities like Dubai and Abu Dhabi become uninhabitable. So, too, Kuwait City, Riyadh, and Manama. Everything the rulers of these Gulf nations have aspired to accomplish over the course of the past several decades will lie in ruins, ghost cities in place of thriving metropolis’.

And Iran would likely do the same to Israel, destroying the critical infrastructure the tiny Zionist enclave needs to survive as a modern nation states. Making the land of milk and honey uninhabitable for millions of Israelis who will have no choice but to go back to their homes of origin.

These are all known knowns - there is no mystery about what the consequences of resuming military operations against Iran will bring. Albert Einstein is widely quoted as once noting that the definition of insanity was doing the same thing over again and expecting a different result. The US and Israel launched a surprise attack against Iran using the full strength of their respective air forces. And they failed.

Today, Iran stands ready to receive a combined US-Israeli strike which will match, but not exceed, the destructive power of those initial attacks. And Iran will respond with missile and drone attacks which will exceed by an order of magnitude the targeted destruction of its previous retaliatory strikes. Iran will change the cycle of escalation by going straight for the jugular. And Trump won’t know what hit him. The consequences of incompetence are real. Something Trump and the American people are about to find out in real time should the US go forward with the threats to resume bombing Iran in the next few days."

"The Most Moral Army In the World"

"The Most Moral Army In the World"
by Redacted

"The Israeli Defense Force says it will investigate this photo of an IDF soldier destroying a statue of Jesus on the Cross by taking a sledgehammer to the head. The image, unsurprisingly, prompted outrage online. The IDF responded that "the soldier’s conduct is wholly inconsistent with the values expected of its troops."

Well, that's not what the troops themselves say. Israeli newspaper Haaretz published a report on what it calls the “moral injuries” experienced by former IDF soldiers after what they did and witnessed in Gaza. Moral injury is not the same as PTSD, which was originally developed as a diagnosis for Vietnam veterans experiencing trauma. Moral injury refers to trauma caused by one’s own actions.

"Moral injury happens due to exposure to incidents that are perceived as a fundamental violation of basic moral values – of oneself or of others – and typically involves feelings of guilt, shame, rage, disgust, alienation, loss of faith and a breakdown in identity, meaning and a sense of humanity," according to Professor Yossi Levi-Belz of the University of Haifa.

IDF soldiers told Haaretz about what haunts them. One recounts killing an old man and children. Another, a sniper, describes shooting people seeking aid. Others describe drone strikes that killed civilians. One reservist says he saw civilians fired upon and then buried with bulldozers. Another describes looting of Palestinian homes and the abuse of detainees.

All of them living in fear of retribution and shame. "Maybe in some way I want to die, to get it over with," one said. "I don't kill myself because I promised my mother, but I admit I don't know how long I can keep it up."

The IDF does not formally recognize moral injury or have programs in place to treat it. How could they? They would have to accept blame for what they sent them to do. "It's pretty obvious that a sociopolitical statement is being made here," said a mental health officer in the reserves. "After all, if we recognize that many soldiers are suffering from moral injuries, how does this fit with the cliché about the most moral army in the world? So, instead, they chose a phrase that shifts responsibility to the soldier, as if there were a problem with his identity rather than the actions his leaders sent him to perform."

So the question becomes harder to avoid: What does it mean to call an army “moral” if carrying out its orders is leaving its own soldiers psychologically and morally broken?"

Bill Bonner, "DC Regime Change"

"DC Regime Change"
by Bill Bonner

"Trump literally sounds like an unhinged super villain from a 
Marvel comic movie. This IS NOT WHAT WE VOTED FOR!!
How do we 25th amendment his ass?"
- Alex Jones

Baltimore, Maryland - "The polling numbers just seem to be getting worse and worse. Newsweek: "President Donald Trump is set to see his worst approval ratings of this second term as new polling from the NBC News Decision Desk released Sunday found that eight out of 10 Gen Z voters say the country is on the wrong track.

The poll, conducted powered by SurveyMonkey, found that that not only is Trump seeing a 76 percent disapproval among voters aged 18 to 29, but that young Republicans are driving the downward trend, marking a troubling shift in a demographic largely credited as key to the party retaking the White House.'

Emboldened by the polls, the press and influencers are firing from two directions: 1) POTUS is crazy. Or, 2) he is monumentally incompetent. New York Times: "President Trump’s erratic behavior and extreme comments in recent days and weeks have turbocharged the crazy-like-a-fox-or-just-plain-crazy debate that has followed him on the national political stage for a decade."

Even Trump’s most loyal fans are turning to the ‘just-plain-crazy’ hypothesis. USA Today: "MAGA dissidents join Democrats in questioning Trump’s ‘mental capacity’. “I really think that his mental capacity needs to be examined,” Marjorie Taylor Greene said an April 15 appearance on CNN International." “And he does babble,” added Alex Jones, giving his medical opinion, “and, you know, sounds like the brain’s not doing too hot.”

Candace Owens: "Trump is a “genocidal lunatic...Our Congress and military need to intervene.”

Ty Cobb, a former White House lawyer: The president is “clearly insane.”

It is one thing to be ranting about the injustices done to him by Hollywood stars and Washington commentators...it is quite another thing to go off the rails on matters of life and death...and national security. Trump:

“We’re offering a very fair and reasonable DEAL, and I hope they take it because, if they don’t, the United States is going to knock out every single Power Plant, and every single Bridge, in Iran. NO MORE MR. NICE GUY! They’ll come down fast, they’ll come down easy and, if they don’t take the DEAL, it will be my Honor to do what has to be done, which should have been done to Iran, by other Presidents, for the last 47 years. IT’S TIME FOR THE IRAN KILLING MACHINE TO END!” the president wrote.

What to make of it? Just a negotiating tactic? But if the threat is just a barroom bluff, it makes Trump look incompetent. If the threat is genuine, he appears to be criminally insane. In any case, the war with Iran invites charges of recklessness and failure.

Former secretary of Labor Secretary, Robert Reich, blasts away on the ‘incompetence’ hypothesis, pointing out that “Trump killed every business he touched.’ Doesn’t matter what he was selling. Airline tickets, steaks, Bibles, gambling, a university, a board game, a bicycle race (Tour de Trump), football, mortgages, a magazine, vodka, ice, travel - they all failed."

Most of the criticism, however, focuses on the attack on Iran. MSNBC: "Trump’s biggest mistake so far in his costly war on Iran." BBC: "US war on Iran was a ‘mistake’, says Reeves." Former Ambassador Chas. Freeman: “AMERICA’S EMPIRE CRACKING UNDER TRUMP’S MISTAKES.”

Mistake? Maybe not. Trump had been training for it all his life. If anyone could wreck the empire, it was Donald J. Trump. One failure after another. And here was a chance to take his inept dilettantism to the very top.

Trump isolated the US from its allies...loaded it up with debt ($11 trillion added so far)...threatened and bombed foreign nations...drove people away from the dollar...increased the price of the world’s most important commodity by 50%...and gratuitously outraged the world’s biggest religious group. He’s followed through on the program better than anyone expected.

At this stage, Republicans must be beginning to see Donald J. Trump as more of a liability than an asset. They watched as the Democrats waited far too long to get Biden to step down. They won’t want to repeat the error. And JD Vance might stand a better chance in ’28 if he’s had a little time on the job before the election. Watch out for ‘regime change’ in America."

"Is Trump Going for Armageddon?"

"Is Trump Going for Armageddon?"
by Larry C. Johnson

"Pakistan is trying desperately to hold a new round of talks in Islamabad between the US and Iran. After conflicting statements from the Trump administration, it appears that JD Vance, accompanied by his Zionist watchers - Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner - are headed back to Islamabad. As of 22:20 hours eastern, Iran’s lead negotiator, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, said there will be no negotiations while the US blockade of Iranian ports remains in effect, stating that they are prepared to demonstrate new cards on the battlefield.

On Monday, April 20, 2026, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian made several public statements (primarily via a post on X and remarks reported by state media) regarding potential negotiations with the United States. His tone was cautious, skeptical, and defiant, while still leaving the door open to diplomacy. He emphasized that any serious talks must be based on consistent, reliable behavior rather than pressure. Pezeshkian highlighted “deep historical mistrust in Iran toward US government conduct.” He accused American officials of sending “unconstructive and contradictory signals” that convey a “bitter message” - that the US is seeking Iran’s surrender.

Pezeshkian stressed that Iran will not yield to threats or bullying. He stated that “war benefits no one” and that “every rational and diplomatic path should be used to reduce tensions.” However, he added that “distrust of the enemy and vigilance in interactions are undeniable necessities.” He described the ongoing US naval blockade as evidence that Washington may be “repeating previous patterns and betraying diplomacy.” Unless Donald Trump lifts the blockade and stops issuing threats, I think that Iran will not agree to a new round of talks.

On the military front, Iran has reacted to the seizure of its cargo ship in the Gulf of Oman by deploying thousands of new anti-ship mines in the Strait of Hormuz. Iran was not making idle threats about closing the Strait of Hormuz. It is day 53 since the start of the Ramadan war on the 28th of February and Iran is showing no signs of wavering in its demand that the US fulfill its initial acceptance of Iran’s 10-point plan.

Today, Tuesday, marks the final day of the ceasefire that Israel, the US and Iran accepted on 7 April. Both the US and Iran are locked-and-loaded to continue the fight. The US lacks the military resources that are required to open the Strait of Hormuz. It is not just a matter of clearing the mines and seizing territory on the coast… The US would need an enormous ground force to drive inland in order to locate and destroy missile and drone launch sites. As long as Iran can fire missiles and drones at a ship that tries to pass through the Strait without the permission of the IRGC, the Strait will remain closed and firmly under Iranian control.

A recent Wall Street Journal article  "Behind Trump’s Public Bravado on the War, He Grapples With His Own Fears" - reports that Trump’s spate of bizarre, vulgar, threatening posts on social media, e.g., threatening to end Iran as a civilization (implying the use of nuclear weapons), is simply a negotiating ploy - i.e., convince the Iranians that he is unstable and could do anything in order to convince Iran to make concessions. If that is genuinely Trump’s intention, it has backfired spectacularly. It has raised legitimate questions about his mental competence.

Although Trump reportedly is terrified of getting bogged down in another forever war that he once vowed he would never do, I think he will order a new round of attacks in hopes that he will break Iran’s will to resist. That will only compound his problems because Iran will retaliate and inflict catastrophic damage on the Gulf Arabs who continue to side with the US.

Trump still has an exit ramp… JD Vance, working through the Pakistanis, had a tentative deal with the Iranians on Friday that consisted of sanctions relief, unfrozen assets, toll fees recognized in exchange for permanent cessation of hostilities, plus enrichment limits under IAEA supervision. Trump blew off that deal with his decision to impose a blockade. Trump being Trump, he could reverse himself, lift the blockade and empower JD Vance to make the deal.

I am not holding my breath. While such a deal will infuriate the Zionists - both Jewish and Christian - this concession might salvage what is left of Trump’s tattered legacy. However, I think Trump will resort to force… I hope I am wrong."

Monday, April 20, 2026

"7 Eleven & Wendy’s Are Shutting Down… US Economy Is Breaking"

Full screen recommended.
Snyder Reports, 4/20/26
"7 Eleven & Wendy’s Are Shutting Down…
 US Economy Is Breaking"
Comments here:

"The Governments Secret Plan for Food Shortages and WW3"

Full screen recommended.
Canadian Prepper, 4/20/26
"The Governments Secret Plan 
for Food Shortages and WW3"
"Engineer and professor Dr. Joshua Pearce discusses what 
scientists are doing to prepare for food shortages."
Comments here:

Musical Interlude: Deuter, "Loving Touch"

Full screen recommended.
Deuter, "Loving Touch"

"A Look to the Heavens"

“The Cat's Eye Nebula (NGC 6543) is one of the best known planetary nebulae in the sky. Its more familiar outlines are seen in the brighter central region of the nebula in this impressive wide-angle view. But the composite image combines many short and long exposures to also reveal an extremely faint outer halo. At an estimated distance of 3,000 light-years, the faint outer halo is over 5 light-years across.
Planetary nebulae have long been appreciated as a final phase in the life of a sun-like star. More recently, some planetary nebulae are found to have halos like this one, likely formed of material shrugged off during earlier episodes in the star's evolution. While the planetary nebula phase is thought to last for around 10,000 years, astronomers estimate the age of the outer filamentary portions of this halo to be 50,000 to 90,000 years. Visible on the left, some 50 million light-years beyond the watchful planetary nebula, lies spiral galaxy NGC 6552.”
"Our planet is a tiny porthole, looking over a cosmic sea.
Can we learn what lies beyond our own horizons of perception?" 

"What Is Hope?"

"What Is Hope?"

"What is hope? It is the pre-sentiment that imagination is more real and reality is less real than it looks. It is the hunch that the overwhelming brutality of facts that oppress and repress us is not the last word. It is the suspicion that reality is more complex than the realists want us to believe. That the frontiers of the possible are not determined by the limits of the actual; and in a miraculous and unexplained way, life is opening creative events which will light the way to freedom and resurrection. But the two - suffering and hope - must live from each other. Suffering without hope produces resentment and despair. But hope without suffering creates illusions, naïveté and drunkenness.

So let us plant dates even though we who plant them will never eat them. We must live by the love of what we will never see. That is the secret discipline. It is the refusal to let our creative act be dissolved away by our need for immediate sense experience, and it is a struggled commitment to the future of our grandchildren. Such disciplined hope is what has given prophets, revolutionaries and saints the courage to die for the future they envisage. They make their own bodies the seed of their highest hope."
- Rubin Alves

“I Know How to Live… I Don’t Know How to Die”

“I Know How to Live… I Don’t Know How to Die”
by Bill Bonner

“I’ve never done this before…” The woman on the bed was almost a skeleton. The flesh had already gone from her. What was left was an 86-year-old empty tube – shriveled, bent, used up. “I know how to live,” she said. “I don’t know how to die. I don’t know what I’m supposed to think or what I’m supposed to do.”

“Don’t worry about it,” we advised. “It’ll come naturally. Do you need anything?” “Need anything? I need nothing at all. Absolutely nothing. I’m dying. And I have everything I need to do it.” “How about some more pain medication?” “No. I don’t want any. I am only going to do this once. I don’t want to get doped up. I don’t want to miss anything.”

Heaven with Tobacco Fields: People who are dying have a status somewhere between Nobel Prize winners and mobsters. We are reluctant to contradict them. We remember a scene from childhood: We had gone to visit a dying uncle, Edward. Like all our relatives, he was a tobacco farmer. But now the plant he had cared for all his life was killing him: he had lung cancer. Other relatives had gathered at the house to say goodbye. The mood was gloomy, dark… quiet. But the conversation, in early spring, ran in a familiar direction – toward the weather and soil conditions. “They won’t be planting tobacco where I’m going,” said Uncle Edward.

The group fell silent. Some looked down at the floor. Some shuffled toward the kitchen. But Agnes, a cousin, challenged him. “How do you know where you’re going or what they’re doing there?” This enlivened and emboldened the confrérie of tobacco growers. “Yeah, for all we know they’re pulling the plants already,” said one, glancing out the window to see if the rain had stopped. (The plants were “pulled” from the nursery beds for transplanting in the fields. We particularly disliked pulling them because black snakes enjoyed the warm of the gauze-like covering and slithered among the plants.)

The 12-year-old in the group – your editor – forever admired his cousin Agnes. She could see the truth and had the courage to speak it. None of us knew what happened after death. Why not tobacco farming? We tried to imagine Heaven with tobacco fields. It was so implausible that we had a hard time with it. But we persisted. Rows of the green plants, tended by generations of deceased farmers. The sun must not be so hot in Heaven, we concluded, for there was nothing heavenly about the scorching summer sun when you were cutting tobacco. The ghost farmers must hoe each row… and “top” the plants to remove the flower and force the growth to the leaves, just as we did in the Maryland fields. At the end of the day, sweat-stained and tired, they must gather around their pickup trucks – one foot up on the running board, an elbow on the raised knee, with a cigarette in the right hand.

An Unexplored Mystery: The other professions must have their quarters, too… Wheat farmers need broader fields. Cobblers could enjoy their trade, too. Why not? Heaven – immeasurably large – could have a place for everybody. Even bankers and lawyers might find a spot. For a moment, we imagined what it must be like, with mechanics tightening their bolts and dairymen milking their cows. But if everybody did in Heaven what he did on Earth, what was the point of it? The juvenile mind, like its adult successor, stalled.

Half a century later, it is still stopped where it was left – like a tractor abandoned on the edge of a field, with trees grown up between the wheels. Rust has covered the hood. The tires, cracked from the sun, have flattened and disintegrated. It has moved not an inch forward… leaving the mystery of Heaven completely unexplored. “Well, you’re not dead yet,” we replied. “How about a little apple juice?”

The death rattle began two days later. The goodbyes have all been said. Prayers have been offered. Undertakers contacted. A church put on alert. Remembrances shared. Toward the end there was no one there to share the remembrances with. The spirit seemed to have packed up and moved out before the body got the message. Life, like bull markets and credit expansions, always come to an end, sooner or later. New technology and newfangled monetary policies offer delays, unfounded hope, and stays of execution – but never a full pardon.”
Bread, "Everything I Own"

"If you were going to die soon and had only one phone call 
you could make, who would you call and what would you say? 
And why are you waiting?"
- Stephen Levine

Chet Raymo, “As Time Goes By”

As Time Goes By
by Chet Raymo

“Is time something that is defined by the ticking of a cosmic clock, God’s wristwatch say? Time doesn’t exist except for the current tick. The past is irretrievably gone. The future does not yet exist. Consciousness is awareness of a moment. Or is time a dimension like space? We move through time as we move through space. The past is still there; we’re just not there anymore. The future exists; we’ll get there. We experience time as we experience space, say, by looking out the window of a moving train. Or is time…

Physicists and philosophers have been debating these questions since the pre-Socratics. Plato. Newton. Einstein. Most recently, Lee Smolin. Without resolution. What makes the question so difficult, it seems to me, is that time is inextricably tied up with consciousness. We won’t understand time until we understand consciousness, and vice versa. So far, consciousness is a mystery, in spite of books with titles like “Consciousness Explained”. Will consciousness be explained? Can consciousness be explained? If so, will it require a conceptual breakthrough of revolutionary proportions? Or is the Darwinian/material paradigm enough? Are we in for an insight, or for a surprise?

As I sit here at my desk under the hill, looking out at a vast panorama of earth, sea and sky, filled, it would seem, infinitely full of detail, so full that my awareness can only skim the surface, I have that uneasy sense that it’s going to be damnably difficult to extract consciousness, as a thing, from the universe in its totality. I think of that word “entanglement,” from quantum theory, and I wonder to what extent consciousness is entangled, perhaps even with past and future.

Who knows? Perhaps consciousness, or what I think of as my consciousness, is just a slice of cosmic consciousness, in the same way that the present is a slice of cosmic time. As a good Ockhamist, I am loathe to needlessly multiply hypotheses. But time will tell. Or consciousness will tell. Or something.”
"Casablanca", "As Time Goes By", 
Original Song by Sam (Dooley Wilson)

"Death in the Afternoon"

"Death in the Afternoon"
by Joel Bowman

"To be immortal is commonplace; except for man, 
all creatures are immortal, for they are ignorant of death; 
what is divine, terrible, incomprehensible, is to know that one is mortal."
~ Jorge Luis Borges

"Everything is illuminated against its opposite; truth against fallacy; light against darkness; life against death. And who would have it any other way, even if they could? What would life on this mortal coil be, for instance, without the eternity of its terminally mysterious counterpoint?

If there exists a perfect setting for these and associated meditations, it must surely be the magnificent Recoleta Cemetery, located right here in Buenos Aires. On any given weekend, this sacred resting place for thousands of the city’s most famous – and infamous – people is found to be one of the liveliest places in town. Notable interments include a who’s-who list of Argentine writers, painters, poets, musicians, scientists and luminaries from other noble fields of interest. And, because nothing, including death, is beyond the law of equilibrium, a handful of politicians also rot underfoot.

Tourists pour in to adorn Maria Eva Duarte de Perón’s grave with flowers, for instance, bypassing the resting place of a Nobel Prize-winning chemist and a dozen honest writers to do so. Other, temporary attendees pose with Colgate smiles to have their picture taken beside weeping cement angels, frozen, as they are, in a state of perpetual sorrow. Young boys give the “peace” symbol next to the generals’ tombs whose armies laid to waste to tens of thousands of men, not much older than they, the bodies of whom are long forgotten, their makeshift graves unmarked.

Nowhere does irony live a fuller life than in a cemetery. Walking among the deceased, reading bookend dates on the bronze plaques, one is reminded of the finite nature of all things; organisms, currencies, political regimes, class structures. When the cemetery was constructed, back in 1822, it must have been a good ride from the exclusive barrios of San Telmo and Montserrat. The rich probably wouldn’t have been caught dead around the grounds of the Monks of the Order of the Recoletos, nor near the shabby, patchwork graveyard that was built there the same year the group disbanded.

Half a century later - and with Argentina still reeling from the War of the Triple Alliance and its own, subsequent civil war - a yellow fever epidemic tore through the capital city. Its wealthier, southern quarters were among the worst hit areas. Death toll estimates range from thirteen to twenty-five thousand. The clase alta packed up and moved north, largely into and around the Recoleta barrio. As such, the marbled vaults came to be populated with members of this same aristocracia, who, though they escaped the fever, came to rest here eventually just the same.

Today, you could buy an entire building in San Telmo for the same price as some of the finely appointed homes in Recoleta. An entire block in Montserrat might go for half that much.

And so it goes. People die…cities and empires crumble to the ground…and time, indifferent to the fleeting anguishes and triumphs of men, presses on.

At the turn of the 20th century, Argentina was ranked as the 8th most prosperous nation on earth. Only Belgium, Switzerland, Britain and a handful of former English colonies - including the United States – were more favorably positioned, economically. In 1913, Argentina’s bustling, cosmopolitan capital, Buenos Aires, had the thirteenth highest per capita telephone penetration rate in the world. Her per capita income was, around this time, 50% higher than in Italy, almost twice that of Japan and five times greater than its northern neighbor, Brazil. Argentina’s industry churned out quality textiles and leading edge, refrigerated shipping containers carried her prized beef, first introduced in 1536 by the Spanish Conquistadors, from the fertile plains of the pampas to the farthest reaches of the known world.

As the century wore on, protectionist policies at home and increased competition from the export-led, post-WWII economies – particularly from Japan and Italy – undermined Argentina’s international advantage. From 1900 through to the beginning of the new millennium, Argentina’s real GDP per person grew at a rate of 1.88% per year. Brazil outpaced her handily, clocking a 2.39% annualized growth rate. Japan, starting with a real GDP per person of just over $1,500 (2006 dollars) at the turn of the twentieth century, grew an average of 2.76% per year. By the middle of last decade, Japan’s real GDP per person had doubled that of Argentina. By 2020, it was more than quadruple.

The phenomenon is so conspicuous, the local Argentines even have a joke for it. “There are four types of countries in the world,” they lament. “First world. Third world. Japan, where nobody can figure out how they did so much with so little. And Argentina, where nobody can figure out how we did so little with so much.”

War, currency debasement, civil unrest, military rule and the catalyzing agent of political aspiration, harbored by the equally corrupt and inept, all conspired to stultify this once-proud nation’s potential. The great Argentine poet and essayist, Jorge Luis Borges, described one such retarding factor with characteristic flare and wit: “The Falklands thing was a fight between two bald men over a comb.”

On a comfortable Sunday afternoon in late February, an elderly group of well-dressed gentlemen met at their favorite restaurant, right by the gate to the Recoleta Cemetery, for lunch. They took a table outside, one in the shade and with a view of the passing foot traffic. The waiters, having brought the regulars the same thing, more or less, every Sunday for as long as they could remember, immediately set about filling their table. There was bife de lomo and chorizo sausages, mozzarella and buffalo tomatoes and papas fritas by the pile. Rich, Argentine Malbecs and Cabernets flowed freely and the merriment of the group soon became infectious. They flirted with the pretty waitresses and joked with patrons at the nearby tables.

After more than a few bottles, one of the gentlemen got chatting with an Australian editor of no particular importance. “I am a judge here,” he eventually told the younger man. “My friends and I have seen it all in this city…riots, economic crises, war, people’s entire life savings wiped out overnight.”

One of his friends lent over and placed a knowing hand on the judge’s shoulder. “Today, we enjoy the moment,” he said to his lifelong friend, before adding, one long finger pointed over the cemetery wall, “because tomorrow…ha ha…well, you know our next stop old man.” And the table erupted in laughter, as the sun set over the angel’s heads in the background.

Cheers,"

“In The Long Run… We Are All Alive”

“In The Long Run… We Are All Alive”
by MN Gordon 

“In 1976, economist Herbert Stein, father of Ben Stein, the economics professor in Ferris Bueller’s Day Off, observed that U.S. government debt was on an unsustainable trajectory. He, thus, established Stein’s Law: “If something cannot go on forever, it will stop.” Stein may have been right in theory. Yet the unsustainable trend of U.S. government debt outlasted his life.  Herbert Stein died in 1999, several decades before the crackup. Those reading this may not be so lucky.

Sometimes the end of the world comes and goes, while some of us are still here. We believe our present episode of debt, deficits, and state sponsored economic destruction, is one of these times.. We’ll have more on this in just a moment. But first, let’s peer back several hundred years. There we find context, edification, and instruction.

In 1696, William Whiston, a protégé of Isaac Newton, wrote a book. It had the grandiose title, “A New Theory of the Earth from its Original to the Consummation of All Things.” In it he proclaimed, among other things, that the global flood of Noah had been caused by a comet. Mr. Whiston took his book very serious. The good people of London took it very serious too. Perhaps it was Whiston’s conviction. Or his great fear of comets. But, for whatever reason, it never occurred to Londoners that he was a Category 5 quack.

Like Neil Ferguson, and his mathematical biology cohorts at Imperial College, London, Whiston’s research filled a void. Much like today’s epidemiological models, the science was bunk. Nonetheless, the results supplied prophecies of the apocalypse to meet a growing demand. It was just a matter of time before Whiston’s research would cause trouble…

Judgement Day: In 1736, William Whiston crunched some data and made some calculations. He projected these calculations out and saw the future. And what he witnessed scared him mad. He barked. He ranted. He foamed at the mouth to anyone who would listen. Pretty soon he’d stirred up his neighbors with a prophecy that the world would be destroyed on October 13th of that year when a comet would collide with the earth.

Jonathan Swift, in his work, “A True and Faithful Narrative of What Passed in London on a Rumour of the Day of Judgment,” quoted Whiston: “Friends and fellow-citizens, all speculative science is at an end: the period of all things is at hand; on Friday next this world shall be no more. Put not your confidence in me, brethren; for tomorrow morning, five minutes after five, the truth will be evident; in that instant the comet shall appear, of which I have heretofore warned you. As ye have heard, believe. Go hence, and prepare your wives, your families, and friends, for the universal change.”

Clergymen assembled to offer prayers. Churches filled to capacity. Rich and paupers alike feared their judgement. Lawyers worried about their fate. Judges were relieved they were no longer lawyers. Teetotalers got smashed. Drunks got sober. Bankers forgave their debtors. Criminals, to be executed, expressed joy.

The wealthy gave their money to beggars. Beggars gave it back to the wealthy. Several rich and powerful gave large donations to the church; no doubt, reserving first class tickets to heaven. Many ladies confessed to their husbands that one or more of their children were bastards. Husbands married their mistresses. And on and on…

The Archbishop of Canterbury, William Wake, had to officially deny this prediction to ease the public consternation. But it did little good. Crowds gathered at Islington, Hampstead, and the surrounding fields, to witness the destruction of London, which was deemed the “beginning of the end.” Then, just like Whiston said, a comet appeared. Prayers were made. Deathbed confessions were shared. And at the moment of maximum fear, something remarkable happened: the world didn’t end. The comet did not collide with earth. It was merely a near miss.

The experience of Whiston, and his pseudoscience prophecy, shows that predictions of the end of the world come and go while people still remain. Sometimes the fallout of these predictions, and the foolishness they provoke, is limited. Other times the foolishness they provoke leads to catastrophe. Here’s what we mean…

“In the long run we are all dead,” said 20th Century economist and Fabian socialist, John Maynard Keynes. This was Keynes rationale for why governments should borrow from the future to fund economic growth today. Of course, politicians love an academic theory that gives them cover to intervene in the economy. This is especially so when it justifies spending other people’s money to buy votes. Keynesian economics, and in particular, counter-cyclical stimulus, does just that.

U.S. politicians have attempted to borrow and spend the nation to prosperity for the last 80 years. Over the past decade, the Federal Reserve has aggressively printed money to fund Washington’s epic borrowing binge. Fed Chair Jay Powell confirmed that the Fed will pursue policies of dollar destruction to, somehow, print new jobs.

The world as it was once known – where a dollar was as good as gold – has come and gone. Today, in life after the end of that world, we are witnessing the illusion of wealth, erected by four generations of borrowing and spending, crumble before our eyes. Moreover, contrary to Keynes, in the long run we are not all dead. In fact, in the long run we are all very much alive. And we are all living with the compounding consequences of shortsighted economic policies.”

The Poet: Galway Kinnel

"Another Night in the Ruins"

"How many nights must it take
one such as me to learn
that we aren't, after all, made
from that bird that flies out of its ashes,
that for us
as we go up in flames,
our one work is
to open ourselves,
to be the flames?"

~ Galway Kinnel