Tuesday, August 20, 2024

"These 14 Small Mindset Shifts Will Change Your Life"

"These 14 Small Mindset Shifts Will Change Your Life"

"For the most part, we can’t change the world. We can’t change the fundamental facts of existence - like the fact that we’re going to die. We can’t change other people. Does that mean that everything is hopeless and permanently broken? No, because although we have that extreme powerlessness in one sense, we have an incredible superpower in another: We can change how we think about things. We can change how we view them, how we orient ourselves to them.

That’s the essence of Stoicism, by the way. The idea that we don’t control what happens, but we do control ourselves. When we respond to what happens, the main thing we control is our mind and the story we tell ourselves.

So one way to think about Stoicism itself then is as a collection of mindset shifts for the many situations that life seems to thrust us in. Indeed, Seneca’s "Letters," Marcus Aurelius’ "Meditations," and Epictetus’ "Discourses" are filled with passages, anecdotes, and quotes which force a shift in perspective. Here are 14 that I have taken from the Stoics over the years that have changed my life. I think they’ll do the same for you.

Everything is an opportunity for excellence. The now famous passage from Marcus Aurelius is that the impediment to action advances action, that what stands in the way becomes the way. But do you know what he was talking about specifically? He was talking about difficult people! He was saying that difficult people are an opportunity to practice excellence and virtue - be it forgiveness or patience or cheerfulness. And so it goes for all the things that are not in our control in life. So when I find myself in situations big and small, positive or negative, I try to see each of them as an opportunity for me to be the best I’m capable of being in that moment. It doesn’t matter who we are, where we are, we can always do this.

Every event has two handles, Epictetus said: “one by which it can be carried, and one by which it can’t. If your brother does you wrong, don’t grab it by his wronging, because this is the handle incapable of lifting it. Instead, use the other - that he is your brother, that you were raised together, and then you will have hold of the handle that carries.” Another way to say that is that there are multiple ways to look at every situation, multiple ways to determine how you’re going to react. Some of them are sturdy and some of them are not. Some are kind and resilient, some are not. Which will you choose? Which handle will you grab?

The world is dyed by the color of your thoughts. Marcus said, “The things you think about determine the quality of your mind. Your soul takes the color of your thoughts.” He also said, “Our life is what our thoughts make it.” If you see the world as a negative, horrible place, you’re right. If you look for shittiness, you will see shittiness. If you believe that you were screwed, you’re right. But if you look for beauty in the mundane, you’ll see it. If you look for evidence of goodness in people, you’ll find it. If you decide to see the agency and power you do have over your life (which as we’ve said is largely in how we think), well, you’ll find you have quite a bit.

There is a tax on everything. Taxes aren’t just from the government. Seneca wrote to his friend Lucilius, “All the things which cause complaint or dread are like the taxes of life—things from which, my dear Lucilius, you should never hope for exemption or seek escape.” Annoying people are a tax on being outside your house. Delays are a tax on travel. Haters are a tax on having a YouTube channel. There’s a tax on money too–and the more successful you are, the more you pay. Seneca said he tried to pay the taxes gladly. I love that. After all, it’s usually a sign of a good problem. It means you had a killer year financially. It means you’re alive and breathing. You can whine about the cost. Or you can pay and move on.

Poverty isn’t only having too little. Of course, not having what you need to survive is insufficient. But what about people who have a lot…but are insatiable? Who are plagued by envy and comparison? Both Marcus Aurelius and Seneca talk about rich people who are not content with what they have and are thus quite poor. But feeling like you have ‘enough’–that’s rich no matter what your income is.

Alive time or Dead time? This isn’t from the Stoics exactly, but close enough. Robert Greene once told me there were two types of time in life: Alive time and Dead time. One is when you sit around, when you wait until things happen to you. The other is when you are using that time productively, actively. You’re stuck at the airport - you don’t control that. You decide whether it’s alive time or dead time (you read a book, you take a walk, you call your grandmother). I had a year left on a job when Robert gave me that advice. I could have just sat on my hands. Instead, it was an incredibly productive period of reading and researching and filling boxes of notecards that helped me write "The Obstacle is the Way" and "Ego is the Enemy."

Anxiety isn’t escaped. It’s discarded. This was a breakthrough I had during the pandemic. Suddenly, I had a lot less to worry about. I wasn’t doing the things that, in the past, I told myself were the causes of my anxiety. I wasn’t having to get to a plane. I wasn’t battling traffic to get somewhere on time. I wasn’t having to prepare for this talk or that one. So you’d think that my anxiety would have gone way down. But it didn’t. And what I realized is that anxiety has nothing to do with any of these things. The airport isn’t the one to blame. I am! Marcus Aurelius actually talks about this in Meditations. “Today I escaped from anxiety,” he says. “Or no, I discarded it, because it was within me, in my own perceptions—not outside.” It’s not your parents that are frustrating you. They’re just doing what they do. You are the source of the frustration. That’s a little frustrating, but it’s also freeing. Because it means you can stop it! You can choose to discard it.

It’s the surprise that kills you. Stuff is going to happen, but what makes it harder is when it catches us off guard. The unexpected blow lands heaviest, Seneca said. That’s why we should practice the art of premeditatio malorum–essentially, a pre-mortem of the things that could happen in a day or a life. This takes the sting out of them in advance…it also lets us prepare and prevent. And for no one is this more important than parents and leaders. Seneca said that the one thing a leader is not allowed to say is, “Wow, I didn’t think that was going to happen.”

You can’t learn what you think you already know. Conceit, Zeno said, was the enemy of wisdom and learning. This was the essential worldview of Socrates, the hero of the Stoics. Think of Socrates’ method. He didn’t go around telling people anything. He went around asking questions. That’s how he learned so much and ended up becoming so smart. If you want to get smarter, stop thinking you’re so smart. If you want to learn, focus on all the things you don’t know. Humility, admission of ignorance–these are the starting points. This is the attitude that gets you further in life.

What good is posthumous fame? Marcus Aurelius knew he was famous. He knew they were building statues of him. He knew he would have a legacy. He also knew this was basically worthless. What good is posthumous fame, he asks in Meditations, when you’re not around to enjoy it?! He reminded himself too that you know, it’s not like the people in the future were going to be way better than the people alive right now - there will be idiots in the future too. What do I care about how many people read my books in 100 years? What matters is if I am doing my best right now, if I am taking pleasure and pride from doing my best right now. So stop trying to live forever by achieving all this greatness, stop trying to get more than you need, stop trying to perform for history. Do the good you can do now. Stop chasing something you will never touch. Legacy is not for you. You’ll be dead. Leave it to others.

People are just doing their job. I don’t just mean at work. After bumping into a particularly frustrating person, Marcus Aurelius asks himself, “Is a world without shamelessness possible?” No, he answers. “There have to be shameless people in the world. This is one of them.” This is just someone fulfilling their role. Seeing things this way not only prevents me from being surprised, but it makes me sympathetic. This person has a crappy job.It’s not fun to be them–they have to be one of the jerks that exist in the world. And then I remind myself that I am lucky that my job is to try to be a good person.

They don’t want you to be miserable. It’s strange that Stoics have the reputation for being unfeeling when Seneca wrote three very beautiful essays on loss and grief called Consolations. I read these essays whenever I lose someone or miss someone who I loved. Anyway, one of the lessons that hit me the most is when he is writing to the daughter of a now-deceased friend. He brings up a great point, basically saying, look, your dad loved you so much. Of course, he would be honored that you miss him, but do you think he would want his death to make you miserable? Would he want the mere mention of his name to bring you pain? No, that would be his worst nightmare. He would want you to be happy. He would want you to go on with your life. He wouldn’t want his memory to haunt you like a ghost–he would want the thought of him to bring you joy and happiness. Of course, we’re always going to feel sad when we lose someone, but then we can remind ourselves of this and try to smile too.

Opinions are optional. “Remember, you always have the power to have no opinion,” Marcus says. Do you need to have an opinion about the weather today - is it changing anything? Do you need to have an opinion about the way your kid does their hair? So what if this person likes music that sounds weird to you? So what if that person is a vegetarian? “These things are not asking to be judged by you,” Marcus writes. “Leave them alone.” Especially because these opinions often make us miserable! “It’s not things that upset us,” Epictetus says, “it’s our opinions about things.” The less opinions you have, especially about other people and things outside your control, the happier you will be. The nicer you’ll be to be around too.

The last one is the most powerful one, I think. And it’s about the thing we have the least amount of power and control over: the fact that we’re all going to die. But the Stoics want us to think about it differently…

Death isn’t in the future. It’s happening now. It’s easy to see death as this thing that lies off in the distant future. It’s a fixed event that happens to us once…at the end. This is literally true but it’s also incorrect. “This is our big mistake,” as Seneca points out, “to think we look forward toward death. Most of death is already gone. Whatever time has passed is owned by death.”

It’s better to think of death as a process - something that is always happening. We are dying every day, he said. Even as you read this email, time is passing that you will never get back. That time, he said, belongs to death. Powerful, right? Death doesn’t lie off in the distance. It’s with us right now. It’s the second hand on the clock. It’s the setting sun. As the arrow of time moves, death follows, claiming every moment that has passed. What ought we do about it? The answer is live. Live while you can. Put nothing off. Leave nothing unfinished. Seize it while it still belongs to us."

"As Americans..."

''As Americans, we must ask ourselves: Are we really so different? Must we stereotype those who disagree with us? Do we truly believe that ALL red-state residents are ignorant racist fascist knuckle-dragging NASCAR-obsessed cousin-marrying roadkill-eating tobacco juice-dribbling gun-fondling religious fanatic rednecks; or that ALL blue-state residents are godless unpatriotic pierced-nose Volvo-driving France-loving left-wing communist latte-sucking tofu-chomping holistic-wacko neurotic vegan weenie perverts?''
- Dave Barry

"Be Careful..."

 

"Are People Really Stupid?"

“All of the available data show that the typical American citizen has about
as much interest in the life of the mind as does your average armadillo.”
- Morris Berman

“Think of how stupid the average person is,
and realize half of them are stupider than that.”
- George Carlin

"Are People Really Stupid?"
by Fred Russell

"On the face of things, judging from the general level of knowledge and understanding, not to mention the intellectual pursuits, of most of the human race one is tempted to say that the overwhelming majority of mankind lacks the intellectual capacity, the intelligence, to contribute to human progress. And it is in fact a very small elite that has carried us beyond Neanderthal Man, without whom, if the truth be told, we might still be living in caves. It is, in a word, appalling to contemplate the level at which ordinary people use their minds, what they read, if at all, what they watch on TV, the movies they go out and see, and the ease with which they are seduced and manipulated by the technicians of the psyche, namely, politicians and advertisers.

The impression one gets when contemplating these tens and hundreds of millions of people glued to their TV screens for the reality shows and sitcoms or fiddling with their smartphones from morning till night is of complete empty-headedness. This is not to say that such people cannot be shrewd, resourceful, or, for that matter, simply decent. It is to say that at the average level of intelligence displayed by the human race, the great intellectual achievements of mankind seem to be beyond the scope of the vast majority of men and women. But are people really stupid? And if they aren't, who or what has held them back?

Now one may be inclined to place all the blame for our ignorance on the television producers and gadget makers, but the truth is that by the time they get to us the damage has already been done. All they really succeed in doing is dragging us down a little further. The problem starts in childhood. It starts in the schools with all those empty cells waiting to be filled and no one, not entire educational systems, really knowing how to fill them. In fact, the opposite result is achieved. By the time the child finishes elementary school, unless he is destined to join the intellectual or scientific or economic or political elite and is self-motivated, as the saying goes, he will have developed an aversion to the learning process that will persist for the rest of his life.

It is not hard to understand why. School bores him, and oppresses him. Its premise, fostered in the West by the Church the virtually exclusive supplier of teachers until fairly recent times, historically speaking is that as a consequence of Original Sin all men are born evil and must therefore be coerced into doing what is good. The result has been rigidly structured frameworks where teachers hammer away at the captive child until his head is ready to explode. Within just a few years, the public school system thus destroys the natural curiosity of the child and dooms him to a life of total ignorance, dependent, for whatever sense of the world he does have, on second rate journalists, who themselves lack the knowledge, understanding, discipline and integrity to be historians or even novelists and therefore shape his perception like the ignorant clerics of the Middle Ages, raining down on his head a disjointed and superficial body of information presented largely to produce effects, and even this is beyond his capacity to retain.

The man in the street may thus be said to have a great many opinions but very little knowledge, mindlessly repeating the half-truths of experts and analysts who reflect his own biases and constructing out of them a credo of dogmatic views that remain embedded in his mind for an entire lifetime like bricks in a brick wall.

Does it matter? After all, we have all the scholars and scientists we need, and besides, a world where everyone became one would be a dull place indeed. It can even be argued that it is better for the race if progress is opposed, since, judging from its products, it mostly expresses itself materially and economically in an unholy alliance of greed and technology. However, progress of this kind cannot be fought if all that people have on their minds is to wire themselves into this technology, and that is what they will be doing until their minds are engaged in less frivolous pursuits. They are thus doubly victimized, first by the schools, whose methods are not attuned to the temperament and capacity of the average child, and then by the economic elites who control the technologies and consequently the flow of information and whose only interest in the man in the street is as a consumer of their products.

Unfortunately, there is very little hope that any of this will change. The wrong people control human society and will continue to do so, because they created the model and are the only ones who know how to operate it. The sad truth is that today's man in the street is neither wiser nor more knowledgeable than a medieval peasant. Calling ourselves Homo sapiens, or even Homo sapiens sapiens, seemed like a good idea once but very few of us have lived up to the billing."

Apologies to armadillos for the comparison! lol

 

That time is now...

Gerald Celente, "Disney World White House: Minnie Mouse VS Donald Duck Presidential Reality Show"

Strong language alert!
Gerald Celente, 8/20/24
"Disney World White House: 
Minnie Mouse VS Donald Duck Presidential Reality Show"
"The Trends Journal is a weekly magazine analyzing global current events forming future trends. Our mission is to present facts and truth over fear and propaganda to help subscribers prepare for what’s next in these increasingly turbulent times."
Comments here:

Gerald's in fine form today! lol

Gregory Mannarino, "Something Big Is About To Happen, And It's Effects Are Going To Be Extreme"

Gregory Mannarino, PM 8/20/24
"Something Big Is About To Happen, 
And It's Effects Are Going To Be Extreme"
Comments here:
o
Related:
ThisisJohnWilliams, 8/20/24
"Corporate Bankruptcies Increase By 200%, 
Millions of Americans Fight to Hold On"
Comments here:
o
Snyder Reports, 8/20/24
"1,000’s Of Grocery Stores Will Close"
Comments here:

"It Was The Essence Of Life..."

"It was the essence of life to disbelieve in death for one's self, to act as if life would continue forever. And life had to act also as if little issues were big ones. To take a realistic attitude toward life and death meant that one lapsed into unreality. Into insanity. It was ironic that the only way to keep one's sanity was to ignore that one was in an insane world or to act as if the world were sane."
- Philip José Farmer

The Daily "Near You?"

Monroe, Wisconsin, USA. Thanks for stopping by!

Bertrand Russell, "Three Passions"

"Three Passions" 

 "Three passions have governed my life:
The longings for love, the search for knowledge,
And unbearable pity for the suffering of humankind.

Love brings ecstasy and relieves loneliness.
In the union of love I have seen
In a mystic miniature the prefiguring vision
Of the heavens that saints and poets have imagined.

With equal passion I have sought knowledge.
I have wished to understand the hearts of people.
I have wished to know why the stars shine.
Love and knowledge led upwards to the heavens,

But always pity brought me back to earth;
Cries of pain reverberated in my heart,
Of children in famine, of victims tortured,
And of old people left helpless.
I long to alleviate the evil, but I cannot,
And I too suffer.
This has been my life; I found it worth living."

- Bertrand Russell

“The Individual vs. The Illusion Of Consensus Reality”

“The Individual vs. The Illusion Of Consensus Reality”
by Jon Rappoport

“This is such a supercharged subject, I could start from a dozen places. But let’s begin here: the individual is unique, because he is he. He is unique because he has his own ideas, because he has his own desires, because he has his own power. That power belongs to no one else. In particular, it doesn’t belong to the State. The State will try, will always try to suggest that it is granting power to the individual, but this is a lie. It’s an illusion broadcast with ill-intent. While everyone else is trying to manufacture connections to the group, under the banner of a false sense of community, the individual is going in the opposite direction.

Philip K Dick: “Insanity - to have to construct a picture of one’s life, by making inquiries of others.”

Consensus reality is the reality of sacrifice. It is coagulating energy, form, content, substance that takes on amorphous shapes studded with slots into which people can fit themselves.

The independent individual thinks what he wants to think. Over time, he keeps graduating into new, more nearly unique levels of what he wants to think. He rises above the group. He rises to his own thoughts.

There is no subject and no substance which is not infiltrated by consensus reality. Wherever you look, you will encounter it. The group is the basis of consensus reality, and the group pact extends everywhere. The group fears a sector where only individual thought can tread. That would be dangerous to the illusion. “Well, we’ve got things well in hand in most places, but over there and over here we’re not in charge. A different kind of reality pervades.” No, that doesn’t work for the group. The exceptions would blow a hole in the rule.

“Stay away from the corner of Lexington Avenue and 34th Street. Something too weird is going on there. We come in and try to inject consensus on that spot and it doesn’t work. Our “sharing” energy bounces off that corner. We may have to call in the troops to surround the place and cordon it off.” Alert! Alert! Consensus reality is breaking down in Sector 328-A! Locate the problem! This is an emergency! Bring in the news team to shore up the illusion! Turn on the hypnosis machines! Group consensus is fraying and fragmenting in Area 768-B! Call the professors and pundits! Discredit the individual! Call him a monster! Do something fast!

Consensus reality is an illusion in the sense that you can see it and I can see it, but we didn’t sign up for it. That’s the catch. Take any area of life, and I mean any, and that’s the case. Wherever there is tight consensus, perception ensues. That’s the whole point. “We, the group, aren’t fooling around. When we sign a pact among ourselves, we intend everybody to see what we decide is there to see.”

So you, the individual, can opt out. That doesn’t necessarily mean the consensus disappears; you can still see it, but you see it without accepting it. You can see the oasis in the desert, which is a mirage, but because you have your own bottle of water, you don’t have to run toward the mirage and fall down on your knees and try to drink from the pool.

Philip K. Dick: “Because today we live in a society in which spurious realities are manufactured by the media, by governments, by big corporations, by religious groups, political groups… increasingly, we are bombarded with pseudo-realities manufactured by very sophisticated electronic mechanisms… And this is an astounding power: that of creating whole universes, universes of the mind. I ought to know. I do the same thing.”

The strong and free individual evolves. He doesn’t stay the same. He doesn’t know everything worth knowing today. He knows enough, but not everything. He continues to emerge with new ideas, new energy, new invention. He becomes larger. He gains more power.

When the illusion of consensus reality attains a level beyond mere slogan, it enters the realm of systems. This is its most convincing format. A system appears to be watertight. Each one of its parts has relations with the whole. This is interesting, because that mirrors what a group is. Each member is a part that connects to the whole. Consensus as a system is like a game of chess that plays the same moves over and over. Game one is the same as game two, three, four… That’s where its illusion of power comes from.

The individual, though, doesn’t proceed according to systems. He isn’t moving from one closed context to another. That’s the group. The individual may retain the same general principles over time, but what he does and thinks strikes out into new territories. Because he creates. There is no individual without creating.

Consensus is the coin of the realm. It is forced from the top, and it is signed up for at the bottom. One hand washes the other. Societies may begin through consensus, but if they have any courage, they shift focus to the job of pulling away coercive restraints on the individual. Regardless, the individual asserts his freedom. It is his to begin with, not the group’s. No one gives it to him.

American society is moving rapidly to an inverse, an upside down structure, in which freedom is looked upon as a privilege grudgingly accorded in the absence of a reason to take it away. The prevalent official attitude is: consensus must be strengthened. It must dominate the landscape.

Through vast experience, the free individual knows that consensus has no theoretical limits. Group-perceptions about the way things are can give birth to the most universally “proven objective truths.” In his explorations, the individual may even find that a demonstrated law of nature is nothing more than a consensus. And, therefore, an illusion.

The group has conception of Normal. Normal is like a message passed around, from hand to hand, and when you look at it closely, for content, it dissolves. There was really nothing there. This is similar to what happens when physicists probe further and further into matter, looking for smaller and smaller particles, and come up with an enormous amount of empty space.

The group consensus is the illusion. Finally, there is mindless hive-action covering a vacuum. This is also what occasionally happens to people who have hidebound political ideologies. The people on the Left move further and further to the Left, and the people on the Right move further and further to the Right. Finally, they are both so distant from government they meet and stare at each other in shock. At that point, they are just individuals.

From my unfinished manuscript, "The Magician Awakes": “You keep saying it doesn’t matter. Sometimes you say it out loud and sometimes it’s just a very strong thought that could cut through a melon. You repeat it over and over—”it doesn’t matter.” You’re sitting there with the most powerful thing in the universe, your imagination, and yet it doesn’t matter. New worlds are waiting for you. But you don’t pull the trigger.

“You go to meetings. What are these meetings? Who’s there? What do you talk about, the end of the world? Your problems? The conversations seem to be endless…”

“But society runs on groups! It must have groups!” And what? The individual must give in and join and belong? That’s the conclusion? I’m afraid not. Consensus reality is a cartoon that is trying to become as real as steel. What deconstructs the steel and exposes the cartoon? There is only one thing that can do that. Nothing and no one else is going to do that. The individual does it."

"Be Like The Bird..."

"What matter if this base, unjust life
Cast you naked and disarmed?
If the ground breaks beneath your step,
Have you not your soul?
Your soul! You fly away,
Escape to realms refined,
Beyond all sadness and whimpering.
Be like the bird which on frail branches balanced
A moment sits and sings;
He feels them tremble, but he sings unshaken,
Knowing he has wings."
– Victor Hugo

"Compassion..."

“Compassion is sometimes the fatal capacity for feeling what
it is like to live inside somebody else's skin. It is the knowledge
 that there can never really be any peace and joy for me
until there is peace and joy finally for you too.”
- Frederick Buechner

"A Life of Learning: Earth School"

"A Life of Learning: Earth School"
by Madisyn Taylor, The DailyOm

"Earth school provides us with an education of the heart and the soul. Life is the province of learning, and the wisdom we acquire throughout our lives is the reward of existence. As we traverse the winding roads that lead from birth to death, experience is our patient teacher. We exist, bound to human bodies as we are, to evolve, enrolled by the universe in earth school, an informal and individualized academy of living, being, and changing. Life’s lessons can take many forms and present us with many challenges. There are scores of mundane lessons that help us learn to navigate with grace, poise, and tolerance in this world. And there are those once-in-a-lifetime lessons that touch us so deeply that they change the course of our lives. The latter can be heartrending, and we may wander through life as unwilling students for a time. But the quality of our lives is based almost entirely on what we derive from our experiences.

Earth school provides us with an education of the heart and the soul, as well as the intellect. The scope of our instruction is dependent on our ability and readiness to accept the lesson laid out before us in the circumstances we face. When we find ourselves blindsided by life, we are free to choose to close our minds or to view the inbuilt lesson in a narrow-minded way. The notion that existence is a never-ending lesson can be dismaying at times. The courses we undertake in earth school can be painful as well as pleasurable, and as taxing as they are eventually rewarding. However, in every situation, relationship, or encounter, a range of lessons can be unearthed. When we choose to consciously take advantage of each of the lessons we are confronted with, we gradually discover that our previous ideas about love, compassion, resilience, grief, fear, trust, and generosity could have been half-formed.

Ultimately, when we acknowledge that growth is an integral part of life and that attending earth school is the responsibility of every individual, the concept of "life as lesson" no longer chafes. We can openly and joyfully look for the blessing buried in the difficulties we face without feeling that we are trapped in a roller-coaster ride of forced learning. Though we cannot always know when we are experiencing a life lesson, the wisdom we accrue will bless us with the keenest hindsight."
"Every person, all the events of your life are there because you have 
drawn them there. What you choose to do with them is up to you."
- Richard Bach
"Ten Rules For Being Human"

Rule One: You will receive a body. You may love it or hate it, but it will be yours for the duration of your life on Earth.
Rule Two: You will be presented with lessons. You are enrolled in a full-time informal school called 'life.' Each day in this school you will have the opportunity to learn lessons. You may like the lessons or hate them, but you have designed them as part of your curriculum.
Rule Three: There are no mistakes, only lessons. Growth is a process of experimentation, a series of trials, errors, and occasional victories. The failed experiments are as much a part of the process as the experiments that work.
Rule Four: A lesson is repeated until learned. Lessons will be repeated to you in various forms until you have learned them. When you have learned them, you can then go on to the next lesson.
Rule Five: Learning does not end. There is no part of life that does not contain lessons. If you are alive, there are lessons to be learned.
Rule Six: 'There' is no better than 'here'. When your 'there' has become a 'here,' you will simply obtain a 'there' that will look better to you than your present 'here'.
Rule Seven: Others are only mirrors of you. You cannot love or hate something about  another person unless it reflects something you love or hate about yourself.
Rule Eight: What you make of your life is up to you. You have all the tools and resources you need. What you do with them is up to you.
Rule Nine: Your answers lie inside of you. All you need to do is look, listen, and trust.
Rule Ten: You will forget all of this at birth. You can remember it if you want by unravelling the double helix of inner knowing.
- Cherie Carter-Scott, 
From "If Life is a Game, These are the Rules"

"Do You Want..."

"Do you want to live life,
 or do you want to escape life?"
- Macklemore

"Is Everything Worse Than It Was In 1900?"

"Is Everything Worse Than It Was In 1900?"
by John Wilder

"For large chunks of human history, things didn’t change all that much from one century to the next. Oh, sure, there were innovations and social changes and cyclic government transformations (Roman Republic to Roman Empire, for instance) but life was such that in many cases, dropping a Frenchman from Paris in 1300 A.D. into Paris around 1400 A.D. would have been a fairly comprehensible change for the resident, except he would probably have had to get a different color beret.

Let’s go back to 1900, though. What changes might have seemed like science fiction (dystopian or otherwise) to a time traveler from Fort Wayne (let’s call him Taylor) if he showed up in the year 2024? Lets start with . . .

Social Changes:
• Elevation of sexual fetish to that of a sacrament rather than that of a criminal offense.
• Unromantic sex with large numbers of partners for unmarried teenage girls and women is the norm.
• Sex changes for children are not punishable by prison time.
• Universal, free availability of pornographic images and videos.
• Women working. Sure, some worked, but it wasn’t the norm.
• Women voting. Yes, it was allowed in some places, but certainly not all.
•Criminals being treated with non-judgement, except when it comes to “hate crimes” – the concept of saying a “bad word” as being worse and less forgivable than murder.
• Rap music. I still can’t believe it exists.
• The fall in popularity of churches.
• Staggeringly low birthrates in developed countries.
• Credit scores as a primary measure of suitability coordinated by large, faceless financial companies.
•Working for large corporations as the norm, rather than a rare exception, like the dude who worked for the railroad.

My grade on how Taylor would rank these? Utterly dehumanizing for most of them. I think he’d be shocked at the collapse of the morality required to run a just society in the absence of tyranny.

I think the sexual stuff would be the most shocking. Sure, humans have been boinking each other in all sorts of ways since Adam’s third night with Eve, but the celebration of things that were called degenerate (or worse) in nearly every Western civilization for thousands of years would be the most shocking.

The criminal change would be a big thing for Taylor, since he was probably used to speedy justice of a trial followed by a fairly quick hanging.

World Power Changes:
• The complete dissolution of the British Empire into a proto-Islamic Caliphate.
• The complete collapse of the Major Power colonial system leaving many colonies adrift in a state of partially collapsed civilizations that can’t care for themselves.
• Western government essentially declaring war on their own citizens in order to import aliens who don’t really assimilate, and importing those aliens in staggering numbers.
• Near universal, real-time information gathering on nearly every citizen from cameras and tracking devices that they buy and carry with them.
• A very small number of very large companies control what news people see.
• Drones in modern warfare cutting down the ability of troops to be sneaky, at all.
• Nuclear weapons which can devastate cities of a larger size than existed in 1900.
• Intercontinental ballistic missiles, which can reach any area of the Earth and devastate square miles in less than an hour.
• Jet fighters which, although nearly obsolete, can move at multiples of the speed of sound and destroy people and planes and things hundreds of miles away.
• Centralization of the financial systems of the world into a near-monolithic system where billions in capital could move easily from one continent to another in seconds.
• World hunger as less of a problem than world obesity.
•The staggering number of laws and rules from the federal level covering every aspect of life.
• Identity theft.

The set of changes was bad, but this may be thought of as more chaotic. In Taylor’s time, colonies certainly exploited the natural resources of a region, but in many places they also gave order and governance to areas that had (until that time) were at the mud and straw hut technology level, and are rapidly regressing back to the mud and straw hut technology level. Warfare went from Teddy’s charge up San Juan Hill to remote controlled impersonal warfare that has the capacity to kill billions in an afternoon. I’m pretty sure that would be horrifying to him.

General Technology:
• Modern cars, including partially self-driving cars are amazing pieces of technology, and combined with modern highways provide a dream transportation system – coast to coast, in a car, in a couple of days.
• Air travel from nearly any part of the world to nearly any other part of the world is possible in hours.
• Humanity has travelled to the Moon. The Moon!
• Instantaneous communication with people all around the world is possible.
• Instantaneous video from anyplace in the world is possible.
• Most of the knowledge accumulated by the human race is available nearly instantaneously.
• Organ transplants are a thing.
• Modern architecture has become ugly and soulless, with no space for beauty and humanity.
• Creation of industrial “food” which incorporates large numbers of components that were created in a chemical plant rather than a growing plant or cow or pig.

What would Taylor say about these? He’d probably be impressed by the first part of the list, but the last two would be very troubling. In the last two weeks I ate a “pretzel” with cheezefoodsauce®, and it was tasty. But compare it to a freshly grown garden tomato? I’d rather have the tomato every time. Wow. I don’t think he’d like to swap his steak and eggs and butter for Cheeze-Itz™ and Doritos©, but they seem popular.

So, what color beret kufi do you think the Frenchman be wearing in 2124?"

"How It Really Is"

 

Gregory Mannarino, "It's Way Worse Than You Think"

Gregory Mannarino, AM 8/20/24
"It's Way Worse Than You Think"
Comments here:

"The Only Thing Necessary for Evil to Triumph Is…"

"The Only Thing Necessary for Evil to Triumph Is…"
by Paul Rosenberg

"I’m betting that most of my readers can complete this phrase. The problem is, it isn’t quite true. Edmund Burke, its supposed source, was a good man, but that doesn’t make the saying true. Here’s the passage, in the form most of us know: "The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing."

Yes, there is a time when good men and women must stand up for what’s right, even when it involves risk, but that moment comes only after evil has already been well established and is powerfully on the move. Fighting evil may be an essential thing, but it isn’t the first problem - it matters only after thousands or millions of mistakes have already been made. And if those first mistakes had not been made, great fights against evil wouldn’t be necessary.

Where Evil Comes From: Let’s begin with a crucial point: Evil is inherently weak. Here’s why that’s true:

• Evil does not produce. It must take advantage of healthy and effective life (aka productive men and women) if it’s to succeed. Evil, by its nature, is wasteful and destructive: 
• It requires the production of the good in order to do its deeds.
• How much territory could Caesar have conquered on his own?
• How many people could Joe Stalin have killed with no one to take his orders?
•How many people could Mao have starved to death without obedient middlemen?

With duteous followers, however, evil rulers killed some 260 million people in the 20th century. The truth is that evil survives by tricking the good into doing its will. Without thousands of basically decent people confused enough to obey, evil would fail quickly. The great tragedy of our era is the extent to which evil has been successful in convincing people to service it. Good people having yielded their wills arm evil, accommodate evil, and acquiesce to its actions.

Hannah Arendt summarized it this way: "The sad truth is that most evil is done by people who never make up their minds to be good or evil. People end up supporting evil because they don’t want to make up their minds at all. They want to avoid criticism and vulnerability, so they hold to the middle of the pack and avoid all risk. These people wouldn’t initiate murders by themselves, but in the name of duty, loyalty and/or the greater good, they cooperate with evil and give it their strength. Each plays a part, but not so large a part that they’ll have to contemplate its effects."

Sins of Obedience: People think of murder, lying, and robbery as sins, but none of those has nearly the death toll of obedience. Basically decent men and women obey agents of evil for very mundane reasons. The process often goes like this:Confused and intimidated, they look for what’s being punished and what isn’t.They try not to make waves.They learn that they can avoid making waves best if they adopt the perspectives of their overlords. So they run the overlords’ slogans through their minds as a default program.

In the end, these people don’t make up their minds. Rather, they take on the minds of their overlords and do their will. And so, the vast majority of evil done on Earth traces back to minds and wills that have been abandoned to fear. So… This is what the famous quote should say: "The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to obey." We should be painting that on our walls."

"It's Good To Be An Illegal"

"It's Good To Be An Illegal"
by Jim Quinn
Click image for larger size.

WTF is wrong with this country?!!

"The Leaky Faucet Agency"

"The Leaky Faucet Agency"
Nine tenths of government is always a scam, pretending to make
 people better off while actually controlling and exploiting them. 
But bad government seems to have gotten worse.
by Bill Bonner

"You go out to western Maryland, or if you go out to West Virginia, or if you keep going and you go to a small town in the former steelmaking regions of Ohio, there are people watching their way of life crumble and disappear. There's no politician that has any intention of doing anything about it, or has a plan for doing anything about it."
- Thomas Frank

Poitou, France - "Yesterday, we saw Milton Friedman’s quote... that government spending is the ‘true tax.’ We also saw that he was wrong. The true tax is much more than just the amount the feds spend. It includes amounts they force you to spend. Donald Trump’s proposed tariffs, for example, will cost the average household $1,700 per year (according to the Peterson Foundation estimate). And then, there’s all the time they force you to waste - accumulated regulation, administration, red tape and assorted folderol - which, according to one study, has cut US GDP by $60 trillion.

The numbers are squishy. But the idea is rock solid. Which is why Harris and Trump are both talking nonsense. Both claim that they can make Americans better off. One would introduce more giveaways, debt forgiveness, and price controls. Yesterday, at the Democratic National Convention, Kamala Harris revealed how she would pay for these things. CNN:

"Vice President Kamala Harris will push to increase the corporate tax rate to 28% from the current 21%, her campaign said Monday, the first day of the Democratic National Convention in Chicago…Raising the corporate tax rate would reduce the deficit by $1 trillion over the next decade, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. The watchdog group estimates the price tag of Harris’ economic package would be $1.7 trillion over the next decade."

Let’s see, Harris proposes to spend $1.7 trillion on various swindles. She would also force corporations to collect $1 trillion from their customers, employees, and shareholders to pay part of the bill. How does this make voters better off?

Donald Trump, meanwhile, proposes to make the public pay more for its imported products. How does forcing people to buy inferior products at higher prices help them? He’s also committed to extending his 2017 tax cuts – with a projected cost to the Treasury of $5.2 trillion over the next ten years. That amount will have to be made up later - presumably in higher prices. But this is politics. And politics is like French cheese. The slogans are attractive - ‘Tax cuts!’…‘Make the rich pay!’… Or, ‘make the foreigners pay!’ Later, they turn rancid and foul.

Last week, we looked at Joseph Tainter’s idea... that societies solve problems, and then suffocate under the accumulated solutions. In our private lives, we solve problems all the time. A faucet leaks. We fix it. Problem solved. In public matters, a faucet leaks. The feds set up a commission to investigate. Then, they set up an agency to control it. And then they prohibit you from taking a shower.

A half a century later... after costly studies have been done, bids gathered, and a hugely expensive program has completely redone the plumbing, the Leaky Faucet Agency is still at work. Because everyone involved has a perverse incentive to keep the faucets leaking. Leaky faucets are now the source of jobs, incomes, contracts; the Leaky Faucet Agency (LFA) is now a cabinet-level post... and its chief, whose expensive ‘surge’ in fighting the leaky faucet never worked, is widely proposed as a presidential candidate.

‘Bad government is a normal cost of government,’ says Tainter. Nine tenths of government is always a scam, pretending to make people better off while actually controlling and exploiting them. But bad government seems to have gotten worse.

No Pyramids: The ancient Egyptians used their resources and time to build great pyramids. Instead of producing more food, improving their houses, or just enjoying more leisure time, huge blocks of stone were hauled across the burning desert to create monuments to defunct rulers. They were all the society had to show for hundreds or thousands of years of ‘investment.’

At least they were paid for. America’s great monument is $35 trillion in debt... soon to reach $50 trillion. And unlike the pyramids, it is not an inert Rushmore, meant to glorify past vanities... but an ongoing charge on the labors of 330 million US residents. The interest on the national debt alone now costs each four-member household about $7,500 annually…expected to more than double by 2034.

But the credit-money system makes it possible for Washington to squander not just today’s resources…but tomorrow’s too. It is as if contracts had been let and everyone involved in building a pyramid had gotten paid... the stonecutters, the crew bosses, the architects, the masons, top management, middlemen and day laborers. But they didn’t build anything. They left it to the next generation to build the pyramid - with no money to pay for it! Stay tuned."
o
Download "The Collapse of Complex Societies", 
by Joseph A. Tainter, here:

"Into The Great Depression, Part 1: The Roaring '20s & The Creation Of The Fed" (Excerpt)

"Into The Great Depression, Part 1:
The Roaring '20s & The Creation Of The Fed"
by Tumous Malinen

Excerpt: "Something that has been a particular interest of mine is the Great Depression of the 1930s. It continues to be the deepest global economic malaise of modern times, which preceded the most destructive war in human history. The extreme nature of the economic contraction has intrigued me, in addition to the path that led to it. The latter mostly because of the role of the newly created central bank, the Federal Reserve, in it.

I’ve written extensively on the Great Depression in a book I am writing about forecasting financial crises. I think that the similarities between now and the era leading into the Depression are strikingly similar. This is why I decided to publish a series mapping the path of the U.S., and the world, into the deep global economic collapse. I start by mapping the route to the ‘Great Crash’, that is, to the collapse of the U.S. stock market at the end of October 1929.
Click image for larger size.
In just four trading bays between 23 and 29 October 1929, the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) collapsed by 29% wiping out massive amounts of financial wealth. While the 1929 crash did not start the Great Depression, it laid the groundwork for it. Worryingly we seem to be on a similar road that led to the Great Crash, which I will map in this first entry to the series. I will also detail the creation of the Federal Reserve, which played a major role in the financial mania that led to the crash.

What is notable with the period, which preceded the Great Depression, is that many leading nations across the world experienced an economic decline at the same time, which manifested into a global banking crisis. We are seeing signs of the same kind of global slowdown now.

Before we dig deeper, let me inform that I decided to the make my piece on the Systemic Meltdown free to read. This is because, I think that everyone should understand what such an event would entail for the world, and how we could be able to manage it.

Now, let’s enter the ‘history lane’."
Full, highly recommended article is here:
o

"Fools, Drunkards and the United States of America"

"Fools, Drunkards and the United States of America"
by Brian Maher

"Mr. Barry Ritholz of the eponymous Ritholtz Wealth Management: "We were warned that deficit spending would crowd out private capital, choke off innovation and new company formation; it will send the costs of U.S. borrowing skyrocketing higher, making the debt impossible to manage; force the U.S. dollar to be radically devalued against all other currencies, thereby devastating the U.S. economy; cause rampant inflation, spiking prices to levels not seen before; last, act as a drag on the overall economy."

That none of these things occurred makes me wonder why we still pay attention to these deficit hawks. The blind man leaps from a 100-story structure. Ninety floors down he concludes he will plunge forever in safety. ‘Nothing’s happened yet so why should it happen now?’ Thus the United States government can continue to pile up deficits. Yet what if the United States is 90 floors down?

So Far, So Good: We concede that there is a high degree of justice in Mr. Ritholz’s comments. For decades deficit hawks, so-called, have yelled wolf. The national debt has scaled $1 trillion, they shrieked. The dollar is doomed, the world will heave it overboard, the United States economy is destined for the gutter. They repeated the wails at $2 trillion… $5 trillion… $10 trillion… $20 trillion… $25 trillion… $30 trillion.

United States national debt presently totters at $35 trillion. Total United States debt - both public and private - comes in at $101.5 trillion. Yet the dollar remains king and the American economy has yet to gutter. There have been shakes, there have been wobbles. And it is entirely possible the United States economy has already wandered into recession. Recent unemployment data indicates that it has. Yet we do not believe the heavens will come falling down upon our hapless and helpless heads.

Not Weimar Germany: Meantime, despite Mr. Ritholz’s soothings, inflation has enjoyed itself quite an inning since 2022. Yet it has not proved the inflationary hell of cataclysmic lore. We believe moderate inflation will continue to cling to the American economy - but nothing nearing hyperinflation.

Is the United States the Germany of the Weimar Republic? You can moan and sob about its present condition - and perhaps with justification. Yet the United States is not the Germany of the Weimar Republic. Nor, in our telling, will it be anytime soon. It enjoys too many natural advantages. As Germany’s iron chancellor Bismarck once noted, and as we are fond to repeat: “God has a special providence for fools, drunkards and the United States of America.”

America’s Natural Advantages: As we have argued before: God filled two oceans - one Atlantic, one Pacific - to moat the United States off from marauders. Against its land borders north and south He positioned two geopolitical bantamweights. He blessed it with vast tracts of wealthy, fertile land… an extended capillary system of internal waterways… natural harbors from which to send items out… and to take items in. What other nation has enjoyed such natural, God-granted riches? We struggle in vain to conceive of one.

Has God given the United States a Baltimore… a Detroit… a Cleveland? Has He populated its capital with an endless roster of rogues, rascals, cadges, chiselers, grifters and swindlers? Well, friends, maybe He has. Yet even God Almighty must be granted space for error. Perhaps it is not even error - but intention. It appears He has a mischievous, even puckish sense of humor, this God. We hazard He delights in pulling noses and yanking chains.

Yet the cardinal fact cannot be denied. He has showered America with immense natural extravagance. As we have likewise argued before, only Americans themselves could make a botch of this God-spawned idyll. Yet it appears they are determined to do precisely that.

Reality Will Soon Set In: We return to the above said Ritholz. He puts his tongue out at the concept that deficit spending “will send the costs of U.S. borrowing skyrocketing higher, making the debt impossible to manage.” Yet he might have another guess. Reports the Peterson Foundation: "The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projects that interest payments will total $892 billion in fiscal year 2024 and rise rapidly throughout the next decade — climbing from $1 trillion in 2025 to $1.7 trillion in 2034.

In total, net interest payments will total $12.9 trillion over the next decade. Relative to the size of the economy, interest will rise from 3.4% of gross domestic product (GDP) in fiscal year 2025 to 4.1% in 2034. The previous high for interest relative to GDP in the post-World War II era was 3.2% in 1991 - that ratio would now be exceeded in 2025." Here you have it in graphic form:
Click image for larger size.
More: In fiscal year 2024, the federal government will spend more on interest than on defense as well as non-defense discretionary, which includes funding for transportation, veterans, education, health, international affairs, natural resources and environment, general science and technology, general government and more.

In fiscal years 2024–2027, interest payments will exceed the amount that the federal government spends on Medicare… According to its latest long-term projections, CBO projects that interest will become the largest category in the federal budget in 2051 - exceeding the amount spent on Social Security that year. What then, Mr. Ritholz? Will deficits finally matter?

Debt Beyond Endurable Limits: Under present and anticipated conditions, we do not believe the United States economy can push along much. Like a pack mule loaded beyond endurable limits… the United States economy is debt-loaded beyond endurable limits. The legs are unequal to the burden upon the back. Yet we do not believe the legs will buckle under - not fully. We concede the possibility that the legs may buckle fully.

But we refer you once again to America’s vast advantages. They will likely keep the beast upright, though vastly hobbled. We embrace instead the gradualist theory of decline, likely unfolding in grass-growing and paint-drying motion.

An Endless “Damp and Drizzly November”: In our estimation this economy presents a future not necessarily of collapse but of gray and twilight, of habitual malaise… Of, in Herman Melville’s phrasing, a “damp and drizzly November”… month upon month… year upon year. May artificial intelligence and other technological wizardries catapult us out from the languor - and into an infinitely productive and prosperous future?

It is possible. Yet is it likely? We are far from convinced that it is. Thus we are reduced to hope. And as Herr Freddy Nietzsche observed: “Hope… is the worst of all evils because it prolongs the torments of man.”