StatCounter

Friday, August 8, 2025

The Poet: Charles Dickens, "Things That Never Die "

"Things That Never Die"

 "The pure, the bright, the beautiful
that stirred our hearts in youth,
The impulses to wordless prayer,
The streams of love and truth,
The longing after something lost,
The spirits longing cry,
The striving after better hopes -
These things can never die.

The timid hand stretched forth to aid
A brother in his need;
A kindly word in griefs dark hour
That proves a friend indeed;
The plea for mercy softly breathed,
When justice threatens high,
The sorrow of a contrite heart -
These things shall never die.

Let nothing pass, for every hand
Must find some work to do,
Lose not a chance to waken love -
Be firm and just and true.
So shall a light that cannot fade
Beam on thee from on high,
And angel voices say to thee -
 These things shall never die." 

- Charles Dickens (1812-1870)

"Should We Be Expecting A 1929 Style Stock Market Crash And Another Great Depression?"

Gregory Mannarino, 8/8/25
"Should We Be Expecting A 1929 Style Stock 
Market Crash And Another Great Depression?"
Comments here:
o
Jeremiah Babe, 8/8/25
"Trump Warns Of 1929 Depression, 
Get Your Money Out Of The Bank"
Comments here:

The Daily "Near You?"

Albemarle, North Carolina, USA. Thanks for stopping by!

"Major US Cities Prepare For Massive Financial Devastation"

Full screen recommended.
Snyder Reports, 8/8/25
"Major US Cities Prepare For 
Massive Financial Devastation"
Comments here:
o
Full screen recommended.
Michael Bordenaro, 8/8/25
"A Layoff Story Everyone Needs To Hear"
Comments here:

"Our Simulacrum Economy"

"Our Simulacrum Economy"
by Charles Hugh Smith

"Readers once routinely chastised me for over-using simulacrum to describe our economy and society. The problem is this word perfectly describes the hollowed-out, rigged economy and social order we inhabit and so synonyms don't quite cut it: it's not the same as simulation or imitation or counterfeit. My use (or over-use) dates back to the 2009 publication of my book "Survival+", which included a chapter titled Simulacrum and the Politics of Experience. I use simulacrum to describe a carefully constructed representation of a once-authentic system that is intended to shape our behavior to suit the interests of those constructing the simulacrum.

The simulacrum has the look and feel of the once-authentic system but it's rigged to benefit the few whose interests are better served by the simulacrum than they could ever be served by an authentic system. As I wrote in "Survival+:" A simulacrum is used to distort a reality that, once revealed, would cause the target audience to act in ways that would not serve the interests of those deploying the simulacrum.

The point of a simulacrum is to mimic an authentic system realistically enough so nobody notices it's rigged to benefit the few at the expense of the many. This is different from a simulation - for example, a flight simulator - that models the actual experience. It's also not a faux copy or counterfeit of the authentic system; it is a replacement that's real in every way.

French Postmodernist Jean Baudrillard's 1981 book "Simulacra and Simulation" attempts to differentiate Simulacra and Simulation by noting that a simulacrum is not a copy of an original (i.e. a counterfeit) because the original is no longer accessible. As a result, the simulacrum becomes not just real but hyper-real.

For an example, consider capitalism which in its classical form is the risking of capital to generate financial and social gains that were not possible in a pre-capital economy. The labor and materials needed to construct a major canal, for example, were beyond the reach of villages or even towns, and so their economies remained localized and poor due to the inability to reach distant, more lucrative markets. Once capital could be assembled in sufficient size, the localized, fragmented economies were unified by the canal, and commerce expanded exponentially as a result, benefiting everyone with access to the canal: laborers, farmers, craftspeople, traders and those who risked the money to construct the canal.

Contrast this authentic form of capitalism with the monopoly-finance-state version we inhabit, a simulacrum of authentic capitalism that retains enough superficial similarities to the original that the vast majority of participants don't even realize that their experience of this simulacrum is entirely different from an experience of authentic capitalism.

Rather than draw benefits from this hyper-real monopoly-finance-state version, the vast majority of participants are exploited, as the value of their labor and capital is extracted by the simulacrum version of "capitalism" which divvies up the extracted value between the monopolies/cartels who control most of the valuable economic activity, the financial sector that parasitically feeds on the real economy and the state, which extracts wealth to feed its vast network of dependents, enforcers and minders of the entire system.

In this hyper-real simulacrum, a vast fortune is never more than a couple of stock gambles, TikTok clips or YouTube videos away. Or for those wary of the casino, the enormous mortgage taken on for life promises access to the riches of the Everything Bubble. In the hyper-real casino, everyone has access to the terrors of losing, but only a few know the joys of the rigged games that guarantee a few big winners by design and a fortunate few who stumbled into the game at a propitious moment.

As Baudrillard anticipated, the authentic original version of capitalism is no longer accessible. The simulacrum that we call capitalism is rigged, and the mechanisms are so cleverly obscured that the vast majority of participants willingly allow themselves to be exploited, disempowered or marginalized because they have no experience or even reference point to the authentic original version, as it no longer exists. Everything they know and experience - the economic models, symbols, signifiers, narratives, adverts, etc., and their own conceptions of value and agency, have all been so thoroughly debauched that they have no idea that the authentic original has been lost.

The problem is our system only survives by cannibalizing its weakest parts, and once they've been consumed, the system can no longer sustain itself and it expires. Simulacra are not fake, but they are profoundly unstable and prone to collapse. Everything gluing the monopoly-finance-state system together is unraveling due to the excesses of extraction and exploitation the system has perfected.

Once the rigged system collapses, we'll have an opportunity to assemble an authentic economy, a new original that isn't rigged to benefit the few at the expense of the many. This is what I discuss in my book "A Hacker's Teleology: Sharing the Wealth of Our Shrinking Planet"

"Are We Living In A Simulation? MIT Scientist Says Likely Yes"

Full screen recommended.
Redacted, 8/8/25
"Are We Living In A Simulation? 
MIT Scientist Says Likely Yes"
Comments here:

"Here We Are..."

"Here we are, trapped in the amber of the moment.
There is no why."
- Kurt Vonnegut

Travelling with Russell, "I Went to the Largest Food Market in Russia"

Full screen recommended.
Travelling with Russell, 8/8/25
"I Went to the Largest Food Market in Russia"
"Food City is the first wholesale food distribution centre in Moscow and the largest in Russia. Built on 91 hectares, it's 5,000 wholesale and retail vendors sell 1,800,000 tons of products annually."
Comments here:
o
Full screen recommended.
Lisa with Love, 8/8/25
"Russia in 2025: 
This Supermarket Shelf Shocked Me"
"Sanctioned life in Russia! Exploring international Russian
 supermarket to find 10 types of Cola?"
Comments here:
o
Full screen recommended.
Nastya in Siberia, 8/8/25
"What’s Inside Typical Russian Grocery 
Store In The Big Shopping Mall"
"In this video I’m continuing sharing my daily live in Novosibirsk, Russia. I’m sharing 
my slow daily routine. Cooking, grocery shopping and occasionally some adventures."
Comments here:

Judge Napolitano, "INTEL Roundtable w/Johnson & McGovern - Weekly Wrap 8-August"

Judge Napolitano - Judging Freedom, 8/8/25
"INTEL Roundtable w/Johnson & McGovern - 
Weekly Wrap 8-August"
Comments here:

"How It Really Is"

 

"Stagflation Has Arrived, Job Weakness Is Apparent, and Stocks Party On!"

"Stagflation Has Arrived, Job Weakness 
Is Apparent, and Stocks Party On!"
Stagflation. It’s back on the menu, boys and girls!

"Howdy! After a much-needed back-country vacation, where my phone was an intentional brick, I’m back with another episode of Finance U with Paul Kiker of Kiker Wealth Management  Today, we dove deep into the current state of the economy, and I’ve got to say, things are looking nuttier than ever. I’m currently struck by the disconnect between the rosy narratives we’re hearing - like Trump’s claims of an economy “on fire” - and the hard data that’s screaming the opposite.

Data like extreme weakness in the employment data and a powerful surge in ‘prices paid’ for services, which are a powerful sign that inflation is back on the rise. I’m feeling a strong sense of unease, and I know many of you are too, as we keep hearing that something just isn’t adding up.

First, let’s talk jobs. The labor market is showing serious weakness. BLS data indicates job growth is a measly 0.97% year-over-year, a level that historically signals recessionary territory. Further, white-collar workers are struggling to find employment, with some searching for 60 to 90 days without luck. Where NAFTA stole blue-collar jobs, AI is now stealing white-collar jobs. Talk about bad luck! The non-elite socioeconomic classes just can’t seem to catch a break.

But it goes beyond services. Manufacturing indices are also in contraction, and job openings on platforms like Indeed are down 35% from their peak. On top of that, the BLS had to revise their numbers for May and June down by a whopping 258.

That’s a massive “oopsie,” and it’s no surprise Trump fired the BLS director over it. I’ve always been super-skeptical of the official numbers - ADP’s real-time payroll data seems more reliable, and it’s showing negative prints too.

So, given the labor weakness, how do we make sense of the market euphoria? Despite the many flashing warning signs, retail investors are buying with abandon, perhaps fueled by a belief that the Fed will cut rates and save the day. But I’m not so sure. Cutting rates might inflate the equity bubbles further without addressing underlying issues. But then again, stocks are at (literally) unprecedented valuations - tech stocks are 2.2 times the S&P 500, higher than the 2000 dot-com peak. Holy smokes!!

I guess “this time is different?” The average investor had better hope so (and ‘hope’ isn’t a strategy, FYI). Maybe, but history says “No,” quite convincingly. Companies like Palantir are trading at 300x forward P/E, and a $60 million revenue beat added $15 billion in market cap overnight. Again, Yikes! That’s frothy, folks. I’ve lived through bubbles before, and this feels eerily familiar.

Housing is another mess. There’s a huge gap between sellers and buyers - 500,000 more sellers - and sales are slow because prices haven’t dropped. Insurance costs are skyrocketing, with some homeowners paying over half their mortgage just for coverage and taxes. I dug into claims that climate change is driving these hikes, but the data on hurricanes and flooding shows no significant increase. I suspect it’s more about inflation and insurer greed than weather. Meanwhile, household debt hit $18.39 trillion, with auto and mortgage debt soaring. People are hanging on by their fingernails.

Stagflation is the word on everyone’s mind, defined as stagnant growth paired with rising inflation. Think ‘weak jobs’ but also ‘more expensive housing and steaks.’ The ISM services PMI barely shows expansion in terms of new orders, while prices paid are spiking near 70, reminiscent of early 2008. Employment in services is contracting, and new orders are flat.

What ‘stagflation’ means for most Americans is “life is getting harder” – 73% now say that buying a home is tougher, and 65% struggle to pay bills. I’m heartbroken by stories like a woman facing $2,627 monthly health insurance, forced to choose between her house and coverage, who now says that she’s given up, that the system is rigged against her. This system feels predatory because it is predatory.

Paul and I agreed that it’s time to build resiliency. I’m not saying sell everything, but taking some chips off the table to create a 12-24 month emergency fund seems prudent and wise. Market cycles always turn, and with margin debt now over a trillion, the fall could be brutal…and fast. I’m counseling my own family to wait out this housing market, rent for now, and prepare for opportunities when blood’s in the streets, as Buffett advises. Whether it’s a deflationary crash or hyperinflation, pain is coming. I believe education and risk management are key - don’t let euphoria blind you."
Watch the video on Rumble:

"Repubs Bad, Dems Worse"

"Repubs Bad, Dems Worse"
Pols, polls and the bipartisan plot to drown America in debt...
by Joel Bowman

“I don't want to belong to any club that would accept me as a member.”
~ Groucho Marx, RIP (1890-1977)

Houston, Texas - "Fear not, gentle reader, we’re in a “safe space” today. The Black Hole coffeeshop here in Houston, whence we pen these very words, brandishes all the signals a mental defective might require in order to enjoy a soy milk latte in peace, without feeling “triggered.” There’s a “Black Lives Matter” poster on the back wall, for instance... two “all gender” restrooms at the rear... a rainbow “pride” flag by the counter... and, in case anyone was unsure as to the establishment’s position vis-à-vis the current administration, a “Pro Jobs, Anti-Trump” sign, right by the community noticeboard. Subtle.

Yes, dear reader, we sit among the fearful... the certain... the blue-haired warriors combating, as they imagine it, the rise and rise of the Fourth Reich. They are the resistance... standing firmly against hate, bigotry, fascism... and proper definitions of terms.

Ah, but we have a soft spot for soft-headed underdogs. Which is why, in honor of the cafe’s commitment to “inclusivity,” we hereby dedicate today’s Note to the weird and wild denizens of the Black Hole, diverse in every manner imaginable... except, of course, when it comes to their unshakable word view. That said, let us turn from a subject upon which nobody seems to agree, identity politics, to one on which everyone can surely disagree… actual politics.

Way Back When: The latest punchline headline, from CNBC: "Trump’s approval rating still negative while the public sours further on Democrats, CNBC survey shows. According to the flailing Comcast network (Stephen Colbert’s soon-to-be-former employer), the public disapproves of the job Trump is doing as president by a 51%-46% margin. That’s slightly better than the April CNBC All-America Economic Survey, which had the president at 51%-44%."

But wait! What’s this? The Dems are in the tank, too... even among those inclined to answer surveys conducted by the mainstream media. From the same article: "Favorability of the Democratic Party among registered voters sank to a net -32 percentage points, with 24% positive and 56% negative. The -32 rating appeared to be the lowest rating for either party going back to at least 1996."

Ah, you remember 1996 don’t you, dear reader? The Internet was just getting going... William Jefferson Clinton had just won reelection... and the O.J. Simpson trial, recently concluded, had just laid bare the “integrity” of the American criminal justice system. Simpler times, eh?

Back then, Uncle Sam had a national debt of “only” $5.2 trillion... or around 65% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Almost 30 years on, thanks to the tireless, bipartisan efforts of your elected officials, those numbers have grown to $37 trillion and 121%, respectively.

That is, while the US economy has grown by an impressive 3.8 times during the past few decades... the national debt has ballooned to more than 7.2 times its original, 1996 size. In other words, the debt has rocketed at almost twice the rate of the underlying economy... and it’s only just hitting escape velocity.

At current rates – that is, assuming no costly wars, no unforeseen interruptions to economic growth, no manufactured “emergencies” or other mass psychosis events – America’s national debt is projected to hit $49 trillion by 2029... which would be ~140% of GDP... or around $382k per taxpaying citizen. For reference, America’s record debt-to-GDP ratio during the last century – “achieved” during WWII, no less – stood at “just” 119%.

The GDP Myth: As savvy readers have recently pointed out, GDP is indeed a sub-optimal measure of the size of an economy, in part because it includes the government’s deficit spending as a net positive under the expenditure method... when really it should be seen as a net drag on the “real” (i.e. private) economy.

Murray Rothbard, a key figure in the Austrian School of Economics, sought to address this convenient “oversight” when he proposed his twin alternative measures: Gross Private Product (GPP) and Private Product Remaining (PPR). (Interested readers can learn more about those in this Note from a few months back: "Alice in Argentina.")

So far in this, the third millennium, successive administrations – and pork barreling congressmen on both sides of the aisle – have added almost $30 trillion to Uncle Sam’s credit card. That’s $6.1 trillion under George W. Bush (2001–2009); $8 trillion under Barack Obama (2009–2017); $7.9 trillion under Donald Trump I (2017–2021); and $5.7 trillion under Joe Biden (2021–2025)…and counting.

Is it any wonder private, hard-working, minding-their-own-business citizens have had enough? Or that they should be so readily “divided and conquered”? The aforementioned CNBC article concluded by stating the bleeding obvious: “Republicans remain solidly behind the president and Democrats solidly against. Half of independents disapprove of the president.”

To summarize: The right hates the left… the left hates the right… and nobody is happy with anybody. As the old saying goes, you cannot fool all of the people all of the time… which is why the world’s leading democracy has two political parties. Indeed, the slogan “Vote Nobody!” never sounded so appealing! Speaking of Argentina’s “libertarian laboratory,” your editor will (finally) be heading home next week. Look forward to our front row coverage of the Greatest Political Experiment of Our Age to resume promptly thereafter. In the meantime, thanks for your patience… and stay tuned for more Notes From the End of the World..."

Bill Bonner, "Stabbed in the Back"

Federal debt held by the public will increase by 9% to 11% by 2034, according to a Congressional Budget Office memo on the budget bill. Debt service costs will rise by at least $718 billion. The public currently owns $29 trillion in US government debt, about 96% of US GDP.
"Stabbed in the Back"
by Bill Bonner

"We are now in a new world. 
Even to trade nerds, the complexity of this is just bonkers."
- Chad Bown, senior fellow at the
 Peterson Institute for International Economics

Poitou, France - "You’ll recall that Oswald Spengler predicted that around the year 2000 western democracy would peak and would be succeeded by a period of strongman leaders. Our question is this: To what extent does our own Donald J. Trump fulfill the prophecy? Who cares?’ is another question that might come up. But our beat is money. And since the feds directly control 20% of GDP (in round numbers) and indirectly control another 20%, it’s worth looking more closely at how the new Trump model works.

“There are three stages to a king’s life,” explained a French friend at a party last night. The moon was full. We dined outside in a magnificent garden. Red wine and philosophy overcame him: “There is love. There is war. And there is architecture. All are ruinous. But architecture is the worst. Louis 14th’s Versailles Palace practically bankrupted France.”

Authoritarians don’t have to be big spenders. But most are. The Big Man tends to buy support by recycling taxpayer money. Plus, he has big ideas. He wants conquests, ‘wins,’ parades and monuments. So far, Trump’s lust-list has been fanciful (make Canada the 51st state!) or no worse than his Obama- and Biden-era predecessors. He did push through a big, beautiful budget abomination (BBBA) that will bring total US debt to $60 trillion or so by 2035.

But this is a feature of the old world, not a new one. The path to bankruptcy and financial chaos is well signposted and well-trod. The Big Man did not discover it. He merely stayed on it. When it came to ‘trade deals,’ however, Trump seemed to channel his inner Caesar. Government-managed trade is a major departure from the policies of the last 70+ years...and from the traditional platform of the Republican party.

The world learned long ago that people are generally better off when people are allowed to decide for themselves with whom and how they trade. But the lesson was lost on the Big Man. POTUS, not Congress (as the Constitution would seem to require) has imposed tariffs. They will be paid by importers, not exporters...and ultimately will amount to the biggest tax increase in American history. They are expected to bring in over $300 billion this year and $2 trillion over the next ten years...a huge transfer of real wealth from the taxpayers (in this case, consumers) to the feds.

And here is where the difference between clumsy, consensual democracy and Big Man government becomes important.How many Americans really want a tax increase? Not many. And among MAGA fans probably even fewer. Sen. Rand Paul put the question to Larry Kudlow: "But the question I would ask you, Larry [Kudlow], is, they're bragging that they think they can bring in $2 trillion in revenue over 10 years. If someone came to you and said, 'Hey Larry, I've got this great idea for a value-added tax that'll bring in $2 trillion over the next 10 years,' you'd shake your head and say 'We don't want to be Europeans, we're not for that, and we've never been for adding a sales tax without removing some other tax.' But...we're getting $2 trillion in taxes on top of all the other taxes that we have. So ultimately conservatives have to decide, do they like taxes because they're Donald Trump's taxes, or do we still say that we don't want more revenue coming out of the productive economy and going to government, that we want to balance the budget by reducing spending, not increasing taxes?"

Tariffs are not uniquely awful. Government absorbs a large part of national output each year. Whether it gets the money from income taxes, sales (tariff) taxes, or inflation (printing money)...the gross effect is the same. But the net effect...including the collateral damage...varies.

Income taxes (in theory) discourage people from earning more money. Sales taxes (including tariffs) discourage them from spending it. And inflation discourages them from saving it. Which is worse? We don’t know. But the Big Man in the White House insists on ALL three of them. We have direct income taxes. We have inflation. And now we have a huge ‘Value Added Tax’ masquerading as tariffs.

Most Americans may oppose it, but the Big Man does what he wants. Up to a point. The press reports that some MAGA fans – Rand Paul, Candace Owens, Tucker Carlson et. al. - are asking: have we been betrayed? Suckered? Stabbed in the back? How serious is the ‘right-wing’ backlash? We’ll look at it next week."

Dan, I Allegedly, "Free Money Does Not Work! Free Money Fails"

Full screen recommended.
Dan, I Allegedly, 8/8/25
"Free Money Does Not Work! Free Money Fails"

"Hey everyone, it’s Dan from I Allegedly! Today, we’re diving into a hot topic: the hidden costs of Universal Basic Income (UBI). On the surface, “free money” sounds like a dream, but does it actually work? Spoiler alert: It doesn’t. From the 160 UBI programs running across the U.S. to the unintended consequences like demotivation and inflation, I’m breaking it all down in this video. We’ll talk about the impact these programs had during COVID, the shocking spending habits of recipients, and how this “free money” mindset could be reshaping our economy and society.

I also touch on the rising costs of child care, food, and basic living expenses, and why many families are struggling to keep up. Plus, we’ll explore how some people took advantage of government programs, like PPP fraud, and the fallout for those caught in the act. And yes, I share my thoughts on crazy business stories, including the struggles of barbecue chains like Dickies, and even a surprising update about Tesla Cybertrucks and the U.S. Air Force!"
Comments here:

Jim Kunstler, "Going, Going Gone..."

"Going, Going Gone..."
by Jim Kunstler

“Because they can no longer distinguish between fantasy and reality,
 they are too crazy to lead this country, and Americans know it.” 
- Sasha Stone on the Democratic Party

"In case you’re wondering why the Democratic Party is in a death spiral, it is the proportionate response to the damage they have done to American culture and politics. You might think that they fell haplessly into error, but their turn to Marxian idealism was a cover for a matrix of hustles and rackets to make up for a void of any sane political program.

Coming into the 21st century, our country was beset by looming decline. Our industrial base was going, going, gone, and with it millions of well-paying blue-collar jobs, the Democratic Party base. It was replaced by a so-called “financialized economy,” which was sanitized language for sets of swindles and frauds allowed to operate in the de-regulated banking system, in concert with the politicized Federal Reserve and crooked Congressional interests - you notice how many politicians paid $175-K a year somehow acquired multi-million-dollar fortunes?

What mainly grew in this period was government and things that fed off of it, such as the war industries, computer tech allied with the Intel gang, and especially the burgeoning universe of government-sponsored non-profit advocacy orgs, which became the jobs program for otherwise unemployables churned out of higher education, a racket that fed on federal loan guarantees. It was in the racketeering ecosystem that billionaires such as George Soros and Bill Gates could use their fortunes to advance their own personal obsessions through webs of non-governmental orgs (NGOs) to influence public affairs.

By 2016, that was really all that the Democratic Party had left. It was the source of their money and their power. They also had the accumulated political capital of race advocacy, starting with the civil rights crusades of the 1960s. After our victory over manifest evil in World War Two, the Jim Crow system had to go, or else America could not pretend to lead the so-called “free world.”

By some paradoxical alchemy of government policy and human nature, the civil rights campaign eventually produced a larger and more intractable “underclass” than existed before. This baffled liberal idealists who had expected a new era of brotherhood and equality. They could only account for it by “structural racism,” and the Marxian trope of “oppressors-and-victims” fit into that scaffold perfectly. It lured them into Marxian “praxis” generally, which by then was already failing everywhere else in the world it had been tried as “communism.”

One way to counter “structural racism” was to declare a new ethos of “multiculturalism,” meaning each ethnic or racial group could behave according to its own particular standards and values. It was like waving a magic wand to make failure disappear and it worked through the 1990s, (which happened to be the fattest years of cheap oil production in America). The trouble with multiculturalism was that it negated the thing that had held America together through vicissitudes such as the Great Depression and World War Two: The American common culture, the thing that belonged to everyone.

The MAGA movement has largely been an effort to reconstruct an American common culture, a consensus of values and behaviors we can all agree on. The Democratic Party opted to oppose that - a poor choice. In fact, they apparently viewed that effort as an existential threat to the hustles and rackets that were sustaining the party. For instance, the jobs program for otherwise unemployable college grads who styled themselves as “activists” working for NGOs under the umbrella of USAID.

This was the party’s army of influencers, organizers, ward-heelers, and ballot-harvesters, laboring on behalf of the “victims of oppression.” Quite a few of them resided in Academia, where they cultivated a whole lexicon of arcane, gnostic, crypto-Marxian ideology aimed not just at opposing the recovery of a common culture, but destroying whatever remnants of it remained.

The catch was: they didn’t believe in “social justice” or “diversity, equity, and inclusion.” That was just a smokescreen of verbiage over their race hustle, which means extorting money, unearned advantages, and status dishonestly. Thus was DEI birthed. And, with it, colossal frauds of “victimhood” such as the beatification of George Floyd and a long line of similar “justice-involved” cases that generated an impressive revenue flow for the Democrats.

That revenue flow and its utility for holding power was all they had left in 2024. It explains the empty symbolism of running Kamala Harris for president. Now, the money flow is gone and so is the party’s power and perhaps its last remaining reason for existence: the maintenance of its own power. Notice that the Democrats can’t even advocate for the return of USAID, now that it has been unmasked as rife with financial fraud and crime.

There is surely a need for an opposition party to any in-party, which happens to be Mr. Trump’s Republicans at the moment, if only because power corrupts. You can see the outline of what that new opposition party might be: a party of re-localization, of small business and small farmers, of traditional towns as opposed to still-rampant and malignant suburban sprawl. Some related issues already belong to MAGA, such as smaller government, the protection of privacy, respect for the Bill of Rights - but these would be implicit in the restoration of an American common culture, a set of values and standards of behavior that both parties in a two-party system can subscribe to."

Thursday, August 7, 2025

"Millions Will Soon Be Unemployed!"

Full screen recommended.
Steven Van Metre, 8/7/25
"Millions Will Soon Be Unemployed!"
The shocking proof that we're on the brink of a crisis, 
one that will impact every American family.
Comments here:

"Rental Market Apocalypse Begins As Americans Can’t Afford Insane Prices"

Full screen recommended.
Epic Economist, 8/7/25
"Rental Market Apocalypse Begins
 As Americans Can’t Afford Insane Prices"

"Landlords are panicking. Rent prices just dropped 10% in 12 months but nobody can still afford them. Rental vacancy rates tripled. Properties sit empty for months. I just talked to a property manager who has to cut his rental price by 100 dollars every week until someone takes it. That's how desperate this rental market crisis has gotten. But here's where the housing affordability crisis gets worse. Jacksonville has 18,000 new apartments flooding the market right now. Developers are offering 3 months free rent, no deposits, even throwing in TVs just to get people in the door. This is creating even more competition for regular landlords dealing with rising mortgage rates.

At the same time, all those people who bought houses in 2020-2022 thinking they'd work from home forever? They're getting called back to the office but can't sell their properties due to the housing bubble. So now they're accidentally becoming landlords and losing 800+ dollars per month, adding even more rental inventory to an already oversaturated market.

And it's not just regular rentals. Phoenix went from 5,000 Airbnbs to over 21,000. Most are sitting empty. Insurance costs exploded 300%. Some owners are getting hit with 30,000 dollar fines from cities. Many are now dumping their Airbnb properties into the long-term rental market, making this rent affordability problem even worse. The result? 70% of Americans are financially stressed in this cost of living crisis and nobody wins in this rental market collapse."
Comments here:

"Store Closures Hit Record High; Crypto In Your 401K; Panera Bread Employees Could Go Homeless"

Jeremiah Babe, 8/7/25
"Store Closures Hit Record High; Crypto In Your 401K; 
Panera Bread Employees Could Go Homeless"
Comments here:

Gerald Celente, "Presstitute Media And Immoral Humans: 'We Hate Celente, He's For Peace'"

Strong language alert!
Gerald Celente, 8/7/25
"Presstitute Media And Immoral Humans:
 'We Hate Celente, He's For Peace'"
The Trends Journal is a weekly magazine analyzing global current events forming future trends. Our mission is to present facts and truth over fear and propaganda to help subscribers prepare for what’s next in these increasingly turbulent times.
Comments here:

Musical Interlude: Il Divo, "Wicked Game" ("Melanconia")

Full screen recommended.
Il Divo, "Wicked Game" ("Melanconia")
(Live In London 2011)

English lyrics here: