StatCounter

Tuesday, March 4, 2025

"When An Old Friend Takes Her Own Life"

"When An Old Friend Takes Her Own Life"
by Charles Hugh Smith

"When an old friend takes her own life, your own life is irrevocably diminished. What seemed to matter before no longer matters, and what seemed to make sense no longer makes sense. My friend had recently moved 1,000 miles away, to a town which had long extended a magnetic draw on her. But she knew no one there, and since her work was all done on computer, she toiled alone. Like any other human being in those conditions, she was lonely. Yes, she had a loyal companion in her dog, and two very close friends here in California, and a constellation of lesser friends like me; but it was not enough at a critical moment.

She'd had those moments before, and been saved: just as she'd gathered the pills to swallow, a friend had called, and she'd gotten past that moment of dark obsession. Of all the past days' memories and thoughts, one returns: what if I had sensed her despair and called her at that moment? And why didn't I sense her need for reassurance and human contact at that critical hour? I have often dreamed of her, and had done so just the week before; it was a vivid dream, not at all alarming, and I'd recounted it to her in an email. She'd made no response, and I'd given it no further thought. Was the dream a premonition? No; but perhaps it was a signal, if not of distress, then of some tendril of distress.

It is convenient is think our friends resilient, just as it is convenient for adults to believe children are resilient when turmoil or tragedy strikes the family. Yes, children are resilent--they are human beings. But they are not endlessly resilient, and their quiet after death or upheaval is not resilience or resolve, it is the numbing of terrible pain.

And so this false reliance on resilience nags at me; I was too self-absorbed to think through the underlying conditions in my dear friend's life, and how lonely she might feel. Her childhood was not positive, nor was her family more than grudgingly supportive; there were always squabbles over money and demands for fealty she could not meet. She was resilient, but only just so; and I should have been alert to the proximity of her limits.

But I am also keenly aware of the limits of my influence in her life; though we each wish with all our hearts that we could have saved her in that moment of supreme temptation and pain, there are limits to our influence.

If you think of your oldest, closest friends - I have known and loved her for 37 years now - then we cannot recall all the thousands of words exchanged or spoken, or the thousands of hours spent together. We recall some few words and scenes, and it is those few we have to cherish and ponder. But what caused us to recall those moments and not others?

We are ripe to influence and connection only rarely; even our closest friends only influence our thinking and emotions at certain unpredictable junctures. After the fact, often when things have gone awry, we remember what they told us, or the comment they made off-handedly, or perhaps most rarely, their earnestly offered advice which we'd promptly ignored.

And so I hold two uncomfortably conflicting truths: that I could have been, and should have been, a better friend to her these past few months, when she needed all her friends' presence and understanding. But feeling this, and knowing it to be painfully true does not alter the limits of my influence in her life. Perhaps I could have contacted her in just the right moment, when my call or words could have tipped her away from that terrible decision; but more likely, that is a vain hope of a heartbroken friend, looking back from the periphery of her life.

For there are limits to us, this poor amalgam of brain and emotion; yes, faith can help, pets can help, friends and family can help, medication can help, insight can help, resolve can help -but none of these, or all of them put together, is guaranteed to overcome the darkness within us at its bleakest. The sufferer must be attuned to that particular wavelength at that moment in time; and if they have spun beyond our reach, then our ability to save them is lost as well.

Those of you who were born with minds which don't follow the happier pathways, the easier pathways, know that the "normal" person cannot understand the despair felt by those prone to one or more of the many madnesses which plague the human mind and spirit. Yes, we all know despression and anxiety, but those blessed with standard-issue minds will never experience the bottomlessness the others experience.

In a peculiarity of natural selection, or God's will (perhaps, despite the false labeling imposed by language, they amount to the same thing), the human spirits with the most enthusiasm for life, the ones with the poet's spark, the ones with the keenest sensibilities and sensitivities to life, are the ones most often drawn to that terrible cliff of self-destruction.

Some may mock Thanatos, the urge to self-destruction, the yin to the will to live's yang, as illusion. But it is real, and if you have not felt it, then count your blessings.

It is ironic, and tragic, that the selfish among us, the bitter types who have soured on life and who tap an endless well of bile to blame others for their own difficulties, or those who always find the energy to trumpet their own self-glory, never end their own lives. They cling on, as if the will to sow discord and ego are indestructable. No, it is the fragile ones, the thoughtful ones, who are drawn to that dark edge, and who jump; for life is too painful to bear at times, and they think not of faith or the love of their friends and family, but of escape.

It is an illusion, a cherished one, and one I wish was true, that love alone can save a lovely soul in extremis. She was loved, dearly, and yet we who loved her could not save her. We cannot but wish with all our own lifeforce that we could have done so, but there are limits, even to love. How I wish I had felt an urge to pick up the phone and call her that day, that hour, in the hope that perhaps that simple act would have distracted her, or comforted her just enough to stay her hand. But I had felt no such urge, and so the moment was lost.

To wish for that is to wish for powers and strengths I do not possess; I am just another muddled, muddling-through human, struggling daily with my own weaknesses and demons, trying not to fail those I love in this life. But I cannot help but feel I failed her, and that haunts me, and will haunt me, even as I know that to want that power in her life is not the same as actually wielding it. Though it is natural to wish for a limitless ability to save such a dear soul, perhaps it is overstating our reach.

When an old friend takes her own life, then you come to know how little you knew of her and of her life in that distant town. There are limits on what a friend can know, at least a friend who is not in the inner circle; and perhaps even they cannot know.

We were close at times, something like cousins or perhaps at the very best, as she once told me, siblings; she had no brothers. There is no good analog or word for friendships with no romantic frisson between men and women. We did not look anything alike; I am tall and fair, and she was very petite, with skin and eyes far different from my own.

She was the much better writer, the one who deservedly won the notice of mentors and prize committees. In comparison, I am a plodder, the aspirant who rows along without attracting much notice because, well, I'm just not that good. I thought her beautiful, and liked looking at her; she had an enthusiasm for things, and life, which I admired and even envied at times.

Now she is gone, and my life is so much poorer. My only consolation, and it too is a poor one, is that I had just written her that I loved her very much, and had always loved her. She'd made no answering comment, for it was known, and understood; but I hope, in my secret heart, that it gave her some small solace to read it, and to know it was true."

"Life is an end in itself, and the only question as to whether 
it is worth living is whether you have had enough of it."
- Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.

Kahlil Gibran, "You Are My Brother..."

"You Are My Brother"

“You are my brother, but why are you quarreling with me? Why do you invade my country and try to subjugate me for the sake of pleasing those who are seeking glory and authority?

Why do you leave your wife and children and follow Death to the distant land for the sake of those who buy glory with your blood, and high honor with your mother's tears?

Is it an honor for a man to kill his brother man? If you deem it an honor, let it be an act of worship, and erect a temple to Cain who slew his brother Abel.

Is self-preservation the first law of Nature? Why, then, does Greed urge you to self-sacrifice in order only to achieve his aim in hurting your brothers? Beware, my brother, of the leader who says, "Love of existence obliges us to deprive the people of their rights!" I say unto you but this: protecting others' rights is the noblest and most beautiful human act; if my existence requires that I kill others, then death is more honorable to me, and if I cannot find someone to kill me for the protection of my honor, I will not hesitate to take my life by my own hands for the sake of Eternity before Eternity comes.

Selfishness, my brother, is the cause of blind superiority, and superiority creates clanship, and clanship creates authority which leads to discord and subjugation.

The soul believes in the power of knowledge and justice over dark ignorance; it denies the authority that supplies the swords to defend and strengthen ignorance and oppression - that authority which destroyed Babylon and shook the foundation of Jerusalem and left Rome in ruins. It is that which made people call criminals great men; made writers respect their names; made historians relate the stories of their inhumanity in manner of praise.

The only authority I obey is the knowledge of guarding and acquiescing in the Natural Law of Justice.

What justice does authority display when it kills the killer? When it imprisons the robber? When it descends on a neighborhood country and slays its people? What does justice think of the authority under which a killer punishes the one who kills, and a thief sentences the one who steals?

You are my brother, and I love you; and Love is justice with its full intensity and dignity. If justice did not support my love for you, regardless of your tribe and community, I would be a deceiver concealing the ugliness of selfishness behind the outer garment of pure love.”
- Kahlil Gibran

"War..."

"War does not determine who's right... only who's left."
- Bertrand Russell
o
"The tragedy of modern war is that the young men die fighting
 each other - instead of their real enemies back home in the capitals."
- Edward Abbey
o
Full screen recommended.
Sarah Paine, "The Greatest Tragedy in Human History"

The Daily "Near You?"

Arvada, Colorado, USA. Thanks for stopping by!

"1930s - Street Scenes New York"

Full screen recommended.
NASS, "1930s - Street Scenes New York"
"I colorized, restored and created a sound design for this video of New York in the 1930s. We start on Manhattan's West Side, at 12th Avenue and 42nd Street, at the ferry terminal of the West Shore Railroad, the New York, Ontario and Western Railway, and the Weehawken Ferry. After we have a Crowd Scene street where we can see the beautiful fashion in the 30s."
Comments here:

Fascinating...

"Causes Do Matter..."

"Causes do matter. And the world is changed by people who care deeply about causes,about things that matter. We don't have to be particularly smart or talented. We don't need a lot of money or education. All we really need is to be passionate about something important; something bigger than ourselves. And it's that commitment to a worthwhile cause that changes the world." - Steve Goodier

"Find the things that matter, and hold on to them,
and fight for them, and refuse to let them go."
- Lauren Oliver

John Wilder, "Trump’s Axe"

"Trump’s Axe"
by John Wilder

“By this axe, I rule!” 
– Kull the Conqueror

"Last week I talked about the relative economic effects of the Great Government Purge of 2025-2026. Unlike Stalin’s Purge, the winners don’t get a bullet, instead they get a severance check and unemployment. Regardless, that’s not fun for the people involved, especially good people who are doing useful work for the Republic. But it might be necessary.

There are two ways to combat waste and ideological rot. Trump tried using a scalpel during in his first term, cutting carefully, and here and there. The impact of his efforts was minimal. Slightly fewer regulations that would later be made by the same bureaucrats that voted for Her® and the dotard Biden was the sum of all of his efforts. He was stopped at every turn by internal bureaucratic resistance, asking for clarifications and just ignoring Trump as if he were the terms and conditions on a piece of software.

Once Biden showed up, however, the bureaucracy reacted like a Ferrari™, purring along as whoever was actually running the government instead of Biden made requests that were instantly carried out. Also, like a Ferrari©, it spilled fluids everywhere, but enough of “Rachel” Levine.

Then they shot at Trump after trying six different ways to put him in prison or impoverish him. That changes a guy. Coming in to this administration, he threw the scalpel away and picked up an axe. During the first 40 days, he’s put out 68 executive orders. The axe has been aimed squarely at GloboLeftist and sex-fetishist activist enclaves, secret slush funds for GloboLeftist causes, and regulatory fortresses.

The rot is deep: it’s been growing for more than a century and excision’s the only shot left. The rot started where most bad things in the United States start, around the time of the creation of the Federal Reserve™ and the income tax. The income tax was promised to only impact the very wealthy, but that was, to put it charitably, a big fat lie.

The income tax was used first to fund a war, then a growing bureaucracy, then another war. Along the way, sometime in the 1930s, the obsession with secrecy began. Our war against Germany and Japan really did require a strong secrecy culture – having the Germans know when we were going to invade Normandy, or even that Normandy was a target would have led to failure. And, yeah, we didn’t really want everyone to know how to make nukes, though the Rosenbergs felt differently. Before they fried differently.

But post-WWII, the state swelled to win a war, then never shrank because it had to fight a Cold War. The New Deal also bled seamlessly into the Great Society, birthing a permanent caste of deskbound overlords who could define the future of a business through a stroke of a pen or the press of a typewriter key.

By the ’70s, agencies like NSA and CIA ballooned under “national security”. Secrecy became a shield, while accountability a ghost. MKUltra? It’s a real thing that happened, and our tax dollars were spent on this top secret program. Why are the JFK files still redacted sixty years later? Why does the CIA maintain that the formula for invisible ink (lemon juice) is still a national secret?

Yes, I can see the reason to have secrets. But we should have about 12 of them. Which 12? I don’t know, but the never-ending, overlapping security state needs something to function: an enemy. The rest of the secrets? We put them where no one would look: in the middle of a Disney® movie.

I can’t see that we have one. Russia? Putin asked to join NATO in 2000. Are the Russians a bit skeevy? Sure they are. Are they a threat to us? Only in a nuclear fashion. After the end of the Cold War, there was no reason not to welcome Russia warmly into the host of nations. We didn’t. Why?

The national security state needed an enemy, and it couldn’t be China because Clinton was too busy giving them all of our missile tech and hiring Chinese nationals into the security state so they could take hard drives of all of our secrets back to China.

The GloboLeft has also hijacked the security state. Ideologues wormed in—trans-activists at NSA, DEI czars at DoD —while “secret” programs metastasized, cloaking rot in classified ink. Secrecy’s a double-edged blade: it really is vital for real threats (SIGINT), but a dark wet rotting swamp where sunlight never shines for that is more wedded to itself than the people it swore to serve.

“Let me tell you: you take on the intelligence community, they have six ways from Sunday at (sic) getting back at you,” said Chuck Schumer. Why is it that politicians should fear the intelligence community?

The purge redraws the map: the bureaucratic blob shrinks. Keep in mind it’s not just the wages paid, it’s also all of those regulators writing regulations that lower competition and increase costs. When the initial pollution regulations hit, they got rid of 90% plus of the pollution very quickly and cost effectively. Getting the last 0.1% of the pollution? Often this is crazy expensive and provides no real benefit. Remember how many jobs were lost because of the . . . snail darter, the spotted owl, and that time Oprah went on a diet.

Redefine carbon dioxide as a pollutant, and now regulators get even more power, and everything you consume increases in price. The people who have all of the climate “solutions”? They are the GloboLeftElite.

The axe is required. Most of the curtains on our “secret” nation should lift. What survives has to earn the right to stay in the shadows. GloboLeft ideologues in federal service that don’t serve the people should be rooted out and given the opportunity to find a way to add value to the world.

Yet there’s a goal in here: a leaner state, loyal to the people, not its own girth or Dear Leader. A century of rot, non-American ideologues and secrets are being sliced away. There will be chaos, as we find that, “Oh, no, we really needed to have air traffic controllers” and as this necessarily blunt instrument hacks through some good things to save the whole. It’s ugly. It’s necessary. And it might just be enough. All without building a single GULAG. Besides, that wouldn’t work on GloboLeftists. They need REEEEEEEEE-education."

"Oh How It Really Will Be"

Dan, I Allegedly, "40% Drive Without Insurance - A Dangerous Trend"

Full screen recommended.
Dan, I Allegedly, 3/4/25
"40% Drive Without Insurance - 
A Dangerous Trend"
"40% of drivers are hitting the road without insurance - an alarming and dangerous trend that could affect all of us. In today’s video, I break down how financial struggles are leading people to make risky decisions like skipping auto insurance, why this is a terrible idea, and how bare minimum coverage just isn't enough to protect you. From shocking stories about accidents to insights on low insurance requirements in states like Florida, there's a lot to unpack about this growing issue."
Comments here:

"15,000 Workers Are Fired From Microsoft as Tech Sector Collapses"

Full screen recommended.
Market Gains, 3/4/25
"15,000 Workers Are Fired From 
Microsoft as Tech Sector Collapses"
Comments here:
o

Bill Bonner, "Crackpot Economics"

Scandinavian Grunge Lines with Nordic Runes
"Crackpot Economics"
by Bill Bonner

‘Det som göms i snö, kommer fram vid tö.’
(What is hidden in snow, is revealed at thaw.)
- Old Norse Saying

Baltimore, Maryland - "There are many issues that get people riled up. And many are the dimwit policies pushed by politicians and elite groups. Personal pronouns, passing out condoms, men competing as women in sports, ‘annexing’ Greenland, forced vaccinations…and here’s a new one. The White House:

"By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered: English is declared as the official language of the United States. A nationally designated language is at the core of a unified and cohesive society, and the United States is strengthened by a citizenry that can freely exchange ideas in one shared language."

Really? Switzerland has five languages. India has 122 major languages and 1,599 minor ones. Why can’t people speak whatever language they want? And in the US today, almost everyone speaks English. Would you say it was a ‘unified and cohesive society?’ Language is a sensitive topic. Canada wisely decided to allow both French and English as official languages. But Ukraine did not. After the US-sponsored coup in 2014, it eliminated Russian as an official language...which proved to be one of the opening shots of the war.

Typical of the world improvers, they want to force everyone into a single formula. But it’s clearly unfair to give native born English speakers an advantage. Why not level the playing field by designating some language no one speaks as the official tongue? We recommend Old Norse. Learning Old Norse would connect us to our first European immigrants…and it would stimulate both the economy and the tired, complacent minds of its citizens. Besides, it would be useful to know what those crafty Greenlanders are saying after we take it over.

But while these fringe issues grab headline attention, in themselves they don’t represent existential threats. Whether Americans speak English or Estonian…the US would still be on its way to $50 trillion of debt before the end of Trump’s second term. Deficits add up. Debt needs to be refinanced. And the larger the cost of servicing past spending, the less is available for the present. This is inherently and obviously a crackpot way to run a nation. It guarantees chaos, inflation, defaults and poverty. But it is the direction taken by every administration since the days of Jimmy Carter.

The first four months of this fiscal year added another $830 billion in debt. At that rate, even with Elon looking for nickels under the seat cushions, the debt will be like water gushing up out of sewers and storm drains…malodorous and hard to clean up. At 5% interest (which could go up), that would be an interest burden of $2.5 trillion per year… or about half of all federal tax receipts. Insider Investor adds: "The billionaire investor Ray Dalio said "debt accumulates like plaque" in a financial system, and that poses a "problem" for governments as interest payments eat up more and more of their budgets. Dalio compared himself to a doctor telling a patient about a plaque buildup: "You're in a high risk of this heart attack, essentially, and now what are you going to do about it?" "Don't wait for this to happen and then try to make it better," Dalio said.

The federal government spent about $6.75 trillion last fiscal year but only collected $4.92 trillion in revenue, meaning it ran a $1.8 trillion deficit, according to the Treasury's website. The national debt has more than tripled since 2000 to an estimated $36.2 trillion, the website showed.

The only member of the House to show any real concern about this is the steadfast Thomas Massie of Kentucky. He was the only Republican to vote ‘no’ on the latest Republican spendfest bill. Massie explained his vote to his constituents on X by writing: “The GOP Budget Resolution that passed the House this week increases the debt limit from $36 trillion to $40 trillion, and spends enough $ to increase the debt from $36 trillion to $56 trillion over the next 10 years. But yay for tax cuts!”

Maybe Massie was being sarcastic. Because there is no real tax cut in the measure passed last week. What there is is a slick tax scam, about which, more tomorrow. For now, it is hidden under the snow…that is, under near record high spending…record high debt…and record high stock prices. It takes time for snow to melt. Inflation emerges gradually, poking up through the frost like crocuses in early spring. Later, we see the old beer cans and wind-blown pizza boxes. Verðið á varðbergi. Stay tuned."

"This Is War: Expect Surging Prices, Rapid Economic Decline, Supply Chain Disruptions"

Gregory Mannarino, 3/4/25
"This Is War: Expect Surging Prices, Rapid 
Economic Decline, Supply Chain Disruptions"
Comments here:

"Alert! Global Trade War Begins Today! 12 Hours To Major Trump Address! French jets Fly In Ukraine!"

Full screen recommended.
Canadian Prepper, 3/4/25
"Alert! Global Trade War Begins Today! 
12 Hours To Major Trump Address! French jets Fly In Ukraine!"
Comments here:

Monday, March 3, 2025

"America Is The World's Cash Cow; Markets Dump As Trade Wars Begin Tomorrow"

Jeremiah Babe, 3/3/25
"America Is The World's Cash Cow; 
Markets Dump As Trade Wars Begin Tomorrow"
Comments here:

Musical Interlude: Kevin Kern, "Above The Clouds"

Full screen recommended.
Kevin Kern, "Above The Clouds"

"A Look to the Heavens"

"Fans of our fair planet might recognize the outlines of these cosmic clouds. On the left, bright emission outlined by dark, obscuring dust lanes seems to trace a continental shape, lending the popular name North America Nebula to the emission region cataloged as NGC 7000. To the right, just off the North America Nebula's east coast, is IC 5070, whose avian profile suggests the Pelican Nebula. The two bright nebulae are about 1,500 light-years away, part of the same large and complex star forming region, almost as nearby as the better-known Orion Nebula. At that distance, the 3 degree wide field of view would span 80 light-years.
This careful cosmic portrait uses narrow band images combined to highlight the bright ionization fronts and the characteristic glow from atomic hydrogen, sulfur, and oxygen gas. These nebulae can be seen with binoculars from a dark location. Look northeast of bright star Deneb in the constellation Cygnus the Swan."

"Are You A Gorilla Or A God?"

"Are You A Gorilla Or A God?"
By Paul Rosenberg

"Humanity stands about halfway between gorillas and gods. The great question that looms over us, is this: “Which will we incorporate into our lives? Primate things or God things?”

Yes, choices are thrust upon us all our lives, accompanied with various levels of intimidation and threat, but at some point, all of us find ourselves able to choose freely. And it is then that we go in one direction or the other. We are able to change directions of course, but every time we choose, we move a step in one direction or the other.

What We Are: Please understand that I am not endorsing any specific theories here – religious, scientific, or otherwise. I’m merely describing the situation in which humanity finds itself. We are halfway between gorillas (or chimps, if you prefer) and gods: The worst things we do are primate things, and the best things we do are god-like things. Either direction is open to us.

Strange as it may seem, we are a lot like the lesser primates. Our bodies are built in the same ways, our body chemistry is nearly identical, and the worst aspects of human nature are essentially the same as the worst aspects of primate behavior.

We are also a lot like gods. We transcend entropy; we create. We can touch the soul in others, and the best aspects of human nature are essentially the same as the best characteristics attributed to gods.

This is not what we can be; this is what we are. What we become in the future depends on whether we choose gorilla things or god things, here and now.

What Are Gorilla and God Things? Gorilla things are those which operate on a dominant/submissive model. Hierarchy (high-level individuals controlling lower-level individuals) is the blueprint of the primate world. Dominant primates seek status and the power to control others. The submissive ones seek to pass along their pain to the animals below them (females, juveniles, etc.) and to avoid punishment. They are servile toward the dominants and cruel toward those they are able to dominate. Females trade sex for favors.

God things operate on a creative model. Blessing is the blueprint of the god world: distributing love, honesty, courage, kindness, blessing, awe, gratitude, and respect into the world and to other humans.

Gorilla things are these:
• The desire to rule.
• The desire to show superiority and status.
• Servility.
• Avoidance of responsibility.
• Reflexive criticism of anything new.
• Abuse of the weak or the outsider (women, children, Gypsies, Jews, immigrants, homosexuals, etc.).

God things are these:
• Producing things that preserve or enhance life.
• Invention and creativity.
• Expressing gratitude and appreciation.
• Experiencing awe and transcendence.
• Adaptability and openness.
• Improving yourself and others.

The Two Wolves: You’ve probably heard the old story of the two wolves: A young boy becomes angry and violent, and then feels guilty about his violence. He goes to his grandfather for advice. The old man says, “You have two wolves inside you: one of them is nice, the other is dangerous, and they’re fighting inside of you.” The boy then asks his grandfather, “Which one will win?” The old man replies, wisely, “Whichever one you feed.”

In the same way, humanity becomes like gorillas or gods depending on whether we build gorilla things or god things into our lives. I’m not going to tell you this is always easy, but the difficulty hardly matters: Somehow, we’ve been given a choice between becoming like gorillas or becoming like gods. No other creatures in this world have been given such a choice.

Bring god things into your life, and reject primate things. You are defining your own nature between two wildly different options, every day."

"What can we know? What are we all?
Poor silly half-brained things peering out at the infinite,
with the aspirations of angels and the instincts of beasts."
- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle

"Hope..."

“Hope is always about the future. And it isn’t always good news. Sometimes, hope can imprison us with belief or expectation that something will happen in the future to change our lives. Similarly hopelessness isn’t always about despair. Hopelessness can bring us right into this very moment and answer all of life’s most difficult questions. Who am I? Where am I? What does this mean? And what now?”
- Daniel Gottlieb

"The Gods Laugh At Your Plans: Chekhov, Jaspers, And Life-changing Moments"

"The Gods Laugh At Your Plans:
Chekhov, Jaspers, And Life-changing Moments"
The most momentous and significant events in our lives are the 
ones we do not see coming. Life is defined by the unforeseen.
by Jonny Thomson

"You’re in the shower one day, and you feel a lump that wasn’t there before. You’re having lunch when your phone rings with an unknown number: there’s been a crash. You come home and your husband is holding a suitcase. “I’m leaving,” he says.

Life is inevitably punctuated by sudden changes. At one moment, we might have everything laid out before us, and then an invisible wall stops us in our tracks. It might be an illness, a bereavement, an accident or some bad news, but life has a habit of mocking those who make plans. We can have our eyes on some distant shore, some faraway horizon, only to find everything come crashing down by the most unseen of events. As the Scottish poet Robert Burns wrote, “The best laid schemes o’ Mice an’ Men Gang aft agley” (often go wrong).

In Anton Chekhov’s remarkable play, "The Seagull," we meet a cast of characters who are all, in some way, in love with something. The young, idealistic artist Konstantin is in love with the idea of pure art. Arkadin, his mother, is in love with her fans and her celebrity. Konstantin’s girlfriend, Nina, is in love with becoming rich and famous. Everyone in the play has some kind of ambition and plan, or they live in regret over the life they chose. They rail against how misguided or mistaken their life has been, while longing for something else.

They are each like a seagull, flying over the sea or a great lake, and aiming purposefully for the shore. The view up there is wonderful. But the longer the seagull flies, the more oblivious they are to how they tire or weaken. They’re so fixated on some distant horizon that they’re at the mercy to life’s sudden changes. They’re blinkered and distracted, and the gods love nothing more than the hopeful hubris of mankind.

At one point in the play, Chekov has the character Trigorin recount a short story about a gull flying over a lake who’s, “happy and free.” But in the next moment, “a man sees her who happens to come that way, and he destroys her out of idleness.” The seagull is killed, its flight and plans annihilated, in one instant of random thoughtlessness.

Boundary Situations: While so much of our lives are spent in planning and preparation, the most transformative and significant moments are those which come at us out of the blue. These are what the psychiatrist Karl Jaspers called “boundary situations” - the ones we cannot initiate, plan, or avoid. We can only “encounter” them. These are not the mundane, everyday parts of our life - what Jaspers calls “situation being” - but rather they are things which thunder down to shake the foundations of our being. They change who we are. Although these “boundary situations” (sometimes called “limit situations”) change a bit in Jaspers’ works, he broadly sorted them into four categories:

Death: Death is the source of all our fear. We fear our loved ones dying, and we fear the moment and fact of our own death. When we know grief and despair, or when we reflect on mortality, we are transformed. We always know about death, but when it’s a boundary situation, it comes crashing into our lives like some grim scythe; an unforeseen curtain call. The awareness and subjective encounter with death transforms us.

Struggle: Life is a struggle. We work for food, compete for resources, and vie with each other for power, prestige, and status in almost every context there is. As such, there are moments when we are inevitably overcome and defeated, but also when we are victorious and champion. The final outcomes of struggle are often sudden and great, and they make us who we are.

Guilt: Hopefully, there comes a moment for each of us when we finally accept responsibility for things. For many, it comes with adulthood, but for others it comes much later still. It’s the awareness that our actions impact all around us, and our decisions echo into the world. It’s seeing the damage or tears we’ve caused. It’s to recognize that, however small or big, we’ve hurt and upset someone. It’s a profound pull of the heart that changes how we live, and it often comes on unexpectedly.

Chance: No matter how neat and ordered we might want our world to be, there will always be a messy, chaotic, and unpredictable exception. We can hope for the best, and make the plans we want, but we can never take a steering handle on the facts that will affect our existence. According to Jaspers, we each prefer, “assembling functional and explanatory structures… whose central axis lies in sufficient reason” and yet, “despite this, it is not possible for man to control and explain everything. In fact, day by day he faces events that he cannot call anything else other than coincidences or hazards.” We want order, and regularity. What we get is the mercurial and capricious throes of chance.

The best laid plans: What Chekhov’s Seagull and Jaspers’ “boundary situations” get right is that we are each much more vulnerable than we might want to allow. A wedding, three years and a fortune to plan, is ruined by a stomach bug. An hour-long journey home for Christmas winds up getting you stuck in the traffic of a freak snowstorm. A lifetime achievement is overshadowed by a national disaster. Our lives are defined by the unforeseen. We have our dreams, hopes and are flying to some faraway shore. Yet life doesn’t care. Around every corner, at every flap of our wings, everything can change."
If you caught a glimpse of your own death,
would that knowledge change the way you live the rest of your life?"
- Paco Ahlgren, "Discipline"

The Poet: Charles Dickens, "Things That Never Die "

"Things That Never Die"

 "The pure, the bright, the beautiful
that stirred our hearts in youth,
The impulses to wordless prayer,
The streams of love and truth,
The longing after something lost,
The spirits longing cry,
The striving after better hopes -
These things can never die.

The timid hand stretched forth to aid
A brother in his need;
A kindly word in griefs dark hour
That proves a friend indeed;
The plea for mercy softly breathed,
When justice threatens high,
The sorrow of a contrite heart -
These things shall never die.

Let nothing pass, for every hand
Must find some work to do,
Lose not a chance to waken love -
Be firm and just and true.
So shall a light that cannot fade
Beam on thee from on high,
And angel voices say to thee -
 These things shall never die." 

- Charles Dickens (1812-1870)

The Daily "Near You?"

Surrey, British Columbia, Canada. Thanks for stopping by!

"Only One Question..."

"There's only one question that matters, and it's the one you never get around to asking. People are capable of varying degrees of truth. The majority spend their entire lives fabricating an elaborate skein of lies, immersing themselves in the faith of bad faith, doing whatever it takes to feel safe. The person who truly lives has precious few moments of safety, learns to thrive in any kind of storm. It's the truth you can stare down stone-cold that makes you what you are. Weak or strong. Live or die. Prove yourself. How much truth can you take?"
- Karen Marie Moning

Travelling with Russell, "Walking in Moscow on the First Day of Spring"

Full screen recommended.
Travelling with Russell 3/3/25
"Walking in Moscow on the First Day of Spring"
"What is it like in Russia on the first day of spring? How do Russians celebrate the end of Winter? Join me as I walk through the centre of Moscow during the Maslenitsa Holidays, from Red Square to the world-famous Bolshoi Theatre."
Comments here:

Judge Napolitano, "Col. Douglas Macgregor: Egypt Ready for War with Israel"

Judge Napolitano - Judging Freedom, 3/3/25
"Col. Douglas Macgregor: 
Egypt Ready for War with Israel"
Comments here:
o
Full screen recommended.
Owen Jones, 3/3/25
"Israel Resumes Genocide In Gaza"
Comments here:

"How It Really Is"


“Alas, regardless of their doom, the little victims play!
No sense have they of ills to come, nor care beyond today.”
- Thomas Gray,
“Ode on a Distant Prospect of Eton College”

"Keir Stamer's Coalition Of The Whimpering"

"Keir Stamer's Coalition Of The Whimpering"
European elites are pushing for a war they are not prepared to fight 
against an enemy they cannot defeat without pushing the world
 to the edge of nuclear armageddon. At that point, all bets are off.
by Leo Hohmann

"British Prime Minister Keir Starmer closed out what amounted to a war summit in London Sunday by pledging more billions for missiles to Ukraine and committing to British “boots on the ground and planes in the sky.” He called for a “coalition of the willing” to bolster his war effort against Russia. No longer satisfied to use Ukraine as a proxy, he now wants to sacrifice his own nation’s sons and daughters. If he and his evil twin in Paris can get their way, they will launch strikes against Russia, get their soldiers killed, then play the victim and hope this is enough to drag America into their self-provoked war with Russia. At that point, all bets are off and we launch recklessly into World War III.

Watch Starmer, below, addressing his fellow Europeans, saying they are doubling down on their support for Ukraine in its border war with Russia. Remember as you listen to Starmer’s rantings, Ukraine is not a NATO member, but the Euro-elites talk about the country as if it is, with no risk, even the risk of nuclear holocaust, being too high for the preservation of this one country’s borders. Ask yourself, why? Why is this country’s borders so sacred, when so many other countries around the world have ongoing border disputes and nobody cares?
Zelensky has previously said European partners would need to station 100,000 to 150,000 soldiers in Ukraine to effectively deter Russia. The U.S. has ruled out sending its own troops so that means Europe will have to go it alone. The U.K. and France are considering deploying a much smaller European-led peacekeeping force with up to 30,000 soldiers, the Telegraph reported. Apart from the U.K., Canada and France, other countries remain cautious about sending their troops to Ukraine, citing concerns over the escalation and limited military resources, according to the Washington Post.

Starmer said world leaders had agreed to keep military aid flowing to Ukraine, and to continue to help the country bolster its defense capabilities in the event of a peace deal. He also announced a new $3 billion loan for Ukraine backed by profits from frozen Russian assets, and $2 billion in export finance for the country to purchase missiles.

Hungary’s Viktor Orban, who seems to be Europe’s only sane leader, said Europe chose war instead of peace at the London summit, adding: “This is bad, dangerous and mistaken.” Slovakia’s Robert Fico has also announced he has opted his country out of Europe’s war plan.

Canada’s lame-duck prime minister, Justin Trudeau, of course, is all in. He said over the weekend that Canada would also commit troops to a military coalition if needed to keep the war going in Ukraine.

Not only do Britain, France and Canada not have sufficiently trained troops in sufficient numbers ready to go against Russia, but these countries also do not have the industrial capacity to churn out enough weapons and ammunition that such a fight would require. Remember, the Russians are outproducing NATO countries 3 to 1 on the production of the all-important 155mm shells so crucial to the meat-grinder war going on in Ukraine. They know they can’t go it alone, but they are calling Donald Trump’s bluff, trying to force his hand to join their war plan. But Trump made it pretty clear over the last couple of weeks that he doesn’t consider this Russia-Ukraine border war to be America’s fight. He wants it over.

In a post to Truth Social, Trump said Zelensky’s statement Monday to AP that the war could last a very long time, was “the worst statement that could have been made, and America will not put up with it for much longer. It is what I was saying, this guy doesn’t want there to be peace as long as he has America’s backing and, Europe, in the meeting they had with Zelensky, stated flatly they cannot do the job without the U.S. Probably not a good statement to have been made in terms of a show of strength against Russia. What are they Thinking?”

Donald Trump seems to be trying to realign the world by drawing Russia away from China and into the U.S. orbit. That, if he can pull it off, would be a monumental achievement, and one that would make the world a much safer place.

Russia never saw China as its natural ally. It was forced to explore that relationship by unrelenting lies and provocations from NATO, which has encircled Russia’s western flank over the last 20 years by allowing Romania, Poland, Finland, the Baltic nations and Sweden, among others, into its anti-Russia military alliance while at the same time offering membership to Ukraine. That sole act of courting Ukraine for NATO membership amounted to a declaration of war against Russia, but what the Europeans didn’t bank on was Donald Trump coming in and tearing up their plans for destabilizing Russia, fomenting a regime change and stealing its resources. That was always the plan, as evidenced by a June 23, 2022 congressional hearing titled “Decolonizing Russia: A Moral and Strategic Imperative.”

After the overthrow of the USSR, as reported by Ben Norton, the neoconservative operative and future Vice President Dick Cheney wanted to slice up Russia into several smaller countries. Former U.S. National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski even published an article in elite Foreign Affairs magazine in 1997 proposing to create a “loosely confederated Russia – composed of a European Russia, a Siberian Republic, and a Far Eastern Republic.” They believe if they can just replace Putin and install a Western puppet, they’ll achieve this unrealistic pipe dream.

The June 23, 2022 hearing before Congress was organized by the U.S. Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE), known more commonly as the Helsinki Commission. You can listen and take in some of this organization’s Russophobic positions and distortions of history in the video below, taken directly from the June 2022 hearing."

These psychopaths are literally insane and determined to get us all killed...

"Modern “Public Health” is Based on Utilitarianism and Socialism"

Rachel Levine swearing in as 
Assistant Secretary for Health and Human Services
"Modern “Public Health” is Based on Utilitarianism and Socialism"
by Robert Malone, MD, MS

Excerpt: "Modern “Public Health” primarily focuses on disease prevention and treatment, rather than on health promotion. “Public Health” relies on top-down, centrally planned interventions imposed on populations rather than individually optimized health promotion and treatment decisions. The “Make America Healthy Again” (MAHA) movement strives to focus on health promotion rather than disease treatment. Success in this enormous transformational endeavor will require a re-examination of the organizational, cultural, and structural drivers that have led to the currently dominant focus on disease.

One simplistic argument is that this modern focus on disease is the consequence of “capitalism” and the profit motive (as embodied by “Big Pharma”) distorting what should be a public utility (“healthcare"). While the predatory nature of many large pharmaceutical firms and their marketing arms is self-evident, they have become adept at exploiting a niche, a business opportunity, that emerged consequent to fundamental political and sociological trends towards centralized planning based on utilitarianism and socialist theories.

Public Health, Utilitarianism, and Socialism: “Public Health” as defined by current Western two-year “Masters in Public Health” (MPH) training programs (that require no prior medical or biological training), theorizes that imposing healthcare management decisions on the population at large will achieve statistically optimal minimized average disease for all people.

In other words, Western “Public Health” is based on the political and sociological logic of both utilitarianism: the greatest good for the greatest number, and socialism: equality of outcome rather than equality of opportunity, coupled with a form of medical authoritarianism in which “healthcare” interventions are imposed on the population in general, rather than developed and negotiated on an individual basis in a private physician-patient relationship.

Current western “Public Health” is characterized by a commitment to achieving equality of statistically optimized “minimal disease” outcomes across the overall population, rather than equality of opportunity to achieve health, and rather than optimizing health on a case-by-case basis for each individual citizen. As history has repeatedly demonstrated, when centralized planning and decision-making imposed on populations errs in assumptions or interventions, the consequences are typically catastrophic due mainly to the scale of the imposed mistake. This is one of the key truths illustrated by the COVID “pandemic” debacle.

The modern practice of “Public Health” relies on big data, and primarily involves statistically isolating and defining measurable medical signs and symptoms associated with existing “bad” public health, and then identifying interventions that are demonstrated to move population-based statistical parameters towards “good” public health. In many cases, “good” and “bad” are subjective, and often myopically lack broader context.

In modern practice, these subjective determinations are made by an “expert” elite (that typically benefits from the priorities it establishes), separate and isolated from the general population- typically in the “ivory towers” of the academy- rather than subjected to any public deliberative democratic process. There are no referendums on injecting fluoride into public water systems, discouraging a meat-based diet or substituting seed oils for animal fats. It is no wonder that one consequence of modern “Public Health” has been the rise of various “health” priesthoods, such as now exist in pediatrics, cardiology, infectious disease, and epidemiology. This is the direct consequence of the logic of centralized planning and socialist philosophy (ends justify the means!) infiltrating the entire US national and global (WHO) healthcare enterprise. Central planning requires an anointed expert elite to guide and justify centralized decision-making."
Full article is here:

Bill Bonner, "Land of Dreams and Shadows"

"Land of Dreams and Shadows"
by Bill Bonner

Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland - "Narcotics won’t improve your world. But they can help you feel better about it. You nod off… even when they are cutting you open… and slide into your own dreamscape. Here at Bonner Private Research we cast our net far and wide to bring you the widest possible view of what is going on. Dan on the high plains of Wyoming…Tom in some woebegone village in India…And here we are in Johns Hopkins hospital, not exactly by choice but, whatever the motivation, it is a learning experience. Here’s what to expect…

You go into the hospital. You give your insurance info, your name and birthday. They put a plastic wristband on…and give you a badge. That allows you to go down the hall where the receptionist asks you for your name and date of birth. You are told to have a seat. “Someone will call for you.” Someone does call for you. You enter a smallish area. She scans your armband with an electronic device.

“Your name?” “You just called my name,” we answer. “Yeah, I know your name. I want to make sure you know your name.” “But I came when you called me.” “Never mind. But I’ve got some questions for you.” You are then required to sign several forms the gist of which is that you won’t light up a cigarette in the hospital, and that if anything bad happens to you while on hospital premises, it’s your own damned fault.

Along the road to the hospital, however, were several large billboards from law firms betting that it wouldn’t be your fault. “You deserve money. We collect $$millions$$ for our clients,” advertises one of them. Another: “Medical Malpractice? Know your rights. Get paid.”

But the questions are just beginning. Embarrassing questions - about bodily functions, medicines allergies, previous illnesses and accidents. All of this information has already been provided, more than once. But they want to be sure. When this interrogation is finished, we are told to return to the lobby, until “someone calls your name.” Again, after a brief wait, we are greeted by a neat person in a hospital uniform and a mask. This time, we are taken to a small room, curtained off, with a bed and many complex instruments in it.

“What is your name?” “William Bonner,” we answer. “Your birth date?” And then come the questions…health status…accidents, interventions…insurance carrier…etc. Have we had Covid shots? Do we get dizzy when we stand up too fast? Has any relative ever had cancer? The most important question was, “Can I see your insurance card?” And for good reason. The system is staggeringly expensive. The average health insurance for a family of 4 is said to be over $20,000. The medical care expenditure per person is over $14,500.

The US now ranks 46th in life expectancy…and every one of those 45 countries where people live longer, spends less than we do. We’ve tried some of them - in France, Ireland, and Argentina. The general service seems similar…at half the cost; but the US is said to have a high-tech edge.

Our visit to Johns Hopkins gave us an occasion to see for ourselves. There are scores of people in hospital get-ups…and scores of people who ask your name and age. When they aren’t asking questions, or actually helping a patient, they are usually making small talk with their colleagues.

Thanks to the complexity of treatments, insurance programs and Medicare/Medicaid, the healthcare industry requires not just doctors and nurses…but an army of administrators. Of the $5 trillion spent on medical services each year, at least 40% has little to do with taking care of patients.

At Johns Hopkins, the doctors, nurses and skilled assistants were pleasant and competent. But efficiency does not appear to be a major concern. There’s little price competition to drive cost cutting. We never knew what anything cost. We never had to make a decision that involved trade-offs or prices. We saw plenty of ads for lawyers eager to sue…but none offering lower cost service. And while there were no obvious efforts to cut costs, neither was much thought given to increasing revenues. We were never offered an ‘up-grade’ at a higher price. The food was free. No one solicited a charitable gift or offered a ‘frequent patient’ discount membership.

Nobody seemed to care. Including us. After all, the insurance company was paying. Why medical care is so inefficient and ineffective, we don’t know. But we can take a guess: the feds have gummed it up with regulations and subsidies. And if the new team - headed by RFK, Jr. - were serious about saving Americans $2 trillion, they’d begin by liberating the healthcare business. Whether that would result in lower prices and higher quality, we don’t know either. But it would be worth a try.

Our adventure at Johns Hopkins continued… We were getting pretty good at answering questions, asked by another nurse…an anesthesiologist…and the surgeons’ assistant. “What are you here for?” asked at least two of them. “What do you think we’re here for?” we replied.

“We just need to be sure that we have the right person and that he is capable of understanding what is happening to him.” “What is today’s date?” asked one. “Where are you?” Another handed us a piece of paper with a circle on it. “Draw a clock that says 11:30.” “AM or PM?” we asked.

Finally, we were laid out on the operating table…with a large robot, like a many-armed Hindu goddess, ready to go to work. The anesthesiologist administered his dose. Our eyes rolled backwards…we were getting drowsy, passing into the land of dreams and shadows. Then, the most remarkable thing happened. The top surgeon appeared. A tall man, dressed in a black cape with a black hood and a deep stentorian voice. He was carrying a scythe. His eyes were like burning coals…his touch as cold as dry ice. “What is your name,” he asked, sounding vaguely like Darth Vader. “Jack Jones,” we lied. “Oh… Must be some mistake. You’re not the one I’m looking for.”

Dan, I Allegedly, "5 Banks Shut Down – Coincidence or Warning?"

Full screen recommended.
Dan, I Allegedly, 3/3/25
"5 Banks Shut Down – Coincidence or Warning?"

"Are five bank shutdowns in one day just bad luck, or is this a serious warning sign for us all? In today’s video, I break down the recent “Black Friday of banking” and explain why I think these events are no coincidence. From payment delays affecting fixed-income individuals to critical warnings about being financially prepared, there’s a lot to unpack. Plus, I’m sharing why I believe these closures could be a test run for larger disruptions ahead. Let’s talk about what this could mean for your money and how you can protect yourself.

We also discuss some wild headlines, from massive recalls at Volkswagen and Audi to the struggles of fast-casual dining chains like Red Robin. And, of course, a little real-world advice on cash management, travel tips, and the importance of staying ready no matter what comes your way. I’m here to share insights, stories, and a little humor while covering topics that matter most to your financial health and peace of mind."
Comments here: