StatCounter

Wednesday, August 27, 2025

"Albert Camus On Finding Invincible Calm"

"Albert Camus On Finding Invincible Calm"
by Thomas Oppong

“And those who were seen dancing were thought to
 be insane by those who could not hear the music."
 – Neitzsche

“How are you this calm?” my daughter once asked me when I picked her up from school and we got stuck in traffic. I’ve been practicing “dichotomy of control” (stoic philosophy that emphasises the distinction between things that are within our control and things that are not) for years. It’s how I stay sane when everything around me feels overwhelming. Stoic philosopher Epictetus explained the concept of “control” in his “Enchiridion,” a manual. Chaotic. Unpredictable. Uncertain. No matter how much we wish these words away, they will forever be part of the human experience. Twists and turns are the very definition of life. It’s a guaranteed experience. But the human capacity to respond with love, joy and calm changes everything.

Existentialist and philosopher Albert Camus explains it beautifully: “In the midst of hate, I found there was, within me, an invincible love. In the midst of tears, I found there was, within me, an invincible smile. In the midst of chaos, I found there was, within me, an invincible calm. I realised, through it all, that… In the midst of winter, I found there was, within me, an invincible summer. And that makes me happy. For it says that no matter how hard the world pushes against me, within me, there’s something stronger — something better, pushing right back.”

“Hate,” “tears,” “chaos,” and “winter” represent the harsh realities of life, while the counter-images of “love,” “smile,” “calm,” and “summer” symbolize the enduring strength within all of us. You have an invisible store of calm. You just have to know when to tap it. Camus grew up in poverty but excelled intellectually. His early philosophical work, particularly his essay “The Myth of Sisyphus”, explored the concept of the absurd  - the idea that life is inherently meaningless.

Camus’s writings explore the human struggle to find meaning and happiness in a world that can seem devoid of these things. He thought we must create our own meaning in the face of an indifferent and sometimes hostile world. Camus was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1957 for his influential literary contributions, especially his novels and essays that reflect his philosophical ideas.

His statement, “an invincible summer within” means even in the midst of winter’s cold and darkness, there is a spark of warmth and hope. The inner strength he talks about is not passive; it is actively “pushing back” against the negativity and challenges we face. It is the foundation for resilience, optimism, and the ability to persevere through adversity.
The capacity to rise above the absurd

Camus observed the absurdity of life but also thought we can rise above the chaos of life and choose our own path. In the darkest of times, find your freedom. “The only way to deal with an unfree world is to become so absolutely free that your very existence is an act of rebellion.” 
- Albert Camus

“In the midst of chaos, I found there was, within me, an invincible calm,” defines his stoic resilience. It represents a resilience and strength that cannot be easily overcome or defeated, even when life is unpredictable. It’s personal strength, resilience, or a deep understanding of life beyond mere chaos. Camus spoke of his “antifragility”. “Blessed are the hearts that can bend; they shall never be broken,” he said. Your inner peace can prevail over the turmoil of the world. Even when we are faced with overwhelming chaos, we can find a sanctuary of tranquillity within ourselves. A refusal to be swept away by the storms of life changes your approach to life.

Your reservoir of love, hope, and perseverance can triumph over any adversity. Even when life throws its worst at us, we possess the inner strength to persevere and find joy amidst sorrow. Inner calm, according to Camus, arises from a deep understanding of our own existence. He realised that life devoid of inherent meaning shouldn’t lead to despair. But should heighten your appreciation for the beauty and fragility of life.

Forge a path through the chaos: “Rule number one is, don’t sweat the small stuff. Rule number two is, it’s all small stuff.” -  Robert Eliot. Life is inherently chaotic and unpredictable, often filled with suffering and misfortune. Yet, Camus believed it is within our capacity to find meaning and purpose amidst this chaos. Cultivate an inner calm that can withstand the storms of life. Author of “The Power of Now”, Eckhart Tolle observed, “The ultimate source of inner peace lies not in changing your external world but in transforming your relationship with it.”

How, then, do we cultivate inner calm? First, recognize the human tendency to dwell on the negative, amplify the storms and diminish the moments of tranquillity. Recognition is how you observe the thoughts you don’t need and detach from them. It’s also how we get away from the chatter of our minds and observe our thoughts and emotions without judgment. It’s also how you step back from your emotional reactions and gain a clearer perspective on life experiences.

Let go of your resistance to things beyond your control: It aligns with Camus’s belief in the power of acceptance and resilience in adversity. It’s a mental shift towards your circle of influence. Resistance only leads to unnecessary stress and frustration. Let go of your resistance to avoid uncertainty. Adapt to circumstances beyond your control. And Acknowledge that you can’t control everything.

Redefine your definition of chaos: Camus’s philosophy of embracing the absurd and questioning our approach to life can help us expand our perception of life. Think of the absurdity of life as a catalyst for transformation. Or chaos as an opportunity to take control of the trajectory of your life. Losing a job might be seen as chaotic and distressing. Think of it as an opportunity for a career shift, skill development, or pursuing something you are deeply curious about.

Finally, Camus believed accepting life’s absurdity was not resignation but an embrace of the reality of life. He thought it was a call to transcend the limitations of fate and create our own values. That’s where inner calm becomes even more essential. In the face of life’s storms, calm within becomes your steadfast anchor, a refuge from the ebb and flow of emotions. It’s a mental state that allows us to live with resilience and composure. And, of course, find meaning and purpose even amidst the chaos.

“Within you, there is a stillness and a sanctuary to which you can retreat at any time and be yourself.”  -  Hermann Hesse

Building an invisible calm requires a paradoxical approach  -  an acceptance of the absurdity of life and cultivating a serene inner state at the same time. That’s how we find meaning even in the darkest of times. The space between the conscious and unconscious has always been the beginning of any change I’ve started. You don’t change by wanting to change. You change when you see yourself clearly. And stop the self-negotiation. According to Stoic Philosopher Seneca, the consciousness to level-up is proof and a significant step of transformation.

Author and teacher Anthony de Mello on doing what grips our soul: “You must cultivate activities that you love. You must discover work that you do, not for its utility, but for itself, whether it succeeds or not, whether you are praised for it or not, whether you are loved and rewarded for it or not, whether people know about it and are grateful to you for it or not. How many activities can you count in your life that you engage in simply because they delight you and grip your soul? Find them out, cultivate them, for they are your passport to freedom and to love.” Source: The Way to Love

Katherine May on happiness and sadness: “If happiness is a skill, then sadness is, too. Perhaps through all those years at school, or perhaps through other terrors, we are taught to ignore sadness, to stuff it down into our satchels and pretend it isn’t there. As adults, we often have to learn to hear the clarity of its call. That is wintering. It is the active acceptance of sadness. It is the practice of allowing ourselves to feel it as a need. It is the courage to stare down the worst parts of our experience and to commit to healing them the best we can. Wintering is a moment of intuition, our true needs felt keenly as a knife.”

Derek Sivers on being fully independent: “If you weren’t dependent on income, people, or technology, you would be truly free. The only way to be deeply happy is to break all dependencies.” “Most problems are interpersonal. To be part of society is to lose a part of yourself … Do what you’d do if you were the only person on Earth.” “Don’t let ideas into your head or heart without your permission.” “You can’t be free without self-mastery … When you say you want more freedom from the world, you may just need freedom from your past self. You don’t see things as they are. You see them as you are.” “Learn the skills you need to be self-reliant.”

"How It Really Is"

 

Bill Bonner, "Why To Own Money You Can Touch"

"Why To Own Money You Can Touch"
by Bill Bonner

Poitou, France - "From India.com comes worrying news: "Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg is building a huge bunker complex in Hawaii for $300 million, along with backup properties in Palo Alto and Lake Tahoe. Elon Musk is building a huge complex in Texas, OpenAI chief Sam Altman has a secret underground palace, while Amazon founder Jeff Bezos has also built a secret luxury palace for himself to live in during doomsday, i.e. the day a nuclear war will break out.

Zuckerberg's most ambitious project is on the island of Kauai in Hawaii, where he has 2.3 square km of land, which is three times bigger than New York's Central Park. Here, Zuckerberg has built two luxurious mansions and a treehouse. There is also a huge underground shelter here, which is being built at a cost of billions of dollars."

The odds of dying in a nuclear war are, we hope, low. And the costs of trying to protect yourself are definitely high. It has been eighty years since the US dropped atomic bombs on Japan. Maybe they will never be used again? Or maybe this long hiatus has given us a false sense of tranquility?

Killing is generally frowned upon...and outlawed...unless, as Voltaire told us, it is “accompanied by the sound of trumpets.” Private murder is a no-no. But government killing is a matter of national pride. Often the killers are memorialized as national heroes. What probably prevents the use of nukes is fear of “mutually assured destruction.” The US dropped atomic bombs on Japanese civilian targets. At the time, America was the only nation to have nukes. It risked little. But today, nine nations are believed to have nuclear weapons...with about 12,000 warheads in existence. These countries are not likely to be any more ‘civilized’ than the US in 1945. So, any major conflict may set off a nuclear exchange.

If you have a substantial bunker (or a bolthole)...and if you could get to it when you needed to...it could save your life. Definitely a plus. For a multi-billionaire, the cost is insignificant. So, even if the likelihood of actually using the place is small, there’s no reason not to do it. But for normal people, is it worth such a substantial investment? We have no answer to that. So, let us try another question. What is the most likely catastrophe we are likely to face...and how can we protect ourselves? For an answer, we turn to today’s real-life, in real-time catastrophe, playing out in Gaza.

In Gaza today, the banks are closed. ATMs don’t work. There is no electricity. There is often no food or water either. But even if there were food available, there would be no money to buy it. A report from Gaza, courtesy of Al Jazeera: Civil servants have gone months without pay. NGOs are unable to transfer salaries to their employees. Families cannot send remittances. What once supported Gaza’s financial structure has vanished. If you manage to obtain money from outside sources - perhaps from a cousin in Ramallah or a sibling in Egypt - it comes at a cost. A brutal one. If you get sent 1,000 shekels ($300), the agent will hand you 500. That’s right, the commission rate on cash withdrawals in Gaza is now 50 percent.

Poor Zuck. He probably travels the world with his credit cards and accountants. But what if the electrical grid is attacked when he is in New York? Do his bodyguards reach in their pockets, pool their cash, so they can buy a hamburger? Do they have enough gas to take him back to the airport where his private jet is waiting? Is it able to take off and land...with no juice on the ground? No matter. He’ll make it to his island stronghold. Somehow.

But how would it work for most people? There is only about $2.3 trillion in physical currency in the US - not even a tenth of GDP. In a crisis, people hoard money and food. And as the economy seizes up, supplies of goods and services quickly run out...and prices soar. Physical money becomes extremely valuable...and hard to get. In Gaza today, for example, a ‘bag’ of flour now sells for $300:

Do you have a bank card? Great. Try using it. There is no power. There’s no internet. No POS machines. When you show your card to a seller, they shake their head. People print screenshots of account balances that they cannot access. Some walk around with expired bank documents, hoping someone will think they’re “good enough” as a pay guarantee. Nobody does.

What about bitcoin? In Gaza today, money you can’t touch is equivalent to no money at all. Where does that leave people? At the market, I saw a woman standing with a plastic bag of sugar. Another was holding a bottle of cooking oil. They did not speak much. I just nodded. Traded. Left. This is what “shopping” in Gaza looks like right now. Trade what you’ve got. A kilo of lentils for two kilos of flour. A bottle of bleach for some rice. A baby’s jacket for several onions. There is no stability. One day, your item will be worth something. The next day, nobody wants it. Prices are guesses. Value is emotional. Everything is negotiable.

“I traded my coat for a bag of diapers,” my uncle Waleed, a father of twins, told me. “He looked at me as if I were a beggar. I felt like I was giving up a part of my life.” Gaza is a very special case. It is being intentionally deprived of money...and things to buy. But there are many things that could cause a collapse of the power grid. Earthquakes or solar events...physical or cyber attacks...even extreme heat. We don’t know how likely it is. But the insurance is cheap. Make sure you have some form of money ‘you can touch.’"

"Massive Mortgage Crisis, Price Drops Everywhere, Housing Crash Has Begun!"

Full screen recommended.
Epic Economist, AM 8/27/25
"Massive Mortgage Crisis, Price Drops Everywhere,
 Housing Crash Has Begun!" 

"The American housing market is collapsing, and even zero percent mortgage rates wouldn't save it. While the real estate industry keeps telling you it's a "good time to buy," the numbers tell a completely different story. In this video, I break down the shocking truth about what's really happening across the country. The nationwide surge in mortgage defaults jumped 13% in just one year, with 36,000 properties receiving foreclosure notices in a single month.

Here's what the data actually shows: home prices have shot up over 50% since the pandemic started, but wages? They've barely kept pace. In 1995, you needed about $34,500 in annual income to qualify for a median home. Today, that number is $108,000. The vast majority of people simply don't make that kind of money. Even more alarming - California's unemployment rate has hit 5.5%, the worst in the nation. Nevada leads the foreclosure crisis with 1 in every 2,326 properties facing default, while Florida follows close behind at 1 in 2,400.

But there's one surprising bright spot: Pittsburgh remains the only major metro where it's still cheaper to buy than rent. I'll show you exactly why this matters and what it means for the broader market. I also reveal why major firms like Coldwell Banker and RE/MAX are finally admitting that even free money wouldn't make homes affordable at today's prices - and what this means for anyone thinking about buying or selling. The housing crash has begun, and the warning signs are everywhere. The question isn't if it will get worse - it's how prepared you are for what's coming next."
Comments here:
o

Dan, I Allegedly, "New York City is Dead! Kiss It Goodbye"

Full screen recommended.
Dan, I Allegedly, AM 8/27/25
"New York City is Dead! Kiss It Goodbye"
"New York City - once the city that never sleeps - is officially done. In this video, I break down why the Big Apple is facing unprecedented challenges, from skyrocketing crime rates to businesses shutting down, all impacted by recent political and economic shifts. Whether it's the loss of iconic 24-hour diners or the looming election of a controversial new mayor, New York's future looks grim. I share personal experiences, insight from a New York Post article, and even touch on how this ties into the larger struggles cities like Las Vegas are facing today. Plus, hear how a local story from Orange, California, perfectly mirrors these issues. It's a must-watch for anyone wanting to understand the bigger picture."
Comments here:

Adventures With Danno, "Stocking Up At Sam's Club, Crazy High Beef And Coffee Prices!"

Full screen recommended.
Adventures With Danno, AM 8/27/25
"Stocking Up At Sam's Club, 
Crazy High Beef And Coffee Prices!"
Comments here:
o
Full screen recommended.
Travelling with Russell, 8/27/25
"Russian Typical Supermarket: 
Would You Shop There?"
"What does a typical Russian supermarket look like inside? Join me as I discover Monetka Supermarket in Moscow, Russia. With more than 3,400 stores across Russia. This very typical Russian supermarket was impressive."
Comments here:
o
Full screen recommended.
Different Russia, 8/27/25
"Fish Prices are Sky-High! 
Shopping in Russian Supermarket"
Comments here:
o
Full screen recommended.
Scottish Guy in Moscow, 8/27/25
"Russia’s Biggest Food Court Under Sanctions!"
"Today I will take you to the biggest food court in Europe. It’s is right here in Moscow 
and has over 400 food stalls and shops. We will also try my favorite Russian food!"
Comments here:

Tuesday, August 26, 2025

"Alert! Everyone Is Wrong About WW3, Extreme Warning!"

Full screen recommended.
Prepper News, 8/26/25
"Alert! Everyone Is Wrong About WW3, 
Extreme Warning!"
Comments here:

"Besides Losing the Proxy War in Ukraine, NATO Also is Losing the Economic War with BRICS"

"Besides Losing the Proxy War in Ukraine,
NATO Also is Losing the Economic War with BRICS"
by Larry C. Johnson

"Russia’s Special Military Operation (SMO) has inflicted massive attrition on Ukraine’s military capabilities and has also exposed the weakness and limitations of the NATO countries to provide replacement weapons, ammunition and combat vehicles. The SMO also has demonstrated the superiority of Russian weapons compared to those of NATO. Russia, for instance, has successfully employed at least four types of hypersonic missiles, while NATO has not fielded even one.

But NATO is not just struggling to remain relevant on the battlefield… it also is losing on the economic front to the BRICS nations. Let’s examine the current debt-to-GDP ratio for the NATO members. It ain’t a pretty picture.

The debt-to-GDP ratio for NATO countries in 2025 varies significantly across the 32 member states, reflecting diverse fiscal policies, economic conditions, and military spending commitments. Below is a comprehensive overview based on available data from web sources, particularly focusing on the most recent estimates for 2025. Note that exact figures for some countries may be projections or slightly outdated (e.g., 2024 data), as not all nations publish real-time debt statistics. I’ve prioritized the most authoritative and recent sources, including web results from SIPRI and World Population Review, and supplemented with IMF and OECD estimates where available. Where precise 2025 data is unavailable, I’ve noted the latest figures and trends.

Why is this a relevant measurement? The debt-to-GDP ratio measures a country’s general government debt (including central, state, and local government obligations) as a percentage of its gross domestic product (GDP). High ratios indicate greater debt burdens relative to economic output, potentially limiting fiscal flexibility, while low ratios suggest room for borrowing. Below is a table summarizing the debt-to-GDP ratios for NATO countries, based on available 2025 projections or the most recent data (primarily 2024, adjusted for trends). Countries are listed alphabetically, with notes on sources and context.

In general, the NATO countries with the largest economies are also heavily burdened with debt — i.e., the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Spain, Italy and Canada. The number for Germany is misleading because Germany’s debt is growing rapidly — its ratio in 2021 was only 50% — as a consequence of its stagnating economy. Compared to the NATO countries, it’s worth noting that Russia’s debt-to-GDP ratio in 2025 is estimated at ~19%, significantly lower than most NATO countries. This low ratio provides Russia with fiscal flexibility to manage its budget deficit (2.2% of GDP in 2025) and sustain war-related spending, unlike high-debt NATO members like France or Italy, which face tighter constraints.

But Russia is not fighting the West alone. Let’s look at the debt-to-GDP ratio for the BRICS nations. As I did with the NATO countries, I am providing a detailed breakdown of the general government debt-to-GDP ratios for the BRICs countries, based on the most recent data and projections available from sources like the IMF, World Population Review, and Trading Economics, as provided in the web results. Where exact 2025 figures are unavailable, I’ve used 2024 data with noted trends for 2025. The ratios are for general government debt (including central, state, and local obligations) unless otherwise specified.

Apart from having a healthier debt-to-GDP ration than the NATO countries as a whole, the projected economic growth for the BRICS countries in 2025 is also better — approximately 3.4% as a group — which outpaced the global average for the NATO countries of 2.8% and the G7’s 1.2%. Here are the stats for the individual BRICS nations and new members:

• India: 6.2% (fastest growing among major economies)
• China: 4.8%
• Brazil: 2.3%
• Russia: 1.4% (following 4.3% in 2024)
• South Africa: 1.0%
• Ethiopia (new BRICS member): 6.6%
• Other new members such as Indonesia and the UAE are also posting strong numbers (4.7% and 4%, respectively).

BRICS is currently leading global growth, now accounting for more than 40% of the world’s GDP according to IMF (PPP terms), with India and China as the primary drivers.

Some NATO members continue to issue bellicose threats directed at Russia, but as the numbers above reveal, NATO is economically impotent to actually confront Russia. Several key members of NATO — i.e. Germany, the United Kingdom and France — are in recession and are facing strong economic headwinds that will put greater strain on their already fragile economies. What does this mean in practical terms? None of these countries have the financial resources to build new military production plants; they don’t have spare cash stashed away to purchase new weapon systems from the US and then send them to Ukraine; and they don’t have the means to build up their armed forces and equip them with modern gear and loads of ammunition required to sustain operations on the 21st century battlefield.

For my friends in Europe, I have some bad news… you are no longer relevant as a military force. After 15 centuries of dominating world events, you are now entering the age of impotence. But, you ain’t going alone… the United States is following you on this path to irrelevancy."

"You Will Own Nothing But Debt, The New Reality Of The Average American"

Jeremiah Babe, 8/26/25
"You Will Own Nothing But Debt, 
The New Reality Of The Average American"
Comments here:

Gerald Celente, "Trump's Corporate Deals Equal Mussolini's Fascism"

Strong language alert!
Gerald Celente, 8/26/25
"Trump's Corporate Deals Equal Mussolini's Fascism"
"The Trends Journal is a weekly magazine analyzing global current events forming future trends. Our mission is to present Facts and Truth over fear and propaganda to help subscribers prepare for What’s Next in these increasingly turbulent times."
Comments here:

"Col. Larry Wilkerson: Warning Signs Everywhere: U.S. on the Verge of Disaster"

Dialogue Works, 8/26/25
"Col. Larry Wilkerson: Warning Signs Everywhere: 
U.S. on the Verge of Disaster"
Comments here:

"Inflation Prices: Nobody Is Talking About The Biggest Crisis Americans Face"

Full screen recommended.
Snyder Reports, 8/26/25
"Inflation Prices: Nobody Is Talking About 
The Biggest Crisis Americans Face"
Comments here:

Musical Interlude: Yanni, "The Storm"

Full screen recommended.
Yanni, "The Storm"

"A Look to the Heavens"

"Dwarf galaxies NGC 147 (left) and NGC 185 stand side by side in this sharp telescopic portrait. The two are not-often-imaged satellites of M31, the great spiral Andromeda Galaxy, some 2.5 million light-years away. Their separation on the sky, less than one degree across a pretty field of view, translates to only about 35 thousand light-years at Andromeda's distance, but Andromeda itself is found well outside this frame. 
Brighter and more famous satellite galaxies of Andromeda, M32 and M110, are seen closer to the great spiral. NGC 147 and NGC 185 have been identified as binary galaxies, forming a gravitationally stable binary system. But recently discovered faint dwarf galaxy Cassiopeia II also seems to be part of their system, forming a gravitationally bound group within Andromeda's intriguing population of small satellite galaxies."

"Iran and World War 3"

"Iran and World War 3"
by Nick Giambruno

"In the east, the Roman Empire generally ended where the Persian Empire began. Unlike most other nation states in the Middle East, Iran (known as Persia before 1935) is not an artificial construct. By race, religion, and social history, it is a nation. European bureaucrats didn’t dream up Iran by drawing zigzags on a map. The map reflects the geographic reality of a country with natural, fortress-like mountain borders.

Iran is Russia and China's key ally in the Middle East, pushing back against the influence of the US and its allies. The US, Israel, and their allies have not been successful in changing the behavior of the Iranian government. They’ve tried pretty much everything short of a full-scale invasion and using nuclear weapons. In short, the US and its allies have few cards left to play against Iran.

If the US really wants to secure its influence in the strategic Middle East in a multipolar world - which would open the door to limiting Russian and Chinese power - it would need to overthrow the Iranian government. However, to do that would require a full-scale ground invasion. Air power alone is not going to remove the Iranian government. It couldn't even dislodge the much smaller and poorer Houthis from Yemen.

Remember, during the Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988) - back when Saddam was a “good guy” - he threw over 500,000 Iraqi soldiers at Iran, had the backing of the US and the Soviet Union, and used chemical weapons on a scale not seen since WW1… and he barely made a dent in Iran before retreating back to Iraq’s borders. The reality is that if the US is serious about invading Iran, it would likely require total mobilization and bringing back the draft. That is not likely to happen, but even if it did, it would not guarantee US victory.

If Iran thought the US was going to invade, it could rush to develop nuclear weapons as a deterrent within a matter of weeks. Iran would also not just sit and wait for the US to stage an invasion, and would likely target any staging area for a ground invasion with hypersonic ballistic missiles. Given those unfavorable prospects, the US (or Israel) could decide to use nuclear weapons on Iran preemptively.

Iran is well aware that the US or Israel could use nuclear weapons against it. It has contingency plans for that outcome to ensure the survival of its government. Iran’s plans also likely include making a dash for developing its own nuclear arsenal to be able to respond in kind. Further, it’s doubtful that Russia and China would just sit back and do nothing if the US and Israel looked like they might nuke Iran. For example, Russia could decide to station nuclear weapons and Russian soldiers on Iranian soil as a deterrent.

Suppose the US and Israel used nuclear weapons on Iran. It would shatter the global taboo and effectively give other countries the green light to use them. Could Russia then nuke Ukraine or another part of Europe? Could China nuke Taiwan? What about India and Pakistan? The consequences of the US or Israel nuking Iran would be catastrophic. And while it's unlikely, it remains a real possibility.

Ultimately, either the US, Israel, and their allies will succeed in toppling the Iranian government, or Iran’s ruling system will endure and emerge as the dominant power in the Middle East. I believe the outcome in Iran will shape the outcome of World War 3 and define the balance of power in the emerging multipolar world order. That’s why the US may not be deterred from taking actions that risk shutting down the Strait of Hormuz - or other drastic measures - in a bid to win.

The stakes in Iran underscore just how fragile the world order has become - and why the next major conflict could ignite not just a geopolitical firestorm, but also an economic one that reshapes the global financial system."

o

"We Are Here..."

"We are here on earth to do good to others.
What the others are here for, I do not know."
- Matthew Arnold

Free Download: Olaf Stapledon, "Star Maker"

"The Sharp Tang And Savor Of Existence..."

"The thought of the disaster which almost certainly lay in wait for the Other Men threw me into a horror of doubt about the universe in which such a thing could happen. That a whole world of intelligent beings could be destroyed was not an unfamiliar idea to me; but there is a great difference between an abstract possibility and a concrete and inescapable danger. On my native planet, whenever I had been dismayed by the suffering and the futility of individuals, I had taken comfort in the thought that at least the massed effect of all our blind striving must be the slow but glorious awakening of the human spirit. This hope, this certainty, had been the one sure consolation. But now I saw that there was no guarantee of any such triumph. It seemed that the universe, or the maker of the universe, must be indifferent to the fate of worlds. That there should be endless struggle and suffering and waste must of course be accepted; and gladly, for these were the very soil in which the spirit grew. But that all struggle should be finally, absolutely vain, that a whole world of sensitive spirits fail and die, must be sheer evil. In my horror it seemed to me that Hate must be the Star Maker.

Not so to Bvalitu. "Even if the powers destroy us," he said, "who are we, to condemn them? As well might a fleeting word judge the speaker that forms it. Perhaps they use us for their own high ends, use our strength and our weakness, our joy and our pain, in some theme inconceivable to us, and excellent." But I protested, "What theme could justify such waste, such futility? And how can we help judging; and how otherwise can we judge than by the light of our own hearts, by which we judge ourselves? It would be base to praise the Star Maker, knowing that he was too insensitive to care about the fate of his worlds." Bvalitu was silent in his mind for a moment. Then he looked up, searching among the smoke-clouds for a daytime star. And then he said to me in his mind, "If he saved all the worlds, but tormented just one man, would you forgive him? Or if he was a little harsh only to one stupid child? What has our pain to do with it, or our failure? Star Maker! It is a good word, though we can have no notion of its meaning. Oh, Star Maker, even if you destroy me, I must praise you. Even if you torture my dearest. Even if you torment and waste all your lovely worlds, the little figments of your imagination, yet I must praise you. For if you do so, it must be right. In me it would be wrong, but in you it must be right."

He looked down once more upon the ruined city, then continued, "And if after all there is no Star Maker, if the great company of galaxies leapt into being of their own accord, and even if this little nasty world of ours is the only habitation of the spirit anywhere among the stars, and this world doomed, even so, even so, I must praise. But if there is no Star Maker, what can it be that I praise? I do not know. I will call it only the sharp tang and savor of existence. But to call it this is to say little."
- Olaf Stapledon, "Star Maker"
o
"In this passionately social world, loneliness dogged the spirit. People were constantly getting together, but they never really got there. Everyone was terrified of being alone with himself; yet in company, in spite of the universal assumption of comradeship, these strange beings remained as remote from one another as the stars. For everyone searched his neighbor's eyes for the image of himself, and never saw anything else. Or if he did, he was outraged and terrified."
- Olaf Stapledon, "Star Maker"

Freely download "Star Maker", by Olaf Stapledon, here:

The Daily "Near You?"

Chelsea, Massachusetts, USA. Thanks for stopping by!

"We Have Met The Enemy..."

 

Chet Raymo, “We Are Such Stuff...”

“We Are Such Stuff...”
by Chet Raymo

“Be not afeard; the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight, and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometimes voices,
That, if I then had wak'd after long sleep,
Will make me sleep again.”

"Caliban is talking to Stephano and Trinculo in Shakespeare's “Tempest”, telling them not to be "afeard" of the mysterious place they find themselves, an island seemingly beset with magic, strangeness, ineffable presences. And you and I, and, yes, all of us, find ourselves inexplicably thrown up on this island that is the world, and we too, if we are attentive, hear the strange music, the sounds and sweet airs, that seems to come from nowhere and everywhere

No, I'm not talking about the usual ubiquitous clamor, the roar of internal combustion, the blare of the television, the beeping of mobile phones. I'm not talking about the Limbaughs and the Becks, the televangelists, the blathering politicians, the twitterers and bloggers (including this one). I'm not even talking about the exquisite music of Mozart, the poetry of Wordsworth, the theories of Einstein.

I'm talking about the sounds we hear in utter silence, in moments of repose, in the heart of darkness, when we are a little bit afraid, disoriented, off kilter. A strange music that comes from beyond our knowing, a felt meaning. You've heard it. I've heard it. You'd have to be deaf not to have heard it. 

Where we differ is how we describe it. Mostly, we give its source a name. Angels. Fairies. Gods or demons. Yahweh. Allah. Father, Son and Holy Spirit. Nixies, E.T.s, shades and shadows. Naiads, dryads, Ariel and Puck. A host of invisible creatures who are, in one way or another, images of ourselves. And, in naming, we are a little less afraid.

And some of us are just content to listen, to take delight. Having woken to the inexplicable mystery of the world- the sounds and sweet airs that give delight and hurt not- we let the music lull us back into a sweet slumber, a kind of dreamless dream, a reverie. Does reverie share a deep root with reverence? I don't know.”

Paulo Coelho, "The Water Pitcher"

"The Water Pitcher"
by Paulo Coelho 

"A legend tells of a man who used to carry water every day to his village, using two large pitchers tied on either end of a piece of wood, which he placed across his shoulders. One of the pitchers was older than the other and was full of small cracks; every time the man came back along the path to his house, half of the water was lost. For two years, the man made the same journey. The younger pitcher was always very proud of the way it did its work and was sure that it was up to the task for which it had been created, while the other pitcher was mortally ashamed that it could carry out only half its task, even though it knew that the cracks were the result of long years of work.

So ashamed was the old pitcher that, one day, while the man was preparing to fill it up with water from the well, it decided to speak to him. "I wish to apologize because, due to my age, you only manage to take home half the water you fill me with, and thus quench only half the thirst awaiting you in your house."

The man smiled and said: "When we go back, be sure to take a careful look at the path." The pitcher did as the man asked and noticed many flowers and plants growing along one side of the path. "Do you see how much more beautiful nature is on your side of the road?" the man remarked. "I knew you had cracks, but I decided to take advantage of them. I sowed vegetables and flowers there, and you always watered them. I've picked dozens of roses to decorate my house, and my children have had lettuce, cabbage and onions to eat. If you were not the way you are, I could never have done this. We all, at some point, grow old and acquire other qualities, and these can always be turned to good advantage."

The Poet: Langston Hughes, “Life is Fine”

“Life is Fine”

"I went down to the river,
I set down on the bank.
I tried to think but couldn't,
So I jumped in and sank.

I came up once and hollered!
I came up twice and cried!
If that water hadn't a-been so cold
I might've sunk and died.
But it was cold in that water! It was cold!

I took the elevator
Sixteen floors above the ground.
I thought about my baby
And thought I would jump down.
I stood there and I hollered!
I stood there and I cried!
If it hadn't a-been so high
I might've jumped and died.
But it was High up there! It was high!

So since I'm still here livin',
I guess I will live on.
I could've died for love -
But for livin' I was born.
Though you may hear me holler,
And you may see me cry-
I'll be dogged, sweet baby,
If you gonna see me die.

Life is fine! Fine as wine! Life is fine!"

- Langston Hughes

"How It Really Is"

 

"Escaping the Trap of Efficiency"

"Escaping the Trap of Efficiency: The Counterintuitive Antidote
 to the Time-Anxiety That Haunts and Hampers Our Search for Meaning"
by Maria Popova

"A decade ago, when I first began practicing with my mindfulness teacher while struggling to make rent and make meaning out of my borrowed stardust, one meditation she led transformed my quality of life above all others - both life’s existential calibration and its moment-to-moment experience: You are asked to imagine having only a year left to live, at your present mental and bodily capacity - what would you do with it? Then imagine you only had a day left - what would you do with it? Then only an hour - what would you do with it?

As you scale down these nested finitudes, the question becomes a powerful sieve for priorities - because undergirding it is really the question of what, from among the myriad doable things, you would choose not to do in order to fill the scant allotment of time, be it the 8,760 hours of a year or a single hour, with the experiences that confer upon it maximum aliveness, that radiant vitality filling the basic biological struggle for survival with something more numinous.

The exercise instantly clarifies - and horrifies, with the force of its clarity - the empty atoms of automation and unexamined choice filling modern life with busyness while hollowing it of gladness. What emerges is the sense that making a meaningful life is less like the building of the Pyramids, stacking an endless array of colossal blocks into a superstructure of impressive stature and on the back of slave labor, than like the carving of Rodin’s Thinker, cutting pieces away from the marble block until a shape of substance and beauty is revealed. What emerges, too, is the sense that the modern cult of productivity is the great pyramid scheme of our time.

Oliver Burkeman reckons with these ideas in "Four Thousand Weeks: Time Management for Mortals" (public library) - an inquiry equal parts soulful and sobering, offering not arsenal for but sanctuary from our self-brutalizing war on the constraints of reality, titled after the (disconcertingly low) number of weeks comprising the average modern sapiens lifespan of eighty (seemingly long) years.

After taking a delightful English jab at the American-bred term “life-hack” and its unfortunate intimation that “your life is best thought of as some kind of faulty contraption, in need of modification so as to stop it from performing suboptimally,” Burkeman frames our present predicament:

"This strange moment in history, when time feels so unmoored, might in fact provide the ideal opportunity to reconsider our relationship with it. Older thinkers have faced these challenges before us, and when their wisdom is applied to the present day, certain truths grow more clearly apparent. Productivity is a trap. Becoming more efficient just makes you more rushed, and trying to clear the decks simply makes them fill up again faster. Nobody in the history of humanity has ever achieved “work-life balance,” whatever that might be, and you certainly won’t get there by copying the “six things successful people do before 7:00 a.m.” The day will never arrive when you finally have everything under control - when the flood of emails has been contained; when your to-do lists have stopped getting longer; when you’re meeting all your obligations at work and in your home life; when nobody’s angry with you for missing a deadline or dropping the ball; and when the fully optimized person you’ve become can turn, at long last, to the things life is really supposed to be about."

In consequence, we lose sight of the fundamental tradeoff that the price of higher productivity is always lower creativity. All of it, Burkeman observes, is the product of an anxiety about time that springs from our stubborn avoidance of the elemental parameters of reality. A century and a half after Emily Dickinson lamented that “enough is so vast a sweetness… it never occurs, only pathetic counterfeits,” he writes:

"Denying reality never works, though. It may provide some immediate relief, because it allows you to go on thinking that at some point in the future you might, at last, feel totally in control. But it can’t ever bring the sense that you’re doing enough - that you are enough - because it defines “enough” as a kind of limitless control that no human can attain. Instead, the endless struggle leads to more anxiety and a less fulfilling life."

This pursuit of efficiency hollows out the fullness of life, flattening the sphere of being that makes us complete human beings into a hamster wheel. Burkeman terms this “the paradox of limitation” and writes: "The more you try to manage your time with the goal of achieving a feeling of total control, and freedom from the inevitable constraints of being human, the more stressful, empty, and frustrating life gets. But the more you confront the facts of finitude instead - and work with them, rather than against them - the more productive, meaningful, and joyful life becomes."

Echoing physicist Brian Greene’s poetic meditation on how our mortality gives meaning to our lives, he adds: "I don’t think the feeling of anxiety ever completely goes away; we’re even limited, apparently, in our capacity to embrace our limitations. But I’m aware of no other time management technique that’s half as effective as just facing the way things truly are."

At the crux of facing the limits of reality is the fact that we must make choices — a necessity that can petrify us with “FOMO,” the paralyzing fear of missing out. And yet, as Adam Phillips observed in his elegant antidote to this fear, “our lived lives might become a protracted mourning for, or an endless tantrum about, the lives we were unable to live. But the exemptions we suffer, whether forced or chosen, make us who we are.”

We have different coping strategies for managing the melancholy onus of having to choose. I am aware that my reliance on daily routines, unvaried meals, interchangeable clothing items, recursive playlists, and other life-loops is a coping mechanism aimed at automating certain choices in order to allay the anxiety and time-cost of having to make them afresh each day. Others orient orthogonally to the problem, avoiding making concrete choices and commitments, in life and in love, in order to keep their options “open” - an equally illusory escape from the grand foreclosure that is life itself.

But however we cope with the fearsome fact of having to choose, choose we must in order to live - and in order to have lives worthy of having been lived. It is, of course, all about facing our mortality - like every anxiety in life, if its layers of distraction and disguise are peeled back far enough.

With an eye to the etymology of “decide” - which stems from the Latin decidere, “to cut off,” a root it shares with “homicide” and “suicide” - Burkeman considers the necessity of excision: "Any finite life - even the best one you could possibly imagine - is therefore a matter of ceaselessly waving goodbye to possibility… Since finitude defines our lives… living a truly authentic life - becoming fully human - means facing up to that fact.
[…]
It’s only by facing our finitude that we can step into a truly authentic relationship with life."

Facing our finitude is, of course, the most challenging frontier of our ongoing resistance to facing the various territories of reality. The outrage we intuitively feel at the fact of our mortality - outrage for which the commonest prescription in the history of our species have been sugar-coated pellets of illusion promising ideologies of immortality - is a futile fist shaken at the fundamental organizing principle of the universe, of which we are part and product. Only the rare few are able to orient to mortality by meeting reality on its own terms and finding in that reorientation not only relief but rapturous gladness.

A generation after Richard Dawkins made his exquisite counterintuitive argument for how death betokens the luckiness of life, Burkeman offers a fulcrum for pivoting our intuitive never-enough-time perspective to take a different view of the time we do have: "From an everyday standpoint, the fact that life is finite feels like a terrible insult… There you were, planning to live on forever… but now here comes mortality, to steal away the life that was rightfully yours.

Yet, on reflection, there’s something very entitled about this attitude. Why assume that an infinite supply of time is the default, and mortality the outrageous violation? Or to put it another way, why treat four thousand weeks as a very small number, because it’s so tiny compared with infinity, rather than treating it as a huge number, because it’s so many more weeks than if you had never been born? Surely only somebody who’d failed to notice how remarkable it is that anything is, in the first place, would take their own being as such a given - as if it were something they had every right to have conferred upon them, and never to have taken away. So maybe it’s not that you’ve been cheated out of an unlimited supply of time; maybe it’s almost incomprehensibly miraculous to have been granted any time at all."

Our anxiety about the finitude of time is at bottom a function of the limits of attention - that great strainer for stimuli, woven of time. Our brains have evolved to miss the vast majority of what is unfolding around us, which renders our slender store of conscious attention our most precious resource - “the rarest and purest form of generosity,” in Simone Weil’s lovely words. And yet, Burkeman argues, treating attention as a resource is already a diminishment of its reality-shaping centrality to our lives. In consonance with William James - the original patron saint of attention as the empress of experience - Burkeman writes:

"Most other resources on which we rely as individuals - such as food, money, and electricity - are things that facilitate life, and in some cases it’s possible to live without them, at least for a while. Attention, on the other hand, just is life: your experience of being alive consists of nothing other than the sum of everything to which you pay attention. At the end of your life, looking back, whatever compelled your attention from moment to moment is simply what your life will have been."

Annie Dillard captured this sentiment best in her haunting observation that “how we spend our days is, of course, how we spend our lives” - a poetic sentiment that, on a hectic day, becomes an indictment. What makes our attention so vulnerable to distraction is the difficulty of attending to what is consequential in the grandest scheme - a difficulty temporarily allayed by the ease of attending to the immediate and seemingly urgent but, ultimately, inconsequential. (Who among us would, on their deathbed, radiate soul-gladness over the number of emails they responded to in their lifetime?) “People are drawn to the easy and to the easiest side of the easy,” Rilke admonished a century before social media’s stream of easy escape into distraction, before productivity apps and life-hacks and instaeverything. “But it is clear that we must hold ourselves to the difficult.”

Burkeman writes: "Whenever we succumb to distraction, we’re attempting to flee a painful encounter with our finitude - with the human predicament of having limited time, and more especially, in the case of distraction, limited control over that time, which makes it impossible to feel certain about how things will turn out… The most effective way to sap distraction of its power is just to stop expecting things to be otherwise - to accept that this unpleasantness is simply what it feels like for finite humans to commit ourselves to the kinds of demanding and valuable tasks that force us to confront our limited control over how our lives unfold."

And so we get to the crux of our human predicament - the underbelly of our anxiety about every unanswered email, every unfinished project, and every unbegun dream: Our capacities are limited, our time is finite, and we have no control over how it will unfold or when it will run out. Beyond the lucky fact of being born, life is one great sweep of uncertainty, bookended by the only other lucky certainty we have. It is hardly any wonder that the sweep is dusted with so much worry and we respond with so much obsessive planning, compulsive productivity, and other touching illusions of control.

Burkeman - whose previous book made a similarly counterintuitive and insightful case for uncertainty as the wellspring of happiness - writes: "Worry, at its core, is the repetitious experience of a mind attempting to generate a feeling of security about the future, failing, then trying again and again and again - as if the very effort of worrying might somehow help forestall disaster. The fuel behind worry, in other words, is the internal demand to know, in advance, that things will turn out fine: that your partner won’t leave you, that you will have sufficient money to retire, that a pandemic won’t claim the lives of anyone you love, that your favored candidate will win the next election, that you can get through your to-do list by the end of Friday afternoon. But the struggle for control over the future is a stark example of our refusal to acknowledge our built-in limitations when it comes to time, because it’s a fight the worrier obviously won’t win.
[…]
And so insecurity and vulnerability are the default state - because in each of the moments that you inescapably are, anything could happen, from an urgent email that scuppers your plans for the morning to a bereavement that shakes your world to its foundations. A life spent focused on achieving security with respect - as if the point of your having been born still lies in the future, just over the horizon, and your life in all its fullness can begin as soon as you’ve gotten it, in Arnold Bennett’s phrase, “into proper working order.”

The primary manifestation of this - and the root of our uneasy relationship with time - is that, in the course of our ordinary days, we instinctively make choices not through the lens of significance but through the lens of anxiety-avoidance, which increasingly renders life something to be managed rather than savored, a problem to be solved rather than a question to be asked, which we must each answer with the singular song of our lives, melodic with meaning.

Leaning on Carl Jung’s perceptive advice on how to live, Burkeman makes poetically explicit the book’s implicitly obvious and necessary disclaimer: "Maybe it’s worth spelling out that none of this is an argument against long-term endeavors like marriage or parenting, building organizations or reforming political systems, and certainly not against tackling the climate crisis; these are among the things that matter most. But it’s an argument that even those things can only ever matter now, in each moment of the work involved, whether or not they’ve yet reached what the rest of the world defines as fruition. Because now is all you ever get.
[…]
If you can face the truth about time in this way - if you can step more fully into the condition of being a limited human - you will reach the greatest heights of productivity, accomplishment, service, and fulfillment that were ever in the cards for you to begin with. And the life you will see incrementally taking shape, in the rearview mirror, will be one that meets the only definitive measure of what it means to have used your weeks well: not how many people you helped, or how much you got done; but that working within the limits of your moment in history, and your finite time and talents, you actually got around to doing - and made life more luminous for the rest of us by doing - whatever magnificent task or weird little thing it was that you came here for.

In the remainder of the thoroughly satisfying and clarifying "Four Thousand Weeks," drawing on a wealth of contemporary research and timeless wisdom from thinkers long vanished into what Emily Dickinson termed “the drift called ‘the Infinite,'” Burkeman goes on to devise a set of principles for liberating ourselves from the trap of efficiency and its illusory dreams of control, so that our transience can be a little more bearable and our finite time in the kingdom of life a little less provisional, a lot more purposeful, and infinitely more alive.

Complement it with Seneca on the Stoic key to living with presence, Hermann Hesse on breaking the trance of busyness, artist Etel Adnan on time, self, impermanence, and transcendence, and physicist Alan Lightman’s poetic exploration of time and the antidote to life’s central anxiety, then revisit Borges’s timeless refutation of time, which Burkeman necessarily quotes, and Mary Oliver - another of Burkeman’s bygone beacons - on the measure of a life well lived."