StatCounter

Wednesday, July 9, 2025

"Steve Jobs' Rules For Life"

"Steve Jobs' Rules For Life"
by Thomas Oppong

“I fear not the man who has practiced 10,000 kicks once, but I fear the man who has practiced one kick 10,000 times, the legendary Bruce Lee once said. Bruce Lee’s philosophy of “being so good they can’t ignore you” focused on refining and mastering the fundamentals to an unparalleled level.

The way to master life and career is to make Steve Jobs’ quote a mantra for almost everything you do. “Be a yardstick of quality. Some people aren’t used to an environment where excellence is expected,” he said. When Jobs said, ‘I want to put a ding in the universe,’ he was challenging not just himself but all of us. Jobs knew that by setting the bar high, he could inspire others to reach for greatness, just like he did at Apple. Becoming a yardstick of quality means a commitment to excellence in everything we do.

“The quality of a person’s life is in direct proportion to their commitment to excellence, regardless of their chosen field of endeavor,” says American Football coach Vince Lombardi. People who are committed to quality habits hold themselves accountable for every outcome. They ensure they deliver nothing less than excellence in all areas of their lives.

Extraordinary is an attainable target. Stephen Hawking was diagnosed with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) at the age of 21, but he went on to become one of the most renowned physicists of our time. They have dared to think differently and made significant contributions to the world. “I think it is possible for ordinary people to choose to be extraordinary,’ Elon Musk once said. He’s shown that by pushing the boundaries in the aerospace and electric car industries. Musk, much like Jobs, isn’t just an entrepreneur; he’s a visionary who sets the bar high for an entire industry.

They both challenge others to rise above mediocrity. Embracing the “yardstick of quality” mindset is about consistently demanding the best from yourself. You set a personal example of excellence, just like Steve Jobs. It means you’re not just aiming for success; you’re unapologetically demanding it from yourself. It’s not a fleeting commitment; it’s a life philosophy.

You don’t merely aim for greatness; you make it an inherent part of your identity. And encourage others to do the same with your words and, more importantly, your actions. “Quality is not an act; it is a habit,” Aristotle said. Making quality a habit is not just about talking about your high standards; it’s about living them every day. And giving your absolute best in everything you do to achieve personal greatness.

Albert Einstein once said, “I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious.” Even the greatest minds among us are not born with special abilities. Rather, they achieve greatness through a deep passion for learning and discovery. You can build a great life on an unquenchable thirst for knowledge and growth. You demonstrate an unwavering commitment to your life or career goals, making it clear that greatness is an achievable goal for anyone determined to reach it.

You become the architect of your greatness. You set the bar for the kind of life you want to lead and, in doing so, motivate yourself to meet and exceed those standards. You don’t just wait for life to happen; you actively shape it according to your vision of greatness. People who hold themselves to high standards expect a lot from themselves. They are personally invested in the pursuit of quality in life and career.

Top performers are relentless in pursuit of excellence. Mozart’s work reflects not just notes on paper but a deep connection to his music. He famously declared, “People err who think my art comes easily to me. I assure you, dear friend, nobody has devoted so much time and thought to compositions as I. There is not a famous master whose music I have not industriously studied through many times.” He was committed to personal excellence is an understatement. Pablo Picasso was a great artist. His creative iterations grew with time. It took him thousands of iterations to find his genius. “It took me four years to paint like Raphael, but a lifetime to paint like a child,” he said.

Picasso’s artistic evolution throughout his career showcases a commitment to pushing the boundaries of creativity. Simone Biles is an artistic gymnast widely regarded as the greatest gymnast ever. She has won a record 32 Olympic and World Championship medals, including seven Olympic gold medals. Biles is known for her brilliance and hard work from an early age. “If they said, ‘Do five pull-ups,’ I would always want to do 10,” she says. “We strive for greatness,” Biles once said.

For top performers, becoming a yardstick of quality is not a sporadic effort; it’s a way of life. Excellence defines their pursuits. In life, it’s about making the same choice: to be extraordinary. You must take ownership of your pursuit of excellence, realizing it’s a continuous process, not a one-time achievement.

As Henry Ford once said, “Quality means doing it right when no one is looking.” That means your commitment to excellence should be ingrained in your character, not just a performance for others. It’s a lifetime commitment.

It’s a journey that begins with you, and it’s only when you’re relentless in your pursuit that you truly achieve greatness. Excellence should define your daily pursuits, setting the bar higher each day. Whether in your work, home life, or personal ethics, hold yourself to the highest expectations and consistently meet or exceed them. “Excellence is doing ordinary things extraordinarily well,” says former US Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare John W. Gardner.

“Be a yardstick of quality,” is a practical rule for life. It’s not just an aspiration; it’s a consistent standard that drives greatness. When you become a benchmark for quality, you not only inspire yourself but everyone around you. Becoming a yardstick of quality is an unwavering commitment to high standards. It’s not merely a goal; it’s the path to a life of significance. Your future self depends on it."

"A Difficult Life Can Still Be a Good Life"

"My own mind turned on me. I kept repeating a simple question in my head: Is this all there is? We don’t always get what we want. Or feel like we deserve. When I’m no longer able to change a situation, solve a problem or fix my life the way I want, I’m challenged to change my reality. Or outgrow the problems. A difficult life can still be a great life. You can go through loss and still choose to love again. You can do the work you don’t like and still find other sources of joy. Or wake up anxious about your life, and still persist. It’s the superhuman thing to do. And you are most likely doing it. You haven’t failed at life. Just temporary things.

There’s a difference. Viktor Frankl survived a concentration camp. He still found the will to live and write about it. If anyone gets to talk about pain and purpose, it’s him. You don’t need a perfect life to live a good one. You just need to live it. But with honesty. Life won’t always be fair. But it can still be beautiful. You’ve survived 100% of your worst days so far. That’s not luck. That’s you.

Hard things happen to good people. But you can’t find meaning in avoiding struggle. You find it in how you move through it. In his book Frankl says, "A difficult life can still be a good life. Not in spite of the struggle, but sometimes because of it."

Some days, everything can feel unbearable. You drag yourself through the hours, wondering if it’s worth it. But the struggle isn’t just a burden, it’s also what keeps you alive. Without it, you’d float away, unrefined. Pain isn’t a sign you’re doing life wrong. It’s a sign you’re alive. If life feels too much at the minute, remember this truth: passing pain doesn’t ruin the whole experience. “The wound is the place where the Light enters you,” says poet Rumi.

“If you can’t get beyond your stresses, your problems, and your pain, you can’t create a new future where those things don’t exist.” - Dr. Joe Dispenza

A hard life doesn’t mean a bad one. Surprise yourself. Difficulty doesn’t cancel out joy. It just improves your grit. And the ability to find joy and hope. Life can be full of suffering, but it is also full of overcoming it. You don’t need an easy life to have a good one. You need purpose. Struggle can teach resilience. You won’t always fix everything at once.

Some days, you’ll feel like you’ve got nothing left. You’ll want to quit. Maybe not everything, but something. The draining work or relationship stress. Hang in there. Hard and good can live in the same place. In fact, they often do. But experiences are temporary. If they don’t. Or you can’t change it, outgrow what you can’t control. Look for pockets of space to find your joy. After the break. After the silence. After the fight. Keep showing up. For yourself. For the people you love. For the life you still get to live. Hard just means you’re still in it.

“Ring the bells that still can ring.
Forget your perfect offering.
There is a crack, a crack in everything.
That’s how the light gets in.” 
- Leonard Cohen

People think brokenness ruins things, but sometimes, it’s what makes them real. It’s a paradox. The things that almost break you also teach you how to live. Life won’t stop being difficult. But you won’t stop being human. That means you won’t stop finding light in dark places. A good life is not without suffering. You can hold both without losing your mind. The pain and the joy, the struggle and the strength. You don’t have to choose. You get to feel them all. A difficult life can still be a good life. It already is.

Life will hurt. It will test you. It will not always make sense. But none of that means your life can’t be good. A good life is real. Live it with both hands, even when you hit a wall. Live it in hard choices, in the slow work of showing up again and again. Find in the ordinary. Strength in the struggle. That’s what’s working for me. Your life, as it is, matters. And even with the woulds, it can still hold light. A difficult life can still be a good life.

I know it. You know it. A good life isn’t measured by how little you suffer. But by how much you live in spite of it. By the love you give when you don’t feel like it. By the hope you hold when you’re afraid. By the way you keep showing up, even when you’re not sure it matters. It does. You’re in it, fighting for it, finding meaning in it. It’s the human thing to do."

"How It Really Is"

 

Dan, I Allegedly, "Why is Food so Expensive? The Grocery Store Sticker Shock"

Full screen recommended.
Dan, I Allegedly, AM 7/9/25
"Why is Food so Expensive? 
The Grocery Store Sticker Shock"
"Food prices are through the roof, and here's why they might NEVER drop again. From skyrocketing grocery bills to restaurant meals that cost a small fortune, we're all feeling the squeeze. Since 2019, food costs have jumped 31%, and there's no end in sight. I break down the shocking numbers, from $14 hamburgers to $5 coffee, and uncover the hidden factors behind these soaring prices—labor, shipping, corporate greed, and even environmental disasters. Whether it's breakfast, burritos, or bacon, costs are climbing faster than wages. Plus, restaurant closures and rising production costs are pushing things to the brink. What can we do to adapt? I share practical tips for saving money and staying ahead of these changes."
Comments here:

Adventures With Danno, "Unbelievable Prices At Meijer"

Full screen recommended.
Adventures With Danno, AM 7/9/25
"Unbelievable Prices At Meijer"
Comments here:

"Arizona's Homeless Hell 2025: The City of Tents, Trauma & Total Collapse"

Full screen recommended.
Street Stories Homeless, 7/8/25
"Arizona's Homeless Hell 2025:
 The City of Tents, Trauma & Total Collapse"
"Beneath the scorching Arizona sun lies an invisible hell – tent encampments that surround the city, where homeless people struggle with addiction, poverty and despair. From flawed policies to systemic incompetence, this video exposes the dark side of Arizona’s Sin City in 2025 – where life is no longer humane."
Comments here:

Free Download: Henry Hazlitt, "Economics in One Lesson"

"'Economics In One Lesson':
 A Review of a Classic"
by Sean Ring

"If you’ve ever found yourself cornered at a dinner party by that one guy with a conspiratorial gleam in his eye and a penchant for explaining why the economy is “just a series of smoke and mirrors,” you’ll appreciate Henry Hazlitt’s "Economics in One Lesson." It’s The Book that offers the economically curious a set of brass knuckles to face the muddled nonsense of popular economic “thought.” And by “thought,” I mean whatever passes for it in political speeches, social media debates, or the average op-ed.

But let’s not get ahead of ourselves. First, a quick primer: Hazlitt’s book is an economics classic, albeit one that uses plain language to dismantle the kind of Keynesian tomfoolery that has turned deficit spending into a national sport. Published in 1946, it’s a slim volume that packs a heavyweight punch. Think of it as the literary equivalent of Muhammad Ali in his prime - quick, elegant, and devastatingly effective.

A Double-Edged Sword: Hazlitt begins with the titular “One Lesson”: the art of economics consists of not just looking at the immediate effects of any policy but at the longer-term effects, as well. Further, it demands that the consequences of that policy be examined for all groups, not just one. A lesson so obvious it seems like common sense - until you realize it’s precisely what most policymakers and pundits ignore.

Why? Looking at all the consequences of an economic policy requires work, patience, and critical thinking. It’s far easier to promise free lunches than to explain why those lunches aren’t free. Hazlitt’s brilliance lies in his ability to show how economic fallacies perpetuate precisely because they focus on immediate, visible effects while conveniently ignoring long-term, invisible ones. The result? Politicians handing out economic band-aids while ignoring the arterial bleeding beneath.

Smashing Windows (and Fallacies): Hazlitt’s first stop is the famous “Broken Window Fallacy.” You’ve heard the argument before, even if you didn’t realize it: destruction stimulates economic activity. The idea is that rebuilding a shattered window, for example, creates jobs for glaziers, boosts spending, and pumps life into the economy. What could possibly be wrong with that? Everything.

Hazlitt dismantles this nonsense by pointing out the unseen cost: the money spent on the new window could have been used for something else - perhaps a new pair of shoes. Instead of creating new value, we’ve merely replaced what was lost. It’s like celebrating a flat tire because it “supports” the tire repair industry. Hazlitt’s takeaway: destruction doesn’t create wealth; it squanders resources. So, the next time someone extols the “economic benefits” of rebuilding after a hurricane or a riot, feel free to remind them that their logic is as sound as a screen door on a submarine.

Not Free, But Taxpayer-Funded: Ah, public works! The bread and circuses of modern governance. Hazlitt addresses the perennial myth that government spending on infrastructure - roads, bridges, statues of politicians with dubious legacies - is a magic wand for economic growth.

But wait, you ask, aren’t those things good? Sure, they can be. The problem, Hazlitt reminds us, is that taxes fund such projects. And taxes, lest we forget, take money out of the pockets of individuals and businesses. What could those people have done with that money? We’ll never know because the government has already spent it on a bridge to nowhere. Hazlitt’s biting critique should be required reading for anyone who still believes in the economic tooth fairy.

Luddites of the World, Unite! Ever since the dawn of the Industrial Revolution, there’s been a persistent fear that machines will destroy jobs. Hazlitt gleefully trashes this notion, pointing out that technological progress doesn’t eliminate jobs; it reallocates them. Machines increase productivity, lower costs, and free up human labor for other pursuits - like writing snarky economic reviews. It’s a shame Barack Obama didn’t read this book. Otherwise, he wouldn’t have bemoaned how ATMs took the jobs of bank tellers. (They didn’t; see here.)

The real “curse” of machinery isn’t job destruction; it exposes the economic illiteracy of those who cry wolf every time a new technology emerges. Remember when computers were going to put us all out of work? Funny how that turned out.

The Donald Should Read About Tariffs: Hazlitt’s takedown of tariffs is a masterclass in economic wit. Hazlitt argues tariffs are a tax on consumers disguised as “protection” for domestic industries. Yes, they shield those businesses from foreign competition. But they shield them at the expense of everyone else. Higher prices, reduced choices, and economic inefficiency are the actual costs of protectionism. So, the next time someone suggests that tariffs are a “win” for the economy, remind them that taxing your citizens to prop up uncompetitive industries is about as bright as burning your house down to keep warm.

Inflation: The Illusion of Prosperity: Hazlitt’s chapter on inflation is remarkably prescient in today’s economic climate. He explains inflation is a stealthy way for governments to rob their citizens, not a sign of prosperity. It’s a tax that a central bank unethically levies, not a legislature. Inflation erodes the value of savings, distorts investment, and wreaks havoc on the economy. And yet, inflation is often sold to the public as a necessary evil or even a good thing. Hazlitt’s advice? Don’t buy it. Inflation benefits debtors (read: governments) at the expense of savers and wage earners. It’s the economic equivalent of a shell game, and you’re the sucker being fleeced.

Profit: Capitalism’s Dirty Word: Perhaps one of Hazlitt’s most important lessons is his defense of profits. In an era where “profit” is often treated as a four-letter word, Hazlitt reminds us that profits are essential for economic progress. They signal where resources should be allocated, incentivize innovation, and reward risk-taking. Destroy profits, and you destroy the engine of growth. It’s a message that should resonate with anyone who’s ever complained about greedy corporations while simultaneously complaining about them by posting on X from their iPhones while wolfing down avocado toast and an egg nog latte.

Why You Should Read This Book (Again): Hazlitt’s "Economics in One Lesson" is a survival guide for navigating the economic nonsense that permeates modern discourse. So, the next time someone tells you that we need more government spending, higher tariffs, or artificially low interest rates, do yourself a favor: hand them a copy of "Economics in One Lesson" and watch as their arguments crumble faster than a house caught in a tornado’s path.

Wrap Up: Hazlitt’s "Economics in One Lesson" is a welcome relief in a world celebrating economic illiteracy. It reminds us that good economics is about understanding the unseen, the long-term, and the big picture. So, grab a copy, pour yourself a stiff drink, and prepare to see the world - and its economic absurdities - in a new light. Just be warned: once you’ve read Hazlitt, you’ll never be able to watch the news without yelling at your TV."
Freely download "Economics In One Lesson", by Henry Hazlitt, here:

"The Big D-Word"

Something for the working man to look forward to…
"The Big D-Word"
by Joel Bowman

“Too many factors must be known, and no one can know them.”
~ Henry Hazlitt, from "Economics in One Lesson" (1946)

Vau, Portugal - "Look out below, dear reader... prices are actually falling at the other End of the World. A friend sends a message from our adopted home in Buenos Aires, Argentina. It shows a sign out front of a popular cafe-restaurant in Palermo: “Bajamos los precios un 11% para estar más cerca tuyo.” (“We lowered prices by 11% to be closer to you.”) Commented another friend, also a long-time Argentine resident: “Competition, baby!”

The price war comes as Javier Milei’s administration continues to tame inflation at what might be called the “printing press level,” with producer (wholesale) prices actually falling for the first time in years. From local paper, La Derecha Diario: "In a historic event for the Argentine economy, the Wholesale Domestic Price Index (IPIM) recorded a 0.3% monthly decrease in May, marking the first wholesale deflation in almost two decades. The data was confirmed this Tuesday by INDEC and was quickly celebrated by the Minister of Economy, Luis “Toto” Caputo, as a new milestone in the process of economic stabilization."

The decline was mainly driven by a 4.1% monthly reduction in the prices of imported products, while the prices of domestic products remained stable. On an annual basis, the IPIM rose by 22.4%, the lowest increase since December 2017, consolidating the downward trend of wholesale inflation.

Phony Fiat: Naturally, egghead establishment economists (EEEs), who lay their uncluttered craniums to sleep each night, visions of everyday high and higher prices dancing in their heads, are baffled. They fear the Big D-Word like a politician fears a lie detector. They cannot comprehend the free market’s promise to you: everyday low and lower prices. And if the free market were allowed to operate properly, that is to say, were it left to function as the name suggests, freely, lower prices are precisely what you would expect to see. Lower prices at the grocery store... at retail outlets and restaurants... at the gas pump and online.

And yet, as inquiring minds fairly recognize, that's simply not the case. Rather than enjoying a cornucopia of hyper-abundance, brought about by the turbo-charged purchasing power of the same or fewer dollars chasing ever more stuff, the average working stiff has witnessed his state plundered fiat plummet in value. In real terms – that is, adjusted for inflation – household net income has gone virtually nowhere in the U.S. over the past half a century. This despite the fact that most modern families now send two (or more) warm bodies off to the daily production line... How could this be?

Road to Nowhere: With all that extra input... with a growing population... mechanized machinery... Moore's Law... the ubiquitous wonders of the digital age... with EVs... NFTs... ChatGPTs and all the rest... shouldn't we expect the price of production and, therefore, the cost of associated goods and services, to fall... or, dare we utter the dreaded D-word... deflate?

Price deflation is progress, after all. Lower prices – ceterus paribus – are a surefire sign we're getting better at "making stuff." It means we're becoming more efficient. This happy outcome is the result of increased competition and scale in the marketplace. It’s the glowing, cherub-cheeked lovechild of Schumpeter’s “creative destruction” and the compounding effect of “learned processes.” Standing on the shoulders of giants, and all that. In this way, lower prices ought to serve as a "kind of dividend for the working man,” as Jim Grant, editor of the venerable Grant's Interest Rate Observer, once quipped.

“Not so fast!” cry the know-it-all federales. After years of grinding, multi-decade high inflation, much of it the direct result of post-pandemic spending hysteria across the so-called developed world, consumers are once again being assured by their slimy monetary overlords that inflation is cooling and that prices are coming down. Ah, but going up “less quickly” is not the same as coming down. Consider annual price inflation in the US going back over just the past decade when overlaid with the cumulative price increase over the same period.
(Data sourced from The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis reports and U.S. Inflation Calculator's compiled tables. Graph made with ChatGPT)

Drowning Less Quickly: The blue line (left axis) makes it look as though prices are decreasing when, really, they are only going up less fast. What you ought to see is each incremental increase stacked one on top of the other in order to get a picture of the total increase. Here, the green line (right axis) shows a clearer picture. An item that cost you $100 a decade ago now costs $135. That’s a 35% increase in the cost of goods ($35 / $100) * 100% = 35%... or a 26% decrease in purchasing power (100/135 = 0.74 or 74%)... meaning you can now buy 74% of what you could before; a 26% decrease. Said another way, your money lost over a quarter of its value in a single decade.

Add to that the wild price swings themselves, due in no small part to the scourge that was Bidenomics and the resulting 40-year high in inflation during his term, upon which we are only building higher now. Whatever happened to “price stability,” one half of the Fed’s own so-called “dual mandate.” (The other half being “maximum employment,” a subject for another Note...) And yet, it’s not like the Fed is being duplicitous in its modus operandi. They rob and steal at will, under cover of the population’s widespread innumeracy and basic economic illiteracy.

The Price of Money: The Fed claims 2% as its “optimum” rate of inflation. That is, it aims to steal exactly 2% of the purchasing power of your savings each and every year, give or take. They don’t always get it right, of course. Sometimes it’s more. Right now, the inflation rate in the US is 2.4%, up slightly from 2.3% the previous print. But even 2%, compounded annually for a decade, adds up. Or rather, it waters down.

For instance, at the stated “target” rate, $100 dilutes to being worth just $82.03 under ten years under the Fed’s reliable abuse and mistreatment. After twenty years, that $100 whittles to $67.29. And during the course of a working man’s life, let’s call it 40 years, that first $100 he put in his sock drawer becomes worth less than half ($45.29) of its original value. With that kind of math, one begins to wonder... could the alternative really be so bad? After all, we hear constantly – from the long-disgraced expert class – dire warnings of dastardly deflation lurking around every corner.

But what's so deadly about discounts? Do producers really suffer during a deflationary episode, as we're constantly assured they do? After all, aren't producers also consumers? Do they not, therefore, also stand to benefit from lower input costs in their respective businesses?

The Price of Administration: In a now classic interview with Steve Forbes, Jim Grant provided an illuminating walk down memory lane... “We've seen this before,” Grant told Mr. Forbes some years ago, “in many different ages of American economic history. The late 19th century was a time of persistently dwindling prices. Some people resented it, of course, and there was a progressive movement - so called - that mobilized itself in opposition. But, on the whole, Americans rather enjoyed a great generation of progress. In the 1920s, prices were stable or dwindled. In the early 1960s, the same."

“As recently as 1954," continued Grant, “there were 12 consecutive months of falling prices, as registered by the CPI. If you go back and look at the newspapers, you will search in vain for expressions of hysterical concern about that as we certainly see today.”

Hmm... what, if anything, has changed during this past half century or so? When did “high and higher prices everyday” become so en vogue? “I think what has changed is not so much the behavior of prices,” concluded Grant, “but rather the attitude of our central bankers towards prices. They feel they must control them and they must raise them up. The Fed has moved to substitute price administration for price discovery.”

And just how does the Fed achieve this dubious end, you may be wondering? Henry Hazlitt explained the process in his artfully-titled column, penned back in 1946, “The Fetish of Low Interest Rates.” "When interest rates are kept arbitrarily low by government policy, the effect must be inflationary...The natural rate of interest is the rate that would be established if the supply and demand for real capital were in equilibrium. The actual money interest rate can only be kept below the natural rate by pumping new money and new credit into the economic system. This new money and new credit add to the apparent supply of new capital, just as the judicious addition of water may increase the apparent supply of real milk."
~Henry Hazlitt, "The Fetish of Low Interest Rates" (1946)

Through “watering down the milk,” to borrow Hazlitt's metaphor, the Fed has successfully spared us the immeasurable inconvenience of lower prices. In other words, the Fed is diluting the value of the currency in which our favorite knickknacks and gizmos are denominated, thus offsetting the gains made through productive efficiency and the market's natural downward pressure on prices. Hazlitt's musings might well have been written yesterday. And yet, until President Milei dared question the “statist quo,” they seem barely to have touched a central banker’s ear. Here’s to low and lower prices, dividends for the working man, and a return to the free markets that deliver them."

Tuesday, July 8, 2025

Jeremiah Babe, "My Hotel Room Was Ghetto For $200 A Night; Buying New Dog For New House"

Full screen recommended.
Jeremiah Babe, 7/8/25
"My Hotel Room Was Ghetto For $200 A Night; 
Buying New Dog For New House"
Comments here:

"Alert! Russia Shuts Down Internet; Trump - 'Surprise For Putin'; Massive Attack Imminent?"

Full screen recommended.
Prepper News, 7/8/25
"Alert! Russia Shuts Down Internet; 
Trump - 'Surprise For Putin'; Massive Attack Imminent?"
Comments here:

Musical Interlude: Deuter, "Endless Horizon"

Full screen recommended. 
Deuter, "Endless Horizon"
"I cannot paint
What then I was. The sounding cataract
Haunted me like a passion: the tall rock,
The mountain, and the deep and gloomy wood,
Their colors and their forms, were then to me
An appetite; a feeling and a love,
That had no need of a remoter charm,
By thought supplied, not any interest
Unborrowed from the eye.

That time is past,
And all its aching joys are now no more,
And all its dizzy raptures. Not for this
Faint I, nor mourn nor murmur: other gifts
Have followed; for such loss, I would believe,
Abundant recompense.

For I have learned
To look on nature, not as in the hour
Of thoughtless youth; but hearing oftentimes
The still, sad music of humanity,
Nor harsh nor grating, though of ample power
To chasten and subdue."

- William Wordsworth,
"Lines Written A Few Miles Above Tintern Abbey"
“Some feelings sink so deep into the heart that
only loneliness can help you find them again.
Some truths are so painful that only shame can help you live with them.
Some things are so sad that only your soul can do the crying for them.”
- Gregory David Roberts, "Shantaram"

Musical Interlude: Elton John, "Your Starter For"

Elton John, "Your Starter For"

"A Look to the Heavens"

“Will our Sun look like this one day? The Helix Nebula is one of brightest and closest examples of a planetary nebula, a gas cloud created at the end of the life of a Sun-like star. The outer gasses of the star expelled into space appear from our vantage point as if we are looking down a helix. The remnant central stellar core, destined to become a white dwarf star, glows in light so energetic it causes the previously expelled gas to fluoresce.
The Helix Nebula, given a technical designation of NGC 7293, lies about 700 light-years away towards the constellation of the Water Bearer (Aquarius) and spans about 2.5 light-years. The above picture was taken three colors on infrared light by the 4.1-meter Visible and Infrared Survey Telescope for Astronomy (VISTA) at the European Southern Observatory’s Paranal Observatory in Chile. A close-up of the inner edge of the Helix Nebula shows complex gas knots of unknown origin.”

"Relax..."

"Relax. They're not going to kill us. They're going to
TRY and kill us. And that is a very different thing."
 - Steve Voake, "The Dreamwalker's Child"
"You cannot kill me here. Bring your soldiers, your death, your disease, your collapsed economy because it doesn't matter, I have nothing left to lose and you cannot kill me here. Bring the tears of orphans and the wails of a mother's loss, bring your Jesus on a cross, bring your hate and bitterness and long working hours, bring your empty wallets and love long since gone but you cannot kill me here. Bring your sneers, your snide remarks and friendships never felt, your letters never sent, your kisses never kissed, cigarettes smoked to the bone and cancer killing fears but you cannot kill me here. For I may fall and I may fail but I will stand again each time and you will find no satisfaction. Because you cannot kill me here."
- Iain S. Thomas

"Our Dilemma..."

"Our dilemma is that we hate change and love it at the same time;
what we really want is for things to remain the same but get better."
- Sydney J. Harris

The Poet: Czeslaw Milosz, “Hope”

“Hope”

“Hope is with you when you believe
The earth is not a dream but living flesh,
That sight, touch, and hearing do not lie,
That all things you have ever seen here
Are like a garden looked at from a gate.
You cannot enter. But you’re sure it’s there.
Could we but look more clearly and wisely
We might discover somewhere in the garden
A strange new flower and an unnamed star.

Some people say we should not trust our eyes,
That there is nothing, just a seeming,
These are the ones who have no hope.
They think that the moment we turn away,
The world, behind our backs, ceases to exist,
As if snatched up by the hands of thieves.”

- Czeslaw Milosz,
“Hope”, from “The World”

"Get Your Stuff Together..."

“We all got problems. But there’s a great book out called “Too Soon Old, Too Late Smart.” Did you see that? That book says the statute of limitations has expired on all childhood traumas. Get your stuff together and get on with your life, man. Stop whinin’ about what’s wrong, because everybody’s had a rough time, in one way or another.”
- Quincy Jones

The Daily "Near You?"

Jackson, Tennessee, USA. Thanks for stopping by!

"You Can Be Sure..."

 

Gerald Celente, "The Time Is Right For A True America Party Of We The People, Abolish The Political Crime Syndicate"

Strong language alert!
Gerald Celente, 7/8/25
"The Time Is Right For A True America Party Of We The People,
Abolish The Political Crime Syndicate"
"The Trends Journal is a weekly magazine analyzing global current events forming future trends. Our mission is to present facts and truth over fear and propaganda to help the people prepare for what’s next in these increasingly turbulent times."
Comments here:

"There Comes A Time..."

"I make no bones about being partisan for my country. I also feel no shame whatever because of it. I absolutely disagree that "great thinkers don't let that affect the thoughts". I would say exactly the opposite: someone who refuses to let love-of-country affect their thoughts is a moral cripple irrespective of their intellectual prowess. I can look dispassionately at the situation, and I have done so repeatedly. But I will never forget which nation I love and support.

We Americans have a saying: “It’s more important what you stand for than who you stand with.” I do not rely upon peer opinion to decide what is right and what is wrong. I make those decisions for myself, and even if I discover that every other human alive chose differently, that doesn’t mean I was wrong.

There comes a time in every man’s life when he has to choose sides. I have chosen my side. I am comfortable with my decision. I do not think everyone on my side is a saint, but I know that those on the other side are much, much worse.

Sometimes a man with too broad a perspective reveals himself as having no real perspective at all. A man who tries too hard to see every side may be a man who is trying to avoid choosing any side. A man who tries too hard to seek a deeper truth may be trying to hide from the truth he already knows. That is not a sign of intellectual sophistication and “great thinking”. It is a demonstration of moral degeneracy and cowardice.”
- Steven Den Beste
“Each man must for himself alone decide what is right and what is wrong, which course is patriotic and which isn't. You cannot shirk this and be a man. To decide against your conviction is to be an unqualified and unexcusable traitor, both to yourself and to your country, let men label you as they may.”
- Mark Twain

"How Iran Sank the US Navy in a $250 Million War Game"

"How Iran Sank the US Navy in a $250 Million War Game"
by Nick Giambruno

"Millennium Challenge 2002 was the largest and most expensive war game in Pentagon history, with a staggering price tag of $250 million. It took over two years to design and involved more than 13,500 participants. The goal was clear: showcase how easily the US military could defeat Iran in a hypothetical conflict.

Commanding the Iranian forces in the simulation was Paul Van Riper, a retired three-star general and 41-year Marine Corps veteran. His task was to go head-to-head with the full might of the US military, including an aircraft carrier battle group and a large amphibious assault force positioned in the Persian Gulf. But what happened next shocked everyone.

Van Riper waited until the US Navy passed through the narrow, shallow Strait of Hormuz - turning them into easy targets for Iran’s unconventional tactics. Using swarms of explosive-laden suicide speedboats, low-flying aircraft with anti-ship missiles, naval mines, and land-based ballistic missiles, Van Riper deployed low-cost but highly effective weapons of asymmetric warfare. In just minutes, he overwhelmed the superior US force and sank all 19 ships. Had this been a real conflict, an estimated 20,000 US sailors and Marines would have died.

The outcome was a disaster for the Pentagon. After spending a quarter of a billion dollars, the war game had demonstrated the exact opposite of what they’d hoped. So, what did the Pentagon do? Like a frustrated gamer, they hit the reset button. They rewrote the rules mid-game, scripting the exercise to ensure a guaranteed US victory. The result was no longer a realistic simulation - it became a stage-managed performance. After realizing the integrity of the war game had been compromised, a disgusted Van Riper walked out. He later said: “Nothing was learned from this. And a culture not willing to think hard and test itself does not augur well for the future.”

The main takeaway from Millennium Challenge 2002 is chilling: aircraft carriers - the most expensive ships ever built - might not survive even a single day in combat against Iran. Against powers like Russia or China, their chances are even worse. They’re oversized, overpriced liabilities. That means the US has potentially wasted trillions on military hardware that may prove useless in a real war. Yet, the US continues to parade aircraft carriers across the globe in shows of force - an intimidation strategy that could backfire catastrophically if an adversary decides to call the bluff.

Though the simulation took place over 20 years ago, its lessons are more relevant than ever. Iran has since advanced its asymmetric warfare capabilities dramatically. There's little reason to believe the US military would fare much better today than it did in 2002. In fact, a full-scale war with Iran today could be even more disastrous.

Tensions in the Middle East are at their highest point in a generation - and they’re still rising. The recent Israel-Iran war resolved nothing. If hostilities resume, the US could be dragged into a catastrophic, full-scale war. In other words, the Middle East teeters on the brink of the largest regional war in decades, and the US is on the precipice of its biggest war since Vietnam. But this time, the consequences won’t just be military.

A full-scale war with Iran could send oil prices soaring overnight, trigger cascading supply chain failures, crash global markets, and spark a financial panic unlike anything in modern history. It could serve as the catalyst that topples an already fragile US economy - and triggers the Great Monetary Reset. If war breaks out, the financial fallout could be immediate and irreversible."

"How It Really Is"

 

"Meaningful Warnings..."

“There are meaningful warnings which history gives a threatened or perishing society. Such are, for instance, the decadence of art, or a lack of great statesmen. There are open and evident warnings, too. The center of your democracy and of your culture is left without electric power for a few hours only, and all of a sudden crowds of American citizens start looting and creating havoc. The smooth surface film must be very thin, then, the social system quite unstable and unhealthy. But the fight for our planet, physical and spiritual, a fight of cosmic proportions, is not a vague matter of the future; it has already started. The forces of Evil have begun their offensive; you can feel their pressure, and yet your screens and publications are full of prescribed smiles and raised glasses. What is the joy about?”
- Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

Gregory Mannarino, "An Economic 'Doom-Loop', And We Are In It"

Gregory Mannarino, AM 7/8/25
"An Economic 'Doom-Loop', And We Are In It"
Comments here:

Adventures With Danno, "Outrageous Price Increases At Walmart!"

Full screen recommended.
Adventures With Danno, AM 7/8/25
"Outrageous Price Increases At Walmart!"
Comments here:

Dan, I Allegedly, "Trouble is Coming! The Fines are In the Mail"

Full screen recommended.
Dan, I Allegedly, 7/8/25
"Trouble is Coming! The Fines are In the Mail"
"Drones are watching, and the $20,000 fireworks fine is just the beginning! In this video, I talk about how Sacramento County is using drones to enforce social host ordinances and send out massive fines for illegal fireworks. Whether it's $1,000 for a first offense or a staggering $20,000 for repeat violations, this is Big Brother in action, and it’s happening now. Plus, I’ll share insights on AI’s growing impact on jobs, housing restrictions, and even the challenges landlords face today. There's so much happening around us, and I'm breaking it all down."
Comments here:

Bill Bonner, "The Curious Case of Fake GDP"

"Beer Barrel Polka, Roll Out the Barrel" (1927)
"The Curious Case of Fake GDP"
by Bill Bonner

“Roll out the (pork) barrel
And we’ll have a barrel of fun.”

Youghal, Ireland - "What we know so far...The feds can’t really deliver real growth. All they can do is get out of the way so people can pursue happiness on their own. But getting out of the way is not a very attractive choice to the ruling class. It’s not on the agenda of either party. Not at this stage of democratic degeneration. Instead, they want to tax, spend, and regulate...

Here’s the latest. Bloomberg this morning: "Trump Threatens New Tariff Rates on Key Partners, Keeps Talks Open." "President Donald Trump unveiled a wave of letters again threatening key trading partners with high tariff rates even as he delayed the increased duties until Aug. 1 and suggested that he was still open to negotiations."

Letters! How civilized. And they are ‘sealed with a diss,’ says Bloomberg columnist John Authers. All economies rely on trade - between people, businesses, cities, and countries. Anything the feds do - including the ‘tariff tax’ - to make trade most costly reduces real wealth.

And yesterday, we saw that the feds can also stymie growth by cutting off the supply of labor. American women don’t produce enough babies even to keep the workforce stable. Without large-scale immigration high growth rates are almost impossible. (Over the weekend, Dan showed what kind of growth rates you would need to keep up with debt increases.)

Without substantial immigration, the only way to ‘growth’ is via homegrown productivity. But productivity increases require real capital invested in private business...and the feds are now absorbing almost all America’s savings.

So, as you see, almost all the current initiatives of the US government are anti-real growth. But while the feds can’t produce real growth, they can inspire plenty of fake growth, by rolling out the pork barrel - ‘printing’ more money...spending more...and depressing interest rates. This fake growth produces high asset prices, increased sales and profits, and raises debt levels. It distorts the economy...uses up precious time and resources (capital!)...and actually makes us poorer.

It was ‘growth’ - both real and phony - that got us to where we are.. It raised US GDP to $28 trillion...and the Dow to 44,000. It increased US government debt to $37 trillion...and total US credit market debt to $103 trillion. How much is real? How much is funny money? How much will go away in the inevitable reckoning?

GDP is up from only $300 billion in 1950 to the aforementioned $28 trillion today - a 90x increase. (We use very round numbers...using more specific numbers would only give the illusion of precision.) Does that mean we are 90 times richer? Nope. The population has increased too. To figure out if we’re better off, we need to adjust the numbers to per-capita GDP, which show a 40-times increase. Does that mean we are each 40-times richer?

No again! Because much of that is based on inflated numbers. Using the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ figures, which show that the dollar has lost about 93% of its value since 1950, we find that we are still ahead of the game...with about a 200% real gain in GDP/capita.

But even that does not seem to square with the evidence of our own lives. The cost of the basic elements of our lives - food, clothing, housing, transportation, education and medical care - seem far in excess of the BLS estimates. Instead of getting three times as much ‘stuff’ for our time on the job (as GDP/capita would imply) we actually get less.

A Ford F-series pickup - the workingman’s wheels - cost $1,390 in 1950. Adjusting to official inflation figures suggests a price today of about $17,000. Instead, the cheapest F-150 you are likely to find will be about $40,000. Yes, it is a better truck. Thanks to tech improvements. But new materials and new tools should have made them cheaper to build, too.

So rather than rely on BLS figures, let’s look at it in terms of gold. US GDP has risen 90 times since 1950. But the price of gold is up 82 times. In other words, in gold terms, US output - including the phony output - has scarcely increased over the last 70 years. And in terms of GDP per person - up 40 times since 1950 - it has actually fallen in half.

But it took 33 ounces of gold to buy an F-100 pickup in 1950. Today, it takes only 13 ounces. In other words, the real economy – measured in gold – cut the price of a pickup truck in half. But the fake economy made them twice as expensive. Where does that leave us? We’re not sure...but we’ll stick with gold until we figure it out. More to come..."

Monday, July 7, 2025

"Alert! Trump Will 'Arm Ukraine!' Iran Prepares For Total War"

Full screen recommended.
Prepper news, 7/7/25
"Alert! Trump Will 'Arm Ukraine!' 
Iran Prepares For Total War"
Comments here:

Adventures With Danno, "Walmart Can't Hide This Anymore"

Adventures With Danno, 7/7/25
"Walmart Can't Hide This Anymore"
Comments here:

"I Just Bought Alabama Alcatraz, You Have To Do What You Can"

Jeremiah Babe, 7/7/25
"I Just Bought Alabama Alcatraz, 
You Have To Do What You Can"
Comments here:

Musical Interlude: 2002, "River Of Stars"

Full screen recommended.
2002, "River Of Stars"

"A Look to the Heavens"

“Riding high in the constellation of Auriga, beautiful, blue vdB 31 is the 31st object in Sidney van den Bergh's 1966 catalog of reflection nebulae. It shares this well-composed celestial still life with dark, obscuring clouds recorded in Edward E. Barnard's 1919 catalog of dark markings in the sky. All are interstellar dust clouds, blocking the light from background stars in the case of Barnard's dark nebulae. For vdB 31, the dust preferentially reflects the bluish starlight from embedded, hot, variable star AB Aurigae.
Exploring the environs of AB Aurigae with the Hubble Space Telescope has revealed the several million year young star is itself surrounded by flattened dusty disk with evidence for the ongoing formation of a planetary system. AB Aurigae is about 470 light-years away. At that distance this cosmic canvas would span about four light-years.”

The Poet: W. H. Auden, “The More Loving One”

“The More Loving One”

“Looking up at the stars, I know quite well
That, for all they care, I can go to hell,
But on earth indifference is the least
We have to dread from man or beast.
How should we like it were stars to burn
With a passion for us we could not return?
If equal affection cannot be,
Let the more loving one be me.
Admirer as I think I am
Of stars that do not give a damn,
I cannot, now I see them, say
I missed one terribly all day.
Were all stars to disappear or die,
I should learn to look at an empty sky
And feel its total dark sublime,
Though this might take me a little time.”

- W. H. Auden

"In Human Society..."

"When a bull is being lead to the slaughter, it still hopes to break loose and trample its butchers. Other bulls have not been able to pass on the knowledge that this never happens and that from the slaughterhouse there is no way back to the herd. But in human society there is a continuous exchange of experience. I have never heard of a man who broke away and fled while being led to his execution. It is even thought to be a special form of courage if a man about to be executed refuses to be blindfolded and dies with his eyes open. But I would rather have the bull with his blind rage, the stubborn beast who doesn't weigh his chances of survival with the prudent dull-wittedness of man, and doesn't know the despicable feeling of despair."
- Nadezhda Mandelstam

"The War Prayer"

"The War Prayer"
By TDB

"My curmudgeonly grandpappy, who reveres Mark Twain and George Carlin and H.L. Mencken and people of that lovable cynic variety – or however you would characterize their philosophical disposition – put me onto "The War Prayer" back in the day. This was in the days of innocence before 9/11 and the subsequent War of Terror, and so whatever lack of an impression it made on me at the time was remedied shortly thereafter by apropos events in the real world.

Twain, in his later years when his family had died and the cynicism became more malignant, would often write fiction in which a cynical protagonist would serve as a proxy for himself. This is one such story; the “aged stranger” is Twain. Via Virginia Commonwealth University:

"It was a time of great and exalting excitement. The country was up in arms, the war was on, in every breast burned the holy fire of patriotism… on every hand and far down the receding and fading spread of roofs and balconies a fluttering wilderness of flags flashed in the sun… nightly the packed mass meetings listened, panting, to patriot oratory which stirred the deepest deeps of their hearts, and which they interrupted at briefest intervals with cyclones of applause, the tears running down their cheeks the while; in the churches the pastors preached devotion to flag and country, and invoked the God of Battles beseeching His aid in our good cause in outpourings of fervid eloquence which moved every listener. 

Sunday morning came - next day the battalions would leave for the front; the church was filled; the volunteers were there, their young faces alight with martial dreams - visions of the stern advance, the gathering momentum, the rushing charge, the flashing sabers, the flight of the foe, the tumult, the enveloping smoke, the fierce pursuit, the surrender! Then home from the war, bronzed heroes, welcomed, adored, submerged in golden seas of glory! The service proceeded; a war chapter from the Old Testament was read; the first prayer was said …

Then came the “long” prayer. None could remember the like of it for passionate pleading and moving and beautiful language. The burden of its supplication was, that an ever-merciful and benignant Father of us all would watch over our noble young soldiers, and aid, comfort, and encourage them in their patriotic work…

An aged stranger entered and moved with slow and noiseless step up the main aisle, his eyes fixed upon the minister, his long body clothed in a robe that reached to his feet, his head bare, his white hair descending in a frothy cataract to his shoulders, his seamy face unnaturally pale, pale even to ghastliness… he ascended to the preacher’s side and stood there waiting. 

The stranger touched his arm, motioned him to step aside - which the startled minister did - and took his place. During some moments he surveyed the spellbound audience with solemn eyes, in which burned an uncanny light; then in a deep voice he said: “I come from the Throne - bearing a message from Almighty God! 

God’s servant and yours has prayed his prayer. Has he paused and taken thought? Is it one prayer? No, it is two - one uttered, the other not. Both have reached the ear of Him Who heareth all supplications, the spoken and the unspoken. Ponder this - keep it in mind. If you would beseech a blessing upon yourself, beware! lest without intent you invoke a curse upon a neighbor at the same time. If you pray for the blessing of rain upon your crop which needs it, by that act you are possibly praying for a curse upon some neighbor’s crop which may not need rain and can be injured by it.

You have heard your servant’s prayer - the uttered part of it. I am commissioned of God to put into words the other part of it - that part which the pastor - and also you in your hearts - fervently prayed silently. And ignorantly and unthinkingly? God grant that it was so! You heard these words: ‘Grant us the victory, O Lord our God!’ When you have prayed for victory you have prayed for many unmentioned results which follow victory – must follow it, cannot help but follow it. Upon the listening spirit of God fell also the unspoken part of the prayer. He commandeth me to put it into words. Listen!

O Lord our Father, our young patriots, idols of our hearts, go forth to battle - be Thou near them! With them - in spirit - we also go forth from the sweet peace of our beloved firesides to smite the foe. O Lord our God, help us to tear their soldiers to bloody shreds with our shells; help us to cover their smiling fields with the pale forms of their patriot dead; help us to drown the thunder of the guns with the shrieks of their wounded, writhing in pain; help us to lay waste their humble homes with a hurricane of fire; help us to wring the hearts of their unoffending widows with unavailing grief; help us to turn them out roofless with little children to wander unfriended the wastes of their desolated land in rags and hunger and thirst, sports of the sun flames of summer and the icy winds of winter, broken in spirit, worn with travail, imploring Thee for the refuge of the grave and denied it - for our sakes who adore Thee, Lord, blast their hopes, blight their lives, protract their bitter pilgrimage, make heavy their steps, water their way with their tears, stain the white snow with the blood of their wounded feet! We ask it, in the spirit of love, of Him Who is the Source of Love, and Who is the ever-faithful refuge and friend of all that are sore beset and seek His aid with humble and contrite hearts. Amen."

(After a pause.) “Ye have prayed it; if ye still desire it, speak! The messenger of the Most High waits!” It was believed afterward that the man was a lunatic, because there was no sense in what he said."
- Mark Twain, "The War Prayer"

Twain reportedly caved to pressure not to publish the short story, as it was regarded by his family and publisher as too inflammatory for public consumption. Asked if he had plans to publish it, Twain answered: "No, I have told the whole truth in that, and only dead men can tell the truth in this world. It can be published after I am dead." At any rate, for whatever reason, it remained unpublished until after his death.

War is an ugly business, fraught with moral pitfalls – not to mention existential implications in the nuclear age. It might be necessary at times, but so are limb amputations. Both should be undertaken with all due discretion. I’ll choose my own wars, not the ones the government or MSNBC or the ADL tells me to."

The Daily "Near You?"

Tewkesbury, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom.
Thanks for stopping by!