StatCounter

Thursday, May 8, 2025

"The Brutal Truth About Violence When The SHTF"

"The Brutal Truth About Violence When The SHTF"
Selco interviewed by Daisy Luther

"Are you prepared for the extreme violence that is likely to come your way if the SHTF? No matter what your plan is, it’s entirely probable that at some point, you’ll be the victim of violence or have to perpetrate violence to survive. As always, Selco is our go-to guy on SHTF reality checks and this thought-provoking interview will shake you to your core.

If you don’t know Selco, he’s from Bosnia and he lived through a year in a city that was blockaded with no utilities, no deliveries of supplies, and no services. In his interviews, he shares what the scenarios the rest of us theorize about were REALLY like.  He mentioned to me recently that most folks aren’t prepared for the violence that is part and parcel of a collapse, which brings us to today’s interview.

How prevalent was violence when the SHTF in Bosnia? It was wartime and chaos, from all conflicts in those years in the Balkan region Bosnian conflict was most brutal because of multiple reasons, historical, political and other. To simplify the explanation why violence was common and very brutal, you need to picture a situation where you are “bombarded” with huge amount of information (propaganda) which instills in you very strong feelings of fear and hate. Out of fear and hate, violence grows easy and fast, and over the very short period of time you see how people around you (including you) do things that you could not imagine before.

I can say that violence was almost an everyday thing in the whole spectrum of different activities because it was a fight for survival. Again, whenever (and wherever) you put people in a region without enough resources, you can expect violence.

We were living a normal life, and then suddenly we were thrown in a way of living where if you could not “negotiate” something with someone, you solve the problem by launching a rocket from an RPG through the window of his living room. Hate stripped down the layers of humanity and suddenly it was “normal” to level an apartment building with people inside with shells from a tank or form private prisons with imprisoned civilians for slave work or sex slaves.

Nothing that I saw or read before could have prepared me for the level of violence and blindness to it, for the lives of kids, elders, civilians, and the innocent. Again, the thing that is important for readers is that we were a modern society one day, and then in few weeks it turned into carnage. Do not make the mistake of saying “it cannot happen here” because I made that mistake too. Do not underestimate power of propaganda, fear, hate, and the lowest human instincts, no matter how modern and good your society is right now and how deeply you believe that “it can not happen here”.

You’ve mentioned warlords and gangs in several of your articles. Were they responsible for the majority of the violence or was it hungry families? Fighting of the armies through the whole period of war brings violence in terms of constant shelling from a distance from different kind of weapons. For example a few multiple rocket launchers (VBR) could bring in 30 seconds the destruction in an area of 3-4 apartment buildings, and being there in that moment and surviving it gives you a completely new view on life. Snipers were a constant threat and over time you simply grow a way of living that you constant scan area in front of you where your next steps gonna be. Are you gonna be visible and from where? Etc.

Most brutal violence was actually lawlessness and complete lack of order between different factions and militias, so in some periods there were militias or gangs who simply ruled the cities or part of the city where they were absolutely masters of everything in terms of deciding of taking someone’s life. In lawlessness, you as one person could be really small and not interesting, or join some bigger group of people to be stronger, some family or militia or gang.

An example of a gang would be group of people of some 300 or 500 people who “officially” were a unit or militia and operate for some faction, but in reality they operate mostly for themselves. That included owning part of the black market, having prison (for forced labor or ransom), attacking people and houses for resources, smuggling people from dangerous areas. Violence from those kinds of group was the most immediate violence, the most visible in terms of SHTF talking. If those people came on your door you could obey, fight, or negotiate, but mostly you could not not ask for help from any kind of authority, because there was no real authority.

In any society, no matter where you are living, there are a great number of people who are waiting for the SHTF to go out and do violent things. Small time criminals or simply violent persons who are not openly violent because system is there to punish them for that. It is like that. Some gang leaders that I knew were actually completely sick people with a strange type of charisma that makes people follow them, weird situations that can happen only in a real collapse. They are people who just waited for their time to rise. Those kinds of people together with criminal organization that are already there in any city in the world will be the backbone of SHTF gangs.

Who were the most likely victims? A very simple answer would be that the most likely victims were people who had interesting things without enough defense. But it was not always that simple. For example one of the first houses that got raided in my neighborhood, right at the beginning of collapse while there was still some kind of order, was a rich family’s home. They had a nice house with bars on the windows, a pretty good setup for defense, and they had enough people inside so they could give pretty good resistance to the mob. But they got raided simply because they were known that they are rich, so they were attacked with enough force to be overwhelmed.

It was not only about how much manpower you had and how well-organized defense of your home was, it was also about how juicy a target you were. If you are faced with 150 angry people attacking your home because they are sure you have good stuff inside your chances are low, no matter how good and tough you are. People who were alone were a pretty easy target and old people without support of family or friends.

It was not always about killing someone or violence. For example, if you were alone and without resources but you had something else valuable like some kind of skill or knowledge you could easily be “recruited” for some faction or group, not by your will of course.

What were some ways to prevent yourself from becoming a victim of violence? How do you recommend that people prepare themselves for the possibility of violence? It can be done in steps, or in layers:

• Do not be interesting (or attract attention) when the SHTF. This means a lot of things, for this article I can give a few examples with shortened explanations because it is a huge topic:

• Do not look like a prepper (before or after SHTF). There is no sense in announcing that you are prepping for EMP, civil collapse, apocalypse, or whatever. With that you are risking the probability that when the SHTF, people will remember that you have interesting things in your home. Your home should look ordinary. For example, if you are living in the city on a street where all houses look similar, there is not  much sense in making your home look like a fortress. You’ll just attract attention.

Your defense should be based on more subtle means. Some examples are having means to reinforce doors and windows quickly when you need it, or to reinforce them from inside. Make changes in your yard to funnel possible attackers where you want them to be (trees, fence, bush…). You can make your home look abandoned or already looted.

• Think about what survival is! Survival is about staying alive, it is not about being comfortable at the expense of losing your life. I have seen many times people lose their lives simply because they were too attached to their belongings (house, car, land, goods…) so they simply did not want to leave something and run in a particular moment.

• Everything can be earned and bought again except life. Forget about statements like “I will defend it with my life” or “over my dead body” or similar because the real SHTF is usually not heroic or noble. It is hard and brutal. When you are gone you are gone and there might be nobody to take care of your family just because you have been stubborn or trusted in movies when it came to violence. To rephrase it: Be ready to leave your home in a split second if that means you and your family will survive, no matter how many good things you have stored there.

• Be mentally ready for violence: In a way, it is impossible to be ready for violence, especially widespread violence when the SHTF, but you can minimize shock when that happens with some things. If you are not familiar with what violence is, you can try to get yourself close” to it today (in normal times). It can be done, for example, by doing some voluntary work for example in a local hospital, ER or similar… or simply by working with homeless people. Sounds maybe strange but activities like this can get you a bit of a feeling of what it is all about, not to mention that you can learn some practical and useful skills for SHTF.

• Have means and skills  (physically) to defend – or to do violence: No matter how old or young you are, your gender or religion I assure you that you are capable of doing violence. It is only a matter of the situation and how far you are going to be pushed. It is not just “some people are capable of violence.” Everybody is capable. Not everybody enjoys doing it or is willing to do it so easily.

In today (normal times) you can learn some violence skills and you should do it, again no matter if you are a woman or old or young. You should own a weapon and know how to use it. You should practice with it, or have at least some basic knowledge about hand-to-hand combat. The worst case scenario is to have a weapon that you try for the first time when SHTF.

Be familiar with your means for defense, let your family members know what they need to do in case of attack of your home, have plan, and go through it. Only through practice will you minimize chances for mistakes.

• Use common sense: I know lot of survivalists almost dream about how they are going to use weapons against bad guys when SHTF, and that they will be something like super heroes from movies, saving innocents and killing villains. Truth is that in a real collapse, a lot of things are kind of blurred and you are not sure who the bad guys are. Good guys turn out to be lunatic gang members who want to bring food to their kids. There are no super heroes when SHTF, and if some of them show up they end up dead quickly.

There is only you and your skills and mindset and what you prepared. Use violence as a last resort because of the simple fact that by using violence you are risking of getting killed or hurt. Remember when SHTF there is maybe no doctor or hospital to take care of your wound. It is a time when even a small cut can eventually kill you through infection and lack of proper care.

I’m a single mom with a household full of girls. In an SHTF situation, what would our best strategies be to remain safe? Just like I have mentioned before, strategy is always same for any part of survival, and shooting from the rifle is pretty similar no matter are you man or woman. Being single mom with household full of girls on first look make you as a ideal target in some situations, but we are talking here in prepper terms so there is no reason not to be perfectly well prepared as a single mom with girls.

But yes I admit it is not perfect situation, even if you are prepared well, some things are sure, you need to connect with other people even more. House with couple of girls will always look like easy prey for some people. It is like that.

Were people in the city safer than people in the country? Can you tell us more about rural living during this time? In my case definitely no. In the essence it always come to the resources and people. City meant more people less resources, country (rural) meant less people more resources, and because that level of violence simply was lower. That was most important reason.

There are few more reasons why it was much better in the country. People in the country (rural settings) were much more “connected to ground”  they were more tough if you like, they grew their own food, had cattle, lived more simple life prior SHTF and when everything collapsed they had less problems getting use to it. Yes they also did not have electricity and phones, running water or connection to other places but they adapted easier to the new life because they had more useful skills then people in the city. Life was harder for them too than prior to the collapse, but they had means to get resources: land, woods, river…

Another thing is that people in small rural communities “in the country” were more connected to each other, people knew their neighborhood and some things were easier to organize, like community security watch, help in case of diseases and similar.

What types of weapons did people have for self-defense? It was different political system prior the collapse where it was not so usual to own a weapon legally. And to own one illegally could mean a lot of troubles. Right prior to SHTF, it became possible to buy different weapons on the black market but still, a majority of people did not own weapons. When it all collapsed, it was possible to get a weapon through trade.

Because of the military doctrine here prior to the collapse, we used “East Bloc” weapons. A favorite was AK-47 in all different kind of editions, or older weapons like M-48 rifle, SKS rifle, 22 and similar. People used what they had, so in one period you would be lucky if you had any kind of pistol and knife. Later through the different channels weapon become more available so people had them more. A lot of that was actually junk that some warlords somehow “imported”. Weapons 50-60 years old without proper ammunition, or not in operating condition. A lot of people simply did not have a clue how to use any kind of weapon so a lot of accidental deaths happened.

I remember people storming abandoned army barracks that was mostly looted, but they found in one building a lot of RPGs while other part of the same building was burning. Two guys were trying to figure out a single-use RPG, and while they were messing with it clearly not knowing how that thing worked, they accidentally armed it and launched a rocket that flew through the crowd, not hurting anyone and exploding in wall 100 meters from where they stood. They were smiling, clearly happy because they thought they figured out how that thing worked.

What weapons do you suggest to have for SHTF? It is a never-ending discussion and a favorite prepper topic, and I must say that whole discussion is overrated. I have used them in a real situation, and tried and tested lot of different kind of weapons and what works for me may simply not work for you. For example, here for me good choice is AK-47 rifle, maybe for you wherever you are it is very bad choice.

Good advice is: you need to have a weapon that most people have around you because of multiple reasons: spare parts, repairing, ammunition availability, possibility that you can pick that rifle from other people and you know how to use it. What caliber and similar is a matter of discussion again. I am talking from the point of owning a rifle. Another thing is that you need to know how that weapon works. Luckily, most of my readers live in an area where gun laws are great comparing to region where I am. You have much more choices when it comes to owning a weapon and practicing with it. Use that.

And do not forget that using a weapon in a real life situation is not like shooting at beer bottles with your friends after a barbecue. In real life you might be in a situation to use a weapon while you are tired, dirty, and hungry and while someone is screaming next to you. It is going to be maybe when you are not ready to do that, maybe in pitch dark, maybe after you have been awake for 48 hours. At least think about that.

When should you use violence? Contrary to some popular beliefs in the prepper community, the point is to use violence only as a last solution. The reason is as I mentioned already, the risk that you can be hurt or killed too, but also once you do violence you change your own rules, or push it more forward, and it is easy to get lost in violence. There are consequences to that, and you are not going to be the same person ever again.

Violence is a tool, not a toy. You need to know how to use it as best as possible, but also to avoid using it when it is not necessary. It is a good idea to set up a clear set of rules (mentally too) when you are gonna use violence and to try to stick to it. For example you will use weapon if someone tries to break your home and attack you, and you need to be ready to do that without hesitation.

What else should we know about post-collapse violence? Think with your head and research. One thing that is absolutely important when it comes to understanding how violent it is going to be and what can you expect in your own case of SHTF, is to understand how much media can influence people in making their decisions about violence.

In my case, the media built up situation where people feared so much from other people that they actually hated them. They hated them so much that they actually strip them down from humanity. In a real-life example, it works in a way that people killed other people, including kids and women, because they hated them so much because media told them.

It may look ridiculous and not possible to you, and you might again think “that can not happen here” but please trust your own resources, look for independent information, not mainstream media, in order to get the right information about what is really happening in the beginning of collapse. Do not be pulled into “popular opinion” just because the “man from TV” (whoever he might be) told you so. It is easier today. Because of the internet, you have much more choices for correct information than in my time. But still be careful, you might find yourself rioting together with 500 people just because you trusted some media."


More information about Selco: Selco survived the Balkan war of the 90s in a city under siege, without electricity, running water, or food distribution. In his online works, he gives an inside view of the reality of survival under the harshest conditions. He reviews what works and what doesn’t, tells you the hard lessons he learned, and shares how he prepares today. He never stopped learning about survival and preparedness since the war. Regardless what happens, chances are you will never experience extreme situations like Selco did. But you have the chance to learn from him and how he faced death for months. Real survival is not romantic or idealistic. It is brutal, hard and unfair. Let Selco take you into that world.
Read more of Selco’s articles here: https://shtfschool.com/blog/
Related:
Laurence Gonzales, "The 12 Rules of Survival"

The Daily "Near You?"

Beatrice, Nebraska, USA. Thanks for stopping by!

"Life Comes at You Fast, So You Better Be Ready"

"Life Comes at You Fast, So You Better Be Ready"
by Ryan Holiday

"In 1880, Theodore Roosevelt wrote to his brother, “My happiness is so great that it makes me almost afraid.” In October of that year, life got even better. As he wrote in his diary the night of his wedding to Alice Hathaway Lee, “Our intense happiness is too sacred to be written about.” He would consider it to be one of the best years of his life: he got married, wrote a book, attended law school, and won his first election for public office.

The streak continued. In 1883, he wrote “I can imagine nothing more happy in life than an evening spent in the cozy little sitting room, before a bright fire of soft coal, my books all around me, and playing backgammon with my own dainty mistress.” And that’s how he and Alice spent that cold winter as it crawled into the new year. He wrote in late January that he felt he was fully coming into his own. “I feel now as though I have the reins in my hand.” On February 12th, 1884 his first daughter was born.

Two days later, his wife would be dead of Bright’s disease (now known as kidney failure). His mother had died only hours earlier in the same house, of typhoid fever. Roosevelt marked the day in his diary with a large “X.” Next to it, he wrote, “The light has gone out of my life.”

As they say, life comes at you fast. Have the last few weeks not been an example of that? In December, the Dow was at 28,701.66. Things were good enough that people were complaining about the “war on Christmas” and debating the skin color of Santa Claus. In January, the Dow was at 29,348.10 and people were outraged about the recent Oscar nominations. In February, when the Dow reached a staggering 29,568.57, Delta Airlines stock fell nearly 25% in less than a week, as people argued intensely over a message from Delta’s CEO about passengers reclining their seats. Even in early March, there were news stories about Wendy’s entering the “breakfast wars” and a free stock-trading app outage that caused people to miss a big market rally.

And that was just in the news. Think about what you busied yourself with at home during that same period. Maybe you and your wife were looking at plans to remodel your kitchen. Maybe you were finally going to pull the trigger on that Tesla Model S for yourself - the $150,000 one, with the ludicrous speed package. Maybe you were fuming that Amazon took an extra day to deliver a package. Maybe you were frustrated that your kid’s room was a mess.

And now? How quaint and stupid does that all seem? Depending on the day you look, years of market gains have now been taken back. 47 million people are projected to be added to the unemployment rolls in the US. The death count from what was dismissed as a mere respiratory flu and the left’s latest hoax is now inching towards 170,000 and there are millions more confirmed cases worldwide. There have been runs on supplies. Hospitals are maxing out ventilators. The global economy has essentially ground to a halt.

Life comes at us fast, don’t it?  It can change in an instant. Everything you built, everyone you hold dear, can be taken from you. For absolutely no reason. Just as easily, you can be taken from them. This is why the Stoics say we need to be prepared, constantly, for the twists and turns of Fortune. It’s why Seneca said that nothing happens to the wise man contrary to his expectation, because the wise man has considered every possibility—even the cruel and heartbreaking ones.

And yet even Seneca was blindsided by a health scare in his early twenties that forced him to spend nearly a decade in Egypt to recover. He lost his father less than a year before he lost his first-born son, and twenty days after burying his son he was exiled by the emperor Caligula. He lived through the destruction of one city by a fire and another by an earthquake, before being exiled two more times.

One needs only to read his letters and essays, written on a rock off the coast of Italy, to get a sense that even a philosopher can get knocked on their ass and feel sorry for themselves from time to time.

What do we do? Well, first, knowing that life comes at us fast, we should be always prepared. Seneca wrote that the fighter who has “seen his own blood, who has felt his teeth rattle beneath his opponent’s fist… who has been downed in body but not in spirit…” - only they can go into the ring confident of their chances of winning. They know they can take getting bloodied and bruised. They know what the darkness before the proverbial dawn feels like. They have a true and accurate sense for the rhythms of a fight and what winning requires. That sense only comes from getting knocked around. That sense is only possible because of their training.

In his own life, Seneca bloodied and bruised himself through a practice called premeditatio malorum (“the premeditation of evils”). Rehearsing his plans, say to take a trip, he would go over the things that could go wrong or prevent the trip from happening - a storm could spring up, the captain could fall ill, the ship could be attacked by pirates, he could be banished to the island of Corsica the morning of the trip. By doing what he called a premeditatio malorum, Seneca was always prepared for disruption and always working that disruption into his plans. He was fitted for defeat or victory. He stepped into the ring confident he could take any blow. Nothing happened contrary to his expectations.

Second, we should always be careful not to tempt fate. In 2016 General Michael Flynn stood on the stage at the Republican National Convention and led some 20,000 people (and a good many more at home) in an impromptu chant of “Lock Her Up! Lock Her Up!” about his enemy Hillary Clinton. When Trump won, he was swept into office in a whirlwind of success and power. Then, just 24 days into his new job, Flynn was fired for lying to the Vice President about conversations he’d had with Sergey Kislyak, the Russian ambassador to the United States. He would be brought up on charges and convicted of lying to the FBI.

Life comes at us fast… but that doesn’t mean we should be stupid. We also shouldn’t be arrogant.

Third, we have to hang on. Remember, that in the depths of both of Seneca’s darkest moments, he was unexpectedly saved. From exile, he was suddenly recalled to be the emperor’s tutor. In the words of the historian Richard M. Gummere, “Fortune, whom Seneca as a Stoic often ridicules, came to his rescue.” But Churchill, as always, put it better: “Sometimes when Fortune scowls most spitefully, she is preparing her most dazzling gifts.”

Life is like this. It gives us bad breaks - heartbreakingly bad breaks - and it also gives us incredible lucky breaks. Sometimes the ball that should have gone in, bounces out. Sometimes the ball that had no business going in surprises both the athlete and the crowd when it eventually, after several bounces, somehow manages to pass through the net.

When we’re going through a bad break, we should never forget Fortune’s power to redeem us. When we’re walking through the roses, we should never forget how easily the thorns can tear us upon, how quickly we can be humbled. Sometimes life goes your way, sometimes it doesn’t.

This is what Theodore Roosevelt learned, too. Despite what he wrote in his diary that day in 1884, the light did not completely go out of Roosevelt’s life. Sure, it flickered. It looked like the flame might have been cruelly extinguished. But with time and incredible energy and force of will, he came back from those tragedies. He became a great father, a great husband, and a great leader. He came back and the world was better for it. He was better for it.

Life comes at us fast. Today. Tomorrow. When we least expect it. Be ready. Be strong. Don’t let your light be snuffed out."

"What We Owe To Ourselves..."

"That we can never know," answered the wolf angrily. "That's for the future. But what we can know is the importance of what we owe to the present. Here and now, and nowhere else. For nothing else exists, except in our minds. What we owe to ourselves, and to those we're bound to. And we can at least hope to make a better future, for everything."
- David Clement Davies

"What Gives Money Value?

"What Gives Money Value?"
An Inquiry into the Origins and Nature of Value...
by Joel Bowman

"If you owe the bank $100 that's your problem. 
If you owe the bank $100 million, that's the bank's problem."
 ~ J. Paul Getty

"Our beat here, unsyncopated as it may sometimes seem, is money. So let’s begin there... What gives money its value? The question was posedon the Internet’s equivalent of the public bathroom stall (Twitter) by PragerU. With almost a million views, responses to the question varied from the confused (“the government”) to the enlightened (“us”) to the cynical (“ten Nimitz class aircraft carriers”). Then there’s the world’s most controversial clinical psychologist, who posited this pithy response...
Indeed, the question - which prima facie seems straightforward enough – has provoked heated debate down through the ages. From Aristotle to Xenaphon, cowry shells to cryptocurrencies, fiat scrip to the Midas Metal, it’s interesting that something as common as money... at turns said to be the “root of all evil” as well as the thing that “makes the world go around”... would be so commonly misunderstood. (Could evil really make the world go around? Hmm…)

Herewith, a modest refresher on the origins and nature of value. We first published today’s essay in this space a year or so ago, back when bank runs were but a twinkle in the Federal Reserve Chairman’s eye. Fast forward to today, with confidence in the system straining like a fat man’s bicycle and the lesson is all the more pertinent.

Today, we unsheathe the mighty pen to slay a sacred cow… or perhaps merely to foil a lame canard. Every so often, history invites Man to reconsider all he thought he knew about a given subject, to upend his presuppositions, and to send him – humbled and eager – back to the drawing board once more. And a good thing, too, for unexamined “truths” can do just as much to retard our intellectual development as undiscovered lies. Especially when we tend to adhere blindly to them, often in care of little more than wounded Pride.

But let us turn directly to our subject, to meet it head on: Money is the matter…What is money? We begin before its birth, to get a fuller picture. Prior to money itself – that is, before folks carried cash, coins, cryptos, cowrie shells, et al. – there was barter. A barter system is one of direct exchange and, as such, does not require money as an intermediary to function. For tens of thousands of years our wandering ancestors got by on such a provincial arrangement.

The barter system is primitive, at best - suitable only for relatively simple transactions in which both buyer and seller desire the exact good or service offered by the counterparty, and at precisely the right time; something economists call the “double coincidence of wants.”

In a complex economy, however, "my three pigs for your one cow" does not exactly form the framework for a viable economic architecture. (As for vegetarians, they are simply out of luck… as well they should be.) Enter, money.

Money, Money, Money: By the time the Greek philosopher Aristotle (384 B.C.- 322 B.C.) was seen traipsing the halls of the Lyceum, Man had been using all manner of scrip and shekel to facilitate trade. Some monies were undoubtedly superior to others, with gold and silver typically rising up the ranks over their competitors. The question of the day was, Why? What made one money better than the next?

An incurable cataloger, Aristotle quickly set about defining what henceforth came to be known as his eponymous “essential characteristics of sound money.” Readers of these pages will have no problem reciting them. (All together now!) A sound money, according to the Father of Logic, must be:

Durable – as a store of wealth it must not rot, melt, erode, corrode or find itself otherwise debased or debauched by the fickle whims of nature’s many gods.

Portable – easily transportable, preferably something one can carry around in his back pocket; that he need not bring into town on the back of a donkey.

Divisible – capable of "making change," something he can dissect into the denominations necessary to make paying a king’s ransom and buying a measure of mead transactions of equal ease.

Fungible – mutually interchangeable i.e. one unit ought to be as good as the next.

So far, so good. But let us reckon further on the old Peripatetic’s fifth point for a moment. In addition to the above mentioned characteristics, Aristotle proposed that sound money ought to have “intrinsic value.” In other words, the material from which the money is fashioned should be a worthwhile commodity “in its own right.” It is here that the inquiring brow furrows and the soft cranium begins to ache.

What, exactly, is "intrinsic value"? And what role do phrases that typically accompany it (“in its own right,” and “in and of itself”) really serve… other than to act as polite placeholders for a better, stubbornly absent answer?

Some suspected “intrinsic” value had to do with “something you could touch and hold in your hand.” But that merely explained a physical characteristic (tangibility). Moreover, one can hold lots of things in his hand, not all of them valuable. (The corollary, of course, is that many intangibles – algebra, language… love – are so valuable one could hardly do without them. But try grasping them too tightly and they are likely to disappear altogether.)

Others posited that “intrinsic” value derived from “a long-standing track record.” But that only spoke to Man’s historical preference for one thing over another. Plenty of things go out of favor or are rendered obsolete by technology. Could “intrinsic” value really be so fleeting?

Still others claimed “intrinsic” value came from a thing’s potential applications elsewhere (away from its role as money). But that merely described potential use cases, which again, time and tide and technology might come to replace.

Thus the underlying query persisted: If value was indeed “intrinsic,” if it really was “in the thing itself,” surely it would be there whether man found use for it or not? Like a falling tree, crashing to ground in the abandoned woods. Clearly, Value (capital “V”) had a problem on its hands: whence cometh thee?

Man in the Mirror: For more than two millennia, the question either failed to ask itself clearly and in a loud enough voice, or nobody bothered to answer it anyway. That was until none other than Adam Smith presented it (borrowing from a little-know dialogue of Plato’s) as the diamond-water paradox. Briefly put: How is it that diamonds are so much more valuable than water when they are clearly less objectively necessary to human wellbeing? Some contemporary economists supposed the answer to be found in scarcity. (Diamonds are far less plentiful than water, therefore command a commensurately higher price.)

But there, again, was yet another of many logical culs-de-sac. If scarcity alone accounted for value, how come would-be brides were not elbowing each other out of the way to score Tanzanite engagement rings in preference to comparatively abundant diamond ones? Why don’t people yearn to contract rare diseases? Why do they pay top dollar for ubiquitous iPhones while happily discarding old, relatively uncommon Nokias?

The problem (hint!) was that the scarcity proposition addressed only the supply side of the equation. Smith himself attempted to solve the conundrum by introducing the Labor Theory of Value. From "An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations": “The real price of everything, what every thing really costs to the man who wants to acquire it, is the toil and trouble of acquiring it.”

But even this value theory only dug the hole deeper. What if a man simply stumbled upon a diamond while out on a casual and fortunate stroll? Surely his minimal labor would not justify the lofty price he could fairly expect to command for his shiny new stones? Besides, chopping away at the branches, Smith hardly attacked the problem at its root; why does Man go to the “toil and trouble” of acquiring something in the first place? Why does he value the thing enough to even bother?

Next came Karl Marx, a man who never saw a cart he didn’t want to put a horse behind. Using the backwards reasoning in front of him, Marx used Smith’s very same "Labor Theory of Value" to smuggle in his class struggle, claiming that the owners of the means of production necessarily oppressed the proletariat because the latter’s labor was not accorded the value commensurate to the product he churned out. (Marx apparently held little regard for the risk the capitalist – private owners of the means of production – necessarily put into the operation in the first place; start-up costs; machinery acquisition; licensing; his own finite time; risk of failure and all the sleepless nights that entailed, etc., etc., etc…)

Alas, Value was still orphaned, without a source on record. At least, that’s how it appeared. As it happened, the answer was staring Man in the face all along… provided he was looking in the mirror. Enter another giant on whose shoulders subsequent thinkers would firmly stand: the father of the Austrian School of Economics, Carl Menger.

Value, Ab Ovo: Rejecting the “cost-base” (labor) value theories of the classical economists, Menger posited a new perspective entirely: that of Man himself. Goods are valuable, he asserted, because they serve various uses whose importance differs with regards to individual preference. In other words, just as beauty resides in the eye of the beholder… and offense in the ear of the listener… so too does value find its womb in the subjective preferences of parties to a given trade.

Menger’s insights influenced many subsequent thinkers, including Ludwig von Mises, who perhaps set the record straight in clearer terms. Value, as Mises described it, was not determined by the nature of objects themselves in a vacuum, but through our interactions with and subjective appreciation for them. "Value is not intrinsic, it is not in things," he argued in "Human Action." "It is within us; it is the way in which man reacts to the conditions of his environment."

In this manner, one object – one money, say – commands value over another, not because it is intrinsically bestowed… but because we afford it value through our interaction with and appreciation for its various properties. We understand intuitively that, depending on the moment in time and the particular circumstances attending it, gold can be a blessing (as in times of hyperinflation or political uncertainty) or a curse (as was the case for poor ol’ mythical Midas).

Who among men, dying of thirst in the middle of the desert, would not trade all the gold in the world for a drop of life-sustaining water? Who on his deathbed would be without his tender (intangible) memory, even for a second, if it meant forgoing a gram… an ounce… a whole chest of yellow metal? Who in that same moment would not exchange all the wealth in the world for another breath, for himself or for a loved one?

Through "Subjective Value Theory," we are all the better equipped to understand why gold has proven a money of superior value throughout history. Likewise are we able to apprehend why cryptocurrencies – non-fiat, intangible and scarcely imaginable even to Aristotle’s bulging cerebrum – may well prove valuable in the Digital Age into which we presently stumble.

As for slaughtering sacred cows and foiling lame canards, whether the metaphor be bovine or anatine, the best way to view the human project seems to be by standing on the shoulders of giants… not unquestioningly carrying them on our own.

And finally today… the kids aren’t alright. “If this is a glimpse at our future,” kvetched a certain curmudgeonly concert-goer at a Lollapalooza festival, “I’m sure glad my glory days were in the past!” Your editor had traveled a ways north of the city, to the leafy, upscale neighborhood with the aim of reliving the misspent days of his youth at a giant music festival, Lollapalooza.

We’ll save the whole horror story for next week… suffice to say, it involved cashless payments, strict zone restrictions, trackable consumption quotas, overt virtue signaling from our globalist, corporate overlords and… perhaps worst of all… a dull, homogenous blob of compliant Gen Z-for-Zombies, sleepwalking toward dystopia while viewing the entire world around them through the 3x6 inch screen glued to their uncalloused little hands. The apocalypse will be selfie-inflicted, dear reader. Whatever you’re up to this weekend, enjoy your freedoms while you have them! Until next time..."

"God Grant Me The Courage..."

“God grant me the courage not to give up what I think is right,
even though I think it is hopeless.”
- Adm. Chester W. Nimitz

"Shocking Government Report Exposes Mass Layoffs Imminent!"

Full screen recommended.
Steven Van Metre, 5/8/25
"Shocking Government Report 
Exposes Mass Layoffs Imminent!"
"Productivity is crashing, labor costs are surging, and the Fed is warning
 of a nightmare economic scenario, one that could tank your job and your future."
Comments here:

Epic Economist, "20 Items Will Be Impossible To Find In The Coming Days"

Full screen recommended.
Epic Economist, 5/8/25
"20 Items Will Be Impossible To 
Find In The Coming Days"

"The supply chain isn't just having issues anymore, it's in serious trouble, and what I'm seeing at stores across the country has me genuinely worried for all of us. Look, I don't normally like to sound this urgent, but I'm seeing empty shelves that shouldn't be empty. Orders are getting canceled left and right. Ships are literally turning around before they reach our ports. This isn't some far-off problem, it's happening right now, and it's about to affect everything you rely on daily.

Here's the reality: By the end of May, there are going to be items you simply cannot find anymore. Not "hard to find" or "backordered for a few weeks", I mean completely gone from American shelves. And the prices for whatever's left? They're going to shock you.

Those attempting to import products to the United States now face crushing port fees and tariffs. For many products, the economic math simply doesn't work anymore. Companies are being forced to either dramatically increase prices or abandon the American market entirely. Many have already chosen the latter.

I'm making this video to walk through the 20 items that will be impossible to find in the coming days. This isn't some distant threat, this is me giving you a heads-up while you still have time to prepare. Because once these shortages hit full force, it'll be too late for most people."
Comments here:

Oh, Memorial Day's gonna be memorial alright. After that, God help us...

"How It Really Is"

 

"Government Admits It Knew Covid Vax Shots Were Fraud – President Trump, Pull Them Off the Market!"

"Government Admits It Knew Covid Vax Shots Were Fraud – 
President Trump, Pull Them Off the Market!"
By Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog.com

"Karen Kingston is a biotech analyst and former Pfizer employee who is back with some grotesque news about what the US government knew about the CV19 bioweapon vax. They knew it was not safe at all, and the FDA also knew Pfizer committed fraud to get the CV19 injections approved. Kingston says, “This is the government’s words exactly: ‘The FDA was aware of the protocol violations.’ So, the FDA was aware of the fraud that was reported before it granted emergency use authorization (EUA) for its vaccine. They were aware of the fraud. Second, the government said it ‘had continued access’ to the Pfizer vaccine clinical data, and ‘in the FDA’s view, Pfizer’s vaccine is effective.’ Notice they dropped the word ‘safe.’ The minimum bar is safe before effective, but they intentionally dropped the word safe. They ignored safety. 

 For the last five or six years, the FDA’s mantra has been to sacrifice safety and disregard disabilities, disease and death that vaccines and gene editing products cause in children and adults in the name of science. They (FDA) had access to the data, and my point is the whole immunity (for Pfizer) is null and void because they co-conspired to commit fraud by withholding safety information of willful injury battery and murder of adults and children. Under the vaccine law, it says the manufacturer shall not be held liable for punitive damages unless they are engaged in fraud or intentional withholding information or other criminal or illegal activity relating to the safety and effectiveness of vaccines.”

The government and Pfizer knew the CV19 vaccines were not safe. Kingston says, “In 2020, they met and listed out Myocarditis. Pericarditis, neurological malfunctions, respiratory failure, multiple system inflammatory disease, Guillain-Barré syndrome, and they listed everything out except for cancer. So, they knew the CV19 vax would cause all those debilitating injuries, infertility and death. Taking the CV19 shots off the childhood vaccine schedule is not enough. These shots, by definition, according to President Trump’s Executive Order yesterday, are dangerous bioweapons. That’s what these shots are, and you can go through President Trump’s criteria, and they meet that criteria. So, these shots need to be taken off the market and not be found in any community in the United States of America, or in any community around the world at this point. 

The information has been there. It’s been in our face, and we have gone along with being gaslit and saying the Trump Administration doesn’t know, and once they know, they will make a change. Well, the Trump Administration, our current Administration, just put in writing, yeah, we know the CV19 vax is fraud. We don’t care, and we are not changing our mind. That’s a tough pill to swallow.”

In closing, Kingston points out they want to put so-called mRNA in everything to fight cancer, but all the studies for the past several decades on mRNA say it causes cancer. Kingston says, “Pfizer is telling us we are putting in faulty genes. We are debilitating you. We are disabling you. We are sterilizing you, and we are killing you. We are directing the evolution of human beings to become more weak and more dependent on us. To survive, you will need us. It’s on their website. It’s called ‘directed evolution.’ They are directing the extinction of our species. That is what this is. They are playing God. You can call it eugenics. You can call it depopulation, but the new word is ‘directed evolution.’ It’s mRNA technology or personalized medicine, it’s all the same thing.” There is more in the 80-minute interview.

Join Greg Hunter on Rumble as he goes One-on-One with renowned biotech analyst Karen Kingston as she uncovers pure evil with the approval of the deadly and debilitating mRNA CV19 bioweapon vax that has yet to be pulled from the market by the new HHS Secretary RFK Jr. and President Trump.

Dan, I Allegedly, "Red Alert to All Email Users - Protect Yourself Now!"

Full screen recommended.
Dan, I Allegedly, 5/8/25
"Red Alert to All Email Users - 
Protect Yourself Now!"
"Google’s Red Alert is here! Cybersecurity breaches are skyrocketing, and your passwords might not be as secure as you think. I’m Dan from I Allegedly, and today, I’m sharing critical tips to protect yourself from phishing scams, password vulnerabilities, and the latest threats online. From shocking stats on weak passwords to Google’s urgent warning about sophisticated scams, this video is packed with information to help you stay ahead of the hackers.

Cybercrime is evolving fast, and the stats will shock you - millions of people are still using weak passwords like “123456” or even “password.” Don’t be one of them! I’ll explain why two-factor authentication is essential and share tips for creating strong, unique passwords. Plus, hear about how scams are targeting your phone, email, and even using video calls to trick you. It's time to take these warnings seriously and secure your personal data."
Comments here:

Bill Bonner, "Lights...Camera...Action"

Clint Eastwood in "The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly"
"Lights...Camera...Action"
by Bill Bonner
From the ranch at Gualfin, Argentina - "The ‘check engine’ light is on! The latest, from USA Today..."In a social media post on May 4, President Donald Trump announced he's authorized his administration to slap a 100% tariff on movies produced outside of the U.S. because, as he put it, "the Movie Industry in America is DYING a very fast death." He called the incentives used to bring filmmakers and studio productions to other countries "a National Security threat" and "propaganda," and concluded his message by writing, "WE WANT MOVIES MADE IN AMERICA, AGAIN!"

Yes, dear reader, movies made outside the US are now a National Security Threat! And maybe he’s right...there are a lot of foreign movies that make you think. No leader wants that!

Just watch the 2022 German movie "All Quiet on the Western Front". You are likely to come away with less than full and unlimited support for America’s DUI hire, Pete Hegseth, and his ‘lethal’ war-fighters. General Erich Ludendorff had pretty ‘lethal’ forces too. At the least, you might wonder whether killing one another for no apparent reason is such a good idea.

Ditto the two great classics on Stalingrad - one is told from the German point of view...the other from the Soviet perspective. Both are grinding, punishing, relentlessly somber views of block-headed military leaders and blind obedience to them.

And then, of course, there is the classic "War and Peace." The 1967 Soviet-made epic goes on for seven hours. We’ve never seen the whole thing...but it leaves you with three worthy insights: Following ‘Big Man’ leaders is dangerous. Empires fall as well as rise. And it is not a good idea to invade Russia.

And then there are all those movies - surely intended to undermine US jefes - that question the competence and moral authority of government. The French Algerian movie "Z," for example, starring Jean-Louis Trintignant, is clearly meant to shake our faith in armed, assertive leaders.

And then, there’s the great English movie, "V for Vendetta." It makes you doubt the goodwill of ‘the State’ generally...and leaves you suspicious of its efforts to force you to do things you don’t want to do.

And how about "Bitter Harvest," a Ukrainian movie about the great famine engineered by Stalin and carried out by government employees during the 1930s? The ‘Holodomor’ resulted in as many as five million deaths.

There’s also the 1927 German movie - "Metropolis" - made by Fritz Lang. In 2008, a forgotten reel of it was discovered in a museum here in Argentina. It was used to reconstruct the film in its entirety. There are many parts of it that seem silly and naïve, to us...but its main message - that you can’t trust the feds - is still not one the Big Man in the White House would want you to get.


The Germans have seen what happens when the feds go wrong. "The Lives of Others" focuses on the way the secret police in East Germany tried to prevent anyone from getting ‘Western’ ideas. It is a marvelous film that highlights the courage of a single spook who surreptitiously undermines the police state.

And talk about a quagmire! The film industry is perhaps the most ‘internationalized’ in the world. Just look at the 1971 film "Viva la Muerte" - another movie that disses government authority. Shot in Algeria, France, Spain, Italy, Portugal, Brazil, Philippines, Morocco and Tunisia and directed by Fernando Arrabal - the film is both subversive and globalized.

How would you tariff it? A director from Italy...shoots a movie in Africa...with a script written by a German...for a US studio, owned by a London-based hedge fund. And Trump wants to tax - with a 100% tariff - the non-US parts?

What a field day...a dream come true...a deep, dark swamp for lobbyists, lawyers, accountants, and fixers to splash around in! There are at least a dozen major steps to making a movie. Today, they are farmed out to the sources all over the globe... producers always trying to get the best, most appropriate quality at the lowest price.

Who knew this would compromise US national security? But if Trump gets his way a whole army of hacks will get busy, undermining the free market choices of people with real skin in the game...and destroying the US-based film industry.

But at least it could be entertaining. We can look forward to a whole new genre of remakes. ‘An American in Paris, Texas,’ for example. Or, ‘Baltimore Holiday,’ with Hollywood’s next Gregory Peck and Audrey Hepburn (maybe they will have tattoos and piercings!)

And of course, the ‘Spaghetti Westerns’ filmed in Spain and Italy and starring Clint Eastwood, could easily be remade in the US. Maybe they will be renamed the ‘Chick-Fil-A Mid-westerns’...filmed on set in Zanesville, Ohio. Sure to be box office hits!"



"Who Is Going To Use Nuclear Weapons First?"

"Who Is Going To Use Nuclear Weapons First?"
by Michael Snyder

"Will we soon witness the world’s first nuclear war? Following nuclear-armed India’s attack on nuclear-armed Pakistan, media outlets all over the globe quickly published stories about the possibility of nuclear war. In fact, this morning the main headline on the Drudge Report was “WORLD HOLDS BREATH” in all capital letters. Yes, it is entirely possible that a nuclear war could erupt between India and Pakistan. But will someone else use nuclear weapons first?

In the Middle East, a showdown is looming between Israel and Iran. We know that Israel possesses nuclear weapons, and there are some experts that are convinced that the Iranians have also acquired nukes. If an all-out war erupts between Israel and Iran, I have a feeling that both sides will be forced to show what cards they are holding.

If the Iranians do have nukes, they may have gotten them from the North Koreans. If a major war erupts on the Korean peninsula, and that is a very real possibility, the North Koreans would not hesitate to use nuclear weapons.

In Europe, the conflict in Ukraine definitely has the potential to go nuclear. The Ukrainians have targeted Moscow with drone attacks for three days in a row, and they are threatening to attack Russia’s Victory Day parade in Moscow on May 9th. If that happens, we are being warned that Kyiv could be wiped “off the face of the Earth”. Let us hope that the Russians will continue to resist the temptation to use tactical nukes against Ukraine, because if that line is crossed any hope of peace with Russia will be completely gone. Once one nation breaks the taboo on using nuclear weapons, it will be much easier for other nations to follow suit.

At the moment, the eyes of the world are on India and Pakistan. The government of India says that the goal of their airstrikes was to destroy “terrorist infrastructure” inside Pakistan…"India said it launched missiles targeting “terrorist infrastructure” in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir, the divided Himalayan territory that India also controls a section of. Pakistan’s military said it shot down five Indian aircraft during the attack – a claim unconfirmed by India. Pakistan said India’s attack killed at least 26 civilians and wounded 46 more. India’s army said at least 10 civilians were killed and 35 injured in cross-border shelling by Pakistani troops in Kashmir."

Following the airstrikes, India’s Defense Ministry released a statement that emphasized that no military facilities in Pakistan were targeted…“Our actions have been focused, measured and non-escalatory in nature. No Pakistan military facilities have been targeted. India has demonstrated considerable restraint in selection of targets and method of execution.”

I think that India was hoping to avoid any additional escalation, but the Pakistanis are furious because a number of mosques were targeted…"In response to Pakistan’s complaint that some of India’s bombs struck mosques, India confirmed that it targeted mosques and madrassas (Islamic religious schools) that were headquarters for “training and indoctrination” by the terrorist groups. The Indian government pointed out that one of the madrassas used as a training camp by LT was funded by Osama bin Laden, the late founder of al-Qaeda and mastermind of the 9/11 attack on America."

Some of India’s targets seemed chosen to make the point that JM, HM, LT, and other terrorist groups are operating openly in Pakistan, with either the indulgence or active support of the government. A few of the targeted facilities were remote terrorist camps hidden in inaccessible terrain, but others were obvious and located near major roads. All of them were large, capable of training hundreds of militants at a time.

If Pakistan strikes back, India will almost certainly respond. Unfortunately, it appears that is exactly what Pakistan is planning to do…"Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif has ordered his armed forces to prepare a plan for “self-defense” with “corresponding actions” in order “avenge the loss of innocent Pakistani lives”. The order was issued after an emergency National Security Commitee (NSC) meeting on Wednesday.

“Pakistan reserves the right to respond, in self-defense, at a time, place, and manner of its choosing to avenge the loss of innocent Pakistani lives and blatant violation of its sovereignty,” the NSC readout said. “The Armed Forces of Pakistan have duly been authorized to undertake corresponding actions in this regard.”

Pakistan’s Government Security Committee has charged that India has “ignited an inferno in the region”. These do indeed seem to be fighting words. One of the sides is going to have to back down at some point or else this thing is going to spiral out of control very rapidly.

If a full-blown war erupts, India has a far larger military than Pakistan does…"India outpaces Pakistan in active military personnel: 1.24 million in the army, 149,000 in the air force, and 75,500 in the navy. Pakistan has about 560,000 army troops, 70,000 in the air force, and 30,000 in its navy. India also operates a 13,350-strong coast guard."

A conventional war between India and Pakistan would be truly horrifying, and we are being warned that it could cause a global recession…"A potential war between India and Pakistan could “push the world in to a global recession” in a matter of months, an expert has warned. On Tuesday, India fired a series of missile strikes on Kashmir, with Pakistan vowing to “respond”, triggering fears of an all-out war between the huge nations."

Space race capable India currently hovers around number 5 in the list of the biggest economies in the world, just one place above the UK. But a conventional war between these two nations is not the real danger. If India’s military started pouring into Pakistani territory, officials in Pakistan may feel forced to use nuclear weapons. Most people living in the western world do not realize this, but both India and Pakistan have enough nuclear warheads to virtually wipe the other side out…

"India has about 172 nuclear warheads, while Pakistan possesses roughly 170, according to the Arms Control Association. Despite their similar numbers, the countries diverge in nuclear doctrine. India publicly maintains an NFU doctrine, pledging to use nuclear weapons only in retaliation. However, recent rhetoric from Indian leadership has hinted at revisiting that stance. Pakistan has never adopted a similar policy and reserves the option of preemptive use."

Don’t think that this can’t happen.In fact, the head of Pakistan’s military just told the world that he believes “at any time a nuclear war can break out”…"NUCLEAR war could break out “at any time” if India continues strikes, Pakistan’s defence chief has warned as his country teeters on the brink of a conflict with India.

Defence Minister Khawaja Asif gave the stark warning in an interview with Pakistani TV channel Geo News as tensions between the two nuclear powers continue to reach boiling point. The minister said: “If they [India] impose an all-out war on the region and if such dangers arise in which there is a standoff, then at any time a nuclear war can break out.”

A full-blown nuclear exchange between India and Pakistan would not be anything like a full-blown nuclear exchange between the United States and Russia. But it would still create at least a limited version of a “nuclear winter”. All of a sudden, it would become exceedingly difficult to grow crops all over the northern hemisphere, and we are already facing a global food crisis of epic proportions.


I really hope that India and Pakistan can find a way to talk things out. But even if they do, it appears that it is just a matter of time before someone out there decides to use nuclear weapons. We really are living in apocalyptic times, and it should deeply alarm all of us that leaders all over the globe seem to have come down with a very bad case of “war fever”.

Wednesday, May 7, 2025

"Kansas City A Mad Max Hellhole; Corporations Are Gutting America; A Dollar Avalanche Is Coming"

Jeremiah Babe, 5/7/25
"Kansas City A Mad Max Hellhole; 
Corporations Are Gutting America; A Dollar Avalanche Is Coming"
Comments here: